重庆市主城区景观格局演变的样带响应与驱动机制差异
收稿日期: 2016-05-09
修回日期: 2016-07-21
网络出版日期: 2017-04-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金（41261045）; 重庆市基础科学与前沿技术研究（重点）（cstc2015jcyjBX0128); 重庆师范大学研究生科研创新项目（YKC16003)
Gradient Analysis and Comparison of Landscape Pattern along Different Transects in the Main Urban Area of Chongqing City
Received date: 2016-05-09
Revised date: 2016-07-21
Online published: 2017-04-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41261045; Key Basic Science and Cutting-edge Technology Research of Chongqing, No.cstc2015jcyjBX0128; Chongqing Normal University Graduate Student Research Innovation Project, No.YKC16003
为深入研究地形地貌和经济背景对快速城市化地区景观格局演变进程与时空差异的影响程度,以重庆市主城区为研究对象,借助于ArcGIS 9.3和Fragstats 4.2软件,采用样带梯度分析和景观格局分析相结合方法,基于研究区独特地貌特征和不同经济环境,设置南北向和东西向等7条样带,对1995—2014年研究区景观格局演变的样带响应和驱动机制进行对比分析。结果表明：1）就相同时期同向样带景观破碎度和景观多样性整体变化特征而言,靠近城市中心的南北向样带c和东西向样带f的斑块密度PD和香农多样性指数SHDI值分别呈最低值和最高值,远离城市中心的样带却恰好相反,可见各样带整体景观特征差异受同期城市化水平、地形因素、政策驱动影响明显;2）随着与城区中心（或丘陵、台地）距离的增加,南北向样带和东西向样带景观破碎度和景观多样性不断提高,景观聚集度却不断降低,斑块之间的连通性变差。2001年之后城市化对研究区景观格局影响程度增强,地形因素减弱,以耕地景观为主导的景观格局也逐步向以城市景观为优势的方向转变;3）在1995—2014年期间,南北向c样带南段18 km和东西向f样带西段8 km附近城乡居民点最大斑块指数LPI值均为最高,随城市向外蔓延,c样带北段6 km处LPI值出现100%,由于2001年之后老城区内部改造,南北向c样带南段18 km和东西向f样带西段8 km附近的面积加权平均斑块分维数AWMPFD也多由波峰值降为最低值（接近于1）,且城市化空间推进过程中不均匀性特征显著。
崔王平, 李阳兵, 李潇然 . 重庆市主城区景观格局演变的样带响应与驱动机制差异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017 , 32(4) : 553 -567 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160487
The paper studies the influence of topography and economics on the evolution process of landscape pattern and its spatial-temporal difference in the rapid urbanization area, taking the main urban area of Chongqing City as the research object. Seven transects in north-south direction and east-west direction were selected on the basis of the unique geomorphologic characteristics and the economic environment in the study area. With the help of the Fragstats 4.2 and ArcGIS 9.3, the responses of transacts to the evolution of landscape pattern in the period of 1995-2014 in the study area were compared and the driving mechanism was analyzed with combined methods of gradient analysis and landscape pattern analysis. Results are shown as follows: 1) In terms of the change characteristics of landscape fragmentation and landscape diversity in the same period and direction transects, the values of PD and SHDI of the north-south transect c and the east-west transect f were the lowest and the highest values near the urban center, but away from the city center of the same direction transects are just the opposite. It is obvious that the differences of the whole landscape features are influenced by the urbanization level, terrain factors and policy-driven in the same period. 2) With the increased distance from the center of city (or hills and plateaus), the landscape fragmentation and landscape diversity of both the north-south and east-west transects continued increasing, while the landscape aggregation continued decreasing, and the connectivity between patches decreased. After the year of 2001, the impact of urbanization on the landscape pattern in the study area enhanced, but the impact of terrain factors weakened, and the dominant landscape changed from farmland to urban landscape. 3) During the period of 1995-2014, in the southern 18 km section of north-south transect c and the western 8 km section of east-west transect f where it is close to the urban and rural residents, the values of LPI were the highest. With urban sprawl, the LPI value became 100% at 6 km in the north of north-south transect c. Because of internal renovation of the old urban area since 2001, the AWMPFD values at 18 km in the south of north-south transect c and at 8 km in the west of east-west transect f dropped from the peak value to the lowest value close to 1. The research results show that the evolution of landscape pattern of Chongqing city has significant characteristics of spatial heterogeneity.
[1] MARK J M, AMY K H. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2008, 23: 1143-1155.
[2] 黄宁, 吝涛, 章伟婕, 等. 厦门市同安区不同扩展轴上的景观格局梯度分析与比较 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(5): 767-774.
[3] VIZZARI M, SIGURA M. Landscape sequences along the urban-rural-natural gradient: A novel geospatial approach for identification and analysis [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 140: 42-55.
[4] TOIT M J, CILLIERS S S. Aspects influencing the selection of representative urbanization measures to quantify urban-rural gradients [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2011, 26(2): 169-181.
[5] WENG Y C. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 81: 341-353.
[6] LI J X, LI C, ZHU F G, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern of urbanization in Shanghai, China between 1989 and 2005 [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28: 1545-1565.
[7] 龚建周, 夏北成. 1990 年以来广州市土地覆被景观的时空梯度分异 [J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62( 2): 181-190.
[8] LI X, YEH A G. Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 69: 335-354.
[9] 黄家生, 李新一, 李建龙. 亚太发展中国家三大城市景观格局梯度动态与城乡融合区特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(6): 1134-1142.
[10] LUCK M, WU J G. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17(4): 327-339.
[11] YU X J, NG C N. Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: A case study of Guangzhou, China [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 79(3): 96-109.
[12] 尚正永, 张小林, 周晓钟. 基于RS/GIS的城市空间扩展与外部形态演变研究——以江苏省淮安市为例 [J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(8): 64-70.
[13] 赵志轩, 张彪, 金鑫, 等. 海河流域景观空间梯度格局及其与环境因子的关系 [J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(7): 1925-1935.
[14] 李阳兵, 邵景安, 赵岩洁, 等. “二环八射”道路格局对重庆地区建设用地扩展演变特征的驱动 [J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(3): 288-294.
[15] 黄勇, 李阳兵, 应弘. 渝宜高速（重庆段）对土地利用变化及景观格局的响应 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(4): 1449-1460.
[16] 李阳兵, 张阳阳. 平行岭谷建设用地格局演变扩展的通道与低山阻隔效应 [J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(3): 440-447.
[17] 范科红, 李阳兵. 1986—2007年重庆主城区土地利用变化及其驱动因素研究 [J]. 水土保持, 2012, 19(1): 168-173.
[18] 熊春妮, 魏虹, 兰明娟. 重庆市主城区城市景观动态的多尺度分析 [J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(5): 128-134.
[19] 刘彦随, 杨忍. 中国县域城镇化的空间特征与形成机理 [J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(8): 1011-1020.
[20] 邬建国. 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.
[21] 王玉洁, 李俊祥, 吴健平, 等. 上海浦东新区城市化过程景观格局变化分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(1): 36-40.
[22] 彭月, 何丙辉. 重庆市主城区1986—2007年用地时空演化特征分析 [J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2012, 14(5): 635-643.
[23] 苏维词. 贵阳城市土地利用变化及其环境效应 [J]. 地理科学, 2000, 20(5): 462-468.
[24] 李卫海, 李阳兵, 周焱, 等. 岩溶山地城市扩展空间差异的地形效应 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(1): 85-92.
[25] 张立权, 吴建平, 甄玉, 等. 基于GIS 的上海市景观格局梯度分析 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(1): 78-85.
[26] 杨永春. 中国西部河谷型城市的发展和空间结构研究 [M]. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2003.
[27] 王新生, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 等. 中国特大城市空间形态变化的时空特征 [J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 392-400.
[28] 潘竟虎, 黛维丽. 1990—2010年中国主要城市空间形态变化特征 [J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(1): 44-52.
[29] 汪昭兵, 杨永春. 探析城市规划引导下山地城市空间拓展的主导模式 [J]. 山地学报, 2008, 26(6): 652-664.
[30] 罗瑾, 刘勇, 岳文泽, 等. 山地城市空间结构演变特征: 从沿河谷扩展到多中心组团式扩散 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(2): 61-67.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |