EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2018 , Vol. 33 >Issue 10: 1755 - 1766

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20171081

资源生态

紫云英配施氮肥对稻田生态系统服务功能的影响

展开
  • 1. 江西外语外贸职业学院,南昌 330099;
    2. 江西农业大学生态科学研究中心,南昌 330045
马艳芹（1987- ）,女,山东日照人,讲师,研究方向为农田生态和生态农业。E-mail:mayanqin408@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-10-16

  修回日期: 2018-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2018-10-20

基金资助

国家重点研发计划课题（2016YFD0300208）; 国家自然科学基金资助项目（41661070）

收起

Effects of Combined Application of Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Ecological Service Function of Paddy Field

Expand
  • 1. Jiangxi College of Foreign Studies, Nanchang 330099, China;
    2. Research Center on Ecological Science, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China

Received date: 2017-10-16

  Revised date: 2018-03-06

  Online published: 2018-10-20

Supported by

National Key R & D Program, No. 2016YFD0300208; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41661070.

Fold

摘要

紫云英是南方稻田重要的绿肥作物,翻压还田后可替代部分氮肥,减少化肥用量,提高农产品产量和品质。基于农田生态系统服务功能价值理论与方法,选取农产品供给、气体调节、土壤养分累积和水分涵养4类服务功能,对紫云英翻压配施不等量氮肥各处理下的稻田生态系统服务功能价值进行了评估。结果表明：紫云英还田后配施氮肥提高了稻田生态系统服务功能总价值。与冬闲处理相比,冬种紫云英处理下的农产品总产出增幅达7.56%~20.83%,气体调节功能价值增幅为21.64%~37.61%,水分涵养功能价值增幅为8.74%~26.26%,稻田生态系统服务功能总价值增幅15.15%~41.39%,尤其以紫云英与氮肥配施效果较好,其中紫云英+优化施氮处理在农产品供给总价值、产投比、气体调节功能价值、涵养水分价值等方面最高。该研究初步核算了紫云英配施不等量氮肥条件下的稻田生态系统服务功能总价值,有利于全面认识冬种紫云英的综合效益,为种植绿肥的生态补偿政策提供理论依据。

关键词： 氮肥; 价值; 生态系统服务功能; 紫云英

本文引用格式

马艳芹, 黄国勤 . 紫云英配施氮肥对稻田生态系统服务功能的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018 , 33(10) : 1755 -1766 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20171081

Abstract

Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) is an important green manure crop in paddy fields in South China. When returned to field, it can replace part of nitrogen fertilizer and reduce the amount of fertilizer, and improve the yield and quality of agricultural products. In this study, based on the agro-ecosystem service appraisal theory, we used methods in ecological economics to develop a systematic model to evaluate the ecological services value of paddy fields when combining Chinese milk vetch and nitrogen fertilizer in paddy fields in South China. This model considered the unique properties of green manuring, and the ecological services value were estimated by considering the influence of green manure on four ecological services functions including crop production, gas regulation, water conservation, and soil nutrient accumulation. Results showed: Chinese milk vetch with nitrogen increased the total value of paddy field ecosystem service function. Compared with the fallow treatment, the treatment with Chinese milk vetch increased 7.56%-20.83% of total output of agricultural products, 21.64%-37.61% of gas regulation function, 8.74%-26.26% of soil nutrient accumulation function, and 15.15%-41.39% of total value of ecosystem services. The effect is even better when combining Chinese milk vetch and fertilizer. Under the combined treatment with Chinese milk vetch and optimized nitrogen, total value of agricultural product supply, ratio of output to input, gas regulation value and conservation of water all reached the highest. This study preliminarily counted the total ecosystem service values of paddy fields under treatments with combining Chinese milk vetch and different amount of nitrogen. It had benefits to understanding of the comprehensive value of Chinese milk vetch, and the findings provided theoretical basis for decision making in planting green manure.

Key words： Chinese milk vetch; ecological service function; nitrogen fertilizer; value

参考文献

[1] 曹卫东, 黄鸿翔. 关于我国恢复和发展绿肥若干问题的思考[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(4): 1-3.
[CAO W D, HUANG H X.Ideas on restoration and development of green manures in China. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2009(4): 1-3. ]
[2] 王卫, 陈安磊, 谢小立, 等. 长期不同施肥对冬闲期稻田土壤种子库和地上杂草群落的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(3): 365-369.
[WANG W, CHEN A L, XIE X L, et al.Effects of long-term different fertilization on weeds seed bank and community in paddy fields in winter fallow season. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2013, 22(3): 365-369. ]
[3] KIM S Y, GUTIERREZ J, KIM P J.Considering winter cover crop selection as green manure to control methane emission during rice cultivation in paddy soil[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2012, 161(10): 130-136.
[4] TOSTI G, BENINCASA P, FARNESELLI M, et al.Green manuring effect of pure and mixed barley hairy vetch winter cover crops on maize and processing tomato N nutrition[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 43: 136-146.
[5] 周志明, 张立平, 曹卫东, 等. 冬绿肥-春玉米农田生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(4): 597-604.
[ZHOU Z M, ZHANG L P, CAO W D, et al.Appraisal of agro-ecosystem services in winter green manure-spring maize. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2016, 25(4): 597-604. ]
[6] 吴庆丰, 刘爱兰, 夏小川, 等. 紫云英与化肥配施对早稻种植效益的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(30): 115-117.
[WU Q F, LIU A L, XIA X C, et al.Effects of fertilization of Astragalus smicus and chemical fertilizer on early rice cultivation benifits. Journal of Anhui Agricultural, 2016, 44(30): 115-117. ]
[7] 马忠明, 王平, 陈娟, 等. 适量有机肥与氮肥配施方可提高河西绿洲土壤肥力及作物生产效益[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5): 1298-1309.
[MA Z M, WANG P, CHEN J, et al.Combined long-term application of organic materials with nitrogen fertilizer in suitable amount could improve soil fertility and crop production profit in Hexi Oasis of Gansu Province. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(5): 1298-1309. ]
[8] 杨滨娟, 黄国勤, 陈洪俊, 等. 稻田复种轮作模式的生态经济效益综合评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(1): 112-120.
[YANG B J, HUANG G Q, CHEN H J, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of eco-economic benefits of multi-crop rotation in paddy field systems. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(1): 112-120. ]
[9] DAILY G C.Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington: Island Press, 1997.
[10] 欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 赵景柱, 等. 海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(8): 1395-1402.
[OUYANG Z Y, ZHAO T Q, ZHAO J Z, et al.Ecological regulation services of Hainan Island ecosystem and their valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(8): 1395-1402. ]
[11] 赵景柱, 徐亚骏, 肖寒, 等. 基于可持续发展综合国力的生态系统服务评价研究——13个国家生态系统服务价值的测算[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003, 23(1): 121-127.
[ZHAO J Z, XU Y J, XIAO H, et al.Ecosystem services evaluation based on comprehensive national power for sustainable development—The evaluations on 13 countries. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2003, 23(1): 121-127. ]
[12] 赵苗苗, 赵海凤, 李仁强, 等. 青海省1998—2012年草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 418-433.
[ZHAO M M, ZHAO H F, LI R Q, et al.Assessment on grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai Province during 1998-2012. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(3): 418-433. ]
[13] 彭涛, 高旺, 隋鹏. 农田生态系统健康评价指标体系的探讨[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2004, 9(1): 21-25.
[PENG T, GAO W, SUI P.Discussion on indicator system of farmland ecosystem health assessment. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2004, 9(1): 21-25. ]
[14] 章家恩, 饶卫民. 农田生态系统的服务功能与可持续利用对策探讨[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(4): 99-102.
[ZHANG J E, RAO W M.Discussion on agroecosystem services and sustainable utilization. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(4): 99-102. ]
[15] 尹飞, 毛任钊, 傅伯杰, 等. 农田生态系统服务功能及其形成机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(5): 929-934.
[YIN F, MAO R Z, FU B J, et al.Farmland ecosystem service and its formation mechanism. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(5): 929-934. ]
[16] 张彪, 史芸婷, 李庆旭, 等. 北京湿地生态系统重要服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1311-1324.
[ZHANG B, SHI Y T, LI Q X, et al.The key ecological services and their values of wetland ecosystems in Beijing. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(8): 1311-1324. ]
[17] 王俊, 李巧云, 关欣. 常德津市农田生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2013(7): 76-78, 81.
[WANG J, LI Q Y, GUAN X.Evaluation of value for farmland ecosystem service in Jinshi of Changde City. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2013(7): 76-78, 81. ]
[18] 杨友, 杨宁, 邹冬生. 张家界市农田生态系统服务功能价值损益特征分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(1): 132-136.
[YANG Y, YANG N, ZOU D S.Farmland ecosystem function service values in Zhangjiajie City. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(1): 132-136. ]
[19] 郭芬, 熊璟, 刘登望, 等. 农田生态系统服务功能研究动态[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2011(1): 68-70, 74.
[GUO F, XIONG J, LIU D W, et al.Research dynamics for service functions of field ecosystem. Hunan Agricultural Science, 2011(1): 68-70, 74. ]
[20] 谢高地, 肖玉. 农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6): 645-651.
[XIE G D, XIAO Y.Review of agro-ecosystem services and their values. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(6): 645-651. ]
[21] 周兴, 李再明, 谢坚, 等. 紫云英利用后减施化肥对水稻产量和产值及土壤碳氮含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 40(3): 225-230.
[ZHOU X, LI Z M, XIE J, et al.Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer on rice yield, output value, content of soil carbon and nitrogen after utilizing the milk vetch. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2014, 40(3): 225-230. ]
[22] 胡安永, 孙星, 刘勤. 太湖地区不同轮作模式对稻田温室气体(CH4和N2O)排放的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 99-106.
[HU A Y, SUN X, LIU Q.Effects of different rotation systems on greenhouse gas (CH4 and N2O) emissions in the Taihu Lake region, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 99-106. ]
[23] 张智, 李小坤, 丛日环, 等. 稻田优化施肥效果与氮、磷环境效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(5): 906-915.
[ZHANG Z, LI X K, CONG R H, et al.Optimized fertilization effects and environmental benefits evaluation of nitrogen and phosphorus in the paddy soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(5): 906-915. ]
[24] PORTER J, COSTANZA R, SANDHU H, et al.The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem[J]. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2009, 38(4): 186-193.
[25] 胡志华, 李大明, 徐小林, 等. 不同有机培肥模式下双季稻田碳汇效应与收益评估[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(2): 157-165.
[HU Z H, LI D M, XU X L, et al.Evaluation of net carbon sink effects and costs benefits of double-cropped rice fields under different organic fertilizer applications. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(2): 157-165. ]
[26] 肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 稻田生态系统气体调节功能及其价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(5): 617-623.
[XIAO Y, XIE G D, LU C X, et al.The gas regulation function of rice paddy ecosystems and its value. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(5): 617-623. ]
[27] 张丹, 闵庆文, 成升魁. 传统农业地区生态系统服务功能价值评估——以贵州省从江县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(l): 31-37.
[ZHANG D, MIN Q W, CHENG S K.Ecosystem services evaluation of traditional agricultural regions: A case study of Congjiang County, Guizhou Province. Resources Science, 2009, 31(l): 31-37. ]
[28] 盛婧, 陈留根, 朱普平. 稻麦轮作农田生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(6): 1541-1545.
[SHENG J, CHEN L G, ZHU P P.Evaluation of ecological service value of rice-wheat rotation ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(6): 1541-1545. ]
[29] 马艳芹, 钱晨晨, 孙丹平, 等. 施氮水平对稻田土壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S2): 128-134.
[MA Y Q, QIAN C C, SUN D P, et al.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions from soil in paddy field. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(S2): 128-134. ]
[30] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group Ⅲ Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[31] 谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13.
[XIE G D, XIAO Y, ZHEN L, et al.Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 10-13. ]
[32] 缪建群, 杨文亭, 杨滨娟, 等. 崇义客家梯田区生态系统服务功能及价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1817-1831.
[MIAO J Q, YANG W T, YANG B J, et al.Evaluating the ecosystem services of Chongyi Hakka terraces in Gannan, Jiangxi Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(11): 1817-1831. ]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉