长江三角洲地区资源环境与经济增长脱钩分析
收稿日期: 2012-03-26
修回日期: 2012-06-23
网络出版日期: 2013-01-30
基金资助
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(11JJD790016,11JJD790051).
Decoupling Analysis between Economic Development and Resources and Environmental of the Yangtze River Delta
Received date: 2012-03-26
Revised date: 2012-06-23
Online published: 2013-01-30
基于环境压力与经济发展,应用脱钩理论和改进的弹性分析法脱钩程度判定标准,对2000—2009年长江三角洲地区16个城市的环境压力与经济发展脱钩程度、时序演变和呈现的规律进行定量评价与综合分析.结果显示:长江三角洲地区资源环境与经济增长主要经历了从相对脱钩Ⅱ—相对脱钩Ⅲ—相对脱钩Ⅱ—相对脱钩Ⅰ,2000—2005年经济增长对资源环境冲击不断增强,而2005—2009年冲击有所减小;该地区资源环境压力各指标与经济增长的关系以相对脱钩为主,且存在时间上和指标间的差异;长江三角洲地区城市群多数时期都处于相对脱钩状态,其中10个城市资源环境与经济增长的脱钩关系呈现"N"型趋势,且多数城市2004年和2005年达到最高,上海在绝对脱钩和相对脱钩Ⅰ徘徊,而江苏和浙江内部差异明显.
盖美, 胡杭爱, 柯丽娜 . 长江三角洲地区资源环境与经济增长脱钩分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013 , 28(2) : 185 -198 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.02.001
Based on the application of the decoupling theory between environmental pressure and economic development and improved elastic analysis decoupling degree judgment standards, this paper attempted to make quantitative and comprehensive analysis of the features or rules of temporal-spatial evolution of decoupling degrees between resource environment and economic development of the Yangtze River Delta, with a time span from 2000 to 2009. The results show that: the relationship between resources-environment and economic growth of the Yangtze River was generally in the order of relative decoupling Ⅱ-relative decoupling Ⅲ-relative decoupling Ⅱ-relative decoupling Ⅰ, and the impact between economic growth and resources-environmental enhanced the impact during 2000-2005, then reduced during 2005-2009; the relationship between each index of resources-environment and economic development was generally in a state of relative decoupling, and decoupling degree of resource consumption and environmental pressure and comprehensive resource presented differences in time and indexes; in most of the time period, the Yangtze River Delta was in a relatively decoupling state, including 10 cities resources environment and economic growth on the decoupling relationship of "N" trend, and the pressure between economic development and resources-environment reached the highest in 2004 and 2005 in the Yangtze River Delta. Shanghai was wandering between absolute decoupling and relative decoupling Ⅰ, and Jiangsu and Zhejiang showed apparent internal differences.
[1] 宋伟, 陈百明, 陈曦炜. 常熟市耕地占用与经济增长的脱钩(decoupling)评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(9): 1532-1540.[SONG Wei, CHEN Bai-ming, CHEN Xi-wei. Decoupling evaluation between cultivated land occupation and economic growth in Changshu City. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(9): 1532-1540.]
[2] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure and economic growth . Paris: OECD, 2002.
[3] Vehmas J, Kaivo-oja J, Luukkanen J. Comparative de-link and re-link analysis of material flows in EU-15 member countries . Wuppertal: Con Account Conference, 2003.
[4] Ayres R U, Ayres L W, Warr B. Energy, power and work in the US economy, 1900-1998[J]. Energy, 2003, 28(3): 219-273.
[5] Tapio Petri. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the ease of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001 [J]. Journal of Transport Policy, 2005(12): 137-151.
[6] Hüttler W, Schandl H, Weisz H. Are industrial economies on the path of dematerialization? Material flow accounts for Austria 1960-1996: Indicators and international comparison //Centre of Environmental Science. Ecologizing Societal Metabolism: Designing Scenarios for Sustainable Materials Management. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Universitair Grafisch Bedrijf, 1999: 26-29.
[7] 于法稳. 经济发展与资源环境之间脱钩关系的实证研究[J]. 内蒙古财经学院学报, 2009(3): 29-34.[YU Fa-wen. Empirical research on the decoupling relationship between economic development and the resource environment. Inner Mongolia Journal of Finance and Economics, 2009(3): 29-34.]
[8] 段晓峰, 许学工. 山东省污染物排放与经济发展水平的关系[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(3): 342-346.[DUAN Xiao-feng, XU Xue-gong. The relationship between pollutant emission and economic development in Shandong Province. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(3): 342-346.]
[9] 李阿萌, 张京祥, 肖翔. 江苏省13城市1996~2008年碳排放时空变异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1235-1242.[LI A-men, ZHANG Jing-xiang, XIAO Xiang. Temporal-spatial variability of carbon emissions. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(10): 1235-1242.]
[10] 彭佳雯, 黄贤金, 钟太洋. 中国经济增长与能源碳排放的脱钩研究[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(4): 626-633.[PENG Jia-wen, HUANG Xian-jin, ZHONG Tai-yang. Decoupling analysis of economic growth and energy carbon emissions in China. Resources Science, 2011, 33(4): 626-633.]
[11] 赵一平, 孙启宏, 段宁. 中国经济发展与能源消费响应关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2006, 27(3): 128-134.[ZHAO Yi-ping, SUN Qi-hong, DUAN Ning. Responsive relationship between economic development and energy consumption in China. Science Research Management, 2006, 27(3): 128-134.]
[12] 王鹤鸣, 岳强, 陆钟武. 中国1998年-2008年资源消耗与经济增长的脱钩分析[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(9): 1757-1767.[WANG He-ming, YUE Qiang, LU Zhong-wu. Decoupling analysis of China's resource consumption and economic growth over the period 1998 〖13] 罗宏, 舒俭民, 吕连宏. 基于IPAT模型的苏州市环境压力－响应分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2010, 23(1): 116-119.[LUO Hong. Research on Environmental Pressure-Ressponse of Suzhou City Based on IPAT Model. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23(1): 116-119.]
[14] 吴璇, 李洪远. 孟伟庆. 基于IPAT模型的天津市经济增长与资源环境负荷分析[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2011(4): 39-43.[WU Xuan, LI Hong-yuan, MENG Wei-qing. The analysis between economic growth and resource-environment in Tianjin based on IPAT Model. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2011(4): 39-43.]
[15] 赵兴国, 潘玉君. 区域资源环境与经济发展关系的时空分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 706-714.[ZHAO Xing-guo, PAN Yu-jun. Temporal-spatial evolution of the relationship between resource-environment and economic development in China. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(6): 706-714.]
[16] 李孝坤, 韦杰. 重庆都市区环境压力与经济发展退耦研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1): 139-147.[LIXiao-kun, WEI Jie. Decoupling between Environmental pressures and economic growth in Chongqing Metropolitian Area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 139-147.]
[17] 李效顺, 曲福田, 郭忠兴. 城乡建设用地变化的脱钩研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(5): 179-184.[LI Xiao-shun, QU Fu-tian, GUO Zhong-xing. Decoupling study on the change of urban and rural construction land use. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(5): 179-184.]
[18] 黄宇驰. 长三角区域一体化发展趋势下的资源环境压力分析[J]. 上海环境科学, 2007(6): 248-251.[HUANG Yu-chi. An analysis on pressures on resources and environment under the integrated development trend in Yangtze Delta region. Shanghai Environmental Sciences, 2007(6): 248-251.]
[19] 唐琦, 虞孝感. 长江三角洲地区经济可持续发展问题初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 269-272.[TANG Qi, YU Xiao-gan, Problems in the economic sustainable development in the Yangtze River Delta. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(3): 269-272.]
[20] 赵鑫霈. 长三角城市群核心区域资源环境承载力研究. 中国地质大学, 2007.[ZHAO Xin-pei. Research on Environmental Bearing Capacity of the Core Region of Long Triangle Urban Agglomeration. China University of Geosciences, 2007.]
[21] 俞林, 徐立青. 长三角能源、环境与经济增长关系计量分析和比较[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2010, 25(4): 82-84.[YU Lin, XUN Li-qin. An analysis on resources-environment and economic growth. Journal of Yunnan Finance &Economic University, 2010, 25(4): 82-84.]
[22] 张蕾, 陈雯, 陈晓. 长江三角洲地区环境污染与经济增长的脱钩时空分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(3): 275-279.[ZHANG Lei, CHEN Wen, CHEN Xiao. Space-time analysis on delinkage between environmental pollution and economic growth in Yangtze Delta. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(3): 275-279.]
[23] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 375-390.
[24] IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories volumeⅡ. Japan: the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2008-07-20.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |