产业关联水平对碳排放演化的影响机理及效应研究——基于欧盟27国投入产出数据的实证分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160549

自然资源学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 841-853.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160549

产业关联水平对碳排放演化的影响机理及效应研究——基于欧盟27国投入产出数据的实证分析

原嫄¹, 席强敏², 李国平^{3, *}

1. 西北工业大学人文与经法学院,西安 710072;
2. 南开大学经济学院,天津 300071;
3. 北京大学政府管理学院,北京 100871

收稿日期:2016-05-30 修回日期:2016-08-31 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-05-20
通讯作者: 李国平（1961- ）,男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为经济地理学、区域经济学、城市与区域规划等。E-mail: lgp@pku.edu.cn
作者简介:原嫄（1986- ）,女,讲师,主要从事区域经济学、气候经济学研究。E-mail: paipaidm@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（41601117）; 国家重点基础研究发展计划（2012CB955802）; 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目（3102016RW008）

The Impact of Industrial Relevancy on Regional Carbon Emission: Empirical Analysis Based on the Input-output Data of EU Countries

YUAN Yuan¹, XI Qiang-min², LI Guo-ping³

1. School of Humanities, Economics and Laws, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China;
2. School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
3. School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2016-05-30 Revised:2016-08-31 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-05-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41601117; National Basic Research Program of China, No.2012CB955802; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No.3102016RW008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碳排放逐步升高是以工业化为特征的区域经济崛起的必然结果。论文的理论研究说明,产业关联水平反映了区域发展过程中产业多样化和分工细化的程度,相较于产业结构,产业关联水平对区域经济发展水平的指示意义更深刻。那么,产业关联水平对碳排放的影响特征及其趋势将更接近于碳排放在经济发展驱动下的演进规律。因此,论文采用欧盟27国投入产出数据,在测算不同类型制造业和服务业的产业关联水平的基础上,确定不同类型制造业所对应的特征服务业类型,进而应用经济计量学工具对制造业与服务业产业关联度对碳排放的影响进行实证分析,结果显示：第一,作为发达经济体,欧盟的制造业与服务业整体间产业关联度对碳排放具有显著负效应;第二,低端、中端和高端制造业与各自对应特征服务业类型间产业关联度对碳排放的影响均较为显著,其强度呈现随制造业水平升级而先上升、后下降的趋势;第三,高端制造业与生产性、分配性服务业间产业关联度的提高是实现区域碳排放达到峰值并逐步下降的重要动力,而中端制造业与其对应特征服务业关联度提升对碳排放的正向效应将高于低端制造业主导时期。因此,结合发达经济体的发展经验可以发现,碳排放的演化具有规律性特征,而以产业关联度入手的分析能够提供操作性更强的参考。目前,中国应在推动产业结构升级结构的过程中,大力提升生产性服务业的发展水平及其与制造业的关联水平,并采取积极措施降低交通运输业等分配性服务业的能耗强度。

关键词: 产业关联度, 欧盟, 碳排放

Abstract: Carbon emission is the inevitable result of development. With the changes of extensive development to intensive development, is there a peak of carbon emission? And if the peak does exist, when it would appear? The answers of above questions are directly related to the distribution principle and equity of global carbon quotas. The industrial correlation, which is the inherent driving force of the upgrade of economic structure, can demonstrate the stage of regional economic development. This paper utilized theoretical and empirical analysis and concluded that the pattern of carbon emission is an inverted-U shape (Carbon Emission Baseline, CEB). The empirical study of this paper shows: the 1% increase in correlation between high-end manufacturing sector and productive service sector and between high-end manufacturing sector and distributive service sector will cause 3.63% and 5.57% decrease of regional carbon emission, respectively; the 1% increase of correlation between middle-end manufacturing sector and productive service sector and between middle-end manufacturing sector and distributive service sector will result in 7.05% decline and 0.57% growth of regional carbon dioxide emission, respectively; the 1% increase of correlation degree between low-end manufacturing sector and distributive services sector and between low-end manufacturing sector and distributive service sector will bring 4.55% and 10.43% increase in regional carbon emissions, respectively. Therefore, in the initial stage of economic development, the high association between low-end manufacturing and services sectors would have positive effect on carbon emissions; when it came to the period of industrialization, although the dominant industries were slightly different, the overall carbon emissions increased significantly; when economic development entered the mature stage, the high-end manufacturing associations would continue exerting negative effect on carbon emissions, and the regional carbon emissions would demonstrate decline trend. This pattern suggests that if a region is still in the stage of low-end manufacturing and services, this region has rights to keep emission increasing to sustain the basic development. Therefore, CEB not only gives a shape of emission, but also provides a standard relationship between the evolution of emission and economic development. On this level, CEB has potential to be a complement principle of global carbon apportion.

Key words: correlation of industries, European Union countries, carbon emission

中图分类号:

F205

原嫄, 席强敏, 李国平. 产业关联水平对碳排放演化的影响机理及效应研究——基于欧盟27国投入产出数据的实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 841-853.

YUAN Yuan, XI Qiang-min, LI Guo-ping. The Impact of Industrial Relevancy on Regional Carbon Emission: Empirical Analysis Based on the Input-output Data of EU Countries[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(5): 841-853.

参考文献

[1] IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[2] NORDHAUS W D. Economic growth and climate: The carbon dioxide problem [J]. The American Economic Review, 1977, 67(1): 341-346.
[3] STERN N. The economics of climate change [J]. The American Economic Review, 2008, 98(2): 1-37.
[4] IPCC. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios—Summary for Policymakers. A Special Report of Working Group III [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[5] FISCHER C, MORGENSTERN R D. Carbon abatement costs: Why the wide range of estimates? [J]. Energy Journal, 2006, 27(2): 73-86.
[6] ROSE A, STEVENS B, EDMONDS J, et al. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy [J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 1998, 12(1): 25-51.
[7] 丁仲礼, 段晓男, 葛全胜, 等. 2050年大气CO 2 浓度控制: 各国排放权计算 [J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 2009, 39(8): 1009-1027. [DING Z L, DUAN X N, GE Q S, et al. Control of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations by 2050: A calculation on the emission rights of different countries. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 2009, 52(10): 1447-1469. ]
[8] 吴静, 马晓哲, 王铮. 我国省市自治区碳排放权配额研究 [J]. 第四纪研究, 2010, 30(3): 481-488. [WU J, MA X Z, WANG Z. Provincial emission permits quota allocations in China. Quaternary Sciences, 2010, 30(3): 481-488. ]
[9] JALIL A, MAHMUD S F. Environment Kuznets Curve for CO 2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(12): 5167-5172.
[10] STERN D I. The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve [J]. World Development, 2004, 32(8): 1419-1439.
[11] CHENERY H B, ROBINSON S, SYRQUIN M. Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
[12] CHENERY H B, SYRQUIN M, ELKINGTON H. Patterns of Development, 1950-1970 [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
[13] LI G, YUAN Y. Impact of regional development on carbon emission: Empirical evidence across countries [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 24(5): 499-510.
[14] EHRLICH P R, HOLDREN J P, MEZIROW J, et al. Impact of population growth [J]. Science, 1971, 171(3977): 1212-1217.
[15] EHRLICH P, HOLDREN J. The people problem [J]. Saturday Review, 1970, 53(27): 42.
[16] GROSSMAN G M, KRUEGER A B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement [M]// GARBER P. The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
[17] SELDEN T M, SONG D. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions? [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 27(2):147-162.
[18] DURO J A, ALCÁNTARA V, PADILLA E. International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: An analysis of OECD countries [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(12): 2468-2474.
[19] FRIEDL B, GETZNER M. Determinants of CO 2 emissions in a small open economy [J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 45(1): 133-148.
[20] YORK R, ROSA E A, DIETZ T, et al. Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity [J]. American Sociological Review, 2003, 68(2): 279-300.
[21] WAGGONER P E, AUSUBEL J H. A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99(12): 7860-7865.
[22] BARKER T, KOEHLER J, VILLENA M. Costs of greenhouse gas abatement: Meta-analysis of post-SRES mitigation scenarios [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2002, 5(2): 135-166.
[23] 徐成龙, 任建兰, 巩灿娟. 产业结构调整对山东省碳排放的影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 201-210. [XU C L, REN J L, GONG C J. The influence of adjustment in industrial structures on carbon emissions in Shandong Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(2): 201-210. ]
[24] 原嫄, 席强敏, 孙铁山, 等. 产业结构对区域碳排放的影响——基于多国数据的实证分析 [J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(1): 81-94. [YUAN Y, XI Q M, SUN T S, et al. The impact of the industrial structure on regional carbon emission: Empirical evidence across countries. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(1): 81-94. ]
[25] ANG B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method? [J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(9): 1131-1139.
[26] ANG B W. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: A practical guide [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 867-871.
[27] ZHANG M, LIU X, WANG W W, et al. Decomposition analysis of CO 2 emissions from electricity generation in China [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 52: 159-165.
[28] XU S C, HE Z X, LONG R Y. Factors that influence carbon emissions due to energy consumption in China: Decomposition analysis using LMDI [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 127(6): 182-193.
[29] 邓吉祥, 刘晓, 王铮. 中国碳排放的区域差异及演变特征分析与因素分解 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 189-200. [DENG J X, LIU X, WANG Z. Characteristics analysis and factor decomposition based on the regional difference changes in China’s CO 2 emission. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(2): 189-200. ]
[30] 王铮, 朱永彬. 我国各省区碳排放量状况及减排对策研究 [J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2008, 23(2): 109-115. [WANG Z, ZHU Y B. Study on the status of carbon emission in provincial scale of China and countermeasures for reducing its emission. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008, 23(2): 109-115. ]
[31] CARLSSON B. The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study [J]. Small Business Economics, 1989, 1(1): 21-37.

产业关联水平对碳排放演化的影响机理及效应研究——基于欧盟27国投入产出数据的实证分析

The Impact of Industrial Relevancy on Regional Carbon Emission: Empirical Analysis Based on the Input-output Data of EU Countries

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	田成诗, 陈雨. 中国省际农业碳排放测算及低碳化水平评价——基于衍生指标与TOPSIS法的运用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 395-410.
[2]	王帅, 赵荣钦, 杨青林, 肖连刚, 杨文娟, 余娇, 朱瑞明, 揣小伟, 焦士兴. 碳排放约束下的农业生产效率及其空间格局——基于河南省65个村庄的调查[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2092-2104.
[3]	吴景辉, 张戈, 王耕. 能源富集区贸易隐含碳及隐含SO₂排放转移——以山西省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1445-1459.
[4]	田华征, 马丽. 中国工业碳排放强度变化的结构因素解析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 639-653.
[5]	沈杨, 汪聪聪, 高超, 丁镭. 基于城市化的浙江省湾区经济带碳排放时空分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 329-342.
[6]	王康, 李志学, 周嘉. 环境规制对碳排放时空格局演变的作用路径研究——基于东北三省地级市实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 343-357.
[7]	丁明磊, 李宇翔, 赵荣钦, 张战平, 侯丽朋, 刘秉涛, 刘薇. 面向配额分配模拟的工业行业碳排放绩效——以郑州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 1027-1040.
[8]	柳君波, 高俊莲, 徐向阳. 中国煤炭供应行业格局优化及排放[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 473-486.
[9]	周迪, 王雪芹. 中国碳排放效率与产业结构升级的耦合度及耦合路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2305-2316.
[10]	崔盼盼, 张艳平, 张丽君, 孙莹莹, 郑智成, 王伟, 徐晓霞. 中国省域隐含碳排放及其驱动机理时空演变分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(5): 879-892.
[11]	卢新海, 匡兵, 李菁. 碳排放约束下耕地利用效率的区域差异及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 657-668.
[12]	赵巧芝, 闫庆友. 基于投入产出的中国行业碳排放及减排效果模拟[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1528-1541.
[13]	黄蕊, 王铮, 钟章奇, 孙翊, 刘昌新, 陆玉麒. 区域贸易隐含碳排放和SO₂排放的投入产出分析——以江苏为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 854-863.
[14]	赵金彩, 钟章奇, 卢鹤立, 吴乐英, 陈玉龙. 基于夜间灯光的城市居民直接碳排放及影响因素——以中原经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 2100-2114.
[15]	杨皓然, 吴群. 碳排放视角下的江苏省土地利用转型生态效率研究——基于混合方向性距离函数[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(10): 1718-1730.