EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2019 , Vol. 34 >Issue 11: 2403 - 2414

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20191112

资源生态

不同恢复模式下红壤区森林植被盖度变化的阈值效应分析

展开
  • 1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875;
    2. 福建省长汀县水土保持事业局,长汀 366300
张军泽（1993- ）,男,黑龙江七台河人,博士研究生,主要从事生态恢复与可持续发展研究。E-mail: zhangjunze427@126.com

收稿日期: 2019-04-17

  修回日期: 2019-08-06

  网络出版日期: 2019-11-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（41171360）; 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室资助项目（2017-FX-04）

收起

Threshold effect analysis of the change of forest vegetation coverage in red soil region under different recovery modes

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Water and Soil Conservation Bureau of Changting County, Changting 366300, Fujian, China

Received date: 2019-04-17

  Revised date: 2019-08-06

  Online published: 2019-11-28

Fold

摘要

植被恢复过程中乔木层与灌草层变化的阈值效应往往决定着生态恢复工程的成败,若忽视这一效应可能会引发其他生态问题。为了进一步促进我国森林生态系统植被恢复建设,填补相关研究空白,研究了典型红壤区自然和人工恢复模式下乔木层和灌草层盖度的动态变化特征,基于前沿的生态阈值评估框架,利用线性模型和三种阈值模型（包括分段回归模型、阶跃函数模型以及通用模型）评估了不同恢复模式下两种盖度指标之间的阈值效应。模型评估结果的后验分布形式表明：在人工恢复乔木层与灌草层盖度之间存在阈值效应,而在自然恢复模式下则不存在;通过比较各个模型评估结果的精度可知,分段回归模型结果更加准确;进一步利用分段回归模型得出,当前人工恢复样地中乔木层盖度的阈值为42.85%（95%的置信区间为41.57%~44.13%）,此时灌草盖度为58.75%,若超过乔木层盖度阈值会使得灌草层盖度开始降低。研究结果对促进我国红壤区人工林生态系统的结构改善具有较高的参考价值。

关键词： 生态恢复; 后验分布; 生态阈值; 植被盖度; 阈值模型

本文引用格式

张军泽, 陈锡云, 岳辉, 冯冲 . 不同恢复模式下红壤区森林植被盖度变化的阈值效应分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019 , 34(11) : 2403 -2414 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191112

Abstract

The threshold effect of the change of canopy and shrub & grass cover during vegetation restoration often determines the success or failure of ecological restoration. If this effect is ignored, other ecological problems may arise. In order to further promote the restoration of forest ecosystems in China and fill in the relevant research gaps, we study the dynamic characteristics of vegetation coverage of tree layer and shrub & grass layer under natural and artificial restoration patterns in typical red soil regions. Based on the advanced ecological threshold assessment framework, we evaluated the threshold effects between the two coverage indicators for different recovery modes through the linear model and three threshold models (including piecewise regression models, step function models, and general models). The results show that, according to the form of posterior distribution of the ecological threshold, there is a threshold effect between the canopy cover and shrub & grass cover under artificial restoration, but it does not exist in the natural recovery mode. Compared with the accuracy of the evaluation results of each model, the results of the hockey stick (HS) model are more accurate. Using the HS model, the threshold of canopy cover in the current artificial restoration plot is 42.85% (95% confidence interval is 41.57%-44.13%), and the shrub & grass cover is 58.75%. If the threshold is crossed, the coverage of the shrub & grass will begin to decrease. Our results can provide an important scientific basis for the structural improvement of plantation ecosystem in red soil region of China.

Key words： ecological restoration; posterior distribution; ecological threshold; vegetation coverage; threshold model

参考文献

[1] LAMB D, ERSKINE P D, PARROTTA J A.Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science, 2005, 310(5754): 1628-1632.
[2] 马姜明, 刘世荣, 史作民, 等. 退化森林生态系统恢复评价研究综述. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12): 3297-3303.
[MA J M, LIU S R, SHI Z M, et al.A review on restoration evaluation studies of degraded forest ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(12): 3297-3303.]
[3] 张光辉, 梁一民. 植被盖度对水土保持功效影响的研究综述. 水土保持研究, 1996, 3(2): 104-110.
[ZHANG G H, LIANG Y M.A summary of impact of vegetation coverage on soil and water conservation benefit. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 3(2): 104-110.]
[4] 章文波, 路炳军, 石伟. 植被覆盖度的照相测量及其自动计算. 水土保持通报, 2009, 29(2): 39-42.
[ZHANG W B, LU B J, SHI W.Determination of vegetation coverage by photography and automatic calculation. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29(2): 39-42.]
[5] BOURGEOIS B, VANASSE A, GONZALEZ E, et al.Threshold dynamics in plant succession after tree planting in agricultural riparian zones. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 53(6): 1704-1713.
[6] GROFFMAN P M, BARON J S, BLETT T, et al.Integrated network models for predicting ecological thresholds: Microbial carbon interactions in coastal marine systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006, 91: 156-167.
[7] QIAN S S.Ecological threshold and environmental management: A note on statistical methods for detecting thresholds. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 38: 192-197.
[8] EIGENBROD F, HECNAR S J, FAHRIG L.Quantifying the road-effect zone: Threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario, Canada. Ecology and Society, 2009, 14(1): 14-24.
[9] LHOTKA J M, LOEWENSTEIN E F.Influence of canopy structure on the survival and growth of underplanted seedlings. New Forests, 2008, 35(1): 89-104.
[10] 康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等. 马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(10): 2323-2331.
[KANG B, LIU S R, CAI D X, et al.Effects of Pinus massoniana plantation stand density on understory vegetation and soil properties. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(10): 2323-2331.]
[11] 龙海, 何丙辉, 包维楷, 等. 高海拔原始暗针叶林采伐迹地次生植被结构与物种多样性比较. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 36(5): 93-97.
[LONG H, HE B H, BAO W K, et al.Vegetation structure and species diversity of secondary vegetation on high altitude dark brown coniferous forest cut land. Journal of Southwest China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2011, 36(5): 93-97.]
[12] QIAN S S, CUFFNEY T F.To threshold or not to threshold? That's the question. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 15(1): 1-9.
[13] 唐海萍, 陈姣, 薛海丽. 生态阈值:概念、方法与研究展望. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(9): 932-940.
[TANG H P, CHEN J, XUE H L.Ecological thresholds: Concept, methods and research outlooks. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(9): 932-940.]
[14] 陈志清. 福建省长汀县河田镇的水蚀荒漠化及其治理. 地理科学进展, 1998, 17(2): 67-72.
[CHEN Z Q.Desertification induced by water erosion and its combat of Hetian town in Changding county, Fujian province. Progress in Geography, 1998, 17(2): 67-72.]
[15] 赵其国, 黄国勤, 马艳芹. 中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7615-7622.
[ZHAO Q G, HUANG G Q, MA Y Q.The problems in red soil ecosystem in southern of China and its countermeasures. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(24): 7615-7622.]
[16] 赵其国, 黄国勤, 王礼献. 中国南方森林生态系统的功能、问题及对策. 森林与环境学报, 2015, 35(4): 289-296.
[ZHAO Q G, HUANG G Q, WANG L X.Forest ecosystems in the south China: Functions, problems and countermeasures. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2015, 35(4): 289-296.]
[17] GAO Y, ZHONG B, YUE H, et al.A degradation threshold for irreversible loss of soil productivity: A long-term case study in China. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48(5): 1145-1154.
[18] QIAN S S, PAN Y, KING R S.Soil total phosphorus threshold in the Everglades: A Bayesian changepoint analysis for multinomial response data. Ecological Indicators, 2004, 4(1): 29-37.
[19] MO K, CONG Z, LEI H.Optimal vegetation cover in the Horqin Sands, China. Ecohydrology, 2015, 9(4): 700-711.
[20] 何圣嘉, 谢锦升, 杨智杰, 等. 南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(6): 65-70.
[HE S J, XIE J S, YANG Z J, et al.Status, causes and prevention of soil and water loss in Pinus massoniana woodland in hilly red soil region of southern China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(6): 65-70.]
[21] 徐义保, 查轩, 黄少燕. 南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林地水土流失研究进展. 亚热带水土保持, 2011, 23(4): 40-43.
[XU Y B, ZHA X, HAUNG S Y.Study on soil and water loss of masson pine forest land in hilly red soil region of South China. Subtropical Soll and Water Conservation, 2011, 23(4): 40-43.]
[22] 张明如, 何明, 温国胜, 等. 芒萁种群特征及其对森林更新影响评述. 内蒙古农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 31(4): 303-308.
[ZHANG M R, HE M, WEN G S, et al.The characteristics of Dicranopteris dichotoma population and its effects on the forest regeneration. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2010, 31(4): 303-308.]
[23] 包维楷, 刘照光, 刘朝禄, 等. 中亚热带湿性常绿阔叶次生林自然恢复15年来群落乔木层的动态变化. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(6): 702-709.
[BAO W K, LIU Z G, LIU C L, et al.Fifteen-year changes of tree layer in secondary Castanopsis-Schima humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in central subtropics of Western China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(6): 702-709.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉