资源评价

利用区域遥感ET分析山东省地表水分盈亏的研究

展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学 地理信息科学教育部重点实验室, 上海 20006;
    2. 华东师范大学、中国科学院对地观测与数字 地球科学中心 环境遥感与数据同化联合实验室,上海 200062;
    3. 美国科罗拉多州立大学 自然资源生态实验室, 柯林斯堡, 美国;
    4. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101
刘朝顺(1980- ),男,福建省闽侯县人,讲师,博士,主要从事资源与环境等方面的遥感应用研究。E-mail:csliu@re.ecnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2009-11-23

  修回日期: 2010-07-09

  网络出版日期: 2010-11-20

基金资助

中央高校基本科研业务费专项;国家重点基础研究发展计划(2006CB403404);上海市教育发展基金会晨光计划(2008CG28)。

Analyze the Regional Water Budget in Shandong Province by Applying the Evapotranspiration Remote Sensing Method

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education, ECNU, Shanghai 20006;
    2. Joint Laboratory for Environmental Remote Sensing and Data Assimilation, ECNU and CEODE, Shanghai 200062, China;
    3. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA;
    4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2009-11-23

  Revised date: 2010-07-09

  Online published: 2010-11-20

摘要

论文利用MODIS遥感数据和常规地面气象观测数据基于SEBAL模型定量反演了山东省区域地表蒸散量(Evaportranspirations,ET),并利用站点Lysimeter实测ET资料与经联合国粮农组织修正的Penman-Monteith公式计算的ET对遥感反演的ET进行验证,获得了较高的精度,日模拟值的平均相对误差约为11.34%,相关系数为0.872,一致性指数达0.917。在此基础上,结合气象站点降水量的空间分布格局,分析了研究区不同土地利用/覆被类型下2005年和2006年逐月与季节的水分盈亏状况。研究结果表明在2005年3—11月期间山东省总的实际蒸散量平均为637.45 mm,降水量为639.61 mm,降水量基本满足ET消耗;而2006年同期蒸散量为578.48 mm,但降水量仅为443.98 mm,水分亏损量为134.50 mm。春秋季节水分亏缺严重,旱情发生的几率较高;夏季水分亏损量相对较小,降水量满足地表蒸散耗水需求。

本文引用格式

刘朝顺, 施润和, 高炜, 高志强 . 利用区域遥感ET分析山东省地表水分盈亏的研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010 , 25(11) : 1938 -1948 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.11.013

Abstract

Evaportranspiration(ET) of Shandong Province was assessed by MODIS satellite image coupling with meteorological data based on SEBAL model herein. It was revealed from the analysis results that ET derived from MODIS data was in very good agreement with the measurement by lysimeter and the calculation recommended by FAO Penman-Monteith method, with the consistency index of 0.917, correlation coefficient of 0.872, and daily relative error of about 11.34%. Further, the monthly and seasonal water budget of different land use/land cover types during 2005 and 2006 have been analyzed by coupling retrieved regional ET and spatial interpretation of precipitation. Results show that the total average of actual ET and precipitation during the month of March to November in the year 2005 were about 637.45 mm and 639.61 mm, respectively. The mean precipitation can almost meet the water consumption of ET. While in the year 2006, the actual ET and precipitation for the same period were respectively averaged 578.48 mm and 443.98 mm. The water loss reached 134.50 mm. It was also found that water deficit and drought were more serious in spring and autumn compared to that in summer.

参考文献

[1] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper-56: Crop Evapotranspiration–Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements [M]. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1998: 24-25. [2] Allen R G, Walter I A, Elliott R L, et al. The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation [M]. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005: A5-A6. [3] 史建国, 严昌荣, 何文清, 等. 黄河流域水分亏缺时空格局变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 113-119. [4] 邵晓梅, 许月卿, 严昌荣. 黄河流域气候水分盈亏时空格局分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2007, 12(1): 74-80. [5] 陈云浩, 李晓兵, 等. 不同地表覆盖条件下区域水分盈亏的遥感分析——以中国北方为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 283-288. [6] 辛晓洲, 柳钦火, 唐勇, 等. 用 CBERS-02 卫星和 MODIS 数据联合反演地表蒸散通量[J]. 中国科学E 辑, 2005, 35(B12): 125-140. [7] 郭晓寅. 黑河流域蒸散发分布的遥感研究[J]. 自然科学进展, 2005, 15(10): 1266-1270. [8] 郭晓寅, 程国栋. 遥感技术应用于地表面蒸散发的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(1): 107-114. [9] Bastiaanssen W G M, Menenti M, Feddes R A, et al. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 212: 198-212. [10] Bastiaanssen W G M, Pelgrum H, Wang J, et al. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 2. Validation [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 212: 213-229. [11] 吴炳方, 邵建华. 遥感估算蒸腾蒸发量的时空尺度推演方法及应用[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(3): 286-292. [12] Bastiaanssen W G M. SEBAL-based sensible and latent heat fluxes in the irrigated Gediz Basin, Turkey [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 229(1/2): 87-100. [13] 曾怀恩, 黄声享. 基于 Kriging 方法的空间数据插值研究[J]. 测绘工程, 2007, 16(5): 5-8. [14] 邵晓梅, 严昌荣, 魏红兵. 基于Kriging 插值的黄河流域降水时空分布格局[J]. 中国农业气象, 2006, 27(2): 65-69. [15] 陈建耀, 吴凯. 利用大型蒸渗仪分析潜水蒸发对农田蒸散量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 1997, 52(5): 439-446. [16] Willmott C J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorologic Society, 1982, 11: 1309-1313. [17] 林耀明, 任鸿遵, 于静洁, 等. 华北平原的水土资源平衡研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2000, 15(3): 252-258.
文章导航

/