基于能值的哈萨克斯坦可持续发展评价

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200914

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用能值方法分析2014—2018年哈萨克斯坦的资源利用和可持续发展状况。结果表明：哈萨克斯坦的总能值使用量约有89.94%依赖于本土不可更新资源,且直接出口大量粗加工原材料（如石油、矿产、金属等）。该国能值货币比率较低（9.50×10¹¹~1.22×10¹² sej/$）,单位货币所购买能值量较小;能值产出率在16.87~26.11范围内波动,从基于能值的可持续发展指数来看,2014年该指数为0.90,系统发展缺乏可持续性;2015—2018年,该指数高于1,系统发展是可持续的。此外,哈萨克斯坦环境负荷较高,主要由于对本土不可更新资源的开采及利用效率较低。对此,提出了加强可再生资源开发力度、提升资源利用效率、改善对外贸易结构等建议,以期为促进哈萨克斯坦的可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 能值理论, 可持续发展, 哈萨克斯坦

Abstract: Kazakhstan, an important country along the Belt and Road, is rich in non-renewable resources such as petroleum and minerals. Its economic development ranks first among the five Central Asian countries (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan) and has friendly trade relations with China. Therefore, understanding the economic development status and sustainable development of Kazakhstan is of great significance to bilateral friendly cooperation. We applied emergy theory to analyze the resource utilization structure, foreign trade status and sustainable development of this country in 2014-2018. The results showed that about 89.94% of Kazakhstan's total emergy used depended on the consumption of local non-renewable resources, and there was a large amount of raw materials (such as petroleum, minerals, metals, etc.) for export, which undoubtedly has a greater impact on the ecological environment and increasing environmental burden of Kazakhstan. And the export of low value-added products placed Kazakhstan in a disadvantaged position in the foreign trade market. The emergy money ratio showed that Kazakhstan's unit currency has low purchasing power (9.50×10¹¹-1.22×10¹² sej/$), and the amount of emergy purchased per unit currency is small, the country's economic development is still at a lower level than that of developed countries. The emergy yield ratio fluctuated within a range of 16.87-26.11. From the perspective of emergy-based sustainability index, the emergy yield ratio was 0.90 in 2014, the system development of Kazakhstan lacked sustainability. From 2015 to 2018, the index was higher than 1, and the system development was sustainable. In addition, Kazakhstan has a high environmental loading ratio, which is mainly due to the exploitation of local non-renewable resources, and the utilization efficiency is low. In view of the above, this paper puts forward suggestions such as strengthening the development of renewable resources, improving resource utilization efficiency, and improving the structure of foreign trade to enhance the competitiveness in the world market, in order to promote the orderly and healthy development of Kazakhstan.

Key words: emergy, sustainability, Kazakhstan

李海涛, 李明阳. 基于能值的哈萨克斯坦可持续发展评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2218-2228.

LI Hai-tao, LI Ming-yang. Evaluation of Kazakhstan's sustainability based on emergy theory[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(9): 2218-2228.

参考文献

[1] BROWN M T, ULGIATI S.Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H T ODUM's contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 178(1-2): 201-213.
[2] 严茂超. 生态经济学新论: 理论、方法与应用. 北京: 中国致公出版社, 2001.
[YAN M C.New Theory of Ecological Economics: Theory, Methods and Applications. Beijing: China Zhigong Press, 2001.]
[3] 董孝斌, 严茂超, 董云, 等. 基于能值的内蒙古生态经济系统分析与可持续发展战略研究. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(3): 47-57.
[DONG X B, YAN M C, DONG Y, et al.Emergy evaluation of the eco-economic system of Inner Mongolia and study on its sustainable development strategy. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26(3): 47-57.]
[4] LI H T, BROWN M T.Emergy-based environmental accounting toward a sustainable Mongolia. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(10): 1227-1259.
[5] 严茂超, ODUM H T.西藏生态经济系统的能值分析与可持续发展研究. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(2): 20-29.
[YAN M C, ODUM H T.A study on emergy evaluation and sustainable development of Tibetan eco-economic system. Journal of Natural Resources, 1998, 13(2): 20-29.]
[6] ULGIATI S, ODUM H T, BASTIANONI S.Energy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An energy analysis of Italy. Ecological Modelling, 1994, 73(3-4): 215-268.
[7] CAMPBELL D E, MEISCH M, DEMOSS T, et al.Keeping the books for environmental systems: An emergy analysis of West Virginia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2004, 94(1-3): 217-230.
[8] 窦睿音, 刘学敏, 张昱. 基于能值分析的陕西省榆林市绿色GDP动态研究. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(6): 994-1003.
[DOU R Y, LIU X M, ZHANG Y.Study on the green GDP of Chinese resource based cities: A case study of Yulin city in Shaanxi province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(6): 994-1003.]
[9] 杜斌, 张坤民, 彭丽颖. 国家环境可持续能力的评价研究: 环境可持续性指数. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 16(1): 19-24.
[DU B, ZHANG K M, PENG L Y.Analysis of new edition of environmental sustainability index. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 16(1): 19-24.]
[10] XU S T, XIONG L Y, AI G H.Study on evaluating index system of ecological environment in mining areas. Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering, 2010, 1: 134-137.
[11] BASTIANONI S, NICCOLUCCI V, PULSELLI R M, et al.Indicator and indicandum: "Sustainable way" vs "prevailing conditions" in the ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 16: 47-50.
[12] 贺成龙. 三峡工程的能值足迹与生态承载力. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 329-341.
[HE C L.Emergy footprint and ecological capacity of the Three Gorges Project. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(2): 329-341.]
[13] Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Committee on Statistics. Kazakhstan Statistical Yearbook in 2014-2018. Astana, 2019.
[14] 吴淼, 张小云, 罗格平, 等. 哈萨克斯坦水资源利用. 干旱区地理, 2010, 33(2): 196-202.
[WU M, ZHANG X Y, LUO G P, et al.Situation of water resources utilization in Kazakhstan. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33(2): 196-202.]
[15] 徐洪峰, 王晶. 哈萨克斯坦可再生能源发展现状及中哈可再生能源合作. 俄罗斯东欧中亚研究, 2019, (4): 141-154, 158.
[XU H F, WANG J.The development status of Kazakhstan's renewable energy and China-Kazakhstan renewable energy cooperation. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies, 2019, (4): 141-154, 158.]
[16] HUAN Y Z, LI H T, LIANG T.A new method for the quantitative assessment of Sustainable Development Gloals (SDGs) and a case study on Central Asia. Sustainability, 2019, 11(13): 3504.
[17] ODUM H T.Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996: 1-370.
[18] BROWN M T, ULGIATI S.Assessing the global environmental sources driving the geobiosphere: A revised emergy baseline. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 339: 126-132.
[19] 石硕. “一带一路”背景下的中国与哈萨克斯坦能源合作分析. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2017.
[SHI S.Energy cooperation between China and Kazakhstan under the background of the "the Belt and Road". Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language University, 2017.]
[20] 吴玉琴, 杨春林. 基于能值分析的2006年广东省社会代谢研究. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(4): 546-552.
[WU Y Q, YANG C L.Emergy-based socioeconomic metabolism of Guangdong province in 2006. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(4): 546-552.]
[21] 郝翠, 李洪远, 莫训强, 等. 基于三元相图法的天津生态经济系统能值分析. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(7): 1132-1141.
[HAO C, LI H Y, MO X Q, et al.Emergetic rernary diagram based on eco-economic analysis of Tianjin city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(7): 1132-1141.]
[22] 李海涛, 廖迎春, 严茂超, 等. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 765-772.
[LI H T, LIAO Y C, YAN M C, et al.Emergy evaluation and assessment of sustainability on the eco-economic system of Xinjiang. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 765-772.]
[23] 国际环境核算数据库(NEAD). 哈萨克斯坦环境核算数据. http://www.cep.ees.ufl.edu/nead/, 2019-10-01.
[The National Environmental Accounting Database. NEAD data by Kazakhstan. http://www.cep.ees.ufl.edu/nead/, 2019-10-01.]
[24] 王明全, 王金达, 刘景双. 不同资源环境梯度下吉林西部生态经济系统能值分析. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 507-515.
[WANG M Q, WAN J D, LIU J S.Emergy analysis of the eco-economic systems of West Jilin province according to the resource and environment gradient. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(4): 507-515.]
[25] ZHU L P, LI H T, CHEN J Q, et al.Emergy-based sustainability assessment of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(5): 843-858.
[26] BROWN M T, ULGIATI S.Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering, 1997, 9(1-2): 51-69.
[27] 苏红霞, 张洁. 共生理论视角下中哈旅游合作路径研究. 新西部, 2019, (17): 71-72, 43.
[SU H X, ZHANG J.Study on the tourism cooperation path between China and Kazakhstan from the perspective of symbiosis theory. New West, 2019, (17): 71-72, 43.]