基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究

王正淑, 王继军, 刘佳

自然资源学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5) : 779-788.

PDF(1437 KB)
PDF(1437 KB)
自然资源学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5) : 779-788. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150560
资源生态

基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究

  • 王正淑1, 王继军1, 2*, *, 刘佳1
作者信息 +

Study on the Compensation Standard of Returning Farmland to Forest in Xiannangou Watershed from the Perspective of Carbon Sink

  • WANG Zheng-shu1, WANG Ji-jun1, 2, LIU Jia1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

补偿标准是退耕还林生态补偿的核心与难点,为探讨黄土高原退耕林地合适的补偿标准,论文基于清洁发展机制的国际背景,通过理论分析、实地测量与室内实验,把碳汇价值与退耕农户的机会成本相结合,构建了禁伐政策下退耕林地补偿标准的动态模型;并选取黄土高原退耕的代表流域——县南沟进行实证分析,依据退耕刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)林特性确定退耕的一个补偿周期为37 a,退耕地补偿过程与补偿标准分为两个阶段:退耕1~17 a,通过机会成本的计算,补偿的可执行标准为1 997.26元/(hm2·a);退耕18~37 a,通过碳汇模型进行测算,补偿的可执行标准为3 692.35元/(hm2·a)。人工刺槐纯林在补偿周期之后会逐渐出现灌木层和衰败现象,因此,这一补偿期结束后,应根据林地生态群落的变化再行核算并完善其补偿标准。将碳汇价值纳入补偿体系,能促使农民为提高碳汇产量自觉增强林地管护,巩固退耕成果。

Abstract

Quantitatively formulating compensation standard is a core and difficulty to establish ecological compensation mechanism. In order to explore appropriate compensation standard for returning farmland to forest and provide reference for national and regional compensation policy formulation in the Loess Plateau, in the international background of the Clean Development Mechanism and logging ban policy, this paper builds a dynamic model of compensation standard for returning farmland to forest by combining value of carbon-sink with farmer’s opportunity cost. Through theoretical analysis and field measurements, combined with laboratory experiments, we made an empirical study of the representative watershed—Xiannangou Watershed on the Loess Plateau. The compensation cycle is determined to be 37 years according to the growth characteristics of the Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the Xiannangou Watershed. The compensation process and standard are divided into two stages. During the 1st-17th years of returning farmland to forest, when the farmer’s opportunity cost is greater than the value of carbon-sink, we should compensate for the actual economic loss of farmers. Executable standard of compensation is 1 997.26 yuan/(hm2·a) according to the oppor-tunity cost. During the 18-37th years of returning farmland to forest, the value of carbon-sink is greater than the farmer’s opportunity cost, which means that the industry substitution has completed. Executable standard of compensation is 3 692.35 yuan/(hm2·a) according to carbon sink model. In summary, the value of carbon-sink accounts for 89.50% of the total compen-sation in the compensation period. Artificial Robinia pseudoacacia forest will gradually generate shrubs and decline after the compensation period, therefore, the compensation standard should be calculated and perfected again in accordance with the change of forestland ecological community after the compensation period finished. Involving the value of carbon-sink into the compensation system can push farmers to manage and protect forestland consciously for improving the carbon sink production, which is beneficial to consolidate the achievements of the Grain for Green Program on the Loess Plateau.

关键词

补偿标准 / 机会成本 / 碳汇价值 / 退耕林地 / 县南沟流域

Key words

compensation standard / opportunity cost / returning farmland to forest / value of carbon-sink / Xiannangou Watershed

引用本文

导出引用
王正淑, 王继军, 刘佳. 基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 779-788 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20150560
WANG Zheng-shu, WANG Ji-jun, LIU Jia. Study on the Compensation Standard of Returning Farmland to Forest in Xiannangou Watershed from the Perspective of Carbon Sink[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(5): 779-788 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20150560
中图分类号: F326.2   

参考文献

[1] 喻永红. 退耕还林生态补偿标准研究综述 [J]. 生态经济, 2014, 30(7): 47-50.

[2] 乔旭宁, 杨永菊, 杨德刚, 等. 流域生态补偿标准的确定——以渭干河流域为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(10): 1666-1676.

[3] DUNN C P, STEARNS F, GUNTENSPERGEN G R, et al. Ecological benefits of conservation reserve program [J]. Conservation Biology, 1993, 7(1): 132-139.
[4] 刘嘉尧, 吕志祥. 美国土地休耕保护计划及借鉴 [J]. 商业研究, 2009(8): 134-136.

[5] 艾春艳, 张世秋, 陶文娣, 等. 美国自然保护计划对中国退耕还林后续政策的启示 [J]. 林业经济, 2008(2): 70-75.

[6] KALACSKA M, SANCHEZ-AZOFEIFA G A, RIVARD B, et al. Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: A case study from Costa Rica and Mexico [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88: 348-359.
[7] 秦艳红, 康慕谊. 国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 557-567.

[8] 孔凡斌. 退耕还林(草)工程生态补偿机制研究 [J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(1): 65-101.

[9] 顾文. 基于CDM的县南沟流域商品型生态农业系统优化结构研究 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014: 1.

[10] PAGIOLA S, PLATAIS G. Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice [M]. Washington: World Bank, 2007.
[11] OLSCHEWSKI R, BENíTEZ P C, DE KONING G H J, et al. How attractive are forest carbon sinks? Economic insights into supply and demand of certified emission reductions [J]. Journal of Forest Economics, 2005, 11: 77-94.
[12] . http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php.
[13] JOTZO F, MICHAELOWA A. Estimating the CDM market under the Bonn Agreement [R]. HWWA Discussion Paper, No.145, 2001.
[14] TREXLER M C, HAUGENC. Keeping it Green: Opportunities for Mitigating Climate Change [M]. Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 1995.
[15] 林国庆, 柳婉郁. 因为二氧化碳排放减量策略下最适造林面积之经济分析 [R]. 台湾经济学会, 2005: 12.

[16] WILMAN E A, MAHENDRARAJAH M S. Carbon offset [J]. Land Economics, 2002, 78(3): 405-416.
[17] COSTA M P, WILSON C. An equivalence factor between CO 2 avoided emissions and sequestration—Description and applications in forestry [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000(5): 51-60.
[18] 柳婉郁, 林国庆. 地主参与碳汇方案与机制之经济分析 [D]. 台北: 台湾大学, 2008.

[19] 张长庆, 张文辉. 黄土高原不同立地条件下刺槐人工林种群的无性繁殖与更新 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(1): 135-144.

[20] HUNTINGTON T G. Carbon sequestration in an aggrading forest ecosystem in the Southeastern USA [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1995, 59(5): 1459-1467.
[21] VESTERDAL L, RITTER E, GUNDERSEN P. Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 169(1/2): 137-147.
[22] 刘迎春, 王秋凤, 于贵瑞, 等. 黄土丘陵区两种主要退耕还林树种生态系统碳储量和固碳潜力 [J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(15): 4277-4286.

[23] 李旭东, 张春平, 傅华. 黄土高原典型草原草地根冠比的季节动态及其影响因素 [J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 307-312.

[24] The Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI) of the IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [Z]. Japan: The Institute for Global Enviromental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, 2006.
[25] 国家林业局应对气候变化和节能减排工作领导小组办公室. 造林项目碳汇计量与监测指南 [M]. 北京: 林业出版社, 2008.

[26] 谢高地, 李士美, 肖玉, 等. 碳汇价值的形成和评价 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(1): 1-10.

[27] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统生态服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究 [J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(15): 608-613.

[28] 周萍, 刘国彬. 黄土丘陵区流域生物量和气体调节服务功能价值动态变化及评价 [J]. 生态经济, 2008, 35(3): 26-31, 35.

[29] 国家林业局. 中国林业统计年鉴 [M]. 北京: 林业出版社, 1990.

[30] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. http://data.stats.gov.cn/search/keywordlist2 [EB/OL]. (2010-11-11)[2015-04-20].
. ]
[31] 中国科学院、水利部西北水土保持研究所, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区水土保持型生态农业研究 [M]. 杨凌: 天则出版社, 1990.

[32] 货币政策司. 金融机构人民币存款基准利 [EB/OL]. (2014-11-18)[2015-04-21]. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/zhengcehuobisi/629/2014/20141128102100157180391/20141128102100157180391_.html.
. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/zhengcehuobisi/629/2014/20141128102100157180391/ 20141128102100157180391_.html. ]
[33] 张建军, 徐佳佳, 李慧敏. 水土保持林生长过程及碳密度的动态变化 [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(1): 70-76.

[34] 洪玫. 森林碳汇产业化初探 [J]. 生态经济, 2011(1): 113-115, 124.

[35] 程姝. 城镇化进程中农民工市民化研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学经济管理学院, 2013.

基金

国家自然科学基金(41571515); 中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目(2012027); “十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD31B05)
PDF(1437 KB)

1140

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/