资源利用与管理

集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响

展开
  • 山东农业大学 资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018
马群(1987- ),女,山东泰安人,研究生,主要从事土地资源信息技术方面的研究。E-mail:mq-0127@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-05-14

  修回日期: 2010-07-13

  网络出版日期: 2010-11-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(40571160);国家级"星火计划"重点项目(2007EA740002)。

Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Nutrients in Intensive Agricultural Region

Expand
  • College of Resources and Environment , Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China

Received date: 2010-05-14

  Revised date: 2010-07-13

  Online published: 2010-11-20

摘要

选择山东省寿光市,通过野外调查和室内分析,利用数理统计软件SPSS,系统分析不同土地利用方式下土壤养分的分布特征、变异情况及其相关性,研究集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响。结果表明,在不同土地利用方式下,各养分含量分布存在明显规律。有机质均值的分布特征是菜地>水浇地>果园>旱地>盐碱地;全氮、碱解氮、速效钾、速效磷和有效锌均值的分布特征是菜地>果园>水浇地>盐碱地>旱地;土壤pH值、交换性镁均值的分布特征为盐碱地>旱地>水浇地>果园>菜地;交换性钙在不同利用方式中的含量为盐碱地>旱地>水浇地>菜地>果园;有效硼为果园>菜地>盐碱地>水浇地>旱地;有效铁为菜地>果园>水浇地>旱地>盐碱地;有效铜和有效锰均为果园>菜地>水浇地>盐碱地>旱地。水浇地、菜地和果园在各养分含量上差异较小,旱地和盐碱地在各养分含量上较为相似。除pH值外,其它12种土壤养分在不同土地利用方式下变异系数均较高,其中以速效磷的变异系数最大。土壤养分中除了交换性镁、有效硼与其它各养分之间的相关性较低外,其它养分之间基本为显著或极显著相关,其中pH值与其它各土壤养分均呈现显著或极显著负相关,有机质与其它各土壤养分均呈现显著或极显著正相关。

本文引用格式

马群, 赵庚星 . 集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010 , 25(11) : 1834 -1844 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.11.003

Abstract

Based on field investigation, laboratory analysis and SPSS software, this paper took Shouguang city of Shandong Province as a case, systematically analyzed the distribution, variation and relevance of soil nutrients to research soil nutrient change under different land use types. The results showed that there was an obvious order in the distribution of soil nutrient content under different land use types: the distribution of organic matter was vegetable land>irrigable land>garden>farmland>saline-alkaline land; the distribution of total-N, available-N, K, P and Zn was vegetable land>garden>irrigable land>saline-alkaline land>farmland; the distribution of pH value and exchangeable-Mg was saline-alkaline land>farmland>irrigable land>garden>vegetable land; the distribution of exchangeable-Ca under different land use types was saline-alkaline land>farmland>irrigable land>vegetable land>garden; the distribution of available-B was garden>vegetable land>saline-alkaline land>irrigable land>farmland; the distribution of available-Fe was vegetable land>garden>irrigable land>farmland>saline-alkaline land; and the distribution of available-Cu and available-Mn was garden>vegetable land>irrigable land>saline-alkaline land>farmland. The variance of nutrient content between irrigable land, vegetable land and garden was comparatively low, and the variance of nutrient content between farmland and saline-alkaline land was similar. Except for pH, the variance coefficients of the other 12 kinds of soil nutrients under different land use types were all comparatively high, of which the highest variance coefficient was for available-P. Except for exchangeable-Mg and B with other nutrients, the relevance among the others was almost significant or marked significant. The relevance between pH value and the other soil nutrients was significant or highly significant negative correlation, while the relevance of organic matter with other nutrients showed significant or highly significant positive correlation.

参考文献

[1] Turner B L II, Meyer W B. Global land-use and land-cover change: An overview//Williamb M, B L Turner II . Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, 1994. [2] 孔祥斌, 张凤荣, 齐伟, 等. 集约化农区土地利用变化对土壤养分的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 333-342. [3] 龙健, 黄昌勇, 李娟. 喀斯特山区土地利用方式对土壤质量演变的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(1): 76-79. [4] 张燕, 张洪, 彭补拙, 等. 不同土地利用方式下农地土壤侵蚀与养分流失[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002, 23(1): 23-31. [5] 唐秀美, 赵庚星, 路庆斌. 基于GIS的滨海集约农区耕地生态环境评价研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(5): 69-74. [6] 邱莉萍, 张兴昌. 子午岭不同土地利用方式对土壤性质的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(6): 965-972. [7] Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M, et al. The relationship between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, China [J]. Catena, 2000, 39: 69-78. [8] Islam K R, Weil R R. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 2000, 79: 9-16. [9] Post W M, Kwon K C. Soil carbon sequestration and land use change: Processes and potential [J]. Global Change Biology, 2000, 6: 317-328. [10] 刘世梁, 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 等. 坡面土地利用方式与景观位置对土壤质量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(3): 414-420. [11] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第三版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. [12] Wilding L P. Spatial variability: Its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys//Nielson D R, Bouma J. Soil Spatial Variability. Purdoc, Wageningen, 1984: 166-193. [13] 赵庚星, 李秀娟, 李涛, 等. 耕地不同利用方式下的土壤养分状况分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(10): 55-58. [14] 高中贵, 彭补拙, 喻建华, 等. 经济发达区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 44-51. [15] 曾希柏, 白玲玉, 李莲芳, 等. 山东寿光不同利用方式下农田土壤有机质和氮磷钾状况及其变化[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(7): 3737-3745. [16] 许自成, 王林, 肖汉乾. 湖南烟区土壤pH分布特点及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(4): 830-834. [17] 陈婵婵, 肖斌, 余有本, 等. 陕南茶园土壤有机质和pH值空间变异及其与速效养分的相关性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 37(1): 182-188.
文章导航

/