资源生态

深圳市土地利用变化对生态服务功能的影响

展开
  • 1. 北京大学深圳研究生院,城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室,广东深圳518055;
    2. 北京大学环境工程系,水沙科学教育部重点实验室,北京100871;
    3. 深圳市城市规划设计研究院,广东深圳518034
李文楷(1983-),男,硕士生,主要研究方向为土地利用变化及其生态环境效应。

收稿日期: 2007-05-20

  修回日期: 2007-12-30

  网络出版日期: 2008-05-28

基金资助

国家973课题(2007CB407202)

Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Values in Shenzhen

Expand
  • 1. Shenzhen Graduate School,The Key Laboratory for Environmental and Urban Sciences,Peking University,Shenzhen 518055,China;
    2. Department of Environmental Engineering,The Key Laboratory for Water andSediment Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;
    3. Academy of Shenzhen Urban Planning andDesign,Shenzhen 518034,China

Received date: 2007-05-20

  Revised date: 2007-12-30

  Online published: 2008-05-28

摘要

选择深圳市为研究区域,基于1996、2000和2004年的土地利用类型图估算了深圳市生态服务价值,探讨了土地利用对生态服务功能的影响。结果表明:1996年深圳市生态系统服务总价值为277597×104元,2000年为291141×104元,2004年为254466×104元。从1996到2004年生态系统服务价值共减少了23131×104元,其中湿地和林地面积的减少是其主要原因。在各种土地利用类型中,林地、水体、湿地、园地产生的价值之和超过了总价值的90%。在各项服务功能中,水源涵养产生的价值最大,其次是废物处理,两者之和约占总价值的40%。从空间上来看,服务价值较高的地区主要分布在深圳市的东南和西南部,而服务价值较低的区域主要以中部为中心向周围扩散。

本文引用格式

李文楷, 李天宏, 钱征寒 . 深圳市土地利用变化对生态服务功能的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008 , 23(3) : 440 -446 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.03.010

Abstract

The evaluation of ecosystem services is conducive to clarify the ecological and environmental changes with urbanization and to provide useful references for city development planning.With Shenzhen,a city experienced rapid economic development and urbanization in the past decades,as study area,the impacts of land use change on ecosystem service values were discussed.The ecosystem service value in Shenzhen was 2775.97 million RMB in 1996,2 911.41 million yuan in 2000 and 2 544.66 million yuan in 2004 respectively,with a decrease of 231.31 million yuan from 1996 to 2004 mainly due to the decrease of woodland and wetland area.Woodland,water-body,wetland and orchard nursery contributed over 90% of the total service value among the land use types.Water supply and waste treatment were the top two service functions with high service value,contributing about 40% of the total service value.Areas with high service values are mainly located in the southeast and southwest while those with low service values around the center.The results suggest that a reasonable land use plan should be made with highlight of protecting wetland,water-body and woodland so as to balance economic and ecological goals in the future.

参考文献

[1] Daily G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997. [2] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural cap ital [J]. N ature, 1997, 387: 253-260. [3] De Groot R S, WilsonM A, Bouman RM J. A typology for the classification, descrip tion and valuation of ecosystem services, goods and services[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2002, 41: 393-408. [4] Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 1999, 29: 293-301. [5] Holmlund CM, HammerM. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 1999, 29: 253-268. [6] Woodward R T, Wui Y S. The economic value ofwetland services: A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2001, 37: 257-270. [7] KreuterU P, HarrisH G, MatlockM D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2001, 39: 333-346. [8] Konarska KM, Sutton P C, Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: A comparison of NOAA2AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2002, 41: 491-507. [9] Boumans R, Costanza R, Farley J, et al. Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2002, 41: 529-560. [10] Curtis IA. Valuing ecosystem goods and services: A new app roach using a surrogatemarket and the combination of amultip le criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2004, 50: 163-194. [11] Allen B P, Loomis J B. Deriving values for the ecological support function ofwildlife: An indirect valuation app roach[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2006, 56: 49-57. [12] Nu′? nezD, NahuelhualL, Oyarzu′n C. Forests and water: The value of native temperate forests in supp lyingwater for human consump tion[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2006, 58: 606-616. [13] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19 (5): 607~613. [OUYANG Zhi-yun, WANG Xiao-ke, MIAO Hong. A p rimary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological2economic values. Acta Ecologica S inica, 1999, 19 (5): 607-613.] [14] CHEN Zhongxin, ZHANG Xinshi. Value of ecosystem services in China [J]. Chinese Science B ulletin, 2000, 45 (10): 870-876. [15] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18 (2): 189~196. [XIE Gao-di, LU Chun-xia, LENG Yun-fa, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of N atural Resources, 2003, 18 (2): 189-196.] [16] 赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19 (4): 480~ 491. [ZHAO Tong2qian, OUYANG Zhi2yun, ZHENG Hua, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal of N atural Resources, 2004, 19 (4): 480-491.] [17] 彭建,王仰麟,陈燕飞,等. 城市生态系统服务功能价值评估初探———以深圳市为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学 版) , 2005, 41 (4): 594~604. [PENG Jian, WANG Yang-lin, CHEN Yan-fei, et al. Economic value of urban ecosystem services: A case study in Shenzhen. Acta Scicentiarum N aturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 2005, 41 (4): 594-604.] [18] 莫宏伟,任志远,谢红霞. 榆阳区土地利用和生态效应变化分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 33 (1): 110~114. [MO Hong-wei, REN Zhi-yuan, XIE Hong-xia. Relation between land use / cover change and changes of ecological effect in wind drift sand region. Journal of Shaanxi N orm alUniversity (N atural Science Edition) , 2005, 33 (1): 110-114.] [19] 白晓飞,陈焕伟. 不同土地利用结构生态系统服务功能价值的变化研究[J]. 中国农业生态学报, 2004, 12 (1): 180~182. [BA IXiao-fei, CHEN Huan-wei. The changes of ecosystem services and their values in various constructions of land use —A case study from Yijinhuoluo County of InnerMongolia. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12 (1) :180-182.] [20] Limburg K E, O’Neill R V, Costanza R, et al. Comp lex systems and valuation [J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2002, 41: 409-420. [21] Turner R K, Paavola J, Coopera P, et al. Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2003, 46: 493-510. [22] Costanza R, Cumberland J, Daly H, et al. An Introduction to Ecological Economics[M]. F L, USA: St Lucie Press, 1997
文章导航

/