生态足迹方法自提出以来受到广泛关注,其缺点也受到一些学者的批评。ZhaoSheng等2005年提出能值足迹法,弥补了生态足迹法以土地生产能力为限制的缺点。论文提出区域能值足迹法,以弥补其改进方法不能够反映区域实际情况和技术进步带来影响的不足。最后,以岷江上游1982到2002年为例应用3种方法进行计算分析。结果表明研究区生态足迹呈缓慢上升趋势,生态足迹方法计算结果<能值足迹<区域能值足迹;生态承载力计算结果显示生态足迹与区域能值足迹方法结果呈平缓下降趋势,而能值足迹方法结果呈不规则变动。区域能值足迹法能够考虑到区域实际情况和技术进步,但它不能完全代替生态足迹方法,将其结合应用将得到更多信息。
Ecological footprint(EF) analysis has gained much attention since developed,but some deficiencies were also criticized.Now,EF has been used in regional ecological carrying capacity and sustainability estimation widely.Zhao Sheng modified EF approach with Emergy theory in 2005,called emergy EF approach,which made up the deficiencies of EF limited with biosphere.However,this article improved the modified method for the deficiencies of the modified approach,which does not consider the local situation and technological advances.Finally,the EF of the upper reach of Minjiang River was estimated based on the three methods from 1982 to 2002.The results demonstrated that the EF of the study area increased slowly.The results of regional EF were greater than that of emergy EF,and that of conventional EF were the least.The ecological carrying capacity with conventional EF and regional emergy EF decreased smoothly,however,that of emergy EF changed irregularly.Although the regional emergy approach overcomes some shortcomings of EF,it can not replace the conventional EF.If the two approaches used together,more information would be discovered.
[1] WackernagelM, ReesW E. Our Ecological Footp rint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [M]. New Society Publish2 ers, Gabriola Island, 1996.
[2] WackernagelM, Yount J D. The ecological footp rint: An indicator of p rogress toward regional sustainability[J]. Environ2 m entalM onitoring and Assessm ent, 1998, 51: 511-529.
[3] WorldWildlife Fund. Living p lanet report[EB /OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2000.pdf, 2000-10-10.
[4] WorldWildlife Fund. Living p lanet report[EB /OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2002.pdf, 2002-06-10.
[5] WorldWildlife Fund. Living p lanet report[EB /OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2004.pdf, 2004-10-10.
[6] Erb K H. Actual land demand ofAustria 1926-2000: A variation on ecological footp rint assessments[J]. Land Use Poli2 cy, 2004, 21: 247-259.
[7] Van Vuuren D P, Smeets EMW. Ecological footp rints ofBenin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2000, 34 (234): 115-130.
[8] Odum H T. Systems Ecology[M]. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, 1983. 664.
[9] 蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2002. [LAN Sheng-fang, Q IN Pei, LU Hong-fang. Eco-Economic System Emergy Analysis. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002.]
[10] WackernagelM, Lewan L, Hansson C B. Evaluating the use of natural cap italwith the ecological footp rint app lications in Weden and subregions[J]. AMB IO, 1999, 28 (7): 604-612.
[11] Odum H T. Self2organization, transformity and information[J]. Science, 1988, 242: 1132-1139.
[12] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Energy and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
[13] Odum H T, BrownM T, Williams S B. Handbook of Emergy Evaluations Folios 1-4. Center for Environmental Policy [M]. University of Florida, Gainesville F L, 2000.
[14] BrownM T, Herendeen R A. Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis: A comparative view[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1996, 19: 219-235.
[15] Odum H T. Emergy evaluation[A]. In: Ulgiati S, BrownM T, Giamp ietroM, et al. Advances in Energy Studies. Energy Flows in Ecology and Economy[C]. MUSIS, Roma, 1998. 99-111.
[16] Zhao S, Li Z, LiW. A modified method of ecological footp rint calculation and its app lication[J]. EcologicalModelling, 2005, 185: 65-75.
[17] Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interp ret ecological footp rints for long periods of time: The case ofAustria 1926-1995 [J]. Ecological Econom ics, 2001, 38 (1): 25-45.
[18] 陈敏,张丽君,王如松. 1978 年～2003 年中国生态足迹动态分析[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27 (6): 132～139. [CHEN Min, ZHANG Li-jun, WANG Ru-song. Dynamics of ecological footp rint of China from 1978 to 2003. Resources Science, 2005, 27 (6): 132-139.]
[19] WackernagelM, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural cap ital accounting with the ecological footp rint concep t[J]. Ecological Econom ics, 1999, 29: 375-390
