资源利用与管理

经济发展与城市蔓延的Logistic曲线假说及其验证——基于华东地区典型城市的考察

展开
  • 1. 中国矿业大学 江苏省资源环境信息工程重点实验室, 江苏 徐州 221116;
    2. 南京农业大学 中国土地问题研究中心, 南京 210095

收稿日期: 2011-09-21

  修回日期: 2011-11-04

  网络出版日期: 2012-05-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(71103182,70833001);中国博士后基金面上一等资助项目(2011M500098);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金和中国矿业大学高层次人才引进及青年教师启航计划项目(2011QNA01);江苏省社科基金项目(10JD019);江苏高校优势学科建设工程"测绘科学与技术学科";大学生实践创新训练计划项目(S111029019)。

Hypothesis and Validation on the Logistic Curve of Economic Development and Urban Sprawl —Based on the Investigation of the Typical Cities in East China

Expand
  • 1. The Key Laboratories of Resources Environment and Information Engineering in Jiangsu Province, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
    2. China Center for Land Policy Research, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received date: 2011-09-21

  Revised date: 2011-11-04

  Online published: 2012-05-20

摘要

经济发展与城市蔓延一直是学者研究的热点,其假说大都建立在发展与保护矛盾不断激化的基础之上,论文基于国内外城市发展轨迹的判断,提出新的研究假说:经济发展与城市蔓延存在Logistic曲线关系,并选择华东地区典型城市进行实证检验。结果表明:第一,国外(区域)经济发展由快速城市化、工业化初级阶段过渡到高级或后工业化阶段进程中,对城市蔓延扩张的依赖程度逐渐减弱;第二,中国1978—2003年间经济发展与城市蔓延增长具有周期性波动特征,2003年以后两者波动出现明显脱钩或分歧;第三,实证结果显示,上海、南京、无锡和徐州的第二三产业GDP在分别达到2.91×1011、1.02×1011、4.43×1010、9.42×1010元时,城市蔓延扩张出现拐点,验证了研究假说,其规模上限分别为8.99×104、6.01×104、2.20×104、3.43×104 hm2。研究结论能够为我国城市蔓延治理和公共政策调整提供科学依据和直接参考。

本文引用格式

李效顺, 曲福田, 陈友偲, 牟守国 . 经济发展与城市蔓延的Logistic曲线假说及其验证——基于华东地区典型城市的考察[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , (5) : 713 -722 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.001

Abstract

Economic development and urban sprawl have been the scholar’s research hot spot, and the hypothesis is mostly based on the contradiction of the development and protection. This paper, based on the development track of cities at home and abroad, puts forward the new research perspective judgment. There is the Logistic curve between economic development and urban sprawl, and then the authors select the typical cities in East China for empirical test. As the results show: First, economic growth’dependence on urban sprawl weakened gradually abroad from the rapid urbanization, industrialization primary phase transiting to the senior or after the process of industrialization stage. Second, China’s economic growth and urban sprawl has periodical fluctuating characteristics from 1978 to 2003, and there have been significant decoupling or different fluctuations since 2003. Third, the empirical results show that turning points would come in urban sprawl when the secondary。 and tertiary industry GDP of Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuxi and Xuzhou achieved respectively 2.91×1011yuan, 1.02×1011 yuan, 4.43×1010 yuan and 9.42×1010 yuan, and this verified the hypothesis that the scale cap would be 8.99×104 hm2, 6.01×104 hm2, 2.20×104 hm2 and 3.43×104 hm2. Research conclusion can provide scientific basis and the direct reference for the management of urban sprawl and public policy adjustment in China.

参考文献

[1] 李郇, 陈刚强, 许学强. 中国城市异速增长分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 399-407.[LI Xun, CHEN Gang-qiang, XU Xue-qiang. Urban algometric growth in China: Theory and facts. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 399-407.]
[2] 曲福田, 陈江龙, 陈会广. 经济发展与中国土地非农化[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007.[QU Fu-tian, CHEN Jiang-long, CHEN Hui-guang. Economic Development and Farmland Conversion. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2007.]
[3] 马荣华, 顾朝林, 蒲英霞, 等. 苏南沿江城镇扩展的空间模式及其测度[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(10): 1011-1022.[MA Rong-hua, GU Chao-lin, PU Ying-xia, et al. Urban spatial sprawl pattern and metrics in south of Jiangsu Province along the Yangtze River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(10): 1011-1022.]
[4] 刘卫东, 谭韧膘. 杭州城市蔓延评估体系及其治理对策[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 417-425.[LIU Wei-dong, TAN Ren-biao. Evaluation system and control mechanism of urban sprawl: A case study of Hangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 417-425.]
[5] 姚士谋, 冯长春, 等. 中国城镇化及其资源环境基础[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.[YAO Shi-mao, FENG Chang-chun, et al. China’s Urbanization and the Foundation of Resource Environment. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.]
[6] 李效顺, 曲福田, 谭荣, 等. 中国耕地资源变化与保护研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(3): 387-401.[LI Xiao-shun, QU Fu-tian, TAN Rong, et al. Research on the variations and protection of the cropland in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(3): 387-401.]
[7] 曲福田, 冯淑怡, 诸培新, 等. 制度安排、价格机制与农地非农化研究[J]. 经济学: 季刊, 2004, 4(1): 229-248.[QU Fu-tian, FENG Shu-yi, ZHU Pei-xin, et al. Instituting arrangements, price system and farmland conversion. China Economic Quarterly, 2004, 4(1): 229-248.]
[8] 谭荣, 曲福田. 中国农地非农化与农地资源保护: 从两难到双赢[J]. 管理世界, 2006(12): 50-59.[TAN Rong, QU Fu-tian. Farmland conversion and protection: From dilemma to win-win situation. Management World, 2006(12): 50-59.]
[9] 吴业, 杨桂山, 万荣荣. 耕地变化与社会经济发展关系研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(1): 90-98.[WU Ye, YANG Gui-shan, WAN Rong-rong. Advances in researches on relations between cultivated land change and socio-economic development. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(1): 90-98.]
[10] 许坚. 土地开发利用与区域经济增长[J]. 中国土地科学, 2007, 21(5): 75-78.[XU Jian. Land exploitation and utilization and regional economic growth. China Land Science, 2007, 21(5): 75-78.]
[11] Arnott R J, Lewis F D. The transition of land to urban use [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1979, 87(1): 161-169.
[12] 李海鹏, 叶慧, 张俊飚. 中国收入差距与耕地非农化关系的实证研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2006, 20(5): 7-12.[LI Hai-peng, YE Hui, ZHANG Jun-biao. Study on the relationship between the income disparity and cultivated land conversion in China: Extensions of cultivated land Kuznets Curve. China Land Science, 2006, 20(5): 7-12.]
[13] 曲福田, 吴丽梅. 经济增长与耕地非农化的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(5): 62-67.[QU Fu-tian, WU Li-mei. Hypothesis and validation on the Kuznets Curves of economic growth and farmland conversion. Resources Science, 2004, 26(5): 62-67.]
[14] 姜海, 夏燕榕, 曲福田. 建设用地扩张对经济增长的贡献及其区域差异研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(8): 4-8.[JIANG Hai, XIA Yan-rong, QU Fu-tian. Study on contribution of construction land expansion to economic growth and its regional difference. China Land Science, 2009, 23(8): 4-8.]
[15] 钟太洋, 黄贤金, 王柏源. 经济增长与建设用地扩张的脱钩分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1): 18-20.[ZHONG Tai-yang, HUANG Xian-jin, WANG Bai-yuan. On the degrees of decoupling and re-coupling of economic growth and expansion of construction land in China from 2002 to 2007. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 18-20.]
[16] 曲福田, 陈江龙, 冯淑怡. 经济发展与土地持续性利用[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2001.[QU Fu-tian, CHEN Jiang-long, FENG Shu-yi. Economic Development and Sustainable Land Use. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2001.]
[17] 张琦. 韩国工业化推进过程中的土地利用与经济发展关系分析研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(3): 81-84.[ZHANG Qi. Analysis research on relationship between land use and economic development in process of industrialization advancement in South Korean. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(3): 81-84.]
[18] Le Gallo J. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach [J]. International Regional Science Review, 2004, 27(2): 138-163.
[19] Aroca P, Bosch M, Maloney W F. Spatial dimensions of trade liberalization and economic convergence: Mexico 1985-2002 [J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 2005, 19: 345-378.
[20] 李效顺, 张绍良, 汪应宏. 中国经济转型阶段建设用地增长极限计量研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(7): 1085-1095.[LI Xiao-shun, ZHANG Shao-liang, WANG Ying-hong. Quantitative study of construction land increase limit year in the economic transition stage in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(7): 1085-1095.]
[21] 徐荣辉. 逻辑斯蒂方程及其应用[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2010, 32(2): 311-312.[XU Rong-hui. Logistic equation and its application. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 2010, 32(2): 311-312.]
[22] 田光进, 庄大方. 90年代中国城镇用地动态变化的遥感监测[J]. 资源科学, 2003, 25(3): 77-82.[TIAN Guang-jin, ZHUANG Da-fang. Monintoring on urban land dynamic change in China in 1990s using remote sensing. Resources Science, 2003, 25(3): 77-82.]
[23] Hasse J. A geospatial approach to measuring new development tracts for characteristics of sprawl [J]. Landscape Journal, 2004 (23): 52-67.
[24] David C Soule. Defining and managing sprawl [C]// Soule D C. Urban Sprawl: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Westport C T: Greenwood Press, 2006.
[25] Anke D Leroux, John Creedy. Optimal land conversion and growth with uncertain biodiversity costs [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2): 542-549.
文章导航

/