研究论文

资源型城市工矿用地系统修复的生态安全格局构建

展开
  • 1. 中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院,北京100083;
    2. 自然资源部土地整治重点实验室,北京100035
王回茴(1996- ),男,四川南部人,硕士,主要从事景观生态与土地利用研究。E-mail: wanghh@cugb.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-07-31

  修回日期: 2019-10-13

  网络出版日期: 2020-01-28

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0504401)

Construction of ecological security pattern for systematic restoration of industrial and mining land in resource-based cities

Expand
  • 1. School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China

Received date: 2019-07-31

  Revised date: 2019-10-13

  Online published: 2020-01-28

摘要

资源型城市可持续发展的关键是对其工矿用地进行系统修复,在空间上统筹工矿用地的生态修复,使其从整体上参与区域生态安全格局构建十分必要。基于生态安全格局与电路理论,以典型资源型城市内蒙古自治区乌海市为例,分别识别2000年、2005年、2011年、2017年生态廊道和关键点,根据优先修复程度设置修复分级方案。研究结果表明:(1)2000-2017年,廊道路径上工矿用地面积增加和城市扩张导致生态廊道质量下降、位置发生变化。7条最小耗费路径总长度从120.74 km增加到125.71 km;加权耗费总距离从692.58 km增加到1162.28 km。(2)识别出2017年障碍点14处,总面积为16.06 km2。其中关键点12处,总面积14.09 km2。 (3)修复区域为识别出的2000-2017年四期生态廊道和2017年关键点,共划分三个修复等级,总面积为475.86 km2。研究通过区域生态安全格局理念统筹工矿用地生态修复,使之成为国土空间系统修复的有机整体,为资源型城市可持续发展提供决策参考。

本文引用格式

王回茴, 李汉廷, 谢苗苗, 许萌, 李少玲, 白中科 . 资源型城市工矿用地系统修复的生态安全格局构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020 , 35(1) : 162 -173 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200114

Abstract

The systematic restoration of industrial and mining land for resource-based cities is a critical method to achieve sustainable development. It is necessary to integrate ecological restoration of industrial and mining land in the construction of regional ecological security pattern as whole. Based on the ecological security pattern and circuit theory, this study identified the key points and ecological corridors in 2000, 2005, 2011 and 2017 in Wuhai, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, a typical resourced-based city, and established the important level of restoration priority. The results show that: (1) From 2000 to 2017, the increase of industrial and mining land area and urban expansion on corridor paths led to a decline in the quality and changes in the location of the ecological corridors. The total length of the seven minimum cost paths increased from 120.74 km to 125.71 km; the total of cost weighted distance increased from 692.58 km to 1162.28 km. (2) 14 barriers are identified in 2017 with a total area of 16.06 km2, including 12 key points with a total area of 14.09 km2. (3) The restoration area is the identified ecological corridors from 2000 to 2017 and the key points in 2017, which were divided into important level of restoration priority, with a total area of 475.86 km2. Based on the paradigm of regional ecological security pattern, the study coordinates the ecological restoration of industrial and mining land, making it an organic whole for the restoration of territorial space, and providing decision-making reference for the sustainable development of resource-based cities.

参考文献

[1] 李惠娟, 龙如银, 兰新萍. 资源型城市的生态效率评价. 资源科学, 2010, 32(7): 1296-1300.
[LI H J, LONG R Y, LAN X P. Assessment for eco-efficiency of resource-based cities. Resources Science, 2010, 32(7): 1296-1300.]
[2] 郭存芝, 罗琳琳, 叶明. 资源型城市可持续发展影响因素的实证分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(8): 81-89.
[GUO C Z, LUO L L, YE M. Empirical analysis of factors influencing the sustainable development of resource-based cities. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(8): 81-89.]
[3] 罗明, 白中科, 刘喜韬, 等. 土地复垦潜力调查评价研究. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2013: 74-78.
[LUO M, BAI Z K, LIU X T, et al.Investigation and Evaluation of Land Reclamation Potential. Beijing: China Agriculture Science and Technology Press, 2013: 74-78.]
[4] 白中科, 周伟, 王金满, 等. 试论国土空间整体保护、系统修复与综合治理. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(2): 1-11.
[BAI Z K, ZHOU W, WANG J M, et al.Overall protection, systematic restoration and comprehensive management of land space. China Land Science, 2019, 33(2): 1-11.]
[5] 杨艳平, 罗福周, 王博俊. 基于朴门设计的煤矿废弃地生态修复规划研究. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(6): 1080-1091.
[YANG Y P, LUO F Z, WANG B J. Research on ecological restoration planning of coal mine wasteland based on permaculture design. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(6): 1080-1091.]
[6] 胡振琪, 多玲花, 王晓彤. 采煤沉陷地夹层式充填复垦原理与方法. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(1): 198-206.
[HU Z Q, DUO L H, WANG X T. Principle and method of reclaiming subsidence land with inter-layers of filling materals. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(1): 198-206.]
[7] WANG Y, DAWSON R, HAN D, et al.Landscape ecological planning and design of degraded mining land. Land Degradation & Development, 2001, 12(5): 449-459.
[8] 王军, 严慎纯, 白中科, 等. 土地整理的景观格局与生态效应研究综述. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(9): 87-94.
[WANG J, YAN S C, BAI Z K, et al.Review on landscape patterns of land consolidation and the ecological effects. China Land Science, 2012, 26(9): 87-94.]
[9] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
[PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[10] 俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 10-17.
[YU K J. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(1): 10-17.]
[11] 王云, 潘竟虎. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的干旱内陆河流域生态安全格局优化: 以张掖市甘州区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10): 3455-3467.
[WANG Y, PAN J H. Establishment of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study of the Ganzhou district, Zhangye city, Gansu province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 3455-3467.]
[12] MCRAE B H, SHAH V B, MOHAPATRA T K.Circuitscape 4 User Guide. The Nature Conservancy. http://www.circuitscape.org.
[13] 王玉莹, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 等. 东部发达区生态安全格局构建: 以苏南地区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2298-2310.
[WANG Y Y, JIN X B, SHEN C Z, et al.Establishment of an ecological security pattern in the eastern developed regions: A case study of the Sunan district. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2298-2310.]
[14] 丛佃敏, 赵书河, 于涛, 等. 综合生态安全格局构建与城市扩张模拟的城市增长边界划定: 以天水市规划区(2015-2030年)为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 14-26.
[CONG D M, ZHAO S H, YU T, et al.Urban growth boundary delimitation method integrating comprehensive ecological security pattern and urban expansion simulation: A case study of planning areas in Tianshui city (2015-2030). Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(1): 14-26.]
[15] PENG J, YANG Y, LIU Y X, et al.Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644: 781-790.
[16] MCRAE B H, DICKSON B G, KEITT T H, et al.Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 2008, 10: 2712-2722.
[17] BEIER P, SPENCER W, BALDWEIN R F, et al.Toward best science practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology, 2011, 25(5): 879-892.
[18] DEHAGHI I M, SOFFIANIAN A, HEMAMI M R, et al.Exploring structural and functional corridors for wild sheep (Ovis orientalis) in a semi-arid area. Journal of Arid Environments, 2018, 156: 27-33.
[19] ZELLER K A, MCGARIGAL K, WHITELEY A R. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: A review. Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27(6): 777-797.
[20] 黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹, 等. 基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.
[HUANG M Y, YUE W Z, FENG S R, et al.Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of ecological security based on MCR model and ecological pattern optimization in the Yuexi county of the Dabie Mountain area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.]
[21] 宋利利, 秦明周. 整合电路理论的生态廊道及其重要性识别. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3344-3352.
[SONG L L, QIN M Z. Dentification of ecological corridors and its importance by integrating circuit theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(10): 3344-3352.]
[22] 叶玉瑶, 苏泳娴, 张虹鸥, 等. 生态阻力面模型构建及其在城市扩展模拟中的应用. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 485-496.
[YE Y Y, SU Y X, ZHANG H O, et al.Ecological resistance surface model and its application in urban expansion simulations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(4): 485-496.]
[23] 彭建, 贾靖雷, 胡熠娜, 等. 基于地表湿润指数的农牧交错带地区生态安全格局构建: 以内蒙古自治区杭锦旗为例. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1990-1998.
[PENG J, JIA J L, HU Y N, et al.Construction of ecological security pattern in the agro-pastoral ecotone based on surface humid index: A case study of Hangjin Banner, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(6): 1990-1998.]
[24] ZHAO L, DAI A G, DONG B. Changes in global vegetation activity and its driving factors during 1982-2013. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 249: 198-209.
[25] SANDHOLT I, RASMUSSEN K, ANDERSEN J. A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of surface moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 79(2-3): 213-224.
[26] 陈斌, 张学霞, 华开, 等. 温度植被干旱指数 (TVDI) 在草原干旱监测中的应用研究. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(5): 930-937.
[CHEN B, ZHANG X X, HUA K, et al.Application study of temperature vegetation drought index (TVDI) in grassland drought monitoring. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(5): 930-937.]
[27] 刘珍环, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等. 基于不透水表面指数的城市地表覆被格局特征: 以深圳市为例. 地理学报, 2011, 66(7): 961-971.
[LIU Z H, WANG Y L, PENG J, et al.Using ISA to analyze the spatial pattern of urban land cover change: A case study in Shenzhen. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(7): 961-971.]
文章导航

/