专题论坛

公共池塘资源可持续管理的理论框架

展开
  • 1. 北京大学 城市与环境学院, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871;
    2. 北京大学 深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室, 广东 深圳 518055

收稿日期: 2011-09-02

  修回日期: 2012-05-01

  网络出版日期: 2012-10-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41130534)。

Theoretical Framework for Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resource

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University; Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. The Key Laboratory for Environmental and Urban Sciences, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received date: 2011-09-02

  Revised date: 2012-05-01

  Online published: 2012-10-20

摘要

由于自然科学和社会科学的学科视角和研究方法各异,使得我们对公共池塘资源管理问题的理解不够系统和全面。论文在综述公共池塘资源和社会-生态系统管理理论的基础上,辨析了公共池塘资源和社会-生态系统的概念;从识别影响公共池塘资源可持续管理的变量出发,梳理了社会-生态系统分析框架的演变及其局限性,指出社会-生态系统可持续发展分析框架为地理学、 生态学、 经济学、 自然资源学、 社会学等学科的交流和融合提供了统一的平台,并为资源管理、 政策分析和案例比较分析等的理论和方法提供了新的研究思路。该框架对现阶段我国资源管理政策的制定有重要借鉴意义。

本文引用格式

王羊, 刘金龙, 冯喆, 李双成, 蔡运龙 . 公共池塘资源可持续管理的理论框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , (10) : 1797 -1807 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.10.017

Abstract

The world is currently threatened by considerable damage to or losses of many natural resources, including fisheries, lakes, and forests, as well as experiencing major reductions in biodiversity and the threat of massive climatic change. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems(SESs). Based on collective lectures about Common-Pool Resources(CPRs) management and Social-Ecological Systems(SESs) analysis framework, the concepts of CPRs and SESs were reviewed and analyzed. After identifying the variables which impact the sustainable development of CPRs, the paper presented the evolution and limitation of the framework for analyzing sustainability of SESs. Three stages were summarized, as the institutional analysis and development framework, the diagnostic framework and the framework for analyzing sustainability of SESs. The framework for analyzing sustainability of SESs provided a unified platform which is helpful for the integration of geography, ecology, economics, environmental science, sociology, and other disciplinary. And it also provided a variety of new methods and ways of thinking for resource management, policy analysis, comparative case analysis.

参考文献

[1] Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action [M]. Cambridge, M A: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[2] Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons [J]. Science, 1968, 162: 1243-1248.
[3] Dawes R M. The commons dilemma game: An N-person mixed-motive game with a dominating strategy for defection [J]. ORI Research Bulletin, 1973, 13: 1-12.
[4] Dawes R M. Formal models of dilemmas in social decision making // Kaplan M F, Schwartz S. Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and Mathematical Approaches. New York: Academic Press, 1975: 87-108.
[5] Ophuls W. Leviathan or oblivion // Daly H E. Toward a Steady State Economy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973: 215-230.
[6] Demsetz H. Toward a theory of property rights [J]. American Economic Review, 1967, 62: 347-359.
[7] Hardin G. Political requirements for preserving our common heritage //Bokaw H P. Wildlife and American. Washington D C: Council on Environmental Quality, 1978: 310-317.
[8] Smith R J. Resolving the tragedy of the commons by creating private property rights in wildlife [J]. CATO Journal, 1981, 1: 439-468.
[9] Field B C. The evolution of individual property rights in massachusetts agriculture, 17th-19th centuries [J]. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1984, 14: 97-109.
[10] Welch W P. The political feasibility of full ownership property rights: The cases of pollution and fisheries [J]. Policy Sciences, 1983, 16: 165-180.
[11] Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity [M]. Princeton University Press, 2005.
[12] Ostrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15181-15187.
[13] Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing the sustainability of social-ecological systems [J]. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 419-422.
[14] Samuelson P A. The pure theory of public expenditure [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954, 36(4): 387-389.
[15] Buchanan J M. An economic theory of clubs [J]. Economica, 1965, 32(125): 1-14.
[16] Ostrom V, Ostrom E. Public goods and public choices [M]//Emanuel S S. Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, 1977: 7-49.
[17] Ostrom E. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems [J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100: 641-672.
[18] Ostrom E, Burger J, Field C B, et al. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges [J]. Science, 1999, 284: 278-282.
[19] Feeny D, Berkes F, Mccay B J, et al. The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later [J]. Human Ecology, 1990, 8(1): 1-19.
[20] 埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆. 公共事物的治理之道[M]. 于逊达, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2000.[Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Translated by YU Xun-da. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Press, 2000.]
[21] Wade R. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India [M]. Oakland: ICS Press, 1994.
[22] Baland J M, Platteau J P. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? [M]. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1996.
[23] Agrawal A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J]. World Development, 2001, 29(10): 1649-1672.
[24] Agrawal A. Sustainable governance of common-pool resource: Context, methods, and politics [J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2003, 32: 243-262.
[25] Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás S V. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management [J]. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15(4): 38. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.
[26] Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
[27] Anderies J M, Janssen M A, Ostrom E. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective [J]. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9(1): 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18.
[28] Ostrom E, Janssen M A, Anderies J M. Going beyond panaceas [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15176-15178.
[29] Berkes F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15188-15193.
[30] Anderies J M, Rodriguez A A, Janssen M A, et al. Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15194-15199.
[31] Meinzen-Dick R. Beyond panaceas in water institutions [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15200-15205.
[32] Brock W A, Carpenter S R. Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15206-15211.
[33] Wilson J, Yan L Y, Wilson C. The precursors of governance in the maine lobster fishery [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15212-15217.
[34] Nagendra H. Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forests [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(39): 15218-15223.
[35] Lemos M, Agrawal A. Environmental governance [J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, 31: 297-325.
[36] Pomeroy R S, Katon B M, Harkes I. Conditions affecting the success of fisheries comanagement: Lessons from Asia [J]. Marine Policy, 2001, 25(3): 197-208.
[37] Young O R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2002.
[38] Berkes F. Commons theory for marine resource management in a complex world [J]. Senri Ethnological Studies, 2005, 67: 13-31.
[39] Berkes F. From community-based resource management to complex systems: The scale issue and marine commons [J]. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 45. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/.
[40] Young O R, Berkhout F, Gallopin G C, et al. The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 304-316.
[41] Mosse D. The symbolic making of a common property resource: History, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in South India [J]. Development and Change, 1997, 28(3): 467-504.
[42] Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I. Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management [J]. World Development, 1999, 27(2): 225-247.
[43] McCay B J. Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events //Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, et al. The Drama of the Commons. Washington D C: National Academy Press, 2002: 361-402.
[44] Johnson C. Uncommon ground: The "Poverty of History" in common property discourse [J]. Development and Change, 2004, 35: 407-433.
[45] Hotimsky S, Cobb R, Bond A. Contracts or scripts? A critical review of the application of institutional theories to the study of environmental change [J]. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 41. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art41/.
[46] Agrawal A. Common resources and institutional sustainability // Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, et al. The Drama of the Commons. Washington D C: National Academy Press, 2002: 41-86.
[47] Ostrom E, Ahn T K. Foundations of Social Capital [M]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2003.
[48] Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R, et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems [J]. Science, 2007, 317(14): 1513-1516.
[49] Paavola J, Adger W N. Institutional ecological economic [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 53: 353-368.
[50] Nowak M A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation [J]. Science, 2006, 314: 160-163.
[51] Bodin O, Crona B, Ernstson H. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structure perspective? [J]. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(2): r2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/.
[52] Bodin O, Crona B. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19: 366-374.
[53] Brondizio E S, Ostrom E, Young O R. Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: The role of social capital [J]. Annual Review of Environmental and Resources, 2009, 34: 253-278.
[54] Bijoor N, Li W J, Zhang Q, et al. Small-scale co-management for the sustainable use of Xilingol Biosphere Reserve, Inner Mongolia [J]. AMBIO, 2006, 35(1): 25-29.
[55] Li W J, Ali S, Zhang Q. Property rights and grassland degradation: A study of the Xilingol Pasture, Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 85: 461-470.
文章导航

/