资源利用与管理

基于人工社会模型的退田还湖生态补偿机制实例研究

展开
  • 1. 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
    2. 太原科技大学 计算机科学与技术学院, 太原 030024
潘理虎(1974- ),男,河南上蔡人,博士生,研究方向为复杂地理系统模拟与应用。

收稿日期: 2010-05-15

  修回日期: 2010-09-02

  网络出版日期: 2010-12-20

基金资助

国家科技支撑项目(2006BAC08B06);国家自然科学基金项目(40901285)。

A Case Study of the Effects of Wetland Restoration Policy with an Artificial Society Model

Expand
  • 1. State Key Lab. of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. School of Computer, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China

Received date: 2010-05-15

  Revised date: 2010-09-02

  Online published: 2010-12-20

摘要

基于补偿者和受偿者意愿的研究方法是建立切实可行的生态补偿机制的有效手段。为探讨在我国许多地区开展退田还湖生态补偿政策的有效实施机制,减少洪涝灾害与生态环境退化负面效应,研究构建了基于农户、政府和企业三类主体及其相互作用的生态补偿模型,并重点分析生态补偿标准、洪灾风险、生态环境保护、劳动力本地转移政策等因素对农户主体土地利用决策的影响。以鄱阳湖区莲湖乡为实例,以农户和企业从事生产活动的行为特征和政府宏观调控方式为基本准则,利用构建的多主体模型模拟了不同补偿机制下退田还湖政策可能产生的土地利用长期效应。结果表明,政府给予农户的经济补偿可以使农户自愿实施退田,但在不同情景下,政府实施退田还湖的代价和达到预期目标的时限差距显著。企业参与不仅能减轻政府的经济负担,同时也有利于剩余农村劳动力的转移。政府发展壮大当地经济,提高农业劳动力向非农产业转移的速度和质量,均有助于推进退田还湖政策的有效实施。

本文引用格式

潘理虎, 黄河清, 姜鲁光, 甄霖 . 基于人工社会模型的退田还湖生态补偿机制实例研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010 , 25(12) : 2007 -2017 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.12.002

Abstract

The analytical approach based on the willingness of compensators and acceptors provides an efficient tool for studying eco-compensation mechanism. By using an artificial society model of land use change, this study takes into account of the roles of a governmental agent and enterprise agents, as well as several factors such as flood risk, ecosystem conservation and labor transfer policy. Taking a township in the Poyang Lake region of Jiangxi Province as a typical case where wetland restoration policy has been implemented since 1998, this study performs a detailed simulation of the decision-making process of farmers, enterprises and government agents under different social, economic and policy conditions. Some useful emerged phenomena and patterns can be found from micro to macro levels in the evolutionary process of the artificial society model. It is demonstrated that if the government gives farmers a certain amount of economic compensation, the farmers will voluntarily restore their farmland into wetland. The costs of compensation and the time for finishing the task of wetland restoration are different under different conditions, and the mechanism of enterprises’ participation is beneficial for both the government and farmers. Furthermore, it is shown that developing local economy and enterprises and promoting shifting agricultural labor force to non-agricultural industries all are positive mechanisms for effectively implementing the policy of wetland restoration. Finally, it is demonstrated that artificial society model provides an effective approach for understanding the complex microscopic interactions between compensators and acceptors in the process of wetland restoration.

参考文献

[1] 李文华. 探索建立中国式生态补偿机制[J]. 环境保护, 2006(10): 1-5. [2] Daily G C, et al. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. San Francisco: Island Press, 1997. [3] Cowell R. Environmental compensation and the mediation of environmental change: Making capital out of Cardiff Bay [J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2000, 43(5): 689-710. [4] Pagiola S, Areenas A, Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America [J]. World Development, 2005, 33(2): 237-253. [5] 李文华, 李芬, 李世东, 等. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(5): 677-687. [6] 杨光梅, 闵庆文, 李文华, 等. 我国生态补偿研究中的科学问题[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 4291-4300. [7] Porras I, Grieg-Gran M, Neves N. All that Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries . International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 2008. [8] Pagiola S, Rios A R, Arcenas A. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua [J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2008, 13(3): 299-325. [9] 钟瑜, 张胜, 毛显强. 退田还湖生态补偿机制研究——以鄱阳湖区为案例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002, 12(4): 46-50. [10] 李文华, 李芬, 李世东等. 森林生态效益补偿机制与政策研究[J]. 生态经济, 2007(11): 151-153. [11] 杨光梅, 闵庆文, 李文华, 等. 基于CVM方法分析牧民对禁牧政策的受偿意愿——以锡林郭勒草原为例[J]. 生态环境, 2006, 15(4): 747-751. [12] 李芬, 甄霖, 黄河清, 等. 土地利用功能变化与利益相关者受偿意愿及经济补偿研究——以鄱阳湖生态脆弱区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(4): 580-589. [13] 姜鲁光. 鄱阳湖退田还湖地区洪水风险与土地利用变化研究. 北京: 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 2006. [14] Parker D C, Hessl A, Davis S C. Complexity, land-use modeling, and the human dimension: Fundamental challenges for mapping unknown outcome spaces [J]. Geoforum, 2008, 39: 789-804. [15] Grimaldo F, Lozano M, Barber F, et al. Simulating socially intelligent agents in semantic virtual environments [J]. Knowledge Engineering Review, 2008, 23: 369-388. [16] Han C L, Wang Q H. Research on modeling and simulation of sports artificial society//Jiang Y, Bao H G. 2nd International Conference on Modelling and Simulation. Manchester, England, 2009: 17-20. [17] Baynes T M. Complexity in urban development and management [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2009, 13: 214-227. [18] Bah A, Toure I, et al. An agent-based model for understanding the multiple uses of land and resources around drilling sites in Sahel . International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Townsville, AUSTRALIA, 2003. [19] Huang H Q, Macmillan W. A generative bottom-up approach to the understanding of the development of rural societies. Agrifood Research Reports, 2005, 68: 296-312. [20] Macmillan W, Huang H Q. A agent-based simulation model of a primitive agricultural society [J]. Geoforum, 2008, 39: 643-658. [21] 黄河清, 潘理虎, 王强, 等. 基于农户行为的土地利用人工社会模型的构造与应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 353-367. [22] 刘小平, 黎夏, 艾彬, 等. 基于多智能体的土地利用模拟与规划模型[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1101-1112. [23] Monticino M, Acevedo M, et al. Coupled human and natural systems: A multi-agent-based approach [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(5): 656-663. [24] 郭华, 苏布达, 王艳君等. 鄱阳湖流域1955—2002年径流系数变化趋势及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 湖泊科学, 2007, 19(2): 163-169. [25] 闵骞. 鄱阳湖水位变化规律的研究[J]. 湖泊科学, 1995, 7(3): 281-288. [26] 马定国, 刘影, 陈洁, 等. 鄱阳湖区洪灾风险与农户脆弱性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(3): 321-332. [27] 王凤, 吴敦银, 李荣昉. 鄱阳湖区洪涝灾害规律分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2008(4): 500-506. [28] 吴菊, 郑林, 陈建军. 鄱阳湖区土地利用演化与对农业经济的影响[J]. 经济地理, 2008, 28(2): 300-303. [29] 陈峰云, 刘伟, 吴宜进, 等. 鄱阳湖区湿地生态旅游资源保护与开发研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2008, 27(5): 659-663. [30] 彭锐, 黄河清, 郑林. 鄱阳湖区1959年至2005年降水过程的持续性特征与减灾对策[J]. 资源科学, 31(5): 731-742.
文章导航

/