自然资源资产负债表编制中生态损益核算

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200401

PDF(1117 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 755-766. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200401

研究论文

自然资源资产负债表编制中生态损益核算

张婕^1,2, 刘玉洁^1,2, 潘韬^1,3, 封志明^1,2, 杨艳昭^1,2, 葛全胜^1,2

作者信息 +

Ecological profit and loss accounting in the preparation of natural resources balance sheet

ZHANG Jie^1,2, LIU Yu-jie^1,2, PAN Tao^1,3, FENG Zhi-ming^1,2, YANG Yan-zhao^1,2, GE Quan-sheng^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

生态损益核算是自然资源资产负债表的重要部分,是对自然资源分类核算的扩展和补充。本文梳理生态损益核算的总体思路,系统总结生态损益核算技术,以围场县为例进行实证,遵循先实物后价值的核算原则,选择森林、草地、湿地生态系统,按不同的生态服务指标进行实物量和价值量的核算,并在已有的核算基础上计算各类型生态系统的实物量参数和价值量参数,以便根据面积统计数据进行快速简洁的核算比较。研究发现：围场县2015年生态系统服务功能价值量总值为338.99亿,与2013年相比增加了0.04%。生态系统服务功能价值量从大到小依次为草地、森林、湿地,核算期间森林和草地生态系统价值量分别下降0.06%和0.22%,湿地生态系统价值量增加4.47%。研究成果有助于全面理解和量化自然资源数量变化和质量变化带来的生态效应,并为自然资源资产负债表中的负债核算提供数据基础。

Abstract

Ecological profit and loss accounting is an important part of the natural resources balance sheet and it is an extension and supplement to the classification of natural resources. This study combs the general idea of ecological profit and loss accounting, systematically summarizes the ecological profit and loss accounting technology, and takes the Weichang county as an example. Following the principle of accounting for values after the physical quantity, the forest, grassland and wetland ecosystems are selected, the service indicator carries out the accounting of the physical quantity and the value quantity, and calculates the physical quantity parameter and the value quantity parameter of each type of ecosystem based on the existing accounting, so as to make a quick and simple accounting comparison based on the area statistics. The study found that, in 2015, the total value of the ecosystem service function value of Weichang county was 33.899 billion, an increase of 0.04% compared with 2013. The value of ecosystem services functioned from grassland to forest and wetland. The values of forest and grassland ecosystems decreased by 0.06% and 0.22%, respectively, and the value of wetland ecosystem increased by 4.47%. The results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the ecological effects brought by the changes in the quantity and quality of natural resources, and provide a data base for liability accounting in natural resource balance sheets.

导出引用

张婕, 刘玉洁, 潘韬, 封志明, 杨艳昭, 葛全胜. 自然资源资产负债表编制中生态损益核算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 755-766 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200401

ZHANG Jie, LIU Yu-jie, PAN Tao, FENG Zhi-ming, YANG Yan-zhao, GE Quan-sheng. Ecological profit and loss accounting in the preparation of natural resources balance sheet[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(4): 755-766 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200401

参考文献

[1] 黄溶冰, 赵谦. 自然资源资产负债表编制与审计的探讨. 审计研究, 2015, (1): 37-43.
[HUANG R B, ZHAO Q.Discussion on the preparation and audit of natural resources balance sheet. Audit Research, 2015, (1): 37-43.]
[2] 闫慧敏, 封志明, 杨艳昭, 等. 湖州/安吉: 全国首张市/县自然资源资产负债表编制. 资源科学, 2017, 39(9): 1634-1645.
[YAN H M, FENG Z M, YANG Y Z, et al.Huzhou/Anji: The first national/county natural resource balance sheet compilation. Resources Science, 2017, 39(9): 1634-1645.]
[3] 杨艳昭, 封志明, 闫慧敏, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制的“承德模式”. 资源科学, 2017, 39(9): 1646-1657.
[YANG Y Z, FENG Z M, YAN H M, et al."Chengde Model" for the preparation of natural resources balance sheet. Resources Science, 2017, 39(9): 1646-1657.]
[4] 封志明, 杨艳昭, 闫慧敏, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制的若干基本问题. 资源科学, 2017, 39(9): 1615-1627.
[FENG Z M, YANG Y Z, YAN H M, et al.Some basic issues in the preparation of natural resources balance sheets. Resources Science, 2017, 39(9): 1615-1627.]
[5] 陶建格, 沈镭, 何利, 等. 自然资源资产辨析和负债、权益账户设置与界定研究: 基于复式记账的自然资源资产负债表框架. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 1686-1696.
[TAO J G, SHEN L, HE L, et al.Analysis of natural resource assets and liabilities, equity account setting and definition research-natural resources balance sheet framework based on double entry accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(10): 1686-1696.]
[6] 张志涛, 戴广翠, 郭晔, 等. 森林资源资产负债表编制基本框架研究. 资源科学, 2018, 40(5): 929-935.
[ZHANG Z T, DAI G C, GUO Y, et al.Basic framework research on the preparation of forest resources balance sheet. Resources Science, 2018, 40(5): 929-935.]
[7] 焦志倩, 王红瑞, 许新宜, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制设计及应用Ⅱ: 应用. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 1715-1724.
[JIAO Z Q, WANG H R, XU X Y, et al.Design and application of natural resources balance sheets Ⅱ. Journal of Applied Natural Resources, 2018, 33(10): 1715-1724.]
[8] COSTANZA R, DARGE R, DEGROOT R, et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[9] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 19-25.
[OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, MIAO H.China's terrestrial ecosystem service function and its ecological economic value. Preliminary Journal of Ecology, 1999, 19(5): 19-25.]
[10] 谢高地, 张镱锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 47-53.
[XIE G D, ZHANG Y L, LU C X, et al.The value of China's natural grassland ecosystem services. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001, 16(1): 47-53.]
[11] 王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究: 以阿尔山市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3): 146-154.
[WANG L Y, XIAO Y, OUYANG Z Y, et al.Study on the accounting of ecosystem value of national key ecological function districts and counties: A case study of Arshaan city. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3): 146-154.]
[12] 欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 等. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7136-7139.
[OUYANG Z Y, ZHENG H, XIE G D, et al.Ecology assets, ecological compensation and ecological civilization science and technology contribution accounting and technology. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7136-7139.]
[13] 孔含笑, 沈镭, 钟帅, 等. 关于自然资源核算的研究进展与争议问题. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 363-376.
[KONG H X, SHEN L, ZHONG S, et al.Research progress and controversy about natural resource accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 363-376.]
[14] 潘韬, 封志明, 刘玉洁, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制中的负债核算方法与案例. 国土资源科技管理, 2019, 36(2): 74-84.
[PAN T, FENG Z M, LIU Y J, et al.The methods of accounting for liabilities in the preparation of natural resources balance sheet and case management. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2019, 36(2): 74-84.]
[15] 高敏雪. 扩展的自然资源核算: 以自然资源资产负债表为重点. 统计研究, 2016, 33(1): 4-12.
[GAO M X.Expanded natural resource accounting: Focusing on natural resources balance sheet. Statistic Research, 2016, 33(1): 4-12.]
[16] 刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 赵文武, 等. 生态资产核算与生态系统服务评估: 概念交汇与重点方向. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8267-8276.
[LIU Y X, FU B J, ZHAO W W, et al.Ecological asset accounting and ecosystem service assessment: Conceptual convergence and key directions of ecology. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(23): 8267-8276.]
[17] 张彪, 徐洁, 王硕, 等. 首都生态圈土地覆被及其生态服务功能特征. 资源科学, 2015, 37(8): 1513-1519.
[ZHANG B, XU J, WANG S, et al. Land cover of the capital ecological circle and its ecological service function characteristics. Resource Science, 2015, 37(8): 1513-1519.]
[18] 缪建群, 杨文亭, 杨滨娟, 等. 崇义客家梯田区生态系统服务功能及价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1817-1831.
[MIU J Q, YANG W T, YANG B J, et al.Ecosystem service function and value evaluation of hakka terraced fields in Chongyi. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(11): 1817-1831.]
[19] AUSSEIL A G E, DYMOND J R, KIRSCHBAUM M U F, et al. Assessment of multiple ecosystem services in New Zealand at the catchment scale. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2013, 43: 37-48.
[20] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11): 1918-1926.
[ZHANG Z Q, XU Z M, CHENG G D.Ecosystem service and evaluation of natural capital value. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(11): 1918-1926.]
[21] 刘树华, 李浩, 陆宏芳. 鼎湖山南亚热带森林生态系统服务价值动态. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(Z1): 1042-1047.
[LIU S H, LI H, LU H F.Dinghushan south subtropical forest ecosystem service value dynamics. Journal of Eco-Environment, 2011, 20(Z1): 1042-1047.]
[22] RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, TENGö M, et al.Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. BioScience, 2010, 60(8): 576-589.
[23] 张翼然, 周德民, 刘苗. 中国内陆湿地生态系统服务价值评估: 以71个湿地案例点为数据源. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13): 4279-4286.
[ZHANG Y R, ZHOU D M, LIU M.Evaluation of the service value of inland wetland ecosystem in China: Based on 71 wetland case points as data sources. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(13): 4279-4286.]