理论探讨

基于空间视角的资源流动内涵与构成要素的再思考

展开
  • 1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023;
    2. 南京师范大学金陵女子学院,南京 210097;
    3. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023;
    4. 虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室(南京师范大学),南京 210023;
    5. 江苏省地理环境演化国家重点实验室培育建设点,南京 210023
张新林(1989- ),男,山东泰安人,博士研究生,研究方向为能源地理学与区域可持续发展。E-mail:smilezhang89@163.com

收稿日期: 2015-10-30

  修回日期: 2015-12-18

  网络出版日期: 2016-10-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41371518)

Rethinking of Connotation and Constituent Elements of Resources Flow Based on Spatial Perspective

Expand
  • 1. School of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. Jinling College, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China;
    3. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China;
    5. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution (Jiangsu Province), Nanjing 210023, China

Received date: 2015-10-30

  Revised date: 2015-12-18

  Online published: 2016-10-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41371518

摘要

资源流动研究已成为资源科学领域新的研究视角和学科成长点,但对资源流动的理论提升、方法总结和范式探讨依然相对较少。论文从地理学的空间视角,对资源流动的内涵及构成要素进行分析。论文给出资源流动的定义,并指出,节点具有业务职能功能、效用功能及社会经济功能,空间位置和流量是节点两个突出的空间特征,不同的节点必然会形成不同的等级,未来应加强对节点功能的量化分析以及完善和发展节点分布特征及等级划分的研究方法;通道和网络具备从属和引导功能,衡量其发育程度主要根据网络的结构特征与网络节点特征,未来应探讨伴随新的交通方式而出现的新功能,系统地对通道网络进行优化分析,构建集多种运输方式为一体的多方式的资源流动通道网络优化模型,针对资源流动流量、强度以及成本等因素进行优化研究;域面是节点、通道网络的载体,根据资源流动节点吸引和辐射的范围,可以将域面划分为不同的等级,加强国际市场因素对我国资源流动域面影响的研究。同时指出,进一步从理论上探讨节点、通道、流动网络及流场的类型,在流动中所起的作用以及彼此之间的作用机制等,将是对资源流动构成要素研究的重要突破。

本文引用格式

张新林, 赵媛 . 基于空间视角的资源流动内涵与构成要素的再思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016 , 31(10) : 1611 -1623 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20151190

Abstract

Research of resources flow has become a new perspective, but it is still lack of the theories, approaches summary and paradigms of the research. The theory, method and innovation of the research framework need to be expanded and improved. In order to reveal the connotation and the constituent elements of resources flow based on spatial perspective, this article summarizes the theoretical studies on resources flow from the aspects of connotations, essence, and elements. Resource transverse flow relies on the geographical space, and different geographical space has different natural phenomena and cultural phenomena, so it is of great significance to study the resources flow from the perspective of space. The resource flow is defined from the perspective of space in this article. The potential differences of resources exist among regions, so one-way flow, bidirectional flow and multidirectional flow will happen because of the force of the resource field and the external force. A node has business function, utility function and social economic function. Spatial location and traffic are two prominent spatial characteristics of the nodes. Different nodes are at different levels. In the future, the quantitative analysis of the functions should be strengthened, so are the methods to divide the hierarchy. Channels and network have the functions of affiliation and guiding. Their development degrees are mainly measured from the structure and the nodes of the network. In the future, new functions will appear with the emergence of new way of transportation, so the new functions should be discussed and the channel network system should be optimized. Building an optimization model including a variety of modes of transportation which can study resources flow, intensity and cost has important practical significance. Domain is the carrier of nodes, channels and networks. The influence of international market on the resources flow domain should also be studied. Research also points out that it is important breakthroughs of the study of the constituent elements of resources flow that further theoretically explores node, channel, network types of resources flow and the roles and the mechanisms among them. Space factors of resources flow are important content of the theory research. It is of great significance to understand the spatial pattern and the structure of the resources flow. The exploration of new analysis model on the basis of empirical research combining with the new element that will emerge in the future will be the important breakthrough in the study of resource flow elements. The establishment of the theoretical system of resource flow must be based on a multidisciplinary integration. Research of resources flow is involved in resources science, eco-logy, economics, management, sociology and geography and so on, but these disciplines have not been jointly researched. It is the key to combine the study in resources science, ecology, economics, management, sociology and geography and integrate their theories.

参考文献

[1] 成升魁, 沈镭, 闵庆文, 等. 资源科学研究的新视角——自然资源流动过程的研究 [J]. 资源科学, 2006, 21(2): 199-200.

[2] 成升魁, 甄霖. 资源流动研究的理论框架与决策应用 [J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(3): 37-44.

[3] 沈镭, 刘晓洁. 资源流研究的理论与方法探析 [J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(3): 9-16.

[4] 王宜强, 赵媛. 资源流动研究现状及其主要研究领域 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(1): 89-101.

[5] 成升魁. 资源科学几个问题探讨 [J]. 资源科学, 1998, 20(2): 1-10.

[6] 董瑜, 谢高地. 资源场理论及其在资源流动中的应用 [J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(5): 407-411.

[7] 张玲, 袁增伟, 毕军. 物质流分析方法及其研究进展 [J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 6189-6198.

[8] FISCHER M K. Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of material flow analysis, part I, 1860-1970 [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1998, 2(1): 61-78.
[9] LOTKA A J. Elements of Physical Biology [M]. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins, 1925.
[10] LINDEMAN R L. Experimental simulation of winter anaerobiosis in a scenescent lake [J]. Ecology, 1942, 23(1): 1-13.
[11] DAHLSTR M K, EKINS P. Combining economic and environmental dimensions: Value chain analysis of UK aluminium flows [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 51(3): 541-560.
[12] DAVIS J, GEYER R, LEY J, et al. Time-dependent material flow analysis of iron and steel in the UK: Part 2. Scrap generation and recycling [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 51(1): 118-140.
[13] SPATARI S, BERTRAM T M, GORDON R B, et al. Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(1): 37-51.
[14] JOHNSON J, JIRIKOWIC J, BERTRAM M, et al. Contemporary anthropogenic silver cycle: A multilevel analysis [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(12): 4655-4665.
[15] LANZANO T, BERTRAM M, PALO M D, et al. The contemporary European silver cycle [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006, 46(1): 27-43.
[16] DAHLSTR M K, EKINS P. Combining economic and environmental dimensions: Value chain analysis of UK iron and steel flows [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58(3): 507-519.
[17] RECK B, BERTRAM M, MÜLLER D B, et al. Multilevel anthropogenic cycles of Copper and Zinc: A comparative statistical analysis [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2006, 10(1/2): 1089-1110.
[18] 单永娟. 物质流分析方法研究与应用综述 [J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2007, 6(3): 83-86.

[19] 程欢, 彭晓春, 陈志良, 等. 基于可持续发展的物质流分析研究进展 [J]. 环境科学与管理, 2011, 36(10): 142-146.

[20] HAGGETT P, CLIFF A D, ALLAN E. Locational Analysis in Human Geography [M]. London: Edwad Arnold, 1977.
[21] 于秋阳, 杨斯涵. 高速铁路对节点城市旅游业发展的影响研究——以西安市为例 [J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(5): 142-148.

[22] 赵媛, 郝丽莎. 20世纪末期中国石油资源空间流动格局与流场特征 [J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(5): 753-764.

[23] 王宜强, 赵媛. 中国天然气资源流动类型、集散特征与格局演化 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 20(2): 248-259.

[24] 杨足膺, 赵媛, 黄克龙. 中国石油资源空间流动的驱动机制分析 [J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(5): 863-875.

[25] 王宜强, 赵媛. 中国煤炭资源流源、汇地空间格局演变与内部空间差异研究 [J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1158-1160.

[26] GRIFFITH D A. Spatial structure and spatial interaction: 25 years later [J]. The Review of Regional Studies, 2007, 37(1): 28-38.
[27] 朱传耿, 顾朝林, 马荣华, 等. 中国流动人口的影响要素与空间分布 [J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 549-560.

[28] CHAMBER N, CHILD R, JENKIN N, et al. Stepping Forward: A Resource Flow and Ecological Footprint Analysis of the Southwest of England Resource Flow Report [M]. Oxford, United Kingdom: Best Foot Forward Ltd., 2005.
[29] 杨足膺, 赵媛, 黄克龙, 等. 基于运费最低的中国原油管道网络空间优化研究 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(4): 722-728.

[30] 郭建科, 韩增林, 王利. 我国中心城市货运外向服务功能空间体系 [J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(10): 1849-1860.

[31] 赵媛, 牛海玲, 杨足膺. 我国石油资源流流量位序——规模分布特征变化 [J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2121-2131.

[32] 赵媛, 牛海玲, 杨足膺. 我国石油资源流动源-汇系统空间格局演变特征 [J]. 地理学报, 2010, 1752-1757.

[33] 孙单智. 城市物流节点的规模与分布问题研究 [D]. 重庆: 西南交通大学, 2006.

[34] 陈良文, 杨开忠. 我国区域经济差异变动的原因——一个要素流动和集聚经济的视角 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2007, 29(3): 35-42.

[35] 叶红. 区域旅游线路节点选择对目的地的影响 [J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(4): 672-675.

[36] 郝丽莎, 赵媛. 石油资源流动空间结构的要素解析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(10): 1817-1826.

[37] CHUNG C H, YI T C. Resource allocation decisions under various demands and cost requirements in an unreliable flow network [J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2005, 32(11): 2771-2784.
[38] HANNU R, ESA R. Continuous flow and interference models in resource use: A clarification [J]. Animal Behavior, 1999, 57(5): 17-18.
[39] 王红霞. 要素流动-空间集聚与城市互动发展的定量研究——以长三角地区为例 [J]. 上海经济研究, 2011(12): 45-55.

[40] 周蓓. 四川省航空旅游网络空间特征及其结构优化研究 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2008, 24(1): 100-104.

[41] 张红. 我国旅游热点城市境外游客旅游流空间分布特征分析 [J]. 人文地理, 2000, 15(2): 56-67.

[42] 保继刚, 郑海燕, 戴光全. 桂林国内客源市场的空间结构演变 [J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 96-106.

[43] 杨国良, 张捷, 刘波, 等. 旅游流流量位序-规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例 [J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 662-672.

[44] 杨国良, 张捷, 艾南山, 等. 旅游流齐夫结构及空间差异化特征——以四川省为例 [J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(12): 1281-1289.

[45] 王子龙. 区域物流网络结构及其功能研究 [D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2004.

[46] 嵇昊威, 赵媛. 长三角高速铁路网建设对江苏省煤炭铁路运输能力的影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 304-312.

[47] 杨足膺, 赵媛. 基于分形理论的中国原油管道网络结构研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5): 820-831.

[48] 陈少沛, 李勇, 庄大昌, 等. 广东区域公路网络的城市通达性度量及空间特征分析 [J]. 地球信息科学, 2014, 16(6): 907-914.

[49] 嵇昊威, 赵媛. 中国煤炭铁路运输网络可达性空间格局研究 [J]. 地域研究与开发, 2014, 33(1): 6-11.

[50] 杨光华. 区域物流网络结构的演化机理与优化研究 [D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010.

[51] 吴晋峰, 包浩生. 旅游系统的空间结构模式研究 [J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(1): 96-101.

[52] 郝丽莎. 世界石油地理格局之变 [M]. 南京: 南京师范大学出版社, 2012.

[53] ZHAO Y, HAO L S, WAN L. Research on the spatial structure of crude oil flow and the characteristics of its flow field in China [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(10): 5035-5050.
[54] 赵媛, 于鹏. 我国煤炭资源空间流动的基本格局与流输通道 [J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(2): 196-200.

[55] 成升魁, 徐增让, 沈镭. 中国省际煤炭资源流动的时空演变及驱动力 [J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6): 603-612.
文章导航

/