渔业配额制度的起源、特点及展望

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.018

PDF(399 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3) : 522-528. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.018

专题论坛

渔业配额制度的起源、特点及展望

白洋

作者信息 +

The Origin, Characteristics and Prospect of Fishing Quota Legal System

BAI Yang

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

渔业配额制度是在渔业资源过度捕捞所导致的渔业危机和传统的投入控制管理失效的历史背景下,基于渔业资源生态特性而构建的一种产出控制的渔业管理模式。它是在总可捕量基础上发展起来的,并在冰岛、新西兰等国家得以成功实施。该制度具有专属性、可转让性、激励性等外在法律特征。学者对于配额制度的法律特性持不同观点,认同其准物权的特性是主流观点。资源的生物特性以及制度的实质内涵告诉我们,无论是国际配额还是国内配额,制度要想取得实效,必须牢牢遵循不得超越总可捕量的共同义务这一要旨,通过落实有限准入、加强监管等多种手段来保障这种共同义务的履行,才能实现资源的永续利用。

Abstract

Fishing quota legal system is an output control management based on ecological characteristics of fisheries resources, which the historical background is over-fishing and input control management failed. It is the development basis for TAC (total allowable catch), and is successfully implemented in Iceland and New Zealand. The system is exclusive, sustainable, transferable and incentive in the layer of law. Scholars have different views for the legal characteristics of quotas, of which the quasi-property was approved by majority. Its resources attribute essentially decides the quotas system which is a common duty that cannot overpass the total allowable catch. Through the implementation of a limited access, deepening international cooperation and strengthening the supervision means, we could secure mutual obligations, and then realize the sustainable utilization of resources.

导出引用

白洋. 渔业配额制度的起源、特点及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 522-528 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.018

BAI Yang. The Origin, Characteristics and Prospect of Fishing Quota Legal System[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 27(3): 522-528 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.03.018

中图分类号： S937

参考文献

[1] 杨得前. 建立配额捕捞制度的几点思考[J]. 中国水产, 2004, 18(4): 26-27. [2] 徐祥民. 极限与分配——再论环境法的本位[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2003, 13(4): 23-26. [3] 张永民, 赵士洞. 全球生态系统服务的状况与趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(5): 515-520. [4] 李家才, 陈工. 海洋渔业过度捕捞与私人可转让配额[J]. 生态经济, 2009(4): 56. [5] The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008 .http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0250e/i0250e00.htm, 2011-12-16. [6] 联合国环境规划署(UNEP). 全球环境展望年鉴2008[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2008. [7] 殷文伟. 我国海洋渔业管理中投入控制的灰色关联评价[J]. 浙江海洋学院学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 28(2): 192. [8] 朴英爱. 论TAC为基础的渔业管理制度[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2004(6): 36. [9] Scheiber H N, Carr C. The limited entry concept and the pre-history of the ITQ movement in fisheries management [M]//Pálsson G, Petersdottir G. Social Implications of Quota Systems in Fisheries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 1997. [10] National Research Council (NRC). Sharing the Fish: Towards a National Policy on Individual Fishing Quotas [M]. Washington D C: National Academy Press, 1999. [11] 陈荔彤. 国际渔业法律制度之研究[J]. 中兴法学, 1997(43): 234. [12] OECD. Toward Sustainable Fisheries [M]. OECD, 1997: 72-84. [13] 郭文路, 黄硕琳, 曹世娟. 个体可转让配额制度在渔业管理中的运用分析[J]. 海洋通报, 2002, 21(8): 26. [14] Talley P. Fishing rights-an Industry perspective ITQ and fishermen's attitudes: The change from hunter to farmer //Ross Shotton. Use of Property Rights in Fisheries Management. Rome: FAO, 2000, 404(1): 248. [15] 何世全. 公害对渔业权造成侵害之民事救济. 台湾海洋大学海洋法律研究所, 1991: 65. [16] 苏永华, 杨松. 我国渔业管理引进TAC、 ITQ制度的思考[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2004(6): 29. [17] 税兵. 论渔业权[J]. 现代法学, 2005, 27(2): 139-146. [18] 孙宪忠. 物权法[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2005: 41-425. [19] 崔建远. 物权法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2008: 258. [20] 陈宗尧. 美国渔业及其管理简介[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2004(1): 53-55.