基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别&mdash;&mdash;以烟台市为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116

PDF(3542 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 190-203. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116

研究论文

基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别——以烟台市为例

方莹, 王静, 黄隆杨, 翟天林

作者信息 +

Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystempreservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: A case study of Yantai city

FANG Ying, WANG Jing, HUANG Long-yang, ZHAI Tian-lin

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

山水林田湖草系统生态保护修复是维护国家生态安全的重要保障。当前国土空间生态保护修复研究缺乏从生态系统的完整性和结构连通性角度对国土空间生态保护修复关键区域进行诊断和识别。烟台市作为我国典型滨海城市,湿地退化,生境类型单一造成景观稳定性差,国土空间生态保护修复刻不容缓。为全面识别烟台市国土空间生态保护修复关键区域,利用生境质量模型、生境风险评估模型、粒度反推法、最小累积阻力模型和电路理论,通过构建区域生态安全格局,诊断生态“夹点”、生态障碍点、生态断裂点等,识别和确定研究区域的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域。研究发现：（1）烟台市生态源地共计668.85 km²,主要为林地、水域,源间廊道共计1548.36 km,呈现“两横两纵”的空间特征;（2）基于生态安全格局识别烟台生态保护修复关键区域,包括13处生态“夹点”区域、8处生态障碍点区域、39处生态断裂点区域、破碎生态空间1308.66 km²;（3）结合各类生态保护修复关键区域的空间分布特征、土地利用现状,分别提出修复提升方向。研究可为国土空间生态保护修复关键区域识别、生态系统整体修复提升提供科学指导。

Abstract

Ecosystem preservation and restoration of Mountain-River-Forest-Farmland-Lake-Grass System is very important for national ecological security. Current researches on ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning lack the determination and identification of key areas from a perspective of ecosystem integrity and landscape connectivity. Due to wetland degradation and homogeneity of habitat types that resulted in the low ecosystem resilience, it is urgent for in Yantai, a typical bay city in China, to restore degraded ecosystem and preserve natural resources. In the study, a regional ecological security pattern was proposed and key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration including pinch points, barrier points, break points and fragmented ecological functional land were identified using habitat quality model, habitat risk assessment model, granularity inverse method, minimum cumulative resistance model and circuit theory. The results showed that the ecological hubs covered an area of 668.85 km², with a total of 1548.36 km corridors between them, and most of the hubs were water body and forests. All of them constructed a "two horizontal and two vertical" ecological security pattern. Key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration were identified based on the ecological security pattern, including a total of 13 ecological pinch points, 8 ecological barrier points, 39 ecological break points, and 1308.66 km² of fragmented ecological land. Suggestions of restoration were proposed, with a combination of the spatial distribution characteristics and land use status of various key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration. It would help to provide scientific guidance for identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning and sustainable ecosystem management.

导出引用

方莹, 王静, 黄隆杨, 翟天林. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别——以烟台市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 190-203 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116

FANG Ying, WANG Jing, HUANG Long-yang, ZHAI Tian-lin. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystempreservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: A case study of Yantai city[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(1): 190-203 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116

参考文献

[1] 彭少麟. 恢复生态学. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004: 497-511.
[PENG S L. Restoration Ecology.Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2004: 497-511.]
[2] 曹永强, 郭明, 刘思然, 等. 基于文献计量分析的生态修复现状研究. 生态学报, 2016, 36(8): 2442-2450.
[CAO Y Q, GUO M, LIU S R, et al.Current status of ecological restoration based on bibliometric analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(8): 2442-2450.]
[3] 杨艳平, 罗福周, 王博俊. 基于朴门设计的煤矿废弃地生态修复规划研究. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(6): 1080-1091.
[YANG Y P, LUO F Z, WANG B J. Research on ecological restoration planning of coal mine wasteland based on Permaculture Design. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(6): 1080-1091.]
[4] 王志强, 崔爱花, 缪建群, 等. 淡水湖泊生态系统退化驱动因子及修复技术研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(18): 6253-6264.
[WANG Z Q, CUI A H, MIU J Q, et al.Research progress on the driving factors of freshwater lake ecosystem degradation and associated restoration techniques. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(18): 6253-6264.]
[5] 刘国彬, 王兵, 卫伟, 等. 黄土高原水土流失综合治理技术及示范. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7074-7077.
[LIU G B, WANG B, WEI W, et al.Technique and demonstration of water and soil loss comprehensive harness on the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7074-7077.]
[6] 邹长新, 王燕, 王文林, 等. 山水林田湖草系统原理与生态保护修复研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(11): 961-967.
[ZOU C X, WANG Y, WANG W L, et al.Theory of Mountain-River-Forest-Farmland-Lake-Grass System and ecological protection and restoration research. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(11): 961-967.]
[7] 王夏辉, 何军, 饶胜, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践. 环境保护, 2018, 46(s1): 17-20.
[WANG X H, HE J, RAO S, et al.Design of implementation path of ecological engineering for ecological protection and restoration of multi ecological elements. Environmental Protection, 2018, 46(s1): 17-20.]
[8] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
[PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[9] 陈影, 哈凯, 贺文龙, 等. 冀西北间山盆地区景观格局变化及优化研究: 以河北省怀来县为例. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 556-569.
[CHEN Y, HA K, HE W L, et al.Study on the change and optimization of landscape pattern in the basin of Northwest Hebei Mountains: A case study of Huailai county, Hebei province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(4): 556-569.]
[10] 关文彬, 谢春华, 马克明, 等. 景观生态恢复与重建是区域生态安全格局构建的关键途径. 生态学报, 2003, 23(1): 64-75.
[GUAN W B, XIE C H, MA K M, et al.A vital method for constructing regional ecological security pattern: Landscape ecological restoration and rehabilitation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(1): 64-75.]
[11] 陈小平, 陈文波. 鄱阳湖生态经济区生态网络构建与评价. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1611-1618.
[CHEN X P, CHEN W B. Construction and evaluation of ecological network in Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5): 1611-1618.]
[12] 黄隆杨, 刘胜华, 方莹, 等. 基于“质量—风险—需求”框架的武汉市生态安全格局构建. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 615-626.
[HUANG L Y, LIU S H, FANG Y, et al.Construction of Wuhan's ecological security pattern under the "quality-risk-requirement" framework. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2): 615-626.]
[13] 彭建, 汪安, 刘焱序, 等. 城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 333-346.
[PENG J, WANG A, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on measuring urban ecological land demand. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 333-346.]
[14] PENG J, PAN Y J, LIU Y X, et al.Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat International, 2018, 71(7): 110-124.
[15] 彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 等. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 701-710.
[PENG J, LI H L, LIU Y X, et al.Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong'an New Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 701-710.]
[16] PENG J, ZHAO S Q, DONG J Q, et al.Applying ant colony algorithm to identify ecological security patterns in megacities. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019, 117(7): 214-222.
[17] 丛佃敏, 赵书河, 于涛, 等. 综合生态安全格局构建与城市扩张模拟的城市增长边界划定: 以天水市规划区(2015-2030年)为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 14-26.
[CONG D M, ZHAO S H, YU T, et al.Urban growth boundary delimitation method integrating comprehensive ecological security pattern and urban expansion simulation: A case study of planning areas in Tianshui city (2015-2030). Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(1): 14-26.]
[18] 刘佳, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于电路理论的南京城市绿色基础设施格局优化. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372.
[LIU J, YIN H W, KONG F H, et al.Structure optimization of circuit theory: Based green infrastructure in Nanjing, China. Acta Ecologica Sinlea, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372.]
[19] 程迎轩, 王红梅, 刘光盛, 等. 基于最小累计阻力模型的生态用地空间布局优化. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(16): 248-257.
[CHENG Y X, WANG H M, LIU G S, et al.Spatial layout optimization for ecological land based on minimum cumulative resistance model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(16): 248-257.]
[20] 钟式玉, 吴箐, 李宇, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的城镇土地空间重构: 以广州市新塘镇为例, 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(11): 3173-3179.
[ZHONG S Y, WU Q, LI Y, et al.Reconstruction of urban land space based on minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study of Xintang town, Guangzhou city. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(11): 3173-3179.]
[21] MCRAE B H, DICKSON B G, KEITT T H, et al.Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 2008, 89(10): 2712-2724.
[22] 徐威杰, 陈晨, 张哲, 等. 基于重要生态节点独流减河流域生态廊道构建. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(5): 805-813.
[XU W J, CHEN C, ZHANG Z, et al.Ecological corridor construction based on important ecological nodes in Duliujian River Basin. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(5): 805-813.]
[23] 史娜娜, 韩煜, 王琦, 等. 青海省保护地生态网络构建与优化. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(6): 1910-1916.
[SHI N N, HAN Y, WANG Q, et al.Construction and optimization of ecological network for protected areas in Qinghai province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(6): 1910-1916.]
[24] MCRAE B H, HALL S A, BEIER P, et al.Where to restore ecological connectivity?: Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. Plos One, 2012, 7(12): e52604, Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604.
[25] MCRAE B H, SHAH V B, MOHAPATRA T K. 2013. Circuitscape 4 User Guide. The Nature Conservancy. http://www. circuitscape.org.2014-03-28.
[26] NELSON E, MENDOZA G, REGETZ J, et al.Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 4-11.
[27] 吴健生, 毛家颖, 林倩, 等. 基于生境质量的城市增长边界研究: 以长三角地区为例. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1): 28-36.
[WU J S, MAO J Y, LIN Q, et al.Urban growth boundary based on the evaluation of habitat quality: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an example. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(1): 28-36.]
[28] 陈晔倩, 李杨帆, 祁新华, 等. 基于栖息地风险评价模型的海岸带滩涂湿地风险评价: 以闽三角为例. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4214-4225.
[CHEN Y Q, LI Y F, QI X H, et al.Assessing ecosystem risk in coastal wetland of the South Fujian Golden Delta using a habitat risk assessment model based on the land-use effect on tidal flat wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4214-4225.]
[29] 陆禹, 佘济云, 陈彩虹, 等. 基于粒度反推法的景观生态安全格局优化: 以海口市秀英区为例. 生态学报, 2015, 35(19): 6384-6393.
[LU Y, SHE J Y, CHEN C H, et al.Landscape ecological security pattern optimization based on the granularity inverse method: A case study in Xiuying district, Haikou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(19): 6384-6393.]
[30] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.
[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al.The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.]
[31] 蒙吉军, 王晓东, 周朕. 干旱区景观格局综合优化: 黑河中游案例. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 53(3): 451-461.
[MENG J J, WANG X D, ZHOU Z. Integrated landscape pattern optimization in arid region: A case study of Middle Reaches of Heihe River. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(3): 451-461.]
[32] 邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局过程尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 17-23.
[WU J G. Landscape Ecology Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 17-23.]
[33] WANG J, HE T, LIN Y F. Changes in ecological, agricultural, and urban land space in 1984-2012 in China: Land policies and regional social-economical drivers. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 1-13.
[34] WANG J, LIN Y F, ZHAI T L, et al.The role of human activity in decreasing ecologically sound land use in China. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(3): 446-460.
[35] WANG J, ZHAI T L, LIN Y F, et al.Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 657: 781-791.