资源评价

基于DEM的山地丘陵区土地利用/覆被研究——以青海湖流域为例

展开
  • 1. 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室(北京师范大学),北京 100875;
    2. 北京师范大学 资源学院,北京 100875;
    3. 青海省天峻县气象局,青海 天峻 817200
崔步礼(1981- ),男,山东东营人,博士生,主要从事景观生态与水文水资源方面研究。E-mail: cuibuli@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-10-26

  修回日期: 2010-12-20

  网络出版日期: 2011-05-20

基金资助

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金;国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2007BAC30B02);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-08-0056);北京师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育基金项目;国家自然科学基金项目(40971063)。

Study on Land Use/Cover in Mountain Area Based on the DEM —Taking the Qinghai Lake Basin as an Example

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. College of Resources Sciences and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    3. Tianjun Meteorological Bureau of Qinghai Province, Tianjun 817200, China

Received date: 2010-10-26

  Revised date: 2010-12-20

  Online published: 2011-05-20

摘要

研究地形对土地利用空间分布格局的影响,对探讨不同地貌部位自然因素和人文因素在土地利用变化过程中的作用具有重要意义。论文以青海湖流域为例,对比各土地利用类型的投影面积与地表真实面积的差异,并从地形(高程、坡度、坡向)角度分析了流域内土地利用的空间分布格局。结果表明:流域投影面积与地表真实面积相差754.79 km2。耕地、居民地、水域、沙地主要分布在3 500 m以下,且坡度小于2°的平地上,耕地和居民地多分布在南坡和西南坡上;林地主要分布在3 500~4 000 m且坡度多在6~25°的缓地和斜坡上,各坡向分布较均匀;草地主要分布在4 500 m以下且坡度小于25°的坡地上;沼泽多分布在3 500~4 500 m且坡度小于25°的河源地区,多分布在北坡和东北坡上;其它用地主要分布在4 000~4 500 m的坡度较大的斜坡或陡坡上。随高度、坡度增加,土地利用程度综合指数呈下降趋势;土地利用综合指数在坡向上呈现:平地>阳坡>阴坡。说明地形在很大程度上影响着青海湖流域的土地利用分布,且这种影响比较符合当地的自然规律和社会经济规律。

本文引用格式

崔步礼, 李小雁, 姜广辉, 张思毅, 黄央奎 . 基于DEM的山地丘陵区土地利用/覆被研究——以青海湖流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011 , 26(5) : 871 -880 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.05.014

Abstract

Study on the influence of terrain upon land use pattern is necessary. This would help us to have a better understanding of the effects of human activity and the physical geography on the processes of land use/cover change, and is of practical significance in regional development and environmental protection. Based on the 1 ∶50000 DEM (Digital Elevation Model) and the multi-temporal remote sensing data of TM image extracted in 2004, this study, taking the Qinghai Lake Basin as an example, analyzed the difference between projected area and true surface area and the relationship between the terrain (elevation, slope and aspect) and the spatial distribution pattern of land use/cover. The conclusions of the study can be drawn as follows: 1) The true surface area is larger than projected area by 754.79 km2. 2) There were different land use types associated with different elevations, slope gradients and aspects. The main distributions of different land use types are listed as: cropland, habitation, water area and sandy land (below 3500 m and 2°, S and S-W aspects), woodland (3500-4000 m and 6°-25°), grassland (below 4500 m and 25°), swamp (3500-4500 m, below 25°, N and N-E aspects) and unused land (4000-4500 m, above 15°). 3) With the rise of elevation and slope, the index of land use intensity showed a gradual decreasing tendency, and the index of land use intensity decreased in the order of flat land, sunny slope and shady slope. These also showed that the terrain features are the foundation of regional land use pattern in the Qinghai Lake Basin. The reason was the terrain factor determines the redistribution of rainfall, heat and other natural resource, which finally affect the land use type and degree of human being. Compared the index of land use intensity with other typical regions, human activity had little effect on the land use/cover in this study area, so the related researches on environmental and ecological problems should pay more attention to the natural driving factors.

参考文献

[1] Verburg P H, Veldkamp T A, Bouma J. Land use change under conditions of high population pressure: The case of Java[J]. Global Environmental Change, 1999, 9: 303-312. [2] 于修兴, 杨桂山. 中国土地利用/覆被变化研究的现状和问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(1): 51-57. [3] 陆云阁, 许月卿, 蔡云龙. 基于遥感技术和GIS的小流域土地利用/覆被变化分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1): 79-86. [4] Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J, et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2001, 11: 261-269. [5] 江晓波, 马泽忠, 曾文蓉, 等. 三峡地区土地利用/土地覆被变化及其驱动力分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(4): 108-112. [6] Fox J, Vogler J B. Land-use and land-cover change in montane mainland Southeast Asia[J]. Environmental Management, 2005, 36: 394-403. [7] 宋开山, 刘殿伟, 王宗明, 等. 1954年以来三江平原土地利用变化及驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(1): 93-104. [8] 王玉华, 刘彦随, 周应华. 沿海发达地区土地利用转换的人文驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(2): 43-50. [9] 潘竟虎, 刘菊玲. 黄河源区土地利用与景观格局变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005, 25(1): 29-32. [10] 李小雁, 许何也, 马育军, 等. 青海湖流域土地利用/覆被变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(2): 285-296. [11] 杨丽, 谢高地, 甄霖, 等. 径河流域土地利用格局的时空变化分析[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 25(4): 26-32. [12] 方精云, 沈泽昊, 崔海亭. 试论山地的生态特征及山地生态学的研究内容[J]. 生物多样性, 2004, 12(1): 10-19. [13] Pinder J E III, Krah G C, White JD, et al. The relationships between vegetation type and topography in Lassen Volcanic National Park[J]. Plant Ecology, 1997, 131(1): 17-29. [14] 冯朝阳, 于勇, 高吉喜, 等. 地形因子对京西门头沟区土地利用/覆盖变化的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2007, 25(3): 274-279. [15] 喻红, 曾辉, 江子瀛. 快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(1): 64-69. [16] 邱扬, 傅伯杰, 王军, 等. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用的时空分布及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(1): 20-29. [17] 孙丽, 陈焕伟, 潘家文. 运用DEM剖析土地利用类型的分布及时空变化[J]. 山地学报, 2004, 22(6): 762-766. [18] Turner M, Wear D, Flamm R. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula[J]. Ecological Applications, 1996, 64: 1150-1172. [19] Wear D N, Bolstad P. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation[J]. Ecosystems, 1998, 1: 575-594. [20] 沈泽昊, 张全发, 岳超, 等. 南水北凋中线水源区土地利用/土地覆被的空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 633-644. [21] 李文航, 龚建华. 遥感地表真实面积和垂直投影面积差异的定量化模拟[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2008, 25(4): 983-985. [22] 陈吉龙, 武伟, 刘洪斌. DEM在林地表面积计算中的应用研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008, 21(5): 1348-1352. [23] 庄大方, 刘纪远. 中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 105-111. [24] Qi Y X. Carrying capacity of grassland and sustainable development of animal husbandry in Qinghai Lake area[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2009, 5: 175-178, 183. [25] 刘瑞民, 杨志峰, 沈珍瑶, 等. 基于DEM的长江上游土地利用分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(1): 102-109.
文章导航

/