资源生态

自然保护区聚落空间格局与演变的梯度效应——以贵州茂兰为例

展开
  • 1. 贵州师范学院 地理与旅游学院, 贵阳 550018;
    2. 贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院, 贵阳 550001;
    3. 中国科学院 地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵阳 550002;
    4. 贵州师范学院 资源环境与灾害研究所, 贵阳 550018

收稿日期: 2011-07-23

  修回日期: 2011-12-18

  网络出版日期: 2012-08-20

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2006CB403200);教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-05-0819);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(11YJCZH120)。

The Gradient Effect of Spatial Patterns and Evolution of Settlement in Nature Reserves—A Case Study in Maolan, Guizhou

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography and Tourism, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550018, China;
    2. School of Geographic and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;
    3. National Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Geochemistry Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China;
    4. Resources-Environmentand Disaster Institute, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550018, China

Received date: 2011-07-23

  Revised date: 2011-12-18

  Online published: 2012-08-20

摘要

研究自然保护区人类活动动态状况,对于加强自然保护区建设与管理具有重要意义。研究以三期高分辨率遥感影像为数据源,运用GIS技术和景观指数定量分析方法,分析了茂兰国家级自然保护区自1963年以来聚落(人类活动的中心场所)空间格局演变的梯度效应。结果表明:①在自然保护区自核心区到外围区,聚落规模、等级、形态等格局信息及其动态演变的梯度效应明显;②根据不同梯度区聚落空间格局演变及其对土地覆盖的影响特点,今后茂兰保护区规划管理应该考虑将洞多聚落迁出,使其不对核心区自然环境造成影响。同时,要加大对实验区聚落用地的管理力度,尽量减少人类活动对原生生态系统的不良影响;③设立保护区后,自核心区到外围区,景观多样性降低,土地利用综合程度指数变化进一步接近200,景观基质(森林)斑块增多,生态环境明显改善;④应加强保护区缓冲区距聚落200~800 m内的土地利用方式管理与生态建设。

本文引用格式

罗光杰, 李阳兵, 王世杰, 罗绪强 . 自然保护区聚落空间格局与演变的梯度效应——以贵州茂兰为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , 27(8) : 1327 -1339 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.08.007

Abstract

To study the dynamic status of human activities in nature reserves is of great significance to the construction and management of natural reserves. This study, taking three high-resolution remote sensing images as data source, and using GIS technology and landscape indices quantitative analysis method, analyzes the gradient effect of the space patterns and evolution of settlement (the central place of human activities) in the Maolan National Nature Reserve since 1963. The results show that: 1) In the Nature Reserve, from the core zone to the peripheral zone, the gradient effect of settlement size, grade and shape and its dynamic evolution is obvious. In the core zone of the Nature Reserve, the extent of settlements change has been generally small in the three periods; in the buffer zone of the Nature Reserve, changes of settlements area and shape were obviously different before and after 1987 (the establishment of the Nature Reserve), in the previous stage settlement increased largely and shape was regular, and the settlement area and the space shapes are in steady state after 1987; in the experimental zone, settlements area first decreased and then increased, the number and the degree of irregular shape of settlements have always increased, the spatial variation occurs mainly in smaller, lower-rank settlements; in the peripheral zone, since the establishment of the Nature Reserve, the settlements have expanded significantly, the rank has markedly increased, the shape tends to be irregular. 2) The adverse effects of environment from settlement is small in the core zone of the Nature Reserve, but that cannot be ignored; after establishing of the Nature Reserve, because of human activities being more restricted, human activity has released in the peripheral zone, settlements in the peripheral zone, the proportion that the land of degradation settlements transferring as arable land has largely increased (the rate of the area transferred (R) was 66.66), and the proportion of new settlements (occupied arable land) has reduced. 3) According to the characteristics of the evolution of spatial patterns of settlement and its impact on land cover in different gradient zones, for not affecting the natural environment in the core zone, the future planning and management in the Maolan Nature Reserve should consider to move out the Dongduo settlement. Meanwhile, the management for settlement land should be enhanced in the experimental zone to minimize the adverse effects of human activities on native ecosystems. 4) After the establishment of the Nature Reserve, from the core zone to the peripheral zone, landscape diversity decreased and the land use comprehensive index is closer to 200, the landscape matrix (forest) patches increased significantly and the ecological environment improved obviously. 5) The management of land use and ecological construction within 200-800 m away from the settlement in the buffer zone of the Nature Reserve should be strengthened.

参考文献

[1] 万绪才, 朱应皋, 吴芙蓉. 自然保护区生态旅游开发与规划研究[J]. 农村生态环境, 2004, 20(3): 15-19.
[2] 中华人民共和国自然保护区条例第二条. http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2005-09/27/content_70636. htm, 2005/2011-12-13.
[3] Hansen A J, DeFries R. Land use change around nature reserves: Implications for sustaining biodiversity [J]. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17(4): 972-973.
[4] Oberholster P J, Botha A M, Cloete T E. Biological and chemical evaluation of sewage water pollution in the Rietvlei nature reserve wetland area, South Africa [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 156(1): 184-192.
[5] William G, Fareed K, Mohammed Y. Development and management of a network of marine protected areas in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region [J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2003, 46: 741-761.
[6] Zabortseva T I, Yevstronpieva O V. Current socio-ecological problems of recreational development of Pribaikalsky National Park [J]. Geography and Natural Resources, 2009, 30(4): 359-366.
[7] 聂勇, 张镱锂, 刘林山, 等. 近30年珠穆朗玛峰国家自然保护区冰川变化的遥感监测[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(1): 13-28.
[8] 张艳红, 刘兆礼, 邓伟, 等. 向海自然保护区鹤类生境优化水位的模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(2): 263-270.
[9] 胡冰冰, 李后魂, 梁之聘, 等. 八仙山自然保护区蝴蝶群落多样性及区系组成[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12): 3226-3238.
[10] 李晓鸿. 甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区生物多样性研究[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 2009.
[11] 权佳, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 等. 中国自然保护区管理有效性的现状评价与对策[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(7): 1739-1746.
[12] 李燕琴, 蔡运龙. 北京市生态旅游者的行为特征调查与分析——以百花山自然保护区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2004, 23(6): 863-874.
[13] Zheng C G, Zhu C. Present conditions and prospects of the researches on nature reserves in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(9): 79-86.
[14] 刘洪鹄, 刘宪春, 赵晓辉. 东北漫岗区村落的分布特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(1): 15-19.
[15] 陈国阶, 方一平, 陈勇, 等. 中国山区发展报告——中国山区聚落研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007.
[16] 陈勇, 陈国阶. 对乡村聚落生态研究中若干基本概念的认识[J]. 农村生态环境, 2002, 18(1): 54-57.
[17] 金其铭. 农村聚落地理[M], 北京: 科学出版社, 1988.
[18] Yan D X. Rock desertification in the subtropical karst of South China [J]. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 1997, 108: 81-90.
[19] 王世杰, 李阳兵, 李瑞玲. 喀斯特石漠化的形成背景、演化与治理[J]. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(6): 657-666.
[20] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 全国自然保护区统计表(截止2007年底). http://sts.mep.gov.cn/zrbhq/zrbhq/200811/t20081117_131296.htm,2008/2011-06-04.[Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. National Nature Reserve Statistics (end of 2007). http://sts.mep.gov.cn/zrbhq/zrbhq/200811/t20081117_131296. htm, 2008/2011-06-04.]
[21] 周政贤. 茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1987.
[22] 王世杰, 卢红梅, 周运超, 等. 茂兰喀斯特原始森林土壤有机碳的空间变异性与代表性土样采集方法[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(3): 475-483.
[23] 龙翠玲. 茂兰喀斯特森林林隙物种多样性的动态规律[J]. 山地学报, 2009, 27(3): 278-284.
[24] 李阳兵, 王世杰, 周德全. 茂兰岩溶森林的生态服务研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2005, 33(2): 39-44.
[25] 苏维词, 李坡, 贺卫, 等. 贵州茂兰喀斯特森林自然保护区的生态旅游[J]. 中国岩溶, 2001, 20(1): 64-68.
[26] Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region [J]. Economic Geography, 1970, 46(2): 234-240.
[27] 邬建国. 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[28] 刘昕, 国庆喜. 基于移动窗口法的中国东北地区景观格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(6): 1415-1422.
[29] 宋开山, 刘殿伟, 王宗明, 等. 1954 年以来三江平原土地利用变化及驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(1): 93-104.
[30] Li Y B, Luo G J, Wang S J, et al. Comparison of ecological significance of landscape diversity changes in Karst mountains //2010 International Conference on Combating Land Degradation in Agricultural Areas. Springer, 2010: 161-165.
文章导航

/