EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2011 , Vol. 26 >Issue 11: 1953 - 1962

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.11.014

资源评价

基于资源价值折耗的石油资源账户建立与分析——以黄河三角洲石油开发为例

展开
  • 1. 中国海洋大学 环境科学与工程学院,山东 青岛 266100;
    2. 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东 青岛 266061;
    3. 青岛大学 国际商学院,山东 青岛 266071
范超(1986- ),男,云南昆明人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为环境经济核算。E-mail: lane087102@sina.com

收稿日期: 2011-02-22

  修回日期: 2011-05-14

  网络出版日期: 2011-11-20

基金资助

山东省科技发展计划项目(2009GG10005001);908专项(908-02-03-03);教育部新世纪优秀人才计划基金(NCET-08-0508)。

收起

Design and Analysis of Oil Resources Accounts Based on Resources Value Depletion: Taking Oil Industry Development of the Yellow River Delta as an Example

Expand
  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;
    2. The First Institute of Oceanography, SOA, Qingdao 266061, China;
    3. International Business College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China

Received date: 2011-02-22

  Revised date: 2011-05-14

  Online published: 2011-11-20

Fold

摘要

在国际上通行的环境经济综合核算体系(SEEA)的基础上,以黄河三角洲石油资源开发为研究案例,根据黄河三角洲2003—2008年石油开发利用等数据,经过计算和统计依次建立了石油资源的实物型账户、价值型账户和综合账户。计算和统计结果表明:2003—2008年,黄河三角洲石油资源因开采而造成的价值折耗分别为154.0×108、111.3×108、121.6×108、104.9×108、106.0×108、83.0×108元,考虑了资源价值折耗的石油行业增加值占工业增加值和地区GDP的比例,以及因价值折耗造成的工业经济和地区GDP损失比例都有减小的趋势,平均分别为59.1%和42.0%,以及14.3%和9.8%。巨大的价值折耗带来了石油资源利用的可持续性下降,但是在当地的整体经济中,黄河三角洲石油开发带来的经济增长的可持续性在一定程度上增强。最后对结果进行了分析和讨论。

关键词： 环境经济核算; 石油资源账户; 价值折耗; 使用者成本法

本文引用格式

范超, 李萍, 陈东景, 彭昌盛 . 基于资源价值折耗的石油资源账户建立与分析——以黄河三角洲石油开发为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011 , 26(11) : 1953 -1962 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.11.014

Abstract

Based on the concise introduction of the system of integrated environmental and economic accounting (SEEA) proposed by United Nations, the oil development in the Yellow River Delta was studied to explain the compiling procedure of oil resources accounts with oil exploration and refining data from 2003 to 2008. Oil resources accounts include physical account, monetary account and integrated account in this paper. The results show that, in the Yellow River Delta from 2003 to 2008, value depletion of oil resources for exploration estimated by applying "user cost approach" are 15.40 billion yuan, 11.13 billion yuan, 12.16 billion yuan, 10.49 billion yuan, 10.60 billion yuan, 8.30 billion yuan, respectively. Then the adjusted indicators of production by subtracting depletion are less than traditional indicators. Meanwhile according to the integrated account, the ratio of oil industry added value with deduction of depletion to industry added value and local GDP (changes from 80% to 40% and 50% to 30%), and loss percentage of industry GDP and local GDP for depletion (changes from 20% to 5% and 30% to 6%) have reduction tendency during the years from 2003 to 2008. Additionally, the average results are 59.1% and 42.0%, 14.3% and 9.8% within the study years, respectively. From this perspective, although poor sustainability of oil resources utilization can be found by huge depletion value for exploration, it is also revealed that sustainability of local entire economic growth brought about by oil industrial development in the Yellow River Delta is enhanced to some extent. And finally the results are analyzed and discussed.

Key words： integrated environmental and economic accounting; oil resources accounts; value depletion; user cost approach

参考文献

[1] 南方报网.石油的重要性. http://www.nfdaily.cn/special_all/content/2008-01/03/content_4301784.htm,2008-01-03. [2] United Nations. The System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting [M]. New York: United Nations,2000. [3] 陈东景,徐中民,陈仁升.水资源账户的建立——环境经济综合核算的一个实例[J].水科学进展,2003,14(5):631-637. [4] 联合国.国民经济核算体系(1993)[M].国家统计局国民经济核算司译.北京:中国统计出版社,1995. [5] 许宪春.环境和经济综合核算体系的基本框架[J].经济评论,1999(3):112-114. [6] 中国石化胜利油田.企业概况.http://www.slof.com/html/slof/ytjs/qygk/2009/12/3329.htm,2010-01-01. [7] 山东省统计局.山东省统计年鉴2004—2009[M].北京:中国统计出版社. [8] 邱大雄.能源规划与系统分析[M].北京: 清华大学出版社,1995. [9] Daly H E, Cobb J B. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future [M]. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989. [10] Peskin H M. Alternative resource and environmental accounting approaches and their contribution to policy //Uno K, Bartelmus Dordrecht P. Environmental Accounting in Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998:375-394. [11] 李国平,吴迪.使用着成本法及其在煤炭资源价值折耗中测算中的应用[J].资源科学,2004,26(3):123-129. [12] Hotelling H. A general mathematical theory of depreciation [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1925,20:340-353. [13] Serafy E L. The proper calculation of income from depletable natural resources//Ahmed Y J, Salah E Seral, Emst Lutz. Chapter 3. Environmental Accounting of Sustainable Development. A UNDP-World Bank Symposium. Washington D C: World Bank,1989. [14] Liu X. Coal-adjusting national accounts in China [J]. Resources Policy,1966,22(3):173-181. [15] 东营市统计局.东营市统计年鉴2004—2009[M].北京:中国统计出版社. [16] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2009[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010. [17] 山东省发改委.山东省能源中长期发展规划纲要(征求意见稿,2008).2008. [18] 张玉梅,秦磊,王子柱.基于贴现率与存款利率倒挂产生的无风险套息研究[J].浙江金融,2009(9):34-35. [19] 中国人民银行货币政策司.中央银行基准利率表. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/zhengcehuobisi/629/2010/20101020160020050483524/20101020160020050483524_.html,2010-10-20. [Monetary Policy Department of the People’s Bank of China. Benchmark interest rate table of the central bank. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/zhengcehuobisi/629/2010/20101020160020050483524/20101020160020050483524_.html,2010-10-20.] [20] GBT4754—2002.中华人民共和国国家标准:国民经济行业分类[S].
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉