理论探讨

碳汇价值的形成和评价

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    2. 山东省东营市林业局,山东 东营 257091
谢高地(1962- ),男,甘肃西和人,研究员,博士,研究方向为资源生态学与生态服务。

收稿日期: 2010-08-15

  修回日期: 2010-10-28

  网络出版日期: 2011-01-30

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB421106);国家自然科学基金资助项目(30770410和31070384)。

Value of Carbon Sink: Concept and Evaluation

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Forestry Bureau of Dongying, Dongying 257091, China

Received date: 2010-08-15

  Revised date: 2010-10-28

  Online published: 2011-01-30

摘要

在碳减排形势下,如何评价固碳收益价值具有重要的理论与实践意义。论文首先从全球气候变化与碳排放的关联、碳排放与现有经济体系的关联、碳排放空间成为稀缺资源三个方面论证了碳汇效用价值形成的现实基础。然后评述了碳汇价值的构成与度量方法,指出了碳固定与碳蓄积价值的内涵差异。继而总结了碳汇价值的实现机制,认为可以通过碳交易、碳税和固碳项目实际成本3种机制实现碳价格,并在此基础上通过补偿实现碳汇价值。

本文引用格式

谢高地, 李士美, 肖玉, 祁悦 . 碳汇价值的形成和评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011 , 26(1) : 1 -10 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.01.001

Abstract

In the context of carbon emission reduction, how to evaluate the benefit of carbon storage and sequestration was theoretically and practically critical. In this study, we investigated the linkage between global climate change and carbon emission and linkage between carbon emission and economic system, and found out the carbon emission permits was scarce, which constituted the realistic basis of carbon sink utility value. We reviewed components of the economic value of carbon sink and their measurement methods, and pointed out the concept difference between carbon storage and carbon sequestration. We also identified the mechanisms for fulfilling the economic value of carbon sink and classified them into three types, which were carbon trade, carbon tax and cost of carbon sequestration project. Based on the price of carbon sequestration from these three types of mechanisms, the economic value of carbon sequestration could be fulfilled with economic compensation.

参考文献

[1] Etheridge D M, Steele L P, Francey R J, et al. Atmospheric methane between 1000 A. D. and present: Evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(D13): 15979-15993. [2] 于贵瑞, 李海涛, 王绍强, 等. 全球变化与陆地生态系统碳循环和碳蓄积[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003. [3] Pearce D W, Cline W R, Achanta A, et al. The social costs of climate change: Greenhouse damage and the benefits of control [M]//Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 183-224. [4] Clarkson R, Deyes K. Government economic service working paper 140: Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions . London: HM Treasury, 2002. [5] Pearce D W. Social Cost of Carbon and its policy implications [J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003, 19(3): 362-384. [6] Tol R S J. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33 (16): 2064-2074. [7] 王景升, 李文华, 任青山, 等. 西藏森林生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(5): 831-841. [8] 肖寒, 欧阳志云, 赵景柱, 等. 森林生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评估初探——以海南岛尖峰岭热带森林为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(4): 481-484. [9] 余新晓, 鲁绍伟, 靳芳, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2096-2102. [10] 李文华, 欧阳志云, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能研究[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002. [11] 侯元兆, 张佩昌, 王琦, 等. 中国森林资源核算研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995. [12] 中国生物多样性国情研究报告编写组. 中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1997. [13] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4): 480-491. [14] Sala O E, Paruelo J M. Ecosystem services in grasslands [M]//Daily G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 1997: 237-252. [15] 马忠海. 中国几种主要能源温室气体排放系数的比较评价研究. 北京: 中国原子能科学研究院, 2002. [16] IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories . Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, et al. IGES, Japan. 2006. [17] Canadell J G, Le Quéréc C, Raupach M R, et al. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks [J]. PNAS, 2007, 104: 18866-18870, doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0702737104. [18] IPCC. IPCC special report: CO2 capture and storage . Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005. [19] 李文华, 谢高地, 肖玉, 等. 北京市森林资源资产评估方法体系. 北京: 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 2007.
文章导航

/