资源生态

不同植被恢复模式对黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土壤水分生态效应的影响

展开
  • 1. 西北农林科技大学 资环学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;
    2. 西北农林科技大学 农学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;
    3. 陕西省循环农业工程技术中心,陕西 杨凌 712100;
    4. 西北农林科技大学 林学院,陕西 杨凌 712100
张笑培(1978- ),女,河北藁城人,博士研究生,主要从事资源与环境生态研究。E-mail xiaopeihb@163.com

收稿日期: 2007-07-02

  修回日期: 2007-12-17

  网络出版日期: 2008-07-28

基金资助

国家重大基础预研项目(2005CCA05300);西北农林科技大学"青年学术骨干人才"专项资助。

Effect of Different Vegetation Recovery Modes on Soil Moisture Ecoeffects in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau

Expand
  • 1. College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, China;
    2. College of Agronomy, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, China;
    3. The Research Center of Recycle Agricultural Engineering and Technology of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, China;
    4. College of Forestry, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100,China

Received date: 2007-07-02

  Revised date: 2007-12-17

  Online published: 2008-07-28

摘要

研究了渭北黄土高原丘陵沟壑区内侧柏、荆条、20年刺槐、4年刺槐、4年苜蓿、农地不同植被恢复模式土壤水分生态效应,结果表明:不同的植被恢复模式土壤容重均低于对照农田,减小幅度为16%~8%,孔隙度增加,总孔隙度增幅为24.5%~8.1%,毛管孔隙度增幅为1.2%~13.9%,非毛管孔隙度增幅为20.5%~90.0%;土壤持水性比农地增加33%~7.5%;水分补给量在0~2m范围内,侧柏、荆条、4年刺槐是农地的2、1.5、1.71倍,20年刺槐和苜蓿比农地低22.5%和31.4%;0~1m内,侧柏、荆条、4年刺槐分别是农地的2.16、1.78、1.85倍,20年刺槐、苜蓿为农地的25%和62.3%;>0.25mm水稳性团聚体含量比农地增加56.84%~30.72%;土壤结构破坏率农地最高为41.09%,其它植被为6.67%~25.73%。相关性分析表明土壤容重、总孔隙度、水分特征曲线a、水稳性团聚体含量、结构破坏率相关性显著。不同植被土壤水分生态效应不同,除20年刺槐、苜蓿土壤水分补给量小于对照农地外,其它各项指标均显著优于农地。

本文引用格式

张笑培, 杨改河, 胡江波, 王得祥 . 不同植被恢复模式对黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土壤水分生态效应的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008 , 23(4) : 635 -642 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.04.011

Abstract

Vegetation recovery is one of the major measures to improve eco-environment of the Loess Plateau. In order to find the ecological effects of different vegetation recovery modes on soil moisture in this region, six trial sites in Ranjiagou were studied. The results showed that compared to farmland, the soil bulk density under the recovery modes of Platycladus orientalis, Vitex negundo var. heterophylla, 20-year Robinia pseudoacacia, 4-year Robinia pseudoacacia and 4-year Medicago sativa L declined dramatically with a percentage of8%-16%; total porosity, capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity apparently increased by 24.5%-8.1%, 1.2%-13.9% and 20.5%-90.0%; the water retention capability of soil increased by 33%-7.5%; the water supply capacity under the mode of Platycladus orientalis, Vitex negundo var. heterophylla and 4-year Robinia pseudoacacia were 2.16, 1.78 and 1.85 times of the farmland while the 20-year Robinia pseudoacacia mode and 4-year Medicago sativa L mode were 25% and 62.3% of the farmland; >0.25mm water stable aggregates were increased by 56.84%-30.72% by all the recovery modes compared to the farmland; the structure fragmentation rate of soil under all recovery modes was 16.2%-62.6% while in farmland it was as high as 41.09%. The correlation analysis indicated there was a significant correlation of soil bulk density, total porosity, water characteristic curve, water stable aggregates and structure fragmentation rate, so the conclusion could be drawn as every vegetation recovery mode has a better ecological effect on soil water than farmland except for the water supply capacity of 20-year Robinia pseudoacacia and 4-year Medicago sativa L.

参考文献

[1] 张小燕,杨改河.中国西部地区退耕还林还草研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2005. [2] 朱芬萌,杨改河,冯永忠,等.陕西黄土高原地区退耕与粮食补助模式研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(2):115~117. [3] 王得祥,杨改河,西北地区林草植被及其生态环境建设策略[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(1):15~19. [4] 杨文治,邵明安.黄土高原土壤水分研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2000. [5] 胡良军,邵明安.黄土高原植被恢复的水分生态环境研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1045~1048. [6] 王志强,刘宝元,海春兴,等.晋西北黄土丘陵区不同植被类型土壤水分分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(4):53~57. [7] 赵世伟,周印东,吴金水.子午岭北部不同植被类型土壤水分特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(4):119~122. [8] 黄奕龙,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵小流域地形和土地利用对土壤水分时空格局的影响[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3):334~342. [9] 王军,傅伯杰.黄土丘陵小流域土地利用结构对土壤水分时空分布的影响[J].地理学报,2000,55(1):84~91. [10] 胡伟,邵明安,王全九.黄土高原退耕坡地土壤水分空间变异性研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(1):74~81. [11] 杜峰,山仑,梁宗锁,等.陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒演替过程中的土壤水分效应[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(5): 669~678. [12] 马祥华,白文娟,焦菊英,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复中的土壤水分变化研究[J].水土保持通报,2004,24(5):19~23. [13] 孙中峰,张学培,刘卉芳,等.晋西黄土区坡面林地土壤持水性能研究[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(4):343~347. [14] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,1995. [15] 史竹叶,赵世伟.黄土高原土壤持水曲线的计算方法[J].西北农业学报,1999,8(6):44~47. [16] Acosts-Martinez V, Reicher Z, Bischoff M, et al. The role of tree leaf mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on turfgrass soil quality[J]. Biol. Fort. Soils,1999,29:55-61. [17] Whalley W R, Dumitru E, Dexter A R. Biological effects of soil compaction[J]. Soil Till. Res.,1995,35:53-68. [18] Herandez T, Garcia C, Reinhardt I. Short-term effect of wildfire on the chemical, biochemical and microbiological properties of Mediterranean pine forest soil[J]. Biol. Forest Soils,1997,25:109-116. [19] Lowery B, Swan J. Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class[J]. Soil Water Conserve.,1995,50: 306-311. [20] 雷志栋,杨诗秀,谢森传.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版杜,1988.19~24. [21] 吴彦,刘世全,付秀琴.植物根系提高土壤水稳性团粒含量的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(1):45~49. [22] Amezketa E, Singer M J, Le Bissonnais Y. Soil aggregate stability: A review[J]. J. Sustainable Agriculture, 1999,14:83-151. [23] Shinjo H, Fujita H, Gintzburger Gus. Soil aggregate stability under different landscapes and vegetation types in a semiarid area in northeastern Syria[J]. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.,2000,46(1):229-240. [24] Neufeldt H, Ayarza M A, Resck D V S, et al. Distribution of water-stable aggregates and aggregating agents in Cerrado Oxisols[J]. Geodermaa,1999,93(1/2):85-99. [25] Cammeraat L H, Imeson. Deriving indicators of soil degradation from soil aggregation studies in southeastern Spain and southern France[J]. Geomorphology,1998,23:307-321. [26] Wright S F, Starf J L, Paltineanu I C. Changes in aggregate stability and concentration of glomalin during tillage transition[J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,1999,63:1825-1829. [27] Neufeldt H, Ayarza M A, Resck D V S, et al. Distribution of water-stable aggregates and aggregating agents in Cerrado Oxisols[J]. Geodermaa,1999,93(1/2):85-99.
文章导航

/