资源生态

基于最小费用距离模型的生态可占用性分析——以广西西江经济带为例

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院 区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
李平星(1982- ),男,山东泰安人,博士研究生,主要从事区域发展与生态规划研究。E-mail:lipx.08b@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2010-08-07

  修回日期: 2010-11-03

  网络出版日期: 2011-02-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目(40830741); 国家科技支撑项目(2008BAH31B01)。

Research of Ecological Occupiability Based on Least-cost Distance Model—A Case Study on Xijiang River Economic Belt in Guangxi

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2010-08-07

  Revised date: 2010-11-03

  Online published: 2011-02-20

摘要

生态可占用性是指从生态学角度出发,生态系统或者生态空间可以被开发利用的程度,是生态系统本身的属性。论文提出生态可占用性的概念和研究目的,并利用最小费用距离模型,分析了广西西江经济带景观单元的可占用性,提出分区方案。研究表明,可占用性低值区、较低值区、中值区、较高值区和高值区分别占区域总面积的12.17%、18.75%、38.55%、28.69%和1.84%。大部分建设用地分布在较高值区内,其余建设用地中,城镇用地主要分布在高值区,而农村居民点和工矿用地则主要分布在中值区。文章认为,研究能够揭示不同类型建设用地的分布规律和区域生态空间布局;虽然受到源的分布、尺度和空间范围等因素的影响,但所得结论对于引导区域开发、构建生态安全格局具有重要指导意义。

本文引用格式

李平星, 陈东, 樊杰 . 基于最小费用距离模型的生态可占用性分析——以广西西江经济带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011 , 26(2) : 227 -236 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.02.006

Abstract

Ecological occupiability refers to the attribute of ecological space when it was occupied by human being. The space is of low occupiability if the whole ecosystem was damaged from the perspective of structure and function for the occupation. The structure, function and its connections with surroundings are of great importance in determining the ecological occupiability. The least cost distance indicated the work or cost from the source to the destination through units with different resistance. The resistance value indicates the suitability of certain landscape units for distribution of ecological space. Adopting Xijiang River Economic Belt (XREB) for a case study, we designed the resistance of different rasters with a size of 90×90 m2 based on land use of XREB and built resistance surface. Using nature reserve as sources, we carried out calculation on minimum cumulative resistance from sources to destination through cost-distance model of ArcGIS. The ecological occupiability of landscape unit and zoning of XREB were calculated and established accordingly. Results indicated that the low-, lower-middle-, middle-, higher-middle-, and high-value zones of ecological occupiability accounted for 12.17%, 18.75%, 38.55%, 28.69% and 1.84% of the whole study area, respectively. Moreover, most of the construction land distributed at higher-middle-value zone, accounted for 55.29%, 58.73% and 63.86% of the urban & town land, rural land and industrial & mining land. The distributions of the rest parts of the three types of the construction land were different. Most of the rest of the urban & town land was located in high-value zones; while most of the rest of the rural and industrial & mining lands was located in middle-value zones. Minute quantity of the rural and industrial & mining lands was located in nature reserve. The high-value zone has been already developed intensively, and the optimization of spatial structure and function should be carried out in the future. The higher-middle value zone should be the focus for future urbanization and industrialization, while the middle-value zone could be developed but to a within certain intensity. Ecological construction should be the main task of the lower-middle-and low-value zones. We concluded that the analysis of ecological occupiability based on the least-cost distance model could explain the distribution of various types of construction lands and spatial pattern of ecological space. Although the analysis and corresponding zoning were affected by the spatial distribution of source, extent and scale, it is of great significance for guiding the regional development and establishment of ecological security pattern.

参考文献

[1] 陆大道, 樊杰. 2050: 中国的区域发展[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009. [2] 刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究[J]. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324-341. [3] Mcharg I. Design with Nature [M]. New York: Natural History Press, 1969. [4] 王介勇, 刘彦随, 张富刚. 海南岛土地生态适宜性评价[J]. 山地学报, 2007, 25(3): 290-294. [5] 宗跃光, 王蓉, 汪成刚, 等. 城市建设用地生态适宜性评价的潜力-限制性分析——以大连城市化区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(6): 1117-1127. [6] Collins M G, Steiner F R, Rushman M J. Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: Historical development and promising technological achievements [J]. Environmental Management, 2001, 28(5): 611-621. [7] 何英彬, 陈佑启, 杨鹏, 等. 国外基于GIS土地适宜性评价研究进展及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(6): 898-904. [8] Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, De Blust G, et al. The application of 'least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 64(4): 233-247. [9] ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). Cell-based Modeling with GRID [M]. US: ESRI. Inc, 1991. [10] Knappen J P, Scheffer M, Harms B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992, 23: 1-16. [11] 李纪宏, 刘雪华. 基于最小费用距离模型的自然保护区功能分区[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(2): 217-224. [12] 俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. [13] 俞孔坚. 景观生态战略点识别方法与理论地理学的表面模型[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(增): 11-20. [14] 李娜. 基于GIS的仪征空间开发适宜性分区研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2009, 28(2): 123-128. [15] 彭晋福. 应用最小累积阻力模型模拟土地利用变化——以江苏省扬中市为例. 北京: 北京大学, 2000. [16] 陈燕飞, 杜鹏飞, 郑筱津, 等. 基于GIS的南宁市建设用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 46(6): 801-804. [17] 刘孝富, 舒俭民, 张林波. 最小累积阻力模型在城市土地生态适宜性评价中的应用——以厦门为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(2): 421-428. [18] 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 徐建英, 等. 基于源-汇生态过程的景观格局识别方法——景观空间负荷对比指数[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2406-2413. [19] 胡望舒, 王思思. 基于焦点物种的北京市生物保护安全格局规划[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(16): 4266-4276. [20] 张世光. 中华鲟在西江的分布及产卵场调查[J]. 动物学杂志, 1987, 22(5): 50-51. [21] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等. 景观生态学原理及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. [22] 赵筱青, 王海波, 杨树华, 等. 基于GIS支持下的土地资源空间生态优化[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 4892-4902.
文章导航

/