资源利用与管理

不同经济发展阶段下城市空间扩展对比研究——以福州和台北为例

展开
  • 1. 广东省生态环境与土壤研究所, 广州 510650;
    2. 福建师范大学 自然资源研究中心, 福州 350007;
    3. 广州大学 地理科学学院, 广州 510006
张金前(1982- ),男,福建泉州人,助理研究员,主要从事土地利用与区域发展研究。E-mail: zhangjinqian_cn@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-11-16

  修回日期: 2011-07-31

  网络出版日期: 2012-02-20

基金资助

广东省科技计划项目(2010B060100068);广东省科技攻关项目(2008A020100010)。

Comparative Study of Urban Spatial Expansion between Regions with Different Economic Development Phases: A Case Study of Fuzhou and Taipei

Expand
  • 1. Guangdong Institute of Eco-environment and Soil Science, Guangzhou 510650, China;
    2. Research Center of Natural Resources, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
    3. College of Geographical Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received date: 2010-11-16

  Revised date: 2011-07-31

  Online published: 2012-02-20

摘要

城市空间扩展在不同的经济发展阶段表现出不同特征。论文以处于不同经济发展阶段的福州和台北为例,以不同时段的遥感影像数据为数据源,结合相关历史文献和城市统计资料,借助GIS技术提取城市空间扩展信息。在此基础上,采用扩展速度、分维数、紧凑度等方法对福州和台北1988—2010年城市空间扩展的时空变化特征及其影响因素进行对比分析。结果表明:22 a来,福州城市建设用地年均扩展速率为台北的4.03倍,福州城市用地快速扩展,与台北形成明显的差异;福州城市空间扩展类型前期以外延类型为主,后期转为外延扩展与内部填充并重,而台北城市空间扩展类型则是以内部填充为主;福州和台北都受到自然地理环境、经济发展和人口增长、交通基础设施建设以及政策与规划等因素的共同影响,但各因素的主导作用不同,导致两地城市空间扩展特征存在差异。

关键词: 城市扩展; 福州; 台北

本文引用格式

张金前, 邓南荣, 韦素琼, 陈健飞 . 不同经济发展阶段下城市空间扩展对比研究——以福州和台北为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012 , 27(2) : 177 -186 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.02.001

Abstract

The characteristics of urban spatial expansion were different in each phase of economic development. Taipei was in the stage of post industrialization and Fuzhou was in the middle stage of industrialization. Comparative study of urban spatial expansion in these two regions could be a good case because they were similar in biophysical and cultural characteristics but differ in the level of economic development. In this study, we extracted urban spatial expansion information in these two regions based on the TM images of 1988, 2004 and 2010. Urban spatial expansion was studied by analyzing some concerned historical literatures, urban statistics data and urban built-up area maps based on fractal model and compact index. The research results show that, during the period from 1988 to 2010, the magnitude of urban land growth in Fuzhou was 4.03 times that of Taipei. The expansion form changed from a single external expansion to a combination form of external and internal expansion in Fuzhou, while Taipei was in the form of internal expansion. Through discussion, we could see that the main natural factors and human factors influenced urban spatial expansion in Fuzhou and Taipei in the past 22 years,including the following aspects: physiographic environment, economic development, population growth, traffic infrastructure construction, and government policy and planning. Effect of terrain condition on urban spatial expansion in Taipei was notable, but it was not marked in Fuzhou.

参考文献

[1] 陈本清, 徐涵秋. 城市扩展及其驱动力遥感分析——以厦门市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2005, 25(1): 79-83. [2] 王慧. 区域城市化发展水平的综合分析——以陕西省为例[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 1997,13(4): 14-20. [3] Martin Herold, Noah C Goldstein, Keith C Clarke. The spatio-temporal form of urban growth: Measurement analysis and modeling [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86: 286-302. [4] 徐强, 华晨. 城市建成区面积统计口径亟待统一——以杭州中心城区为例[J]. 规划师, 2005, 21(4): 88-91. [5] 匡文慧, 张树文, 张养贞, 等. 1900年以来长春市土地利用空间扩张机理分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(5): 841-850. [6] 杨永春, 杨晓娟. 1949—2005年中国河谷盆地型大城市空间扩展与土地利用结构转型——以兰州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 37-49. [7] 李丽, 迟耀斌, 王智勇, 等. 改革开放30年来中国主要城市扩展时空动态变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1933-1943. [8] 王伟武, 金建伟, 肖作鹏, 等. 近18年来杭州城市用地扩展特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 685-695. [9] TANG Jun-mei, WANG Le, YAO Zhi-jun. Analyses of urban landscape dynamics using multi-temporal satellite images: A comparison of two petroleum-oriented cities [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 87(4): 269-278. [10] FAN Shou-fan, George Z Gertner, SUN Zhan-li, et al. The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 73(4): 294-306. [11] CHEN Jian-fei, WEI Su-qiong, Kangtsung Chang, et al. A comparative case study of cultivated land changes in Fujian and Taiwan [J]. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(2): 386-395. [12] 姚士谋, 帅江平. 城市用地与城市生长: 以东南沿海城市扩展为例[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 1995. [13] 王新生, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 等. 中国特大城市空间形态变化的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 392-400. [14] Keersmaeeker M L D, Frankhauser P, Thomas I. Using fractal dimensions for characterizing intra-urban diversity: The example of Brussels [J]. Geographical Analysis, 2003, 35(4): 310-328. [15] Shen G. Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2002, 16(5): 419-437. [16] 陈彦光, 刘继生. 城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述——从信息熵到分维[J]. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 146-162. [17] Batty M, Longley P. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function [M]. London: Academic Press, 1994. [18] Benguigui L, Daoud M. Is the suburban railway system a fractal [J]. Geographical Analysis, 1991, 23(4): 362-368. [19] White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns [J]. Environment and Planning A, 1993, 25: 1175-1199. [20] 陈勇, 艾南山. 城市结构的分形研究[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 1994, 10(4): 35-41. [21] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 交通网络空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法探讨[J]. 地理学报, 1999, 54(4): 471-478. [22] 叶俊, 陈秉钊. 分形理论在城市研究中的应用[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 2001(4): 38-42. [23] Roberto C, Maria C G, Paolo R. Urban mobility and urban form: The social and environment costs of different patterns of urban expansion [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(2): 199-216. [24] Stephan P, Friedrich D. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 52(1): 1-20. [25] 刘纪远, 王新生, 庄大方, 等. 凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(6): 885-892. [26] 武进. 中国城市形态: 结构、特征及其演变[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1990. [27] 张文开. 福州市城市景观类型与城市发展[J]. 福建师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 18(2): 85-88. [28] 倪鹏飞. 中国城市竞争力报告No. 4[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006. [29] 洪迪光. 台北的竞争力[J]. 规划师, 2005, 21(5): 121-123.
文章导航

/