自然资源学报 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 1778-1787.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.10.015
许丽忠, 杨净, 钟满秀, 韩智霞, 胡军, 黄梅芬, 张江山
收稿日期:
2011-08-23
修回日期:
2011-09-08
出版日期:
2012-10-20
发布日期:
2012-10-20
基金资助:
XU Li-zhong, YANG Jing, ZHONG Man-xiu, HAN Zhi-xia, HU Jun, HUANG Mei-fen, ZHANG Jiang-shan
Received:
2011-08-23
Revised:
2011-09-08
Online:
2012-10-20
Published:
2012-10-20
摘要: 条件价值(CV)法是评估环境与资源价值的重要手段,后续确定性问题可有效便捷地提高CV结果的有效性。应用10刻度量化表式后续确定性问题对鼓山风景名胜区非使用价值CV评估结果进行校正。问卷采用双边界二分式,面对面调查获得518份有效调查问卷。结果显示:具有正支付意愿的受访者,其付费加入"鼓山保护协会"的确定度呈正态分布,确定度的平均值为6.72;确定度与受访者的收入、受访者对鼓山的熟悉程度呈显著正相关;受访者对起始投标值敏感。当确定度门槛值取7或8时,正支付率从51.5%分别下降至27.8%或23.3%,而平均支付意愿分别从33.24元下降至19.74元或16.36元,采用后续确定性问题校正后CV结果下降了一半左右。
中图分类号:
许丽忠, 杨净, 钟满秀, 韩智霞, 胡军, 黄梅芬, 张江山. 应用后续确定性问题校正条件价值评估——以福建省鼓山风景名胜区非使用价值评估为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, (10): 1778-1787.
XU Li-zhong, YANG Jing, ZHONG Man-xiu, HAN Zhi-xia, HU Jun, HUANG Mei-fen, ZHANG Jiang-shan. Contingent Valuation Calibration Using Follow-up Certainty Question: A Case Study of Non-use Value Assessment of Gushan Scenic Area in Fujian Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, (10): 1778-1787.
[1] 张茵, 蔡运龙. 条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 41(2): 317-328. [ZHANG Yin, CAI Yun-long. Using contingent valuation method to value environmental resources: A review. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 2005, 41(2): 317-328.] [2] Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P R, et al. Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation [J]. Federal Register, 1993, 58(10): 4601- 4644. [3] Weimer D, Vining A, Thomas R. Cost-benefit analysis involving addictive goods: Contingent valuation to estimate willingness-to-pay for smoking cessation [J]. Health Economics, 2009, 18: 181-202. [4] 蔡春光, 陈功, 乔晓春, 等. 单边界、双边界二分式条件价值评估方法的比较——以北京市空气污染对健康危害问卷调查为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2007, 27(1): 39-43. [CAI Chun-guang, CHEN Gong, QIAO Xiao-chun, et al. Comparison of single bound and double bound dichotomous contingent valuation technique-A case of estimate health economic loss by air pollution of Beijing. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(1): 39-43.] [5] Samuel Kim, Kevin Wong, Min Cho. Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site and willingness -to-pay determinants: A case of Changdeok Palace [J]. Tourism Management, 2007, 28: 317-322. [6] 刘亚萍, 潘晓芳, 钟秋平, 等. 生态旅游区自然环境的游憩价值[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3765-3774. [LIU Ya-ping, PAN Xiao-fang, ZHONG Qiu-ping et al. Analyzing about the assessment of the recreational value of the natural spaces in ecotourism districts. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(11): 3765-3774.] [7] Ekin Birol, Katia Karousakis, Phoebe Koundouri. Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 365: 105- 122. [8] 杨凯, 赵军. 城市河流生态系统服务的CVM 估值及其偏差分析[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(6): 1391-1396 [YANG Kai, ZHAO Jun. Study on the ecosystem services value of urban river using contingent valuation method and bias analysis of the results. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25 (6): 1391-1396.] [9] Carson R T, Robert Mitchell, Michael Hanemann, et al. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 25: 257-286. [10] 李金平, 王志石. 澳门噪音污染损害价值的条件估值研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(6): 599-604. [LI Jin-ping, WANG Zhi-shi. Evaluation of the loses of noise pollution in macao with contingent valuation method. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(6): 599-604.] [11] Susan Chilton, Diane Burgess, George Hutchinson. The relative value of farm animal welfare [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59: 353-363. [12] 宗雪, 崔国发, 袁婧. 基于条件价值法的大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)存在价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2090-2098. [ZONG Xue, CUI Guo-fa, YUAN Jing. Contingent valuation of the existent economic of Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca ). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 2090-2098.] [13] Diwakar Poudel, Fred H Johnsen. Valuation of crop genetic resources in Kaski, Nepal: Farmers’ willingness to pay for rice landraces conservation [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 483-491. [14] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地非市场价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 763-773. [CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 763-773.] [15] Serkan Gürlük. The estimation of ecosystem services’ value in the region of Misi Rural Development Project: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Policy and Economics, 2006(9): 209-218. [16] Paul Mcnamee, Laura Ternent, Adjima Gbangou, et al. A game of two halves? Incentive incompatibility, starting point bias and the bidding game contingent valuation method [J]. Health Economics, 2009, doi: 10.1002/Hec.1448. [17] Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: A review [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24: 89-124. [18] Carson R, Nicholas Flores, Norman Meade. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19: 173-210. [19] List John, Craig Gallet. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? [J] Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 20: 241-254. [20] Joseph Little, Robert Berrens. Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: Further investigation using meta-analysis [J]. Economics Bulletin, 2004, 3(6): 1-13. [21] Murphy J, Allen Geoffrey, Stevens Thomas, et al. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 30: 313-325. [22] Glenn Blomquist, Karen Blumenschein, Magnus Johannesson. Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: comparisons between probably/ definitely and a 10-point certainty scale [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 43: 473-502. [23] Morrison Mark, Thomas C. Brown. Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44: 307-326. [24] Richard C Ready, John C Whitehead, Glenn C Blomquist. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995, 29: 181-196. [25] Wang H. Treatment of don’t-know responses in contingent valuation surveys: A random valuation model [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1997, 32: 219-232. [26] Champ P, Bishop R, Brown T, et al. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997, 33: 151-162. [27] Champ P, Bishop R. Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19: 383-402. [28] Champ P, Moore R, Bishop C. Hypothetical bias: The mitigating effects of certainty questions and cheap talk . Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2004. [29] Poe G L, Clark J E, Rondeau D, et al. Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23: 105-131. [30] Blumenschein K, Johannesson M, Blomquist G C, et al. Experimental results on expressed uncertainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1998, 65(1): 169-177. [31] Blumenschein K, Blomquist G C, Johannesson M, et al. Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment [J]. The Economic Journal, 2008, 118(525): 114-137. [32] Johannesson M, Liljas B, Johansson P O. An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions [J]. Applied Economics, 1998, 30: 643-647. [33] Johannesson M, Blomquist G C, Blumenschein K, et al. Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999, 8: 21-32. [34] Vossler C A, Kerkvliet J. A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45: 631-649. [35] Vossler C A, Kerkvliet J, Polasky S, et al. Externally validating contingent valuation: An open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2003, 51: 261-277. [36] 薛达元. 长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2000, 20(2): 141-145. [XUE Da-yuan. Valuation on non-use values of biodiversity by contingent valuation method in Changbai Mountain Biosphere Reserve in China. China Environmental Science, 2000, 20(2): 141-145.] [37] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋等. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 107-116. [XU Zhong-min, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, CHENG Guo-dong, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(1): 107-116.] [38] 曹建军, 任正炜, 杨勇, 等. 玛曲草地生态系统恢复成本条件价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1872-1880. [CAO Jian-jun, REN Zheng-wei, YANG Yong, et al. Using CVM to estimate the restoring cost of Maqu grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1872-1880.] [39] 王凤珍, 周志翔, 郑忠明. 武汉市典型城市湖泊湿地资源非使用价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12): 3261-3269. [WANG Feng-zhen, ZHOU Zhi-xiang, ZHENG Zhong-ming. Evaluation on non-use values of typical lake wetlands in Wuhan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(12): 3261-3269.] [40] 张茵, 蔡运龙. 用条件估值法评估九寨沟的游憩价值——CVM方法的校正与比较[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(7): 1205-1211. [ZHANG Yin, CAI Yun-long. Measuring the recreational value of Jiuzhaigou Nature Reserve with contingent valuation method. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(7): 1205-1211.] [41] 许丽忠, 朱宇, 张江山, 等. 环境资源价值PC格式CV法评估在中国的预测有效性实验室研究[J]. 科学通报, 2009, 54(22): 3574-3581. [XU Li-zhong, ZHU Yu, ZHANG Jiang-shan, et al. Can PC format CV reveal true value of environmental resource in developing countries? A laboratory experiment in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(22): 3574-3581.] [42] 赵军, 杨凯, 刘兰岚, 等. 环境与生态系统服务价值的WTA/WTP不对称[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(5): 854-860. [ZHAO Jun, YANG Kai, LIU Lan-lan, et al. The WTA/WTP disparity in environmental and ecosystem services valuation. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(5): 854-860.] [43] 许丽忠, 吴春山, 王菲凤, 等. 条件价值法评估旅游资源非使用价值的可靠性检验[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 4301-4309. [XU Li-zhong, WU Chun-shan, WANG Fei-feng, et al. Testing reliability of contingent valuation method: A case study on the tourism attraction non-use value. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(10): 4301-4309.] [44] 董雪旺, 张捷, 刘传华, 等. 条件价值法中的偏差分析及信度和效度检验——以九寨沟游憩价值评估为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 267-278. [DONG Xue-wang, ZHANG Jie, LIU Chuan-hua, et al. Bias analysis and reliability and validity test in contingent valuation method: A case study of assessment of Jiuzhaigou’s recreational value. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(2): 267-278.] [45] 蔡志坚, 杜丽永, 蒋瞻. 条件价值评估的有效性与可靠性改善——理论、方法与应用[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(10): 2915-2923. [CAI Zhi-jian, DU Li-yong, JIANG Zhan. Improving validity and reliability of contingent valuation method through reducing biases and errors: Theory, method and application. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(10): 2915-2923.] [46] 蔡志坚, 杜丽永, 蒋瞻. 基于有效性改进的流域生态系统恢复条件价值评估——以长江流域生态系统恢复为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(1): 127-134. [CAI Zhi-jian, DU Li-yong, JIANG Zhan. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring basin ecosystem with validity improvement: A case study for Yangtze River ecosystem. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(1): 127-134.] [47] 张明军, 孙美平, 姚晓军, 等. 不确定性影响下的平均支付意愿参数估计[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(9): 3852-3859. [ZHANG Ming-jun, SUN Mei-ping, YAO Xiao-jun, et al. Parameter estimation of average willingness to pay under uncertainty effect. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(9): 3852-3859.] [48] Whittington D. Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 22: 323-367. |
[1] | 昝欣, 张玉玲, 贾晓宇, 熊广森. 永定河上游流域水生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1326-1337. |
[2] | 龚亚珍, 关宝珠, 代喆, 张惠. 基于外部效应分析机井密度对地下水位的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 633-645. |
[3] | 段学军, 邹辉, 陈维肖, 闵敏. 岸线资源评估、空间管控分区的理论与方法—以长江岸线资源为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2209-2222. |
[4] | 戴胡萱, 李俊鸿, 程鲲, 宗诚. 三江平原保护区社区居民对湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 977-987. |
[5] | 赵苗苗, 赵海凤, 李仁强, 张丽云, 赵峰侠, 刘丽香, 沈瑞昌, 徐明. 青海省1998—2012年草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 418-433. |
[6] | 肖建红, 于庆东, 张运磊, 刘娟, 管建世. 基于CVM的旅游相关资源价值评估总体范围扩展方法研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(9): 1623-1636. |
[7] | 杜丽永, 蔡志坚, 杨加猛, 蒋瞻. 运用Spike模型分析CVM中零响应对价值评估的影响——以南京市居民对长江流域生态补偿的支付意愿为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 1007-1018. |
[8] | 徐大伟, 刘春燕, 常亮. 流域生态补偿意愿的WTP与WTA差异性研究: 基于辽河中游地区居民的CVM调查[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3): 402-409. |
[9] | 许丽忠, 钟满秀, 韩智霞, 胡军, 黄梅芬, 张江山. 环境与资源价值CV评估预测有效性研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(8): 1421-1430. |
[10] | 段锦, 康慕谊, 江源. 东江流域生态系统服务价值变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(1): 90-103. |
[11] | 金建君, 江冲. 选择试验模型法在耕地资源保护中的应用——以浙江省温岭市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(10): 1750-1757. |
[12] | 吴丰林, 方创琳. 中国风能资源价值评估与开发阶段划分研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(8): 1412-1421. |
[13] | 栾晓峰, 周建华, 周楠, 吴波, 李迪强. 东北林区自然保护区管理有效性初步评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(4): 567-576. |
[14] | 周学红, 马建章, 张伟, 王强. 运用CVM评估濒危物种保护的经济价值及其可靠性分析——以哈尔滨市区居民对东北虎保护的支付意愿为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(2): 276-285. |
[15] | 刘飞. 淮北市南湖湿地生态系统服务及价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(10): 1818-1828. |
|