三峡库区景观格局粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20170065

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 588-599.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20170065

三峡库区景观格局粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应

陈雅如, 肖文发^*, 滕明君, 冯源

中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所/国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京 100091

收稿日期:2017-01-22 修回日期:2017-05-04 出版日期:2018-04-10 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 肖文发（1964- ）,男,教授,博士,研究方向为森林生态系统管理。E-mail: xiaowenf@caf.ac.cn
作者简介:陈雅如（1984- ）,女,博士研究生,研究方向为森林生态学、景观恢复等。E-mail: chenyaru09@126.com
基金资助:
国家公益性行业（气象）科研专项（GYHY201406072）

Grain Size Effect of Landscape Pattern and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

CHEN Ya-ru, XIAO Wen-fa, TENG Ming-jun, FENG Yuan

Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry / Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2017-01-22 Revised:2017-05-04 Online:2018-04-10 Published:2018-04-10
Supported by:
Research Project of National Public Welfare (Meteorology), No. GYHY201406072.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 1992—2012年,受大型水利工程建设影响,三峡库区土地利用/覆被发生剧烈变化,论文选取工程建设重要时点1992、2002、2006和2012年的土地利用覆被图,探讨景观格局指数在30~1 000 m粒度范围内的粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应。结果表明：1）所选取的27个景观指数中,有14个对空间粒度变化高度敏感、3个中度敏感、7个低敏感、3个不敏感;不同类型景观（除裸地外）粒度效应规律相似。2）景观格局指数随粒度变粗呈5种变化规律：单调下降、单调上升、阶梯状上升、无明显变化、先增大后迅速下降。形状指数粒度效应对土地利用变化过程的响应明显,聚集度指数、面积-边缘指数、多样性指数随土地利用变化的特征不受粒度粗细影响。因此,景观格局分析最适宜粒度范围为30~60 m。3）1992—2012年三峡库区整体景观异质性增大、优势度降低、呈小斑块密集格局;耕地面积急剧下降、破碎化加剧,林地面积稳步提升,连通性提高。

关键词: 景观格局指数, 粒度效应, 三峡库区, 土地利用变化过程

Abstract: Affected by the Three Gorges Reservoir Project, land use/cover in this area dramatically changed during 1992-2012. Based on the land use map in 1992, 2002, 2006 and 2012 (representing important stages of the Project’s construction), we selected a suite of metrics to characterize the grain size effect of landscape pattern within 30-1 000 m grain size range and its dynamic response to land use change. The results reveal: 1) Among the selected 27 metrics, there are 14 metrics showing high sensitivity, 3 metrics showing medium sensitivity, 7 metrics showing low sensitivity and 3 metrics showing insensitivity to the change of grain size. The metrics of different landscape types (except bare land) showed similar trends. 2) The behaviors of the metrics in response to change of grain size can be grouped into five types: monotonous decrease, monotonous increase, staircase increase, no obvious change, and slow increase followed by rapidly decrease. Grain size effect of shape metric showed obvious response to land use change, while the responses of aggregation metric, area-edge metric and diversity index were not affected by the grain size. The optimal grain size for landscape pattern analysis is 30-60 m. 3) Landscape pattern of the Three Gorges Reservoir area became more fragmentary and heterogeneous during 1992-2012. There was a sharp decline and more fragment of cropland while a gradual rise and more connectivity of forest.

Key words: grain size effect, land use change, landscape pattern metrics, Three Gorges Reservoir area

中图分类号:

P901

陈雅如, 肖文发, 滕明君, 冯源. 三峡库区景观格局粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 588-599.

CHEN Ya-ru, XIAO Wen-fa, TENG Ming-jun, FENG Yuan. Grain Size Effect of Landscape Pattern and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(4): 588-599.

参考文献

[1] LAM N S-N, QUATTROCHI D A. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences[J]. The Professional Geographer, 1992, 44(1): 88-98.
[2] JENERETTE G D, WU J G.On the definitions of scale[J]. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 2000, 81(1): 104-105.
[3] SCHNEIDER D C.The rise of the concept of scale in ecology[J]. BioScience, 2001, 51(7): 545-553.
[4] 邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级 [M]. 第2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.
[WU J G.Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. The Second Edition. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. ]
[5] JELINSKI D E, WU J G.The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11(3): 129-140.
[6] WU J G.Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(2): 125-138.
[7] 陈永林, 谢炳庚, 李晓青. 长沙市土地利用格局变化的空间粒度效应[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(4): 564-570.
[CHEN Y L, XIE B G, LI X Q.Spatial grain size effect on land use pattern changes in Changsha City. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(4): 564-570. ]
[8] 吴未, 许丽萍, 张敏, 等. 生态斑块粒度效应研究——以长三角地区无锡市为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2014, 30(5): 88-92.
[WU W, XU L P, ZHANG M, et al.Effect of grain size on ecological patch: A study case of Wuxi, the Yangtze River Delta Region. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2014, 30(5): 88-92. ]
[9] 耿焕侠, 张小林, 李红波. 县域农村居民点景观格局指数的空间粒度效应——以江苏省丰县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(10): 1418-1424.
[GENG H X, ZHANG X L, LI H B.Effects of changing grain size on landscape indices of rural settlement at county scale—A case study of Fengxian in Jiangsu Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(10): 1418-1424. ]
[10] 李秀珍, 布仁仓, 常禹, 等. 景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(1): 123-134.
[LI X Z, BU R C, CHANG Y, et al.The response of landscape metrics against pattern scenarios. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(1): 123-134. ]
[11] 赵文武, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶. 景观指数的粒度变化效应[J]. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3): 326-333.
[ZHAO W W, FU B J, CHEN L D.The effects of grain change on landscape indices. Quaternary Sciences, 2003, 23(3): 326-333. ]
[12] 吴未, 范诗薇, 许丽萍, 等. 无锡市景观指数的粒度效应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 413-424.
[WU W, FAN S W, XU L P, et al.Grain size effect of landscape metrics in Wuxi City. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 413-424. ]
[13] 刘源鑫, 焦峰. 黄土高原丘陵区景观特征与景观指数粒度效应研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(3): 23-27, 31.
[LIU Y X, JIAO F.Landscape pattern characteristics and grain effect of landscape index in Loess Hilly Region. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(3): 23-27, 31. ]
[14] SAURA S.Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(2): 197-209.
[15] 申卫军, 邬建国, 林永标, 等. 空间粒度变化对景观格局分析的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(12): 2506-2519.
[SHEN W J, WU J G, LIN Y B, et al.Effects of changing grain size on landscape pattern analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(12): 2506-2519. ]
[16] 邱扬, 杨磊, 王军, 等. 黄土丘陵小流域景观格局指数的粒度效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(5): 1159-1166.
[QIU Y, YANG L, WANG J, et al.Grain effect of landscape pattern indices in a gully catchment of Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(5): 1159-1166. ]
[17] 朱明, 濮励杰, 李建龙. 遥感影像空间分辨率及粒度变化对城市景观格局分析的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(6): 2753-2763.
[ZHU M, PU L J, LI J L.Effects of varied remote sensor spatial resolution and grain size on urban landscape pattern analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(6): 2753-2763. ]
[18] 张玲玲, 史云飞, 刘玉华. 空间粒度变化对沂蒙山区景观格局指数的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2): 459-464.
[ZHANG L L, SHI Y F, LIU Y H.Effects of spatial grain change on the landscape pattern indices in Yimeng Mountain area of Shandong Province, East China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32( 2): 459-464. ]
[19] 杨丽, 甄霖, 谢高地, 等. 泾河流域景观指数的粒度效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(2): 183-187.
[YANG L, ZHEN L, XIE G D, et al.Effects on changing grain size of landscape indices in Jinghe Watershed. Resources Science, 2007, 29(2): 183-187. ]
[20] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等. 景观生态学原理与应用 [M]. 第2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
[FU B J, CHEN L D, MA K M, et al.Principles and Applications of Landscape Ecology. The Second Edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2011. ]
[21] MCGARIGAL K, SA C, ENE E. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps [CP/OL]. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. 2012.
[22] TENG M J, ZENG L X, ZHOU Z X, et al.Responses of landscape metrics to altering grain size in the Three Gorges Reservoir landscape in China[J]. Environmentai Earth Sciences, 2016, 75: 1055-1067.
[23] 王新明, 王长耀, 占玉林, 等. 大尺度景观结构指数的因子分析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2006, 22(1): 17-21.
[WANG X M, WANG C Y, ZHAN Y L, et al.A factor analysis on landscape structure metrics with large scale. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2006, 22(1): 17-21. ]
[24] 徐丽, 卞晓庆, 秦小林, 等. 空间粒度变化对合肥市景观格局指数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(5): 1167-1173.
[XU L, BIAN X Q, QIN X L, et al.Effects of grain size change on landscape pattern indices of Hefei City. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(5): 1167-1173. ]
[25] ALHAMAD M N, ALRABABAH M A, FEAGIN R A, et al.Mediterranean drylands: The effect of grain size and domain of scale on landscape metrics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11(2): 611-621.
[26] LU Y H, FENG X M, CHEN L D, et al.Scaling effects of landscape metrics: A comparison of two methods[J]. Physical Geography, 2013, 34(1): 40-49.
[27] 邵景安, 张仕超, 魏朝富. 基于大型水利工程建设阶段的三峡库区土地利用变化遥感分析[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(12): 2189-2203.
[SHAO J A, ZHANG S C, WEI C F.Remote sensing analysis of land use change in the Three Gorges Reservoir area based on the construction phase of large-scale water conservancy project. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(12): 2189-2203. ]
[28] 赵静, 吴昌广, 周志翔, 等. 三峡库区1988—2007年植被覆盖动态变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 30-38.
[ZHAO J, WU C G, ZHOU Z X, et al.Vegetation cover change in the Three Gorges Reservoir area during 1988-2007. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(11): 30-38. ]
[29] BUYANTUYEV A, WU J G, GRIES C.Multiscale analysis of the urbanization pattern of the Phoenix metropolitan landscape of USA: Time, space and thematic resolution[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2010, 94(3/4): 206-217.

三峡库区景观格局粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应

Grain Size Effect of Landscape Pattern and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	梁鑫源, 李阳兵. 三峡库区“耕—果”转换时空变化特征及其启示——以草堂溪流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 385-399.
[2]	曹飞, 邵景安, 马雪莹, 李春梅, 杜建平, 蒋佳佳, 强丹阳. 三峡库区社区水平乡村路网对森林景观变化的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1363-1375.
[3]	刘婷, 邵景安. 基于BP神经网络的三峡库区土壤侵蚀强度模拟[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 669-683.
[4]	马雪莹, 邵景安, 徐新良. 乡村路网对三峡库区社区水平森林结构的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1482-1494.
[5]	吴未, 范诗薇, 许丽萍, 张敏, 欧名豪. 无锡市景观指数的粒度效应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 413-424.
[6]	张广纳, 邵景安, 王金亮, 倪九派, 谢德体. 三峡库区重庆段农村面源污染时空格局演变特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(7): 1197-1209.
[7]	王金亮, 邵景安, 李阳兵. 近20 a 三峡库区农林地利用变化图谱特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2): 235-247.
[8]	董玉红, 刘世梁, 安南南, 尹艺洁, 王军, 邱扬. 基于景观指数和空间自相关的吉林大安市景观格局动态研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(11): 1860-1871.
[9]	张广纳, 邵景安, 王金亮. 基于农业面源污染的三峡库区重庆段水质时空格局演变特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(11): 1872-1884.
[10]	赵岩洁, 李阳兵, 邵景安. 基于土地利用变化的三峡库区小流域生态风险评价——以草堂溪为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 944-956.
[11]	杨利, 谢炳庚, 秦建新, 张猛. 三峡建坝前后洞庭湖区湿地景观格局变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(12): 2068-2080.
[12]	刘晓冉, 杨茜, 王若瑜, 程炳岩. 1980—2009年三峡库区空中水资源变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(9): 1550-1560.
[13]	赵东, 祝昌汉, 罗勇, 高歌. 三峡库区太阳能资源基本特征及其演变[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1984-1993.
[14]	刘祥梅, 郭志华, 肖文发, 王建力, 杨海明, 何红艳. 基于GIS的三峡库区生态环境综合评价Ⅱ.气候评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 613-622.
[15]	苏维词, 杨华, 赵纯勇, 李晴. 三峡库区(重庆段)涨落带土地资源的开发利用模式初探[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(3): 326-332.