资源生态

秸秆燃烧比例时空变化与影响因素——以江苏省为例

展开
  • 南京农业大学 资源与环境科学学院, 南京210095
刘丽华(1985- ),女,甘肃白银人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为全球变化生物学。E-mail: sevenllh123@yahoo.com.cn

收稿日期: 2010-11-05

  修回日期: 2011-04-07

  网络出版日期: 2011-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目资助(40975091)。

The Spatial-temporal Variation of the Burning Proportion of Crop Straw and Its Influencing Factors —A Case Study of Jiangsu Province

Expand
  • College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received date: 2010-11-05

  Revised date: 2011-04-07

  Online published: 2011-09-20

摘要

通过对江苏省47个县(市)农户的实地问卷调查,分析了江苏省不同地区4个研究阶段(1990—1995年、1996—2000年、2001—2005年和2006—2008年)的秸秆利用状况及影响秸秆田间燃烧的因素。结果表明,全省秸秆作为家用燃料比例在上述4个研究阶段均值分别为62.81%、59.76%、27.55%和24.13%,田间燃烧比例分别为21.16%、23.93%、53.29%和47.87%,两者逐阶段变化趋势正好相反,显著变化皆出现在第二与第三研究阶段之间,在第三阶段(2001—2005年)家用燃料比例较之前明显下降,而田间燃烧比例显著上升。苏北地区(淮安、连云港、宿迁、徐州和盐城)秸秆作为家用燃料比例(54.22%)较苏中苏南(南通、扬州、泰州、镇江、无锡和苏州)地区(34.68%)高,而秸秆田间燃烧比例(29.60%)较苏中苏南地区(42.37%)低。秸秆田间燃烧比例与农户兼业比例、年均收入、家庭炊事活动用电量及务农人员年龄呈极显著正线性相关(P<0.01)。Logistic回归分析模型显示对农户田间燃烧意愿选择有显著影响的因子主要是4个,按影响程度由大到小依次为农户家庭兼业比例、家庭种植面积、农户年均收入和秸秆用作家用燃料比例。

本文引用格式

刘丽华, 蒋静艳, 宗良纲 . 秸秆燃烧比例时空变化与影响因素——以江苏省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011 , 26(9) : 1535 -1545 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.09.009

Abstract

In order to find out the spatial-temporal variation of the proportion of six crop straws (rice, wheat, maize, oil rape, cotton and soybean) used as household fuel, direct open burning and its influencing factors in different periods (1990-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005 and 2006-2008), the questionnaire survey during the above four study periods in 47 counties of Jiangsu Province was carried out. Logistic regression model, including the ratio of farmers taking job in cities, age structure of family population going in for agriculture, family incomes, kitchen power consumption, the ratio of crop straw used as domestic fuel and acreage of six crops factors, was set up to discuss the influencing factors of farmers’ willing to chose direct burning crop straw in fields. Results showed that the mean proportion of straw used as household fuel in Jiangsu Province during the above four research periods were 62.81%, 59.76%, 27.55% and 24.13%, respectively, and the mean proportion of straw open burning in fields were 21.16%, 23.93%, 53.29% and 47.87%, respectively. They had an opposite tendency and the obvious change appeared in the second and third research periods. The mean proportion of crop straw used as household fuel decreased obviously in the third research period (2001-2005) compared with the previous periods, while the mean proportion of straw open burning increased significantly. There was regional disparity for crop straw using in northern (including Huaian, Suqian, Lianyungang, Xuzhou and Yancheng), central and southern parts (including Nantong, Yangzhou, Taizhou, Zhenjiang, Wuxi and Suzhou) of Jiangsu Province. The proportion of crop straw used as household fuel (54.22%) in the northern part was higher than the central and southern parts (34.68%), while the ratio of crop straw open burning (29.60%) was lower than the central and southern parts (42.37%). Further analysis indicated that the positive linear relationships (P<0.01) between the proportion of crop straw open burning and the four factors, such as the ratio of farmers taking job in cities, age of farmers, family income and kitchen power consumption. Logistic regression model established declared that four factors had a significant effect on the farmers’ willingness to choose crop straw open burning in fields, and the degree of influence followed the order of the ratio of farmers taking job in cities > acreage >family incomes > the ratio of crop straw used as household fuel.

参考文献

[1] Heil A, Goldammer J G. Smoke-haze pollution: A review of the 1997 episode in Southeast Asia [J]. Regional Environment Change, 2001, 2(1): 24-37. [2] Duncan B N, Bey I, Chin M, et al. Indonesian wildfires of 1997: Impact on tropospheric chemistry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003, 108(5): 1-7. [3] Hodzic A, Madronich S, Bohn B, et al. Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: Meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radioactive effects[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion, 2007(7): 4043-4064. [4] 陈新锋. 对我国农村燃烧秸秆污染及其治理的经济学分析——兼论农业现代化过程中农业生产要素的工业替代[J]. 中国农村经济, 2001(2): 47-52. [5] 曹国良, 张小曳, 郑方成, 等. 中国大陆秸秆露天燃烧的量的估算[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(1): 9-12. [6] 曹国良, 张小曳, 王亚强, 等. 中国区域农田秸秆露天燃烧排放量的估算[J]. 科学通报, 2007, 52(15): 1826-1831. [7] 赵学平, 陆迁. 控制农户燃烧秸秆的激励机制探析[J]. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2006, 4(5): 70-72, 82. [8] 王书肖, 张楚莹. 中国秸秆露天燃烧大气污染物排放时空分布[J]. 中国科技论文, 2008, 5(3): 329-333. [9] Yang S J, He H P, Lu S L, et al. Quantification of crop residue burning in the field and its influence on ambient air quality in Suqian[J]. China Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(9), 1961-1969. [10] 江苏统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1990—2009. [11] 艾尔·巴比(美). 社会研究方法[M]. 邱泽奇, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2005. [12] 陈秧分, 刘彦随, 翟荣新. 基于农户调查的东部沿海地区农地规模经营意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(7): 1102-1108. [13] 王伟林, 黄贤金, 陈志刚. 发达地区农户被征地意愿及其影响因素——基于苏州农户调查的实证研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(4): 76-80. [14] Tasser E, Walde J, Tappeiner U, et al. Land-use changes and natural reforestation in the eastern central Alps[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 118(4): 115-129. [15] Adesina A A, Mbila D, Nkamleu G B, et al. Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southwest Cameroon[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 80(3): 255-265. [16] 钟太洋, 黄贤金, 孔苹. 农地产权与农户土地租赁意愿研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2005, 19(1): 49-55. [17] 唐步龙, 边胜男. 影响农作物秸秆处置利用的因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6): 568-571. [18] 何立明, 王文杰, 王桥, 等. 中国秸秆燃烧的遥感监测与分析[J]. 中国环境监测, 2007, 23(1): 42-50. [19] 谢花林, 李波. 基于Logistic回归模型的农牧交错区土地利用变化驱动力分析——以内蒙古翁牛特旗为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 294-304. [20] 王爱玲, 高旺盛, 洪春梅. 华北灌溉区秸秆燃烧与直接还田生态效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2003, 11(1): 142-144.
文章导航

/