EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2016 , Vol. 31 >Issue 7: 1231 - 1240

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20150803

资源评价

东江流域主要支流溶解性有机质污染特征初探

展开
  • 1. 中药资源保护与利用北京市重点实验室,北京 100875;
    2. 北京师范大学资源学院,北京 100875;
    3. 深圳市环境科学研究院,深圳 518001
刘琦（1990- ）,男,博士研究生,研究方向为自然地理学和资源生态学。E-mail:liuqi@mail.bnu.edu.cn *通信江源（1960- ）,女,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为自然地理学和资源生态学。E-mail:jiangy@bnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2015-07-25

  修回日期: 2015-10-07

  网络出版日期: 2016-07-20

基金资助

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项项目（2012ZX07501002-04）; 国家自然科学基金（41271104）

收起

Exploring the Pollution Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Primary Tributaries of the Dongjiang River

Expand
  • 1. Protection and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources of Beijing Key Laboratory, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    3. Shenzhen Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shenzhen 518001, China

Received date: 2015-07-25

  Revised date: 2015-10-07

  Online published: 2016-07-20

Supported by

National Science and Technology Major Project: Water Pollution Control and Management Technology of China, No.2012ZX07501002-04 ;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271104

Fold

摘要

溶解性有机质（DOM）是天然水体的重要组成部分,其组分构成及含量能够反映河流污染特征。研究利用三维荧光光谱技术对2014年3—4月东江流域8条一级支流下游DOM的荧光组分进行分析。通过寻峰法和平行因子分析（PARAFAC）识别出两种类腐殖质组分（Peak A和Peak B）和两种类蛋白质组分（Peak C和Peak D）;并结合常规水质指标,探索各支流的主要污染源,为东江流域水质管理提供科学依据。结果表明：1)东江流域淡水河和石马河两种类蛋白质显著高于其他支流,两种类腐殖质出现缺失现象。2）8条支流样点的DOM中,Peak C、Peak D与各常规水质参数相关性显著,说明东江流域DOM能够较好地反映水质情况。3）东江流域中上游支流自然生境良好,受到人为活动影响强度低。中游支流受农业及工业的双重污染,类腐殖质及类蛋白质的含量较上游河流有显著增加。下游支流受人为活动影响剧烈,河岸带自然生境破坏严重,河岸固化,使得类腐殖质缺失;工业废水及生活污水大量排放,类蛋白质含量显著上升。4）与国内外其他河流相比,东江流域各支流、珠江干流广州河段及河口、辽河流域太子河均呈现以类蛋白质为主要组分,与长江流域以及国外河流存在显著差异,说明东江流域人类产生的有机污染严重,亟须治理。

关键词： 东江; 平行因子分析（PARAFAC）; 溶解性有机质（DOM）; 三维荧光光谱

本文引用格式

刘琦, 江源, 丁佼, 侯兆疆, 付岚 . 东江流域主要支流溶解性有机质污染特征初探[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016 , 31(7) : 1231 -1240 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150803

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is an important component of natural water, and its composition and content can reflect the pollution characteristics of rivers. We assessed the components of DOM from eight primary tributaries of the Dongjing River sampled from March to April, 2014 using excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence. Two humic-like DOMs (Peak A and B) and two protein-like DOMs (Peak C and D) were found by peak-picking method and PARAFAC method. We used these four components, combining with water quality parameters, to explore the pollutant sources of each tributary. The results showed that: 1) The content of two protein-like components in Danshui River and Shima River was significantly higher than in other tributaries, and two humic-like components were missing in these two rivers. 2) The protein-like components (Peak C and D) showed strong correlations with general water quality parameters (P<0.05). 3) The tributaries located in upper and middle reaches of the Dongjing River were polluted slightly, the habitat conditions being good. The contents of the humic-like and protein-like components in the tributaries located in the middle reach were significantly high due to the pollutants from industries and agriculture. There was no humic-like components in the tributaries located in lower reach, but the protein-like components increased significantly, as a result of destruction of natural habitat and industrial wastewater discharges. 4) Like the estuary of the Pearl River and the Taizi River in the Liaohe River Basin, the tributaries of Dongjing River had high concentration of protein-like components, which is quite different from the Changjiang River and foreign rivers. This indicated that the human-caused organic pollution is serious in the Dongjing River.

Key words： dissolved organic matter (DOM); Dongjiang River; excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence; PARAFAC method

参考文献

[1] MOSTOFA K M G, SAKUGAWA H. Spatial and temporal variations and factors controlling the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and organic peroxides in rivers [J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2009, 6(6): 524-534.
[2] HOSEN J D, MCDONOUGH O T, FEBRIA C M, et al. Dissolved organic matter quality and bioavailability changes across an urbanization gradient in headwater streams [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(14): 7817-7824.
[3] 王立英, 张润宇, 吴丰昌. 滇池北部沉积物孔隙水中溶解性有机质的光谱特性与空间分异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(12): 3416-3422.
[4] 于会彬, 宋永会, 杨楠, 等. 三维荧光与神经网络研究城市河流沉积物孔隙水有机物组成与结构特征 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(4): 934-939.
[5] YU X, HAWLEY-HOWARD J, PITT A L, et al. Water quality of small seasonal wetlands in the Piedmont ecoregion, South Carolina, USA: Effects of land use and hydrological connectivity [J]. Water Research, 2015, 73: 98-108.
[6] 廖剑宇, 彭秋志, 郑楚涛, 等. 东江干支流水体氮素的时空变化特征 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(3): 505-513.
[7] 刘昌明, 何希吾. 中国 21 世纪水问题方略 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
[8] 宋照风, 方战强. 珠江广州河段水体中溶解性有机质的特性 [J]. 轻工科技, 2013(5): 118-120.
[9] ZHAO J, CAO W, WANG G, et al. The variations in optical properties of CDOM throughout an algal bloom event [J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2009, 82(2): 225-232.
[10] 肖红伟, 龙爱民, 孙羚晏. 珠江口磨刀门溶解有机物CDOM三维荧光光谱特征 [J]. 海洋科学, 2013, 37(7): 41-46.
[11] LIU F F, TANG S L, CHEN C Q. Temporal variability of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in the Pearl River Estuary, China from 2003 to 2009 [J]. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 2014, 17(3): 261-270.
[12] 广东省统计局. 广东统计年鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014.
[13] 国家环境保护局. 水和废水监测分析方法 [M]. 第四版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[14] COBLE P G, DEL CASTILLO C E, AVRIL B. Distribution and optical properties of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon [J]. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 1998, 45(10/11): 2195-2223.
[15] STOLPE B, ZHOU Z, GUO L, et al. Colloidal size distribution of humic- and protein-like fluorescent organic matter in the northern gulf of Mexico [J]. Marine Chemistry, 2014, 164: 25-37.
[16] STEDMON C A, RASMUS B. Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: A tutorial [J]. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2008, 6(11): 572-579.
[17] COBLE P G, GREEN S A, BLOUGH N V, et al. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in the Black Sea by fluorescence spectroscopy [J]. Nature, 1990, 348(6300): 432-435.
[18] BAKER A. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(5): 948-953.
[19] 王菊翠, 仵彦卿, 党碧玲,等. 基于统计分析的陕西段泾河水质时空分布特征 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4): 674-685.
[20] 张永勇, 王中根, 于静洁, 等. 流域COD减排核证研究——以淮河中上游为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 819-829.
[21] 程庆霖, 郑丙辉, 王圣瑞, 等. 滇池水体有色溶解性有机质(CDOM)三维荧光光谱特征 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014, 34(3): 698-703.
[22] 刘瑞霞, 李斌, 刘娜娜, 等. 辽河流域与英国中部河湖水体中溶解有机质的荧光特性 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(9): 2321-2328.
[23] BORISOVER M, LAOR Y, SAADI I, et al. Tracing organic footprints from industrial effluent discharge in recalcitrant riverine chromophoric dissolved organic matter [J]. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2011, 222(1/4): 255-269.
[24] ZHANG X, MARCÉ R, ARMENGOL J, et al. Distribution of dissolved organic matter in freshwaters using excitation emission fluorescence and Multivariate Curve Resolution [J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 111: 120-128.
[25] 博罗县地方志编纂委员会. 博罗年鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国文史出版社, 2012.
[26] 付川, 郭劲松, 祁俊生, 等. 长江(万州段)水体溶解性有机物的荧光光谱分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 856-859.
[27] 甘淑钗, 吴莹, 鲍红艳, 等. 长江溶解有机质三维荧光光谱的平行因子分析 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(6): 1045-1052.
[28] MOUNIER S, PATEL N, QUILICI J, et al. Three-dimensional fluorescence of the dissolved organic carbon in the Amazon River [J]. Water Research, 1999, 33(6): 1523-1533.
[29] YAMASHITA Y, MAIE N, BRICEÑO H, et al. Optical characterization of dissolved organic matter in tropical rivers of the Guayana Shield, Venezuela [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115, G00F10, doi:10.1029/2009JG000987.
[30] SINGH S, D’SA E J, SWENSON E M. Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) variability in Barataria Basin using excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(16): 3211-3222.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉