资源利用与管理

三工河流域油料作物的农户种植意愿影响因素分析——基于Logistic模型和240户农户微观调查数据

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 新疆生态与地理研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    2. 新疆师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院, 乌鲁木齐 830054;
    3. 新疆维吾尔自治区发展和改革委员会 地区处, 乌鲁木齐 830000
朱慧(1985- ),女,新疆石河子人,硕士研究生,主要从事区域经济发展、 干旱区绿洲农业研究。E-mail:zhh124@sina.cn

收稿日期: 2011-04-13

  修回日期: 2011-08-31

  网络出版日期: 2012-03-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40801065);中国科学院"西部博士资助项目"(XBBS200803);新疆师范大学研究生科技创新活动基金。

Analysis on Decision-making Mechanism of Farmer Household in Sangong River Watershed on Logistic Model

Expand
  • 1. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,CAS,Urumqi 830011,China;
    2. School of Geographic Science and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi 830054,China;
    3. Development and Reform Commission, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 30000,China

Received date: 2011-04-13

  Revised date: 2011-08-31

  Online published: 2012-03-20

摘要

论文以新疆三工河流域27个行政村(连队)240户农户的调查数据为基础,通过建立农户种植油料作物意愿和各自变量的Logistic回归计量模型,从家庭特征因素、 资源禀赋因素、 家庭经济因素和其他因素四大方面分析了农户对油料作物种植意愿的影响因素。研究表明:家庭总人口、 对农业技术服务的态度与农户的种植意愿呈正相关关系,且对农业技术服务的态度标准化系数更大,影响更显著;常年从事农业劳动人数、 户主文化水平和地块位置与之呈反相关关系,且户主文化水平的标准化系数更大,影响更显著。但是反映土地投入、 种地收入以及人均收入没有通过检验,不能得出这几个变量与农户种植油料作物意愿之间的关系。文章最后探讨了兵地差异对农户种植意愿的影响及研究展望。

本文引用格式

朱慧, 张新焕, 焦广辉, 王哲 . 三工河流域油料作物的农户种植意愿影响因素分析——基于Logistic模型和240户农户微观调查数据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , 27(3) : 372 -381 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.003

Abstract

This paper, based on survey data of 27 administrative villages and 240 households around Sangong River Basin in Xinjiang (the companies),through the establishment of farmers' willingness to grow oil crops and logistic regression variables and measurement models, analyses influential factors of farmers planting willingness from factors of household characteristics,factors of resource endowments,factors of household economy and other 13 factors in four major oil crops producing areas.Studies have shown that: the total household population,the agricultural technology service attitude and farmers planting willingness are positively correlated,and the attitude of the standardization coefficients of agricultural technology service factor has more significant impact; the annual number of employed in agriculture, education level and block-headed are negatively correlated, and the greater the cultural level of the head of the household's standardized coefficient, the greater the impact. However,reflection of the land input into the farm family economy,farming income,and per capita income does not pass inspection,it can not gain the relationship between these variables and farmers' willingness to grow oil crops.Finally,the article discusses the differences of impact on farmers' willingness between companies and administrative villages.

参考文献

[1] Klein R D. Urbanization and stream quality impairment [J]. Water Resources Bulletin,1979,15(4): 948-963. [2] Arnold C L, Gibbons J C. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1996,62(2): 243-258. [3] Booth D B, Rhett C. Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,1997,33(5): 1077-1090. [4] Brabec E, Schulte S, Richards P L. Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning [J]. Journal of Planning Literature,2002,16(4): 498-514. [5] Conway T M. Impervious surface as an indicator of pH and specific conductance in the urbanizing coastal zone of New Jersey, USA [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2007,85(2): 308-316. [6] Horner R C, Livingston M E, Maxted J. Impervious cover, aquatic community health, and storm water BMPs: Is there a relationship?//Proceedings of the Sixth Biennial Storm water Research and Watershed Management Conference. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Tampa, Florida,1999. [7] Kauffman G J, Corrozi M B, Vonck K J. Imperviousness: A performance measure of a Delaware water resource protection area ordinance [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2006,42(3): 603-616. [8] Moglen G E, Kim S. Limiting imperviousness to maintain ecological quality: Are threshold-based policies a good idea? [J] Journal of the American Planning Association,2007,73(2): 161-171. [9] Mueller G D, Thompson A M. The ability of urban residential lawns to disconnect impervious area from municipal sewer systems [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2009,45(5): 1116-1126. [10] Saravanapavan T, Anbumozhi V, Yamaji E. Using percent imperviousness as a planning tool in watershed management: Case study of the shawsheen in USA [J]. Journal of Rural Planning Association,2004,23: 73-78. [11] Dougherty M, Dymond R L, Goetz S J, et al. Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed [J]. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing,2004,70(11): 1275-1284. [12] Chabaeva A, Civco D L, Hurd J D. Assessment of impervious surface estimation techniques [J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2009,14(4): 377-387. [13] 岳文泽,吴次芳.基于混合光谱分解的城市不透水面分布估算[J].遥感学报,2007,11(6): 914-922. [14] 陈爽,张秀英,彭立华.基于高分辨卫星影像的城市用地不透水率分析[J].资源科学,2006,28(2): 41-46. [15] 梁洪华,白音,包力皋.ArcGIS技术在城市不透水表面信息提取中的应用//唐洪武,李桂芬,王连祥.水力学与水利信息学进展.南京:河海大学出版社, 2007: 759-764. [16] 徐涵秋.不透水面与相关城市生态要素关系的定量分析[J].生态学报,2009,29(5): 2456-2462. [17] 赵建伟,单保庆,尹澄清.城市旅游区暴雨径流污染过程中的不透水面效应[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2006,7(12): 50-53. [18] Office of Environmental Health Hazard, State of California. Impervious surface coefficients: A tool for better environmental management . County of San Diego, Department of Planning and Land Use,2008. [19] Center for Watershed Protection (CWP). Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic systems . Watershed Protection Research Monograph No.1. Ellicott City, Maryland,2003. [20] Lu D, Weng Q, Li G. Residential population estimation using a remote sensing derived impervious surface approach [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2006,27(16): 3553-3570. [21] Espey W H, Morgan C W, Masch F D. A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed . Tech. Report 44D 07-6501 CRWR-2, Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin,1965. [22] Leopold L B. Hydrology for Urban Land Planning—A Guidebook on the Hydrologic Effects of Urban Land Use [M]. USGS Circular 554,1968. [23] Taylor Brian L. The Influence of Wetland and Watershed Morphological Characteristics on Wetland Hydrology and Relationships to Wetland Vegetation Communities . Seattle: University of Washington,1993. [24] Booth D B. Urbanization of aquatic systems—Degradation thresholds and the limits of mitigation//Jackson Hole W. Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association Conference. American Water Resources Association,1994. [25] Wang L J, Kanehl L P. Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales [J]. Environmental Management,2001,28(2): 255-266. [26] Chin N T. Watershed Urbanization Effects on Palustrine Wetlands: A Study of Hydrologic, Vegetative, and Amphibian Community Response over Eight Years . Seattle: University of Washington,1996. [27] Booth D B, Reinelt L E. Consequences of urbanization on aquatic systems—Measured effects, degradation thresholds, and corrective strategies //Watershed '93 Conference Proceedings. Alexandria, Virginia, March 21-24, 1993. [28] Galli F J. Thermal impacts associated with urbanization and stormwater management best management practices . Washington D C: Washington Council of Governments,1991. [29] Moore A A, Palmer M A. Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: Implications for conservation and management [J]. Ecological Applications,2005,15(4): 1169-1177. [30] Schueler T R. The importance of imperviousness . Watershed Protection Techniques,1994,1: 100-111. [31] Black Longwell V. Branch restoration—Feasibility study . Carroll County, M D Office of Environmental Services,1994. [32] Galli F J. Personal communication . Washington D C: Department of Environmental Programs, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, 1994. [33] Paul M J, Meyer J L. Streams in the urban landscape [J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,2001, 32: 333-365. [34] Jones R, Clark C. Impact of watershed urbanization on stream insect communities [J]. Water Resources Bulletin,1987,23(6): 1047-1055. [35] Shaver E, Maxted J, Curtis G, et al. Watershed protection using an integrated approach //Torno H C. Stormwater NPDES Related Monitoring Needs: Proceedings of an Engineering Foundation Conference. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers,1995. [36] Yoder C O, Miltner R J, White D. Assessing the status of aquatic life ection designated uses in urban and suburban watersheds //Proceedings of National Confevence on Retrofit Opportunities for Water Resource Protection in Urban Environments. EPA/625/R-99/002, 1999. [37] Morse C C, Huryn A D, Cronan C. Impervious surface areas as a predictor of the effects of urbanization on stream insect communities in Maine, USA [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2003,89: 95-127. [38] Roy A H, Shuste W D. Assessing impervious surface connectivity and applications for watershed management [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2009,45(1): 198-209. [39] Cianfrani C M, Hession W C, Rizzo D M. Watershed imperviousness impacts on stream channel condition in southeastern Pennsylvania [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2006,42(4): 941-956. [40] Wenger S J, Peterson J T, Freeman M C, et al. Stream fish occurrence in response to impervious cover, historic land use, and hydrogeomorphic factors [J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,2008,65(7): 1250-1264. [41] Griffin D M, Grizzard T J, Randall C W, et al. Analysis of non-point pollution export from small catchments [J]. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,1980,52(4): 780-790. [42] Todd D A, Benient P B, Haasbeek J F, et al. Impact of land use and NPS loads on lake quality [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering,1989,115(30): 633-649. [43] May C W, Horner R R, Karr J R, et al. Effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound lowland ecoregion [J]. Watershed Protection Techniques,1997,2(4): 483-494. [44] Horner R R, Booth D B, Azous A, et al. Watershed determinants of ecosystem functioning //Roesner L A.Effects of Watershed Development and Management on Aquatic Ecosystems. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers,1997. [45] Mallin M K, Esham W E, Lowe R. Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds [J]. Ecological Applications,2000,10(4): 1047-1056. [46] Ourso R T, Frenzel S A. Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska [J]. Hydrobiologia,2003,501: 117-131. [47] Holland A F, Sanger D M, Gawle C P. Linkages between tidal creek ecosystems and the landscape and demographic attributes of their watersheds [J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,2004,298: 151-178. [48] Elizabeth A, Brabec J D. Imperviousness and land-use policy: Toward an effective approach to watershed planning [J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2009,14(4): 425-433. [49] Derry B. Tualatin basin effective impervious area reduction task force report . Clean Water Services (US),2002. [50] 赵军.平原河网地区景观格局演变与多尺度环境响应研究.上海: 华东师范大学,2008. [51] 杨凯,袁雯,赵军,等.感潮河网地区水系结构特征及城市化响应[J].地理学报,2004,59(4): 557-564. [52] 钱进,王超,王沛芳,等.河湖滨岸缓冲带净污机理及适宜宽度研究进展[J].水科学进展,2009,20(1): 139-144. [53] 周婷,彭少麟,任文韬,等.东江河岸缓冲带景观格局变化对水体恢复的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(1): 231-239. [54] Maxted J. The effectiveness of retention basins to protect downstream aquatic life in three regions of the United States//Malone M. Comprehensive Stormwater and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, First South Pacific Conference. Conference Proceedings. Volume one. Auckland Regional Council. Auckland, New Zealand, 1999. [55] 程江,杨凯,刘兰岚.上海中心城区土地利用变化对区域降雨径流的影响[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(6): 914-925.
文章导航

/