资源利用与管理

发展生物能源引发的土地利用问题

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
    2. 南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 南京 210095;
    3. 中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
陈瑜琦(1982- ),女,博士后,主要从事土地利用/土地覆被变化方面的研究。E-mail: chyq82@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-04-28

  修回日期: 2010-06-07

  网络出版日期: 2010-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40971062)。

Land Use Changes Caused by Biofuel Production

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. College of Land Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
    3. Gradate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-04-28

  Revised date: 2010-06-07

  Online published: 2010-09-20

摘要

在经济发展不断增加对能源的需求和国际上减少温室气体排放的压力下,生物能源得到了各国政府的大力扶持并取得了快速发展。全球燃料乙醇生产总量1975年为5.68×108 L,2000年增加到170×108 L,2007年迅速增加到511×108 L。生物柴油也自2000年的约9.1×108 L迅速增加到2007年的132×108 L。生物能源的迅速发展带来了关于其对粮食安全影响的激烈争论。论文从剖析近年来关于生物能源发展对粮食安全的影响入手,系统分析了耕地在生物能源生产及其效应研究中的重要作用、近年来生物能源发展占用耕地面积、对土地利用变化的影响及其对农户耕地利用决策行为的影响机制。研究发现:①土地作为生物能源生产的主要资源投入类型,是其对粮食安全产生影响的最重要媒介;②近年来生物能源占用耕地面积呈不断增加趋势,2004年,全球生物能源占地1 400×104 hm2,约为全球耕地总面积(140 583×104 hm2)的1%,到2007年,占地4 221.7×104 hm2,相当于2004年的3.05倍,据保守估计到2030年,将占地5 300×104 hm2;③发展生物能源直接带来林地、草地和农用地等土地利用类型之间,以及不同农作物类型之间的土地利用冲突,并带来土地利用方式的显著变化;④从农户尺度看,相对于粮食作物,能源作物具备较高的经济收益,根据对广西武鸣县的农户调查得出,2009年木薯纯收益为11 123.04元/hm2、甘蔗为12 138.36元/hm2,远远高于稻谷(6 984.04 元/hm2)、玉米(5 104.61元/hm2)、花生(2 851.36元/hm2),收益上的比较优势是其播种面积不断增加的根本原因。

本文引用格式

陈瑜琦, 李秀彬, 盛燕, 张雯 . 发展生物能源引发的土地利用问题[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010 , 25(9) : 1496 -1505 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.09.009

Abstract

Influenced by increasing thirst for energy to fuel fast growing economy and pressure of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, biofuel production expanded rapidly these years. The total bio-ethanol production increased from 5.68×108 L in 1975 to 170×108 L in 2000 and to 511×108 L in 2007. The biodiesel increased from 9.1×108 L in 2000 to 132×108 L in 2007. The rapid increase of biofuel aroused hot debates on its effect on food security. This paper analyzed the debates of biofuel production, area of land used for biofuel production, its impact on land use changes and the international mechanism of farmers’ land use decisions. Results show that as one of the main input of biofuel production, land use change is the medium of its influence on food security, environment and other social dimensions. Secondly, the arable land used for biofuel production has been increased rapidly these years. In 2004, there was 1400×104hm2 of arable land used for biofuel production, accounted for 1% of the total arable land (140583×104hm2). In 2007, figure increased to 4221.7×104hm2. It is projected that fuel crops’ sown area may account for 15%-20% of the total sown area in some countries in the near future. Fuel crops will become one of the main crops. Thirdly, extension of the sown area of fuel crops caused remarkable land use changes. Large area of forest, grassland and unused land was converted to agricultural land. In the internal planting structure, food crops were converted into fuel crops. Fourthly, household is the basic decision maker of land use changes. Attracted by higher income, famers are more inclined to plant crops that have more net income. From the input-output comparison of main food and fuel crops in Guangxi, net income of fuel crops is much higher than food crops. In 2009, the net income of cassava was 11123.04 yuan/hm2 and sugarcane 12138.36 yuan/hm2, more than rice (6984.04 yuan/hm2), maize (5104.61 yuan/hm2) and peanut (2851.36 yuan/hm2). This is the basic reason for the increase sown area of fuel crops. Finally, the paper proposed that further studies were needed to be done on the quantitative analysis of the competition of biofuel crops and food crops, the internal mechanism of farmers’ land use decisions, the impact of biofuel production on future land use changes in the process of urbanization.

参考文献

[1] 仇焕广, 黄季焜. 全球生物能源发展及对农产品价格的影响[J]. 世界环境, 2008(4): 19-21. [2] FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization. The Market and Food Security Implications of the Development of Biofuel Production . Committee on Commodity Problems, Rome, 20-22 April, 2009. [3] 杨世琦, 杨正礼, 刘国强. 国外生物能源与能源作物发展回顾[J]. 世界农业, 2009(7): 4-6, 11. [4] Tian Y S, Zhao L X, Meng H B, et al. Estimation of un-used land potential for biofuels development in China [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(Supp 1): S77-S85. [5] FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization. Bioenergy, Food Security and Sustainability—Towards an International Framework . High-level Conference on World Food Security: The Challenges of Climate Change and Bioenergy. Rome, 3-5 June, 2009. [6] Boddiger D. Boosting biofuel crops could threaten food security [J]. The Lancet, 2007, 370(9591): 923-924. [7] Phalan B. The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: An overview [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(Supp 1): S21-S29. [8] 王永春, 王秀东. 非洲生物能源发展与粮食安全问题的利弊均衡分析[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2009(13): 177-178. [9] 胡明远, 孙英辉. 美国生物能源战略与粮食危机[J]. 北方经济, 2009(1): 3-4. [10] Muller A, Schmidhuber J, Hoogeveen J, et al. Some insights in the effect of growing bio-energy demand on global food security and natural resources [J]. Water Policy, 2008(10): 83-94. [11] Kerckow B. Competition between agricultural and renewable energy production [J]. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 2007(46): 333-347. [12] Hazell P, Pachauri R K. Bioenergy and Agriculture: Promises and Challenges [M]. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2006. [13] Goldemberg J, Coelho S T, Guardabassi P. The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane [J]. Energy Policy, 2008(36): 2086-2097. [14] FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization. Second FAO Technical Consultation on Bioenergy and Food Security . Summary Proceedings. Roma, 2008. [15] Pimentel D, Patzek T. Ethanol production: Energy and economic issues related to U.S. and Brazilian sugarcane [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2007, 16(3): 235-242. [16] Sumathi S, Chai S P, Mohamed A R. Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(9): 2404-2421. [17] Rathmann R, Szklo A, Schaeffer R. Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debate [J]. Renewable Energy, 2009(2): 1-9. [18] International Energy Agency IEA. Renewables in global energy supply—An IEA fact sheet . http://www.iea.org.2007-08-05. [19] Rathmann R, Szklo A, Schaeffer R. Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debate [J]. Renewable Energy, 2009(2): 1-9. [20] 李向阳. 全球生物能源发展背后的利益格局. http://www.sciencenet.cn/html/showxwnews1. aspx?id=209830, 2008-08-06. [21] International Energy Agency IEA. World Energy Outlook 2007 . http://www.iea.org/weo/2007.asp. [22] 周志伟.巴西重画世界能源版图.http://www.indaa.com.cn,2009-08-07. [23] 朱行.巴西:全球最大的可再生能源生产国.http://www.grainnews.com.cn/column/lydl/2010/04/01_11100.html,2010-04-01. [24] Westcott P C.U.S. ethanol expansion driving changes throughout the agricultural sector [J]. Amber Waves, 2007, 5(4): 10-15. [25] European Commission. The impact of a minimum 10% obligation for biofuel use in the EU-27 in 2020 on agricultural markets. Brussels, 2007-04-30. [26] 国际能源网. 爱尔兰发布2007-2008年度中国生物能源产业研究报告. 2008-04-08. http: //news. cnfol. com/080408/101, 1588, 4002542, 00. shtml. [27] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴(2008)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008. [28] Yang H, Zhou Y, Liu J. Land and water requirements of biofuel and implications for food supply and the environment in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2009(37): 1876-1885. [29] 王鑫鑫, 郭红东. 国外生物燃料产业发展及其产生的影响[J]. 世界农业, 2008(4): 18-21. [30] FAOSTAT. Resource STAT, Land . http: //faostat. fao. org/site/377/default. aspx. [31] Zhou A, Thomson E. The development of biofuels in Asia [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(Supp 1): S11-S20. [32] Mathews J A. Biofuels: What a biopact between North and South could achieve [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(7): 3550-3570. [33] Wright L. Worldwide commercial development of bioenergy with a focus on energy crop-based projects [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30(8-9): 706-714. [34] Watanabe M, Gomes J, Dewes H. Sugarcane-induced changes in the land use in the Parana' State . VI International Pensa Conference. Ribeira~o Preto, Brazil: USP, 2007. [35] Meekhof R L, Tyner W E, Holland F D. Agricultural policy and gasohol: A policy simulation [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1980, 63(3): 408415. [36] Benedetti O I B, Rathmann R, Padula A D, et al. Usage competition between oilseeds and biofuels: Impact assessment on the Brazilian food production . 17th Annual World Food and Agribusiness Forum and Symposium—IFAMA, Parma, 2007. [37] 谭淑豪, 曲福田, 黄贤金. 市场经济环境下不同类型农户土地利用行为差异及土地保护政策分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2001, 24(2): 110-114.
文章导航

/