资源利用与管理

建设用地扩张与碳排放效应的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证

展开
  • 1. 南京大学 国土资源与旅游学系, 南京 210093;
    2. 国土资源部 土地利用重点实验室, 北京 100029

收稿日期: 2011-07-10

  修回日期: 2010-09-02

  网络出版日期: 2012-05-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目"基于知识表示与推理的城乡用地空间格局演变与优化研究——以苏锡常地区为例"(40871255);南京大学研究生科研创新基金项目"快速城市化地区土地利用覆被变化的大气效应及其规划应用"(2010CL12)。

Hypothesis and Validation on the Kuznets Curve of Construction Land Expansion and Carbon Emission Effect

Expand
  • 1. Department of Land Resources and Tourism Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Land Use, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100029, China

Received date: 2011-07-10

  Revised date: 2010-09-02

  Online published: 2012-05-20

摘要

论文基于无锡市1996—2008年的土地利用和能源消耗数据,分析了无锡市13 a间建设用地扩张及碳排放特征,并构建了建设用地比例与碳排放强度之间的库兹涅茨曲线模型,对无锡市建设用地扩张与碳排放效应之间的相关关系进行了实证研究,尝试验证库兹涅茨曲线在建设用地扩张与碳排放强度之间的存在性。结果表明:①建设用地总量在1996—2008年间迅速增长,绝对增长量44 032.97 hm2,且除了农村居民点逐渐下降以外,其余地类均呈逐年增长态势,无锡市1996—2008年间的碳排放基本上也呈现逐年增长趋势,绝对增长量1 936.38×104 t;②建设用地总量与碳排放强度之间呈倒U型曲线关系,即随着建设用地扩张至拐点后,碳排放强度则逐渐下降,且拐点位于建设用地比例1.91%附近,但是目前仅仅刚开始出现拐点的迹象,表明目前无锡市建设用地扩张还未完全达到集约及精明增长的标准,建设用地扩张对碳排放而言仍然具有较强的推动作用,但是可以预见,随着产业结构调整和能源技术的提高,碳排放强度会逐渐进入下降的阶段;③城市用地与碳排放强度之间为三次曲线关系,建制镇用地、农村居民点用地与碳排放强度之间分别为正相关和负相关线性关系,其他建设用地与碳排放强度之间则存在一种不明显的库兹涅茨曲线关系。建设用地地类组成的不同会导致不同形态的库兹涅茨曲线,由于城市用地和建制镇用地对碳排放具有明显的驱动作用,其比例的提高亦会促使库兹涅茨曲线更加陡峭,并延缓库兹涅茨曲线拐点的到来。

本文引用格式

张润森, 濮励杰, 文继群, 许艳 . 建设用地扩张与碳排放效应的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , (5) : 723 -733 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.002

Abstract

On the basis of the data on land use and energy consumption in Wuxi City during the course of 13 years from 1996 to 2008, this paper carries out an empirical research into the relationship between construction land expansion and carbon emission effect in Wuxi City by means of not only pointing up the characteristics of construction land expansion and carbon emission but also setting up Kuznets curve model of construction land rate as well as carbon emission intensity to try to verify the beingness of Kuznets curve between construction land expansion and carbon emission intensity. As shown in the result: 1) Construction land increased sharply by 44032.97 hm2 from 1996 to 2008, and all of the land use types presented a year-by-year increasing tendency except rural settlements decreased year by year. Generally speaking, carbon emission in Wuxi City from 1996 to 2008 also presented a year-by-year increasing tendency, with an increment of 1936.38?104 t. 2) The relationship between gross construction land and carbon emission intensity presents an inverted "U-shaped" curve, that is to say, when construction land expands to the inflexion point which turns up around at construction land rate 1.91%, carbon emission intensity will decrease gradually. The inflexion point just emerges for the moment which shows that construction land expansion in Wuxi City has not reached the standard of intensive and smart growth and it still drives carbon emission to increase. However, it is foreseeable that carbon emission intensity will decrease gradually with industrial restructuring and energy technological advancement. 3) The relationship between carbon emission intensity and urban land shows cubic curve; the relationships between carbon emission intensity and town land as well as rural settlements respectively form positive and negative linear ones. An unobvious Kuznets curve exists between other construction land and carbon emission intensity. Different compositions of construction land types cause different shapes of Kuznets curve. Because urban land and town land have an obvious driving force on carbon emission, the increase of rate will cause the Kuznets curve more steeply, and delay the arrival of inflexion point of Kuznets curve.

参考文献

[1] 顾朝林, 谭纵波, 韩春强. 气候变化与低碳城市规划[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社, 2009.[GU Chao-lin, TAN Zong-bo, HAN Chun-qiang. Climate Change and Low-Carbon Urban Planning. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2009.]
[2] 顾朝林, 谭纵波, 刘宛, 等. 气候变化、碳排放与低碳城市规划研究进展[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2009(3): 38-45.[GU Chao-lin, TAN Zong-bo, LIU Wan, et al. A study on climate change, carbon emissions and low-carbon city planning. Urban Planning Forum, 2009(3): 38-45.]
[3] Kuznets S. Economic growth and income equality [J]. American Economic Review, 1955, 45(1): 1-28.
[4] Grossman G, Krueger A. Economic growth and the environment [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(2):353-337.
[5] Masaaki Kijima, Katsumasa Nishide, Atsuyuki Ohyama. Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2010, 34: 1187-1201.
[6] Jie He, Patrick Richard. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1083-1093.
[7] Hiroki Iwata, Keisuke Okada, Sovannroeun Samreth. Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: The role of nuclear energy [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38: 4057-4063.
[8] 林伯强, 蒋竺君. 中国二氧化碳的环境库兹涅茨曲线预测及影响因素分析[J]. 管理世界, 2009(4): 27-36.[LIN Bo-qiang, JIANG Zhu-jun. CO2environmental Kuznets Curve forecasting and analysis of influencing factors of China. Management World, 2009(4): 27-36.]
[9] 刘扬, 陈劭锋. 基于IPAT方程的典型发达国家经济增长与碳排放关系研究[J]. 生态经济, 2009(11): 28-30.[LIU Yang, CHEN Shao-feng. Study on the relationship between economic growth and carbon emission in typical developed countries based on IPAT Equation. Ecological Economy, 2009(11): 28-30.]
[10] IPCC, OECD, IEA. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Green House Gas Inventories [R]. IPCC, Bracknell, 1996, Vol 21.
[11] Cai Zucong, Kang Guoding, Tsuruta H, et al. Estimate of CH4 emissions from year-round flooded rice field during rice growing season in China [J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(1): 66-71.
[12] 何勇. 中国气候、陆地生态系统碳循环研究[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006.[HE Yong. Research on China’s Climate and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2006.]
[13] 方精云, 过兆迪, 朴世龙等. 1981—2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J]. 中国科学D辑, 2007, 37(6): 804-812.[FANG Jing-yun, GUO Zhao-di, PIAO Shi-long. Carbon sink estimation of terrestrial vegetation in China: 1981-2000. Science in China Series D, 2007, 37(6): 804-812.]
[14] 徐国泉, 刘则渊, 姜照华. 中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析: 1995—2004[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(6): 158-161.[XU Guo-quan, LIU Ze-yuan, JIANG Zhao-hua. Decomposition model and empirical study of carbon emissions for China, 1995-2004. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(6): 158-161.]
[15] 张秀梅, 李升峰, 黄贤金, 等. 江苏省1996年至2007年碳排放效应及时空格局分析[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(4): 768-775.[ZHANG Xiu-mei, LI Sheng-feng, HUANG Xian-jin, et al. Effects of carbon emissions and their spatio-temporal patterns in Jiangsu Province from 1996 to 2007. Resources Science, 2010, 32(4): 768-775.]
[16] 李颖, 黄贤金, 甄峰. 江苏省区域不同土地利用方式的碳排放效应分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(增刊2): 102-107.[LI Ying, HUANG Xian-jin, ZHEN Feng. Effects of land use patterns on carbon emission in Jiangsu Province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(Supp2): 102-107.]
[17] 桂小丹, 李慧明. 环境库兹涅茨曲线实证研究进展[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(3): 5-8.[GUI Xiao-dan, LI Hui-ming. Empirical study of environmental Kuznets Curve. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(3): 5-8.]
[18] 陈勇, 冯永忠, 杨改河. 农业非点源污染源的环境库兹涅茨曲线实证研究——基于陕西省农业投入和废弃物排放的研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(3): 191-198.[CHEN Yong, FENG Yong-zhong, YANG Gai-he. Empirical study on environmental Kuznets Curve of non-point source pollution—A case study of agricultural input and agricultural waste’s output in Shaanxi Province. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2010, 28(3): 191-198.]
[19] 吴玉鸣. 广西生态足迹与能源消费的库兹涅茨曲线分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(11): 30-35.[WU Yu-ming. Kuznets Curve analysis of Guangxi ecological footprint and energy consumption. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20 (11): 30-35.]
文章导航

/