资源生态

中国东部典型森林生态系统蒸散及其组分变异规律研究

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;
    3. 中国科学院 沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳 110016;
    4. 中国科学院 华南植物园,广州 510650
路倩倩(1989- ),女,山东德州人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态信息学研究。E-mail:luqq.12s@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2014-08-18

  修回日期: 2015-01-29

  网络出版日期: 2015-09-15

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA05050600); 国家科技支撑计划(2013BAC03B00)

Study on the Variations of Forest Evapotranspiration and Its Components in Eastern China

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institution of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
    4. South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

Received date: 2014-08-18

  Revised date: 2015-01-29

  Online published: 2015-09-15

摘要

森林蒸散包括植被蒸腾、土壤蒸发、冠层截留蒸发三个组分,在陆地生态系统水分循环及能量流动研究中占有重要地位。论文基于Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory Model (PT-JPL)模型,估算温带针阔混交林、人工常绿针叶林、亚热带常绿阔叶林三个典型森林生态系统2003—2008年蒸散(组分);在模拟结果基础上揭示了蒸散(组分)的季节变异规律及主控因子。结果表明:①PT-JPL模型在中国东部森林生态系统蒸散及其组分估算中具有较高的稳定性和可靠性;②蒸散(组分)季节变化特征明显,不同森林生态系统类型变化规律差异较小,但主控因子存在较大差异:温带针阔混交林蒸散和植被蒸腾季节变异主要由净辐射和增强植被指数(EVI)共同控制,而亚热带人工常绿针叶林和亚热带常绿阔叶林主要受净辐射影响;EVI和饱和水汽压差(VPD)是土壤蒸发季节变异的主控因子,截留蒸发的季节变化则主要受VPD影响。

本文引用格式

路倩倩, 何洪林, 朱先进, 于贵瑞, 王辉民, 张军辉, 闫俊华 . 中国东部典型森林生态系统蒸散及其组分变异规律研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015 , 30(9) : 1436 -1448 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.09.002

Abstract

The study of forest evapotranspiration (ET) occupies a significant position in the research of water and energy cycles, owing to the important role of forest ecosystem in the entire terrestrial ecosystem. In this paper, based on Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory Model (PT-JPL), we simulated ET and its components for the temperate mixed broadleaf-coniferous forest, the artificial evergreen coniferous forest and the subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China from 2003 to 2008, and then validated the accuracy of PT-JPL model with flux data. In addition, seasonal variation characteristics and controlling factors of ET and its components were also studied. The results indicate that PT-JPL model is robust and accurate for estimating forest ET and its components. There are obvious seasonal variation of ET and its components in all three forest ecosystems, with similar variation trends. However, the main controlling factors dominating the seasonal variation of forest ET and its components vary in different forest ecosystems. The seasonal variation of ET and its components for temperate mixed broadleaf-coniferous forest are mainly controlled by net radiation and VPD, while those for artificial evergreen coniferous forest and subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest are net radiation only. As for seasonal variation of soil evaporation, EVI and VPD are the major contributors in all three forest ecosystems, but when referring to the seasonal change of interception evaporation, VPD is considered as the dominant factor.

参考文献

[1] 于贵瑞, 王秋凤, 等. 植物光合、蒸腾与水分利用的生理生态学 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 350-351. [YU Gui-rui, WANG Qiu-feng, et al . Ecophysiology of Plant Photosynthesis, Transpiration, and Water Use. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 350-351. ]
[2] Stewart J B. Evaporation from the wet canopy of a pine forest [J]. Water Resources Research , 1977, 13: 915-921.
[3] Yao Y J, Liang S L, Cheng J, et al . MODIS- driven estimation of terrestrial latent heat flux in China based on a modified Priestley-Taylor algorithm [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2013, 171: 187-202.
[4] Komatsu H, Tanaka N, Kume T. Do coniferous forests evaporate more water than broad-leaved forests in Japan [J]? Journal of Hydrology , 2007, 336: 361-375.
[5] Lin Y, Wang G X, Guo J Y, et al . Quantifying evapotranspiration and its components in a coniferous subalpine forest in Southwest China [J]. Hydrological Processes , 2012, 26: 3032-3040.
[6] Oishi A C, Oren R, Paul C S. Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: A footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2008, 148: 1719-1732.
[7] Wang K C, Dickinson R E, Wild M, et al . Evidence for decadal variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002. Part 2: Results [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research , 2010, 115: D20112
[8] Kool D, Agam N, Lazarovitch N, et al . A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2014, 184:56-70.
[9] 袁国富, 张娜, 孙晓敏, 等. 利用原位连续测定水汽δ 18 O和Keeling Plot方法区分麦田蒸散组分 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(2): 170-178. [YUAN Guo-fu, ZHANG Na, SUN Xiao-min, et al . Partitioning wheat field evapotranspiration using Keeling Plot method and continuous atmospheric vapor δ 18 O data. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology , 2010, 34(2): 170-178. ]
[10] 涂洁, 刘琪璟, 林耀明, 等. 亚热带红壤区湿地松生长与耗水耦合关系研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(4): 685-693. [TU Jie, LIU Qi-jing, LIN Yao-ming, et al . Coumpling relationship between growth and water consumption of Pinuselliottii in subtropical red earth area. Journal of Natural Resources , 2008, 23(4): 685-693. ]
[11] Jin Y F, Randerson J T, Goulden M L. Continental-scale net radiation and evapotranspiration estimated using MODIS satellite observations [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2011, 115: 2302-2319.
[12] Mu Q Z, Heinsch F A, Zhao M, et al . Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2007, 111: 519-536.
[13] 莫兴国, 薛玲, 林忠辉. 华北平原1981—2001年作物蒸散量的时空变异特征 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(2): 181-187. [MO Xing-guo, XUE Ling, LIN Zhong-hui. Spatio-temporal distribution of crop evapotranspiration from 1981~2001 over the north China plian. Journal of Natural Resources , 2005, 20(2):181-187. ]
[14] Hu Z M, Yu G R, Zhou Y L, et al . Partitioning of evapotranspiration and its controls in four grassland ecosystems: Application of a two-source model [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2009, 149: 1410-1420.
[15] Fisher J B, Kevin P, Tu D D. Global estimates of the land-atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data validated at 16 FLUXNET sites [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2008, 112: 901-919.
[16] 魏焕奇, 何洪林, 刘敏, 等. 基于遥感的千烟洲人工林蒸散及其组分模拟研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5): 778-789. [WEI Huan-qi, HE Hong-lin, LIU Min, et al . Modeling evapotranspiration and its components in QYZ plantation based on remote sensing data. Journal of Natural Resources , 2012, 27(5): 778-789. ]
[17] 腾菱, 任海, 彭少麟. 中国东部陆地农业生态系统南北样带的自然概况 [J]. 生态科学, 2000, 19(4): 1-10. [ TENG Ling, REN Hai, PENG Shao-lin. The natural situation of north south transect of eastern China. Ecologic Science , 2000, 19(4): 1-10. ]
[18] 张新建, 袁凤辉, 陈妮娜, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林能量平衡和蒸散 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(3): 607-613. [ZHANG Xin-jian, YUAN Feng-hui, CHEN Ni-na, et al . Energy balance and evapotranpiration in broad-leaved Korean pine forest in ChangbaiMountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 2011, 22(3): 607-613. ]
[19] 宋耀明, 郭维栋, 张耀存. CoLM模式在中国温带混交林和亚热带人工针叶林的水热通量模拟性能评估 [J]. 高原气象, 2008, 27(5): 967-977. [SONG Yao-ming, GUO Wei-dong, ZHANG Yao-cun. Simulation of latent heat flux exchange between land surface and atmosphere in temperate mixed forest and subtropical artificial coniferous forest sites in China by CoLM. Plateau Meterology , 2008, 27(5): 967-977. ]
[20] 闫俊华, 周国逸, 张德强, 等. 鼎湖山顶级森林生态系统水文要素时空规律 [J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2359-2366. [YAN Jun-hua, ZHOU Guo-yi, ZHANG De-qiang, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of some hydrological factors in a climax forest ecosystem in the Dinghushan region. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2003, 23(11): 2359-2366. ]
[21] Yu G R, Zhang L M, Sun X M, et al. Environmental controls over carbon exchange of three forest ecosystems in eastern China [J]. Global Change Biology , 2008, 14: 2555-2571.
[22] Xiao X M, Zhang Q Y, Braswell B, et al . Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2004, 91: 256-270.
[23] Yuan W P, Liu S G, Yu G R, et al. Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2010, 114: 1416-1431.
[24] June T, Evans J R, Farquhar G D. A simple new equation for thereversible temperature dependence of photosynthetic electron transport: A study on soybean leaf [J]. Functional Plant Biology , 2004, 31: 275-283.
[25] Savitzky A, Golay M J E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures [J]. Analytical Chemistry , 1964, 36: 1627-1639.
[26] 刘敏, 何洪林, 于贵瑞, 等. 中亚热带人工针叶CO 2 通量组分统计不确定性分析 [J]. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2008, 38(8): 257-268. [LIU Min, HE Hong-lin, YU Gui-rui, et al . Uncertainty analysis of CO 2 flux components in subtropical evergreen coniferous plantation. Science in China Series D : Earth Sciences , 2008, 38(8): 257-268. ]
[27] Hu Z M, Li S G, Yu G R, et al . Modeling evapotranspiration by combing a two-source model, a leaf stomatal model, and a light-use efficiency model [J]. Journal of Hydrology , 2013, 501: 186-192.
[28] Tang Y K, Wen X F, Sun X M, et al . The limiting effect of deep soil water on evapotranspiration of a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to seasonal drought [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences , 2013, 31: 385-395.
[29] Sjöström M, Ardö J, Arneth A, et al . Exploring the potential of MODIS EVI for modeling gross primary production across African ecosystems [J]. Remote Eensing of Environment , 2011, 115: 1081-1089.
[30] Tan B, Woodcock CE, Hu J, et al . The impact of gridding artifacts on the local spatial properties of MODIS data: Implications for validation, compositing, and band-to-band registration across resolutions [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2006, 105: 98-114.
[31] Wilson K B, Hanson P J, Mulholland P J, et al . A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: Sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2001, 106: 153-168.
[32] Wang K C, Dickinson R E. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability [J]. Reviews of Geophysics , 2012, 50: RG2005
[33] Xu M J, Wen X F, Wang H M, et al . Effects of climatic factors and ecosystem responses on the inter-annual variability of evapotranspiration in a coniferous plantation in subtropical China [J]. Plos One , 2014, 9: e85593
[34] 李海涛, 于贵瑞, 李家永, 等. 亚热带红壤丘陵区四种人工林凋落物分解动态及养分释放 [J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(3): 898-908. [LI Hai-tao, YU Gui-rui, LI Jia-yong, et al . Decomposition dynamics and nutrient release of litters for four artificial forests in the red soil and hilly region of subtropical China. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2007, 27(3): 898-908. ]
[35] 杨弘, 裴铁璠, 关德新, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林土壤水分动态研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(4): 587-591. [YANG Hong, PEI Tie-fan, GUAN De-xin, et al . Soil moisture dynamics under broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 2006, 17(4): 587-591. ]
[36] Zhang X Y, Friedl M A, Schaaf C B, et al . Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2003, 84: 471-475.
[37] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al . Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements [EB/OL]. 1998. http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/x0490e00.htm#Contents.

文章导航

/