资源生态

安徽省会经济圈土地利用变化的碳排放效益

展开
  • 皖西学院 资源环境与旅游管理学院, 安徽 六安 237012
孙贤斌(1970- ),男,安徽含山人,副教授,博士,主要从事资源生态与GIS应用研究。E-mail: sunxb98@126.com

收稿日期: 2011-05-05

  修回日期: 2011-07-08

  网络出版日期: 2012-03-20

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(11YJA790134);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK09-10D185);安徽省人文地理学重点学科建设项目(皖西学院)。

Effects of Carbon Emission by Land Use Patterns in Hefei's Economic Circle of Anhui Province

Expand
  • College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Wanxi University, Lu'an 237012, China

Received date: 2011-05-05

  Revised date: 2011-07-08

  Online published: 2012-03-20

摘要

土地利用变化是影响碳排放的重要因素。利用1997和2007年土地利用类型数据,采用碳排放评价模型,对安徽省会经济圈碳排放效益进行评价,并估算碳排放生态补偿标准。研究结果显示:①1997—2007年间碳排放总量增加1 049.92×104 t,年均增长14.4%;②2007年经济圈内地均建设用地碳排放强度和地均碳排放强度分别为1997年的2.41倍、 2.18倍,1997和2007年,碳排放强度指数值都是合肥市>巢湖市>六安市;③经济圈内各县(区)地均碳排放强度差异显著,建设用地平均碳排放强度前3位的是合肥市区、 霍山县、 金寨县;④据中国造林成本的价格估算,合肥、 巢湖、 六安3市的碳汇补偿增加量分别为:21.83×108、 4.31×108、 2.48×108元,县域生态补偿额差异显著;⑤土地利用结构、 产业结构与碳排放量存在一定的关系。从碳排放效益和生态补偿的角度,提出减少碳排放的途径。

本文引用格式

孙贤斌 . 安徽省会经济圈土地利用变化的碳排放效益[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , 27(3) : 394 -401 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.005

Abstract

Land use change is an important factor for carbon emission. According to the assessment model and by using the Landsat TM data separately acquired in 1997 and 2007 on the economic circle of Hefei, the provincial capital of Anhui, the authors utilized data of land use types such as cultivated land, woodland, grassland and land for construction in 1997 and 2007 to calculate carbon emissions and the compensation standard based on price of fixation carbon dioxide. The results shows: 1) Carbon emissions greatly varied over different land use types, in which the land for construction and cultivated land were considered as two major carbon sources. Woodland and grassland were two major carbon sinks. Carbon emissions were found to increase by 14.4% per year over the entire economic circle of Hefiei from 1997 to 2007. Carbon emissions increased most quickly in the city, with an average annual growth rate of 32.3% during the ten years. With more impacts of human activities, carbon emission from land for construction was the highest, increased from 7.4587 million tons in 1997 to 17.9409 million tons in 2007. However, carbon sink maintained generally stable during this period. 2) Two indexes describing carbon emissions, i.e., carbon emission per unit area of land and carbon emission per unit area of construction land, were proposed. These two indexes could better reflect carbon emission intensity from 1997 to 2007 and the differences among the regions. Compared with carbon emission intensity in 1997, the two indexes increased by 1.18 and 1.41 times in 2007, respectively. Carbon emissions peaked in Hefei city, and showed a relatively higher level in Chaohu city and a low level in Lu'an city, and the index of carbon emission per unit area of land and construction land indicated the same changing trend. 3) Carbon emission per unit area of land was markedly different in 15 counties or urban areas, and the three largest ones per unit area of construction land are urban area of Hefei city, Huoshan and Jinzhai counties. 4) On the basis of carbon emission and price of fixation carbon dioxide over the provincial city economic circle during the period 1997-2007, the value of the standard for ecological compensation in three cities was estimated. Based on average cost of tree planting in China, an increasing amount of the compensation standard for the three cities was 2.183, 0.431 and 0.248 billion yuan respectively, and the amount of compensation standard was different among counties or urban areas. 5)There was certain relationship between land use structure and carbon emissions. Some suggestions for reducing carbon emissions were put forward.

参考文献

[1] 张林波,李伟涛,王维,等.基于GIS的城市最小生态用地空间分析模型研究——以深圳市为例[J].自然资源学报, 2008,23(1):69-78. [2] Malczewski J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview [J]. Progress in Planning,2004,62:3-65. [3] LIU Yan-sui, WANG Jie-yong, GUO Li-ying. GIS-Based assessment of land suitability for optimal allocation in the Qinling Mountains, China [J]. Pedosphere,2006,16(5):579-586. [4] Sharareh Pourebrahim, Mehrdad Hadipour, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar. Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land use planning in coastal areas: Case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor, Malaysia [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011(101):84-97. [5] Kalogirou S. Expert systems and GIS: An application of land suitability evaluation [J]. Computers Environment and Urban Systems,2002(26):89-112. [6] Rajesh Bahadur Thapa, Yuji Murayama. Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques: A case study of Hanoi [J]. Land Use Policy,2008, 25: 225-239. [7] Wandahwa P, van Ranst E. Qualitative land suitability assessment for pyrethrum cultivation in west Kenya based upon computer-captured expert knowledge and GIS [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment,1996, 56: 187-202. [8] Saswati Mukhopadhyay, Vadakepuram Chacko Joy. Influence of leaf litter types on microbial functions and nutrient status of soil: Ecological suitability of forest trees for afforestation in tropical laterite wastelands [J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2010, 42: 2306-2315. [9] Store R, Kangas J. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modeling [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55(2):79-93. [10] Liu Jie, Ye Jing, Yang Wang, et al. Environmental impact assessment of land use planning in Wuhan City based on ecological suitability analysis [J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010, 2: 185-191. [11] Joan Marull, Joan Pino, Josep Maria Mallarach, et al. A land suitability index for strategic environmental assessment in metropolitan areas [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007, 81: 200-212. [12] Pham Duc Uy, Nobukazu Nakagoshi. Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban green space planning in Hanoi, Vietnam [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2008,7(1): 25-40. [13] 杨少俊,刘孝富,舒俭民.城市土地生态适宜性评价理论与方法[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(1):380-385. [14] Miller W, Collins W M G, Steiner F R, et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1998,42(2/4):91-105. [15] Westman W E. Ecological Impact Assessment and Environmental Planning [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985. [16] 刘康,李团胜.生态规划——理论、方法与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004:7-55. [17] 陈绪冬,李剑,陈眉舞,等.基于损益分析的城市用地生态适宜性评价研究——以福建长汀为例[J].规划师,2008, 24(7):86-90. [18] 周建飞,曾光明,黄国和,等.基于不确定性的城市扩展用地生态适宜性评价[J].生态学报,2007,27(2): 774-783. [19] 刘孝富,舒俭民,张林波.最小累积阻力模型在城市土地生态适宜性评价中的应用——以厦门为例[J].生态学报, 2010,30(2):421-428. [20] 宗跃光,王蓉,汪成刚,等.城市建设用地生态适宜性评价的潜力-限制性分析——以大连城市化区为例[J].地理研究,2007,26(6):1117-1127. [21] 李德清,李洪兴.变权决策中变权效果分析与状态变权向量的确定[J].控制与决策,2004,19(11):1241-1245. [22] LI Hong-xing, LI Ling-xia, WANG Jia-yin, et al. Fuzzy decision making based on variable weights [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2004,39: 163-179. [23] 汪培庄.模糊集与随机集落影[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985. [24] 李洪兴.因素空间理论与知识表示的数学框架(IX)[J].模糊系统与数学,1996,10(3):12-19. [25] 姚炳学,李洪兴.局部变权的公理体系[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000(1):106-110. [26] 龚建周,夏北成,陈健飞.快速城市化区域生态安全的空间模糊综合评价——以广州市为例[J].生态学报,2008, 28(10):4992-5011. [27] 顾彭涛,邱金波,许保桐,等.太仓—奉贤北西向活动断裂带及其地震地质意义初探[J].上海地质,1990(3): 1-6. [28] 陈燕飞,杜鹏飞,郑筱津,等.基于GIS的南宁市建设用地生态适宜性评价[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2006, 46(6):801-804. [29] 朱虹.基于GIS的工业园土地生态适宜性评价研究.大连:大连理工大学,2007. [30] 杜栋,庞庆华.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005. [31] Kaufmann M, Tobias S, Schulin R. Quality evaluation of restored soils with a fuzzy logic expert system [J]. Geoderma,2009,151:290-302.
文章导航

/