黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险时空动态及其风险分区—以陕西省米脂县为例

刘迪, 陈海, 史琴琴, 张行, 耿甜伟

自然资源学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9) : 2012-2025.

PDF(4789 KB)
PDF(4789 KB)
自然资源学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9) : 2012-2025. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190916
资源生态

黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险时空动态及其风险分区—以陕西省米脂县为例

  • 刘迪, 陈海, 史琴琴, 张行, 耿甜伟
作者信息 +

Spatio-temporal variation of ecological risk in the loess hilly-gully region and its precaution partitions: A case study of Mizhi county, Shaanxi province, China

  • LIU Di, CHEN Hai, SHI Qin-qin, ZHANG Hang, GENG Tian-wei
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目前,黄土丘陵沟壑区等生态脆弱区生态风险评估已成为地理学与生态学应对生态系统管理的研究热点之一。以黄土丘陵沟壑区米脂县为研究区,构建“风险概率—敏感性—损失度”(PSI)的三维评价框架,并以子流域为评价单元进行数据整合,分析了米脂县2009-2015年准则层与综合生态风险的时空分异及其重心转移,并基于风险主导因子给出米脂县风险防范分区及降险对策。结果如下:(1)2009-2015年风险概率分别为49.93%、52.92%,有上升趋势;生境敏感性分别为0.61、0.60,下降了1.6%,生境质量趋好;损失度分别为0.42、0.46,损失度增加。(2)生态风险呈现中间高南北低的空间分布;研究期间生态风险值分别为0.14、0.15,风险有所升高;风险重心向西南转移跃入银州川道且风险演化主体方向为西北—东南走向。(3)风险预警区、生态恢复区、预警恢复兼顾区、自然调控区面积占比分别为7.53%、6.57%、23.86%、62.04%。基于风险主导因子的风险防范分区可有效进行风险消解,促进区域生境的可持续。

Abstract

Ecologically fragile regions such as loess hilly-gully region are highly responsive to global change. Regional development is on an unsustainable track under the background of fragile ecological environment and agricultural activities. The study of ecological risk in this region has become one of the hot spots of geographical and ecological response to ecosystem management. Taking Mizhi county for the study of loess hilly-gully region, land-use maps of this county in 2009 and 2015, a digital elevation model (DEM) and social and economic statistical yearbook of Mizhi county were needed and 253 small watersheds were identified as the auxiliary evaluation units by using ESRI's Hydrological Analysis Tools for ArcGIS 10.2. A comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework for identifying risk probability, habitat sensitivity, and system impairment was established, and multi-source data were integrated through range standardization and entropy weight method at watershed level. The spatio-temporal differentiation of criteria layers and comprehensive ecological risk were analyzed, at the same time, the evolution trend of comprehensive ecological risk was explored through the Standard Deviation Ellipse (SDE) and risk gravity. The risk precaution partitions were simultaneously delineated based on the risk dominant factor and the risk management strategies were formulated. The results were as follows: (1) The spatial distribution pattern of risk probability in Mizhi county was generally high in the middle and east and low in the northwest. The value of risk probability increased from 49.93% to 52.92% during 2009-2015. The habitat sensitivity index was 0.61 in 2009 and 0.60 and 2015, respectively, which was a decrease of 1.6% based on the InVEST model, and the habitat quality improved. The system impairment index was generally higher in the central and western regions while lower in the eastern region (southeast and northeast). The impairment index increased from 0.42 to 0.46 during 2009-2015, which indicated that the degree of impairment caused by ecological risk increased. (2) The spatial distribution pattern of comprehensive ecological risk was high in the middle, while low in the south and north. Between 2009 and 2015, the ecological risk index increased from 0.14 to 0.15, with an increase of 7.14%. The risk gravity of Mizhi county was distributed in Gaoqu township in 2009, and jumped into Yinzhou township in 2015. The main ecological risk evolution was northwest-southeast trending, and kept stable basically. (3) The study area was divided into four types of risk precaution partitions. Risk monitoring zones, ecological recovery zones, monitoring and recovery zones, and natural regulation zones encompassed 7.53%, 6.57%, 23.86% and 62.04% of the study area, respectively. Risk precaution partitions based on risk dominant factors can effectively eliminate risks and promote the sustainable development of regional habitats.

关键词

生态风险 / 风险重心 / 米脂县 / 时空分异 / 风险分区 / 黄土丘陵沟壑区

Key words

ecological risk / Mizhi county / risk gravity / spatio-temporal differentiation / loess hilly-gully region / risk precaution partitions

引用本文

导出引用
刘迪, 陈海, 史琴琴, 张行, 耿甜伟. 黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险时空动态及其风险分区—以陕西省米脂县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9): 2012-2025 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20190916
LIU Di, CHEN Hai, SHI Qin-qin, ZHANG Hang, GENG Tian-wei. Spatio-temporal variation of ecological risk in the loess hilly-gully region and its precaution partitions: A case study of Mizhi county, Shaanxi province, China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(9): 2012-2025 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20190916

参考文献

[1] 傅伯杰. 地理学:从知识、科学到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932.
[FU B J.Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932.]
[2] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 664-677.
[PENG J, DANG W X, LIU Y X, et al.Review on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(4): 664-677.]
[3] 张小飞, 彭建, 王仰麟, 等. 全球变化背景下景观生态适应性特征. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(9): 1167-1175.
[ZHANG H F, PENG J, WANG Y L, et al.Characteristics of landscape system in the context of global change. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(9): 1167-1175.]
[4] 徐兰, 罗维, 周宝同. 基于土地利用变化的农牧交错带典型流域生态风险评价: 以洋河为例. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(4): 580-590.
[XU L, LUO W, ZHOU B T.Landscape ecological risk assessment of farming-pastoral ecozone based on land use change: A case study of the Yanghe Watershed, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(4): 580-590.]
[5] 杜悦悦, 彭建, 赵士权, 等. 西南山地滑坡灾害生态风险评价: 以大理白族自治州为例. 地理学报, 2016, 71(9): 1544-1561.
[DU Y Y, PENG J, ZHAO S Q, et al.Ecological risk assessment of landslide disasters in mountainous areas of Southwest China: A case study in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(9): 1544-1561.]
[6] MIRZABEYGI M, ABBASNIA A, YUNESIAN M, et al.Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in drinking water of Sistan-and-Baluchistan, Southeastern Iran. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2017, 23(8): 1893-1905.
[7] KICINSKA A, MAMAK M.Health risks associated with municipal waste combustion on the example of Laskowa Commune (Southern Poland). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2017, 23(8): 2087-2096.
[8] 汪翡翠, 汪东川, 张利辉, 等. 京津冀城市群土地利用生态风险的时空变化分析. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4307-4316.
[WANG F C, WANG D C, ZHANG L H, et al.Spatiotemporal analysis of the dynamic changes in land use ecological risks in the urban agglomeration of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4307-4316.]
[9] 曹祺文, 张曦文, 马洪坤, 等. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.
[CAO Q W, ZHANG X W, MA H K, et al.Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services: ESRISK. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 843-855.]
[10] MALEKMOHAMMADI B, RAHIMA BLOUCHI L.Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using Multi Criteria Decision Making and Geographic Information System. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 41(6): 133-144.
[11] 彭建, 谢盼, 刘焱序, 等. 低丘缓坡建设开发综合生态风险评价及发展权衡: 以大理白族自治州为例. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1747-1761.
[PENG J, XIE P, LIU Y X, et al.Integrated ecological risk assessment and spatial development trade-offs in low-slope hilly land: A case study in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1747-1761.]
[12] 李谢辉, 王磊, 李景宜. 基于GIS的渭河下游河流沿线区域生态风险评价. 生态学报, 2009, 29(10): 5523-5534.
[LI X H, WANG L, LI J Y.Regional ecological risk assessment in catchment area along the Weihe River based on GIS. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(10): 5523-5534.]
[13] 刘春艳, 张科, 刘吉平. 1976-2013年三江平原景观生态风险变化及驱动力. 生态学报, 2018, 38(11): 3729-3740.
[LIU C Y, ZHANG K, LIU J P.A long-term site study for the ecological risk migration of landscapes and its driving forces in the Sanjiang Plain from 1976 to 2013. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(11): 3729-3740.]
[14] 徐羽, 钟业喜, 冯兴华, 等. 鄱阳湖流域土地利用生态风险格局. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23): 7850-7857.
[XU Y, ZHONG Y X, FENG X H, et al.Ecological risk pattern of Poyang Lake Basin based on land use. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(23): 7850-7857.]
[15] 赵岩洁, 李阳兵, 邵景安. 基于土地利用变化的三峡库区小流域生态风险评价: 以草堂溪为例. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 944-956.
[ZHAO Y J, LI Y B, SHAO J A.Ecological risk assessment of small watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on land use change: A case study of Caotang River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(6): 944-956.]
[16] 许妍, 高俊峰, 郭建科. 太湖流域生态风险评价. 生态学报, 2013, 33(9): 2896-2906.
[XU Y, GAO J F, GUO J K.The ecological risk assessment of Taihu Lake watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(9): 2896-2906.]
[17] 周汝佳, 张永战, 何华春. 基于土地利用变化的盐城海岸带生态风险评价. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1017-1028.
[ZHOU R J, ZHANG Y Z, HE H C.Ecological risk assessment based on land use changes in the coastal area in Yancheng city. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(6): 1017-1028.]
[18] LI J L, PU R L, GONG H B, et al.Evolution characteristics of landscape ecological risk patterns in coastal zones in Zhejiang province, China. Sustainability, 2017, 9, 584.
[19] 吴健生, 乔娜, 彭建, 等. 露天矿区景观生态风险空间分异. 生态学报, 2013, 33(12): 3816-3824.
[WU J S, QIAO N, PENG J, et al.Spatial variation of landscape eco-risk in open mine area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 3816-3824.]
[20] 张学斌, 石培基, 罗君, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析: 以石羊河流域为例. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 410-419.
[ZHANG X B, SHI P J, LUO J, et al.The ecological risk assessment of arid inland river basin at the landscape scale: A case study on Shiyang River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(3): 410-419.]
[21] 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等. 基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1052-1067.
[LIU Y X, WANG Y L, PENG J, et al.Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the 3D framework of adaptive cycle. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(7): 1052-1067.]
[22] LIU D, LIANG X Y, CHEN H, et al.A quantitative assessment of comprehensive ecological risk for a loess erosion gully: A case study of Dujiashi Gully, Northern Shaanxi province, China. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 3239.
[23] PENG J, ZONG M L, HU Y N, et al.Assessing landscape ecological risk in a mining city: A case study in Liaoyuan city, China. Sustainability, 2015, 7(7): 8312-8334.
[24] 虞燕娜, 朱江, 吴绍华, 等. 多风险源驱动下的土地生态风险评价: 以江苏省射阳县为例. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1264-1274.
[YU Y N, ZHU J, WU S H, et al.Assessment of land ecological risks driven by multi-sources: A case study of Sheyang county, Jiangsu province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(8): 1264-1274.]
[25] 张小飞, 王如松, 李正国, 等. 城市综合生态风险评价: 以淮北市城区为例. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20): 6204-6214.
[ZHANG H F, WANG R S, LI Z G, et al.Comprehensive assessment of urban ecological risks: The case of Huaibei city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(20): 6204-6214.]
[26] 巫丽芸, 何东进, 游巍斌, 等. 福建东山岛灾害生态风险的时空演化. 生态学报,2016, 36(16): 5027-5037.
[WU L Y, HE D J, YOU W B, et al.Disaster ecological risk assessment in Dongshan Island: Spatio-temporal evolution. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(16): 5027-5037.]
[27] 刘迪, 陈海, 梁小英, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险动态变化及其地形梯度分析: 以陕西省米脂县为例. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8584-8592.
[LIU D, CHEN H, LIANG X Y, et al.The dynamic changes to ecological risk in the Loess Hilly-gully Region and its terrain gradient analysis: A case study of Mizhi county, Shaanxi province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(23): 8584-8592.]
[28] WANG Z T, YANG L, CAI G J, et al.A quantitative health evaluation of an eco-economy in the Semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2015, 21(7): 1884-1902.
[29] 李景刚, 何春阳, 李晓兵. 快速城市化地区自然/半自然景观空间生态风险评价研究: 以北京为例. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 33-47.
[LI J G, HE C Y, LI X B.Landscape ecological risk assessment of natural/semi-natural landscape sin fast urbanization regions: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(1): 33-47.]
[30] WONG C P, JIANG B, KINZIG A P, et al.Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18(1): 108-118.
[31] 刘春芳, 王川, 刘立程. 三大自然区过渡带生境质量时空差异及形成机制: 以榆中县为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(2): 419-432.
[LIU C F, WANG C, LIU L C.Spatio-temporal variation on habitat quality and its mechanism within the transitional area of the Three Natural Zones: A case study in Yuzhong county. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(2): 419-432.]
[32] 吴健生, 曹祺文, 石淑芹, 等. 基于土地利用变化的京津冀生境质量时空演变. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(11): 3457-3466.
[WU J S, CAO Q W, SHI S Q, et al.Spatio-temporal variability of habitat quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area based on land use change. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(11): 3457-3466.]
[33] RICHARD S, REBECCA C K, SPENCER W.InVEST 3.3.0 User's Guide. http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/ nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html/habitatquality.html, 2015.
[34] 梅亚军. 生态脆弱区景观服务定量化及综合评价研究. 西安: 西北大学, 2017.
[MEI Y J.The study on the quantification and integrated assessment of landscape services in the fragile area: The study of Mizhi county of Shannxi province. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2017.]
[35] XIE H L, WANG P, HUANG H S.Ecological risk assessment of land use change in the Poyang Lake eco-economic zone, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013, 10(1): 328-346.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(41671086,41871185)
PDF(4789 KB)

1604

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/