资源评价

亚热带典型小流域磷收支及流失特征对比研究

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙 410125;
    2. 湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,长沙 410081;
    3. 湖南农业大学工学院,长沙 410128
王美慧(1990- ),女,山东人,硕士研究生,研究方向流域土壤环境生态。E-mail:847856516@qq.com

收稿日期: 2014-12-09

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41171396,41201299); 国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD14B02)

Comparison on Phosphorus Budgets in Two Typical Subtropical Small Watersheds of China

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, CAS, Changsha 410125, China;
    2. College Resources and Environmental Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;
    3. College of Engineering, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

Received date: 2014-12-09

  Online published: 2016-02-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41171396 and 41201299; National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China, No.2014BAD14B02

摘要

磷素(P)在环境中的过量累积是导致农业面源污染的主要因素。论文以湖南省长沙县脱甲河农区小流域(52 km2)和涧山河森林-农区小流域(50 km2)为研究单元,基于入户调查资料和连续4 a的流域把口站水文水质定位观测数据,采用物质流分析法,对比研究了亚热带丘陵区典型小流域P的收支平衡及流失特征。结果表明,农区小流域出口地表水总磷(TP)含量变化为0.03~0.68 mg·L-1,平均含量为0.21 mg·L-1,整体达到Ⅲ类水质标准;森林-农区小流域TP含量变化范围为0.01~0.35 mg·L-1,平均为0.08 mg·L-1,整体为Ⅱ类水质,表明森林-农区小流域地表水水质明显优于农区小流域。农区小流域P的环境滞留强度(32.0 kg·hm-2·a-1)显著高于森林-农区小流域(20.6 kg·hm-2·a-1),对环境影响更大。以2013年为例,农区小流域P的主要输入项为饲料,占53.1%,森林-农区小流域则以肥料为主,占53.0%;两个流域的P输出项都以植物和畜禽产品输出为主,均占总输出量的94.0%左右。控制小流域肥料和饲料投入、增加循环利用途径以及提高P利用率是当前减轻水体富营养化的有效途径。

本文引用格式

王美慧, 周脚根, 韩增, 孟岑, 杨文, 焦军霞, 程牧春, 李裕元, 吴金水 . 亚热带典型小流域磷收支及流失特征对比研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016 , 31(2) : 321 -330 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20141612

Abstract

Surplus phosphorus is a main source of non-point source pollution. Tuojia, a small agricultural watershed (52 km2) and Jianshan, a small forest-agricultural watershed (50 km2), located in Changsha County, Hunan Province, are taken as the case study. Based on the household surveys and 4-successive-year of observations of the phosphorus (P) flows at the terminal of river, substance flow analysis was used to quantify the budgets of P. Results showed that the concentrations of P in the agricultural ranged 0.03-0.68 mg·L-1, with the average 0.21 mg·L-1, while the corresponding one in the forest-agricultural ranged 0.01-0.35 mg·L-1 with the average 0.08 mg·L-1. The surface water quality in the forest-agricultural watershed was obviously better than that in the agricultural watershed. The phosphorus surplus intensity in the agricultural watershed was apparently higher (32.0 kg·hm-2·a-1) than that in the forest-agricul-tural watershed (20.6 kg·hm-2·a-1), and thus had a greater effect on environment. In 2013, livestock feeding accounted for 53.1% of total P inputs in the agricultural watershed, while fertilizer contributed 53.0% in the forest-agricultural. Generally, the phosphorus from plant and animal products dominated in both watersheds, approximately accounting for 94.0% of the total. Thus, controlling the amount of P fertilizer and improving its utilization efficiency are good ways to mitigate the eutrophication in the study area.
文章导航

/