资源生态

淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所 陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室,北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院 研究生院,北京 100049;
    3. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072;
    4. 华东师范大学 资源与环境学院,上海 200062
夏军(1954- ),男,湖北广水人,研究员,主要从事水文水环境方面的科学研究工作。

收稿日期: 2007-09-23

  修回日期: 2007-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2008-02-01

基金资助

国家自然科学基金国际合作重大项目(No. 50279049);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(Kzcx2-yw-126)。

Impact Assessment of Dams & Flood Gates Projects of Huaihe River on River Ecosystem:A Case Study of the Bengbu Site

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101,China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
    4. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received date: 2007-09-23

  Revised date: 2007-10-22

  Online published: 2008-02-01

摘要

论文以历史时期淮河干流水生态调查与2006年全流域重点闸坝水生态调查资料为依据,通过分析水生态指标与同期水质指标之间的关系,建立淮河水文-水质-生态耦合模型,提出了一种水利闸坝工程对水生态影响的评价方法。利用该模型分析了淮河中下游重点闸——蚌埠闸对其下游水生态系统的影响,结果表明:①蚌埠闸对下游水生态系统中浮游植物影响最大,浮游动物次之,对底栖动物的影响最小;②与历史时期水生态状况对比发现,蚌埠闸下游的水生态质量比历史时期有所降低;水利工程闸坝修建后对其下游水生态系统有一定的不利影响;③通过加强闸坝的调度,增加下泄水量,满足生态需水,可以缓解对下游水生态系统的不利影响。

本文引用格式

夏军, 赵长森, 刘敏, 王纲胜, 张永勇, 刘玉 . 淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008 , 23(1) : 48 -60 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.006

Abstract

This paper addresses a method applied to the impact assessment of dams & flood gates projects in Huaihe River on river ecosystem. Major contents include: 1) the river ecosystem survey in 2006 and related historical investigation; 2) building coupled models of river hydrological process with water quality and ecosystem indicators system; and 3) development of assessment method applied to impact assessment of dams & flood gates projects in Huaihe River on river ecosystem, where the relationship between ecosystem indicators and water quality indicators could be recognized. The case study of the Bengbu site was given as an explanation of this method. The results indicate that dams and flood gates projects have significant impact on river ecosystem. For Bengbu case, the biggest impact is on phytoplanktons of the aquatic ecosystem, then on zooplanktons and zoobenthos. By comparison with historical ecosystem situation, the ecosystem quality of downstream of Bengbu site has a decline due to dams and gates construction. By the way, it also shows that river system could be improved by strengthening operation of river ecosystem and increasing ecological flow.

参考文献

[1] James A E. Lernaea(Copepod) Infection of Three Native Fishes from the Salt River Basin, Arizona. M. S. Thesis. Tempe: Arizona State University,1968. [2] Dolan R A, A Howard, A Gallenton. Man’ s impact on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon[J]. Am. Sci., 1974,(62). [3] Stanford J A, J V Ward. The Colorado River system. In: B Davier, K F Walker. The Ecology of River Systems. Dordrecht, TheNetherlads: Dr. W. Junk Publishers,1986. [4] Crayton W M, M R Sommerfeld. Phytoplankton of the lower Colorado River, Grand Canyon Region[J]. J. Ariz. Nev. Acad. Sci.,1978,(13). [5] Armitage P D. Environmental changes induced by stream regulation and their effect on lotic macroinvertebrate communities. In: A Lillehammer, A J Saliveit. Regulated Rivers. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo Press,1984. [6] Ward J V, J A Stanford. The ecology of regulated streams. Past accomplishments and directions for future research. In: J F Craig, J B Kemper. Regulated Streams: Advances in Ecology. New York: Plenum Press,1987. [7] Voelz N J, J V Ward. Biotic and abiotic gradients in a regulated high elevation Rocky Mountain river[J]. Regulated Ri-vers,1989,(3). [8] Stephen Higgs, Elizabeth Maclin, Margaret Bowman, et al. The ecology of dam removal-A summary of benefits and impacts. American Rivers. http://americanrivers.org.2002. [9] Eaglson P S. Ecohydrology: Darwinmian Expression of Vegetation and Function[M]. London, UK: Cambridge University Press,2002. [10] Rodriguez I, Porporato A. Ecohydrology of Water Controlled Ecosystem: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics[M]. London, UK: Cambridge University Press,2004. [11] Xia Jun, FENG Hua-li, ZHAN Che-sheng, et al. Determination of a reasonable percentage for ecological water-use in the Haihe River Basin, China[J]. Pedosphere,2006,16(1):563-575. [12] 夏军.维系黄河健康生命的理念与实践[J].科学对社会的影响,2005,20(4):288~292. [13] 郑利民,王世忠,黄福贵.黄河水利枢纽对生态环境的影响[J].西北水电,2005,(3):4~6. [14] 毛战坡,彭文启,王世岩,等.三门峡水库运行水位对湿地水文过程影响研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(1):36~41. [15] 洪再恭."绿水"工程中橡胶坝的水环境和生态问题初探[J].水利科技,2006,(2):32~33. [16] 刘庄,沈渭寿,吴焕忠.水利设施对淮河水域生态环境的影响[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(2): 77~81. [17] 索丽生.闸坝与生态[J].中国水利,2005,(16):5~7. [18] 刘昌明,郑红星,王中根.流域水循环分布式模拟[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2006. [19] 张东,张万昌,朱利,等.SWAT分布式流域水文物理模型的改进及应用研究[J].地理科学,2005,(4): 434~440. [20] 张银辉.SWAT模型及其应用研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,(5):121~130. [21] 丁晋利,郑粉莉.SWAT模型及其应用[J].水土保持研究,2004,(4):128~130. [22] 张永勇,夏军,王纲胜,等.淮河流域闸坝联合调度对河流水质影响分析[J].武汉大学学报(工学版), 2007,40(4):31~35. [23] M Di luzio, R Srinivasan, J G Arnold, et al. ARCVIEW interface for SWAT2000 user’s guide. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas TWRI Report TR-193, 2002. [24] S L Neitsch, J G Arnold, J R Kiniry, et al. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas TWRI Report TR-191,2002.
文章导航

/