EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2018 , Vol. 33 >Issue 12: 2183 - 2199

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20171185

资源评价

重庆山区县域高标准基本农田建设综合成效评估——以重庆市垫江县为例

展开
  • 1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆 400047;
    2. 三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室,重庆 400047
马雪莹（1991- ）,女,汉族,黑龙江双鸭山人,硕士,主要从事土地利用与土地管理研究。 E-mail: mxy19910102@sina.com

收稿日期: 2017-11-07

  修回日期: 2018-02-23

  网络出版日期: 2018-12-20

基金资助

重庆市国土资源和房屋管理局科技计划项目（CQGT-KJ-2016003）; 2016年重庆高校创新团队建设计划（CXTDX201601017）

收起

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of High Standard Farmland Construction in Mountainous Counties—A Case Study in Dianjiang, Chongqing

Expand
  • 1. Geography and Tourism Department, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Surface Process and Environment Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 400047, China

Received date: 2017-11-07

  Revised date: 2018-02-23

  Online published: 2018-12-20

Supported by

Chongqing Land and Housing Authority Science and Technology Plan Program, No. CQGT-KJ-2016003; Chongqing University Innovation Team for 2016, No. CXTDX201601017

Fold

摘要

高标准农田建设综合成效评估对高标准基本农田规划实施、政府决策等有重要意义。论文基于粒子群优化算法的投影寻踪模型,使用访谈数据、图件数据和统计数据,构建综合绩效评价指标体系,评估样区高标准农田建设综合成效。结果表明：1）与建设前相比,农地平整状况维度中耕地连片度增加13.56%。耕地破碎度呈显著离散性,梯田化率明显提升;农业生产条件维度中道路通达度提升25%,空间离散度略微增加,有集聚效应。道路硬化率建设后分布仍呈中部高、两端低的态势。灌溉保证率和沟渠密度显著增加,空间分布均与南部产业结构、地形密切相关;农田生态环境维度植被覆盖率在建设后空间分布仍呈显著离散性。有效土层厚度明显增加,空间分布格局与道路通达性相当;多主体满意度维度农民满意度和公司企业满足度在空间上均表现为南部鹤大台地区满意度最为明显,农民人均新增年收入建设后空间分布较为均匀。2）Ⅰ级成效区,综合成效评价最佳,4个子目标也引起了足够重视,占比为53.26%;Ⅱ级成效区的综合评价次之,4个子目标的投影值也与之匹配,是高标准农田建设的选址及建成后综合成效凸显的重点区,占比37.62%;Ⅲ级成效区的综合成效相对较差,4个子目标所得投影值也相对较低,占比为9.12%。高标准农田建设的评价,应考虑区域独有特点,制定科学合理的评价程序,有序开展差别化评价。

关键词： 垫江; 高标准农田; 绩效评价; 投影寻踪模型

本文引用格式

马雪莹, 邵景安, 曹飞 . 重庆山区县域高标准基本农田建设综合成效评估——以重庆市垫江县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018 , 33(12) : 2183 -2199 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20171185

Abstract

Evaluating the comprehensive performance of high standard farmland construction project has important significance in the implementation of high standard farmland planning and government decision-making. On the bases of particle projection pursuit model (PP) optimized with swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, investigation data, maps and statistic data of land use were used to build the index system for comprehensive performance evaluation of high standard farmland construction project in Dianjiang County, Chongqing. The results showed that: 1) Compared with the situation before the construction of high standard farmland, the contiguous degree of cultivated land increased by 13.56%, which indicated the improvement of the agricultural land flat condition. After the construction of high standard farmland, arable land showed significant discreteness, and the rate of terraced field increased significantly. The road accessibility also increased by 25%, which showed the improvement of the agricultural production conditions. Spatial dispersion slightly increased and agglomeration effect appeared after the project implementation. Road hardening rate were high in the middle and low at two sides of the area after high standards farmland construction. Irrigation guarantee rate and ditch density were improved apparently after high standards farmland construction, and the improved area was closely related to the industrial structure and terrain conditions in the south. The vegetation coverage rate of farmland ecological environment kept remarkably discrete during the whole process of the project. The thickness of effective soil layer increased obviously, and its spatial distribution is quite related with road accessibility. There existed big dispersion in the improvement of multiple subjects' satisfaction that both individual satisfaction and corporation satisfaction were high in southern crane platform areas after the implementation. The spatial distribution of newly increased annual income was evenly distributed after the high standards farmland construction. 2) As for the comprehensive effect evaluation, the comprehensive effect of Class Ⅰ production area, accounting for 53.26% of the area, was the best where the multiple subjects' satisfaction was promoted, the agricultural condition, the farmland ecological environment and the agricultural land flat condition were all improved. The overall comprehensive effect of Class Ⅱ area, taking 37.62% of the area, was the second where the projection values of the four subgoals matched the effect and comprehensive results will be significant after the completion of the project. The comprehensive effect of Class Ⅲ area, taking 9.12% of the area, was relatively poor where the projection values of the four subsystems were relatively low. Comprehensive evaluation of high standard farmland construction should take unique regional characteristics into consideration, formulate scientific and reasonable evaluation plan, and orderly perform differential evaluation.

Key words： Dianjiang; high standard farmland; performance evaluation; projection pursuit model

参考文献

[1] 刘新卫, 李景瑜, 赵崔莉. 建设4亿亩高标准基本农田的思考与建议[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(3): 1-5.
[LIU X W, LI J Y, ZHAO C L.On building 4 hundred million mu of high-standard basic farmland in the twelfth five-year plan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(3): 1-5. ]
[2] 刘彦随, 刘玉. 中国农村空心化问题研究的进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1): 35-42.
[LIU Y S, LIU Y.Progress and prospect on the study of rural hollowing in China. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(1): 35-42. ]
[3] 邵景安, 张仕超, 李秀彬. 山区耕地边际化特征及其动因与政策含义[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(2): 227-242.
[SHAO J A, ZHANG S C, LI X B.Farmland marginalization in the mountainous areas: Characteristics, influencing factors and policy implications. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(2): 227-242. ]
[4] 马雪莹, 邵景安, 徐新良. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的山区乡镇通达性研究——以重庆市石柱县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9): 1144-1154.
[MA X Y, SHAO J A, XU X L.Rural transportation accessibility in mountainous areas based on the entropy-weight TOPSIS method: A case study of Shizhu County, Chongqing Municipality. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(9): 1144-1154. ]
[5] 边振兴, 杨子娇, 钱凤魁, 等. 基于LESA体系的高标准基本农田建设时序研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 436-446.
[BIAN Z X, YANG Z J, QIAN F K, et al.Study on time sequence of high-standard prime farmland based on LESA. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 436-446. ]
[6] 薛剑, 韩娟, 张凤荣, 等. 高标准基本农田建设评价模型的构建及建设时序的确定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(5): 193-203.
[XUE J, HAN J, ZHANG F R, et al.Development of evaluation model and determination of its construction sequence for well-facilitied capital farmland. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(5): 193-203. ]
[7] 张忠, 雷国平, 张慧, 等. 黑龙江省八五三农场高标准基本农田建设时序分析[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(6): 155-161.
[ZHANG Z, LEI G P, ZHANG H, et al.Time sequence analysis of high-standard basic farmland construction in 853 farm of Heilongjiang Province. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(6): 155-161. ]
[8] 罗文斌, 吴次芳, 吴一洲. 国内外土地整理项目评价研究进展[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(4): 90-96.
[LUO W B, WU C F, WU Y Z.Research progress of land assessment on land reconsolidation. China Land Science, 2011, 25(4): 90-96. ]
[9] ĐOKIĆ V, MAROŠAN S. New model of land consolidation and rural development in Serbia [J]. Spatium, 2008, 17/18: 61-67. doi: 10.2298/SPAT0818061D.
[10] 张蚌蚌, 王数. 群众自主式土地整治模式及其效应研究——以新疆玛纳斯县三岔坪村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(5): 131-136.
[ZHANG B B, WANG S.Research on the model of mass autonomous land consolidation and its effect—A case study in Sanchaping Village, Manasi County, Xinjiang. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(5): 131-136. ]
[11] 闫旭东, 吴晓光, 张宏飞, 等. 基于改进综合指标法的内蒙古自治区农村居民点整治潜力评估及分区[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(9): 163-169.
[YAN X D, WU X G, ZHANG H F, et al.Evaluation and zoning of land improvement potential of rural settlements in Inner Mongolia: Based on improved comprehensive index method. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(9): 163-169. ]
[12] 郭贝贝, 金晓斌, 杨绪红, 等. 基于农业自然风险综合评价的高标准基本农田建设区划定方法研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 377-386.
[GUO B B, JIN X B, YANG X H, et al.Study on zoning approach for well-facilitied capital farmland: Based on a comprehensive assessment of agricultural natural disaster risk. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(3): 377-386. ]
[13] 关小东, 何建华. 基于贝叶斯网络的基本农田划定方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(6): 1061-1072.
[GUAN X D, HE J H.Prime farmland protection zoning based on bayesian network. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(6): 1061-1072. ]
[14] 信桂新, 杨朝现, 杨庆媛, 等. 用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 238-249.
[XIN G X, YANG C X, YANG Q Y, et al.Post-evaluation of well-facilitied capital farmland construction based on entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(1): 238-249. ]
[15] 熊冰瑶, 夏建国, 林婉嫔, 等. 四川省高标准农田建设绩效评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(S2): 219-222.
[XIONG B Y, XIA J G, LIN W B, et al.Research on performance evaluation of high standard farmland construction in Sichuan Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(S2): 219-222. ]
[16] 班茂盛, 方创琳, 刘晓丽, 等. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
[BAN M S, FANG C L, LIU X L, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184. ]
[17] 杜鑫昱, 夏建国, 章大容. 四川省土地整理项目绩效评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(4): 514-524.
[DU X Y, XIA J G, ZHANG D R.Evaluation of performance of land consolidation projects in Sichuan Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(4): 514-524. ]
[18] 杨俊, 王占岐, 金贵, 等. 基于AHP与模糊综合评价的土地整治项目实施后效益评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(8): 1036-1042.
[YANG J, WANG Z Q, JIN G, et al.Post-benefit evaluation of land consolidation project implementation based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(8): 1036-1042. ]
[19] 封志明, 郑海霞, 刘宝勤. 基于遗传投影寻踪模型的农业水资源利用效率综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(3): 66-70.
[FENG Z M, ZHENG H X, LIU B Q.Comprehensive evaluation of agricultural water use efficiency based on genetic projection pursuit model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2005, 21(3): 66-70. ]
[20] 杨晓华, 杨志峰, 郦建强. 区域水资源潜力综合评价的遗传投影寻踪方法[J]. 自然科学进展, 2003, 13(5): 554-558.
[YANG X H, YANG Z F, LI J Q.Genetic projection pursuit method for regional water resources potential comprehensive evaluation. Progress in Natural Science, 2003, 13(5): 554-558. ]
[21] 陈曜, 丁晶, 赵永红. 基于投影寻踪原理的四川省洪灾评估[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(2): 220-225.
[CHEN Y, DING J, ZHAO Y H.Assessment on flood disaster in Sichuan Province based on the principle of projection pursuit method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(2): 220-225. ]
[22] 李彦苍, 周书敬. 基于改进投影寻踪的海洋生态环境综合评价[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(10): 5736-5740.
[LI Y C, ZHOU S J.Comprehensive assessment of marine ecological indexes based on improved projection pursuit method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(10): 5736-5740. ]
[23] 中华人民共和国国土资源部. 中华人民共和国第二次土地利用现状调查技术规程, TD/T 1014—2007 [M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China. Technical Regulations of Land Use Status of the People's Republic of China, TD/T 1014-2007. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007. ]
[24] 刘军, 张正福, 胡燕凌. 应用DEM 数据进行耕地坡度分级量算方法研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2009, 24(5): 691-697.
[LIU J, ZHANG Z F, HU Y L.Study on the slope calculating of farmland based on the DEM data. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2009, 24(5): 691-697. ]
[25] 付强, 赵小勇. 投影寻踪模型原理及其应用 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
[FU Q, ZHAO X Y.The Principle of Projection Pursuit Model and Its Application. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. ]
[26] 刘名冲, 刘瑞卿, 张路路, 等. 基于粒子群优化投影寻踪模型的土地整治综合绩效评价研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(5): 1047-1052.
[LIU M C, LIU R Q, ZHANG L L, et al.Comprehensive benefit evaluation of land consolidation based on projection pursuit model optimized by particle swarm optimization. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 44(5): 1047-1052. ]
[27] 董旭光, 顾伟宗, 孟祥新, 等. 山东省近50年来降水事件变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(5): 661-671.
[DONG X G, GU W Z, MENG X X, et al.Change features of precipitation events in Shandong Province from 1961 to 2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(5): 661-671. ]
[28] DEMETRIOU D.The assessment of land valuation in land consolidation schemes: The need for a new land valuation framework[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 54: 487-498.
[29] 曹飞, 邵景安, 邓华, 等. 影响山区农业活动收入因素分析——以重庆武隆县4个村为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(5): 73-80.
[CAO F, SHAO J A, DENG H, et al.The factors influencing agricultural income in the mountainous area—A case study of four villages in Wulong County, Chongqing. China Journal Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(5): 73-80. ]
[30] 李升发, 李秀彬. 耕地撂荒研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 370-389.
[LI S F, LI X B.Progress and prospect on farmland abandonment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 370-389. ]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉