城市生态空间冲突分析与系统优化方法

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200308

PDF(3636 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 601-613. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200308

研究论文

城市生态空间冲突分析与系统优化方法

苏伟忠¹, 马丽雅^1,2, 陈爽¹, 杨桂山¹

作者信息 +

Conflict analysis and system optimization of urban ecological space

SU Wei-zhong¹, MA Li-ya^1,2, CHEN Shuang¹, YANG Gui-shan¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为适应国土空间整合理论方法的迫切需求,建立由冲突源、冲突区、冲突影响组成的城市生态空间冲突分析框架,其案例应用表明:城市生态空间的社会经济第一冲突源并不突出,政策驱动力构成首要冲突源;城市汇水区渗透性能下降,产流增加,汇流速度加快,形成上游高地型、中下游沿岸型、下游低洼型及沿山型等4种冲突类型,采用城市雨洪模型（SWMM）辨识出4种内涝区及分布类型;针对冲突源、空间优化核心和末端排水建立城市生态空间系统优化目标体系,重点提出“点线面”结合的空间优化核心路径。研究为国土空间整合提供理论与方法支撑,并涵盖国际雨洪管理演替过程,有助于对当前大规模土地开发转型及海绵城市建设理念的本土认识。

Abstract

On the basis of the needs of national land space integration theory and method, the paper explores the system optimization method of urban ecological space adapting to the local development characteristics of China's rapidly urbanized areas. (1) Firstly, from the perspective of landscape or land composition based on CHANS (coupled human and nature system), the elements of urban ecological space system are deconstructed as ecological space and urban space. Then, the process framework of urban ecological space conflict analysis is established, which includes three aspects: conflict source, conflict area and conflict impact. The conflict source refers to the driving force of urban spatial growth and the source of ecological spatial change. The pressure of urban spatial change on ecological space results in the formation of ecological spatial conflict area under the conflict source. The consequences of various urban ecological functions (processes) are caused by conflict factors and conflict areas. Lastly, the way of system optimization is proposed based on the systematic diagnosis of conflict process and causes. (2) The case study of rapid urbanization shows that the first conflict source of social and economic activities in urban ecological space conflict is not prominent, and the policy driving force constitutes the main conflict source and runs through the whole conflict process. Through the analysis of road network and land layout planning process, the type and conflict mechanism of conflict area between urban and natural catchment areas are revealed, and the SWMM model is used to simulate and identify four flooding types and key causes. (3) Therefore, the system optimization objectives of urban ecological space are constructed respectively for conflict sources, conflict areas and conflict impact. The traditional optimization objectives aim at the drainage process and facilities formed by end-conflict impacts, and the core objectives aim at the key causes of formation of flooding areas, i.e. the enhancement of storage function and reconstruction of spatial elements in conflict areas of urban ecological space change. The fundamental optimization objectives aim is to change system, policy and planning of urban ecological space. The spatial optimization framework consisting of three types of main functional optimization areas, six types of key points and five types of key channels is identified for the case area. The framework of conflict analysis and the method of system optimization in the paper provide reference for the study of national land spatial integration. The case study covers the succession process of international stormwater management as a whole, which is helpful for the local understanding of the current large-scale land development transformation and the concept of sponge city construction.

导出引用

苏伟忠, 马丽雅, 陈爽, 杨桂山. 城市生态空间冲突分析与系统优化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 601-613 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200308

SU Wei-zhong, MA Li-ya, CHEN Shuang, YANG Gui-shan. Conflict analysis and system optimization of urban ecological space[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(3): 601-613 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200308

参考文献

[1] ZHANG T W.Community features and urban sprawl: The case of the Chicago Metropolitan Region. Land Use Policy 2001, 18(3): 221-232.
[2] 金经元. 再谈霍华德的明日的田园城市. 国际城市规划, 1996, (4): 31-36.
[JIN J Y.Talking about Howard's tomorrow's rural city. International Urban Planning, 1996, (4): 31-36.]
[3] MCHARG I L.Design with Nature. England: John Wiley Sons Inc, 1992.
[4] ORTOLAND L.Environmental Regulation and Impact Assessment. Chichester: Wiley, 1997.
[5] DAVID S, OLIVIER S.Investigating the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. Town Planning Review, 2003, 74(1): 31-50.
[6] CAMAGNI R, CAPELLO R.Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Towards smart innovation policies. Growth & Change, 2013, 44(2): 355-389.
[7] BROWN L R.Building a sustainable society. Society, 1982, 19(2): 75-85.
[8] 欧阳志云, 王如松. 生态规划的回顾与展望. 自然资源学报, 1995, 10(3): 203-215.
[OUYANG Z Y, WANG R S.The review and prospect ecological planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 1995, 10(3): 203-215.]
[9] YU K J.Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36: 1-17.
[10] AHERN J.Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1995, 33(1-3): 131-155.
[11] HAAREN C V, REICH M.The German way to greenways and habitat networks. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2006, 76(1-4): 7-22.
[12] JONGMAN R H G, KULYIK M, KRISTIANSEN I. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2004, 68(2-3): 305-319.
[13] TAN K W.A greenway network for Singapore. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2006, 76(s1-s4): 45-66.
[14] BENEDICT M A, MCMAHON E T.Green infrastructure: Smart conservation for the 21^st century. Renewable Resources Journal, 2002, 20(3): 12-17.
[15] SU W Z, GU C L, YANG G S, et al.Measuring the impact of urban sprawl on natural landscape pattern of the Western Taihu Lake watershed, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 95(1): 61-67.
[16] SU W, YE G.Differences of soil fertility in farmland occupation and supplement areas in the Taihu Lake watershed during 1985-2010. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health, 2014, 11(6): 5598-5612.
[17] SAMANIEGO L, BARDOSSY A.Simulation of the impacts of land use/cover and climatic changes on the runoff characteristics at the mesoscale. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 196(1): 45-61.
[18] SU W Z, GU C L, YANG G S, et al.Assessing the impact of land use/land cover on urban heat island pattern in Nanjing city, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2010, 136(4): 365-372.
[19] MEJIA A I, MOGLEN G E.Impact of the spatial distribution of imperviousness on the hydrologic response of an urbanizing basin. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(23): 3359-3373.
[20] 李锋, 叶亚平, 宋博文, 等. 城市生态用地的空间结构及其生态系统服务动态演变: 以常州市为例. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5623-5631.
[LI F, YE Y P, SONG B W, et al.Spatial structure of urban ecological land and its dynamic development of ecosystem services: A case study in Changzhou city, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5623-5631.
[21] PAULEIT S, ENNOS R, GOLDING Y.Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change: A study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Planning, 2005, 71(2-4): 295-310.
[22] NUISSL H, HAASE D, LANZENDORF M, et al.Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions: A context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(2): 414-424.
[23] BRABEC E A.Imperviousness and land use policy: Toward an effective approach to watershed planning. Journal of Hydrology Engineer, 2009, 14: 425-433.
[24] SHUSTER W D, BONTA J, THURSTON H, et al.Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water Journal, 2005, 2(4): 263-275.
[25] SCHUELER T R, FRALEY-MCNEAL L, CAPPIELLA K.Is impervious cover still important?: Review of recent research. Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 309-315.
[26] 张钦弟, 卫伟, 陈利顶, 等. 黄土高原草地土壤水分和物种多样性沿降水梯度的分布格局. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362.
[ZHANG Q D, WEI W, CHEN L D, et al.Spatial variation of soil moisture and species diversity patterns along a precipitation gradient in the grasslands of the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362.]
[27] 孔繁花, 尹海伟, 刘金勇, 等. 城市绿地降温效应研究进展与展望. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(1): 171-181.
[KONG F H, YIN H W, LIU J Y, et al.A review of research on the urban green space cooling effect. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(1): 171-181.]
[28] 蒙吉军, 朱利凯, 杨倩, 等. 鄂尔多斯市土地利用生态安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2012, 32(21): 6755-6766.
[MENG J J, ZHU L K, YANG Q, et al.Building ecological security pattern based on land use: A case study of Ordos, Northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(21): 6755-6766.]
[29] 苏伟忠, 杨桂山, 陈爽, 等. 城市增长边界分析方法研究: 以长江三角洲常州市为例. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(2): 322-331.
[SU W Z, YANG G S, CHEN S, et al.Analysis method of urban growth boundary of the Changzhou city in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(2): 322-331.]
[30] 吴健生, 张理卿, 彭建, 等. 深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别. 生态学报, 2013, 33(13): 4125-4133.
[WU J S, ZHANG L Q, PENG J, et al.The integrated recognition of the source area of the urban ecological security pattern in Shenzhen. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(13): 4125-4133.
[31] 高吉喜, 邹长新, 王丽霞. 划定生态保护红线深化环境影响评价. 环境影响评价, 2014, (4): 11-14.
[GAO J X, ZOU C X, WANG L X.Deepening environmental impact assessment by delimitating red line of ecological protection. Environmental Impact Review, 2014, (4): 11-14.]
[32] 苏伟忠, 陈维肖, 郭葳, 等. 太湖流域城乡用地扩张对河网的空间占用机制初探. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1289-1301.
[SU W Z, CHEN W X, GUO W, et al.The occupation of river network by urban-rural land expansion in Taihu Basin, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(8): 1289-1301.]
[33] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
[PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[34] PULLINGER M G, JOHNSON C J.Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: Evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landscape Ecology, 2010, 25(10): 1547-1560.
[35] 刘毅. 论中国人地关系演进的新时代特征: “中国人地关系研究”专辑序言. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1477-1484.
[LIU Y.Preface to the special issue on Chinese man-land relationships in a New Era. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(8): 1477-1484.]
[36] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3): 1-6.
[WU C J.The core of geography: Man-earth relationship area system. Economic Geography, 1991, 11(3): 1-6.]
[37] ROZENFELD A F, SOPHIE A H, EMILIO H G, et al.Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulational system. PNAS, 2008, 105(48): 18824-18829.
[38] SHEPPARD E, MCMASTER R B.Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. Scale & Geographic Inquiry Nature Society & Method, 2004, 47(7): 1-22.
[39] LIU J G, DIETZ T, CARPENTER S R, et al.Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317(5844): 1513-1516.
[40] 傅伯杰. 地理学综合研究的途径与方法: 格局与过程耦合. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059.
[FU B J.The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and processes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059.]
[41] MAXIM L, SPANGENBERG J, O'CONNO M. The DPSIR framework for biodiversity assessment. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(1): 12-23.
[42] SU W Z, YE G B, YAO S M, et al.Urban land pattern impacts on floods in a new district of China. Sustainability, 2014, 6(10): 6488-6508.
[43] LOWE S A.Sanitary sewer design using EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2010, 18(2): 203-212.
[44] 苏伟忠. 都市密集区城镇土地格局的环境效应与适应研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
[SU W Z.Study on Environmental Effect and Adaption of Urban Land Pattern in the Metropolitan Area. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.]