耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展与述评

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.017

PDF(959 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2012 ›› Issue (5) : 883-892. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.017

专题论坛

耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展与述评

谭永忠¹, 王庆日², 陈佳¹, 牟永铭³, 张洁¹

作者信息 +

Research Progress and Review on Non-market Value Evaluation Methods of Farmland Resource

TAN Yong-zhong¹, WANG Qing-ri², CHEN Jia¹, MOU Yong-ming³, ZHANG Jie¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

论文系统梳理了国内外耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展,指明了今后该领域研究的努力方向。研究结果表明:国内评价耕地资源非市场价值的方法主要是CVM,研究方法单一,缺少同时运用其他非市场价值评价方法来对CVM的研究进行比较的案例,从而无法清晰辨识CVM的缺陷,并对其加以改进;而且,CVM方法本身存在一些不足,大多数CVM的应用尚停留在实施CVM实验并报告结果的初级阶段,对CVM的有效性与可靠性方面的相关研究不够。国外非市场价值评价方法表现出两个特点:一是研究方法不断拓展,Mixed Logit逐步得到应用;二是研究方法不断深化,对CVM的研究从调研内容与结果的报告,向检验结果的有效性、可靠性方向转变,进而转向CVM的经济学理论的探讨和研究;对CVM与预期不相符合的原因进行深入研究;对问卷的设计进行深入研究;并将非市场价值评价模型和方法与空间分析相结合。在此基础上,建议将CE模型引入中国的耕地资源非市场价值评价研究;加强耕地资源非市场价值的空间分异特征与分异规律,以及耕地资源非市场价值形成的空间分异机理和动态演变规律的研究;尝试调查问卷设计中的可视化研究。

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to elaborate research progress of non-market value evaluation methods of farmland resource at home and abroad, and points out research direction of this area in future. The results of this paper are that CVM is the main method for evaluating non-market value of farmland resource in China, and it lacks case studies in applying other non-market value evaluation methods to compare those of CVM, which cannot clearly identify the defects of CVM and then improve it, meanwhile, there are some shortcomings of CVM method itself. Overseas non-market value evaluation methods show two characteristics: first, research methods expand and Mixed Logit Method is gradually applied; second, research methods deepen, and the design of the questionnaire is studied deeply, and it comes up studies that combine non-market value evaluation model with spatial analysis. This paper suggests that: 1) CE model is proposed to introduce to the study of evaluating non-market value of farmland resource in China; 2) the study of spatial differentiation characteristics of non-market value of farmland resource and spatial differentiation mechanism and dynamic evolution of the formation of non-market value of farmland resource should be enhanced; and 3) the questionnaire visualization can be tried to use in the future studies.

导出引用

谭永忠, 王庆日, 陈佳, 牟永铭, 张洁. 耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展与述评 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012(5): 883-892 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.017

TAN Yong-zhong, WANG Qing-ri, CHEN Jia, MOU Yong-ming, ZHANG Jie. Research Progress and Review on Non-market Value Evaluation Methods of Farmland Resource[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012(5): 883-892 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.017

中图分类号： F321.1 F062.1

参考文献

[1] 李景刚, 欧名豪, 张效军, 等. 耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价——以青岛市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880. [LI Jing-gang, OU Ming-hao, ZHANG Xiao-jun, et al. Reconstruction of cultivated land resources value system and its evaluation: A case study of Qingdao. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880.]
[2] 金建君, 王玉梅, 刘学敏. 耕地资源非市场价值及其评价方法分析[J]. 生态经济, 2008(11): 39-41. [JIN Jian-jun, WANG Yu-mei, LIU Xue-min. Analysis on the non-market value of cultivated land resources and its valuation methods. Ecological Economy, 2008(11): 39-41.]
[3] 郭贯成, 吴群. 农地资源不同价值属性的产权结构设计实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(4): 143-147. [GUO Guan-cheng, WU Qun. On farmland resource value attributes, design of property rights structure and protection of peasants’land property. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(4): 143-147.]
[4] 蔡银莺, 李晓云, 张安录. 耕地资源非市场价值评估初探[J]. 生态经济: 学术版, 2006(10): 10-14. [CAI Yin-ying, LI Xiao-yun, ZHANG An-lu. The application of contingent value method in non-market value of cultivated land resource. Ecological Economy, 2006(10): 10-14.]
[5] Bateman I J. Placing Money value on the un-priced benefits of forestry [J]. Quarterly journal of Forestry, 1991, 85(3): 152-185.
[6] Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method [M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989.
[7] Bell Kathleen P, Kevin J Boyle, Jonathan R Rubin. Economics of Rural Land-Use Change [M]. Hampshire, U K: Ashgate Publishers, 2006.
[8] Bateman I J, Carson R T, Day B, et al. Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-Market Goods [M]. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2003.
[9] 江冲, 金建君, 罗永剑. 耕地资源非市场价值评估研究进展及展望[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2010, 31(5): 51-56. [JIANG Chong, JIN Jian-jun, LUO Yong-jian. The research progress and prospect on non-market valuation of cultivated land resources. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2010, 31(5): 51-56.]
[10] 俞奉庆, 蔡运龙. 耕地资源价值探讨[J]. 中国土地科学, 2003, 17(3): 3-9. [YU Feng-qing, CAI Yun-long. A new insight of cultivated land resource value. China Land Science, 2003, 17(3): 3-9.]
[11] 蔡运龙, 俞奉庆. 中国耕地问题的症结与治本之策[J]. 中国土地科学, 2004, 18(3): 13-17. [CAI Yun-long, YU Qing-feng. Sticking points of fundamental policies for the farmland issue in China. China Land Science, 2004, 18(3): 13-17.]
[12] 陈丽, 曲福田, 师学义. 耕地资源社会价值测算方法探讨——以山西省柳林县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(6): 86-90. [CHEN Li, QU Fu-tian, SHI Xue-yi. The social value of cultivated land resources: A case in Liulin County of Shanxi Province. Resources Science, 2006, 28(6): 86-90.]
[13] 蔡银莺, 陈莹, 任艳胜, 等. 都市休闲农业中农地的非市场价值估算[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(2): 305-312. [CAI Yin-ying, CHEN Ying, REN Yan-sheng, et al. Measuring agricultural land’s non-market values of urban leisure agriculture. Resources Science, 2008, 30(2): 305-312.]
[14] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 19(2): 189-196. [XIE Gao-di, LU Chun-xia, LENG Yun-fa, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 19(2): 189-196.]
[15] 鲁春霞, 谢高地, 肖玉, 等. 青藏高原生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(12): 2749-2756. [LU Chun-xia, XIE Gao-di, XIAO Yu, et al. Ecosystem diversity and economic valuation of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(12): 2749-2756.]
[16] 霍雅勤, 蔡运龙. 耕地资源价值的评价与重建——以甘肃省会宁县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2003, 17(5): 81-85. [HUO Ya-qin, CAI Yun-long. Assessment and restoration of the value of cultivated land resources: A case study of Huining County, Gansu Province. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2003, 17(5): 81-85.]
[17] 王瑞雪. 耕地非市场价值评估理论方法与实践[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2005. [WANG Rui-xue. Study on Non-Market Valuation Theories, Methods of Farmland and Application. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2005.]
[18] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市石榴红农场休闲景观的游憩价值和存在价值估算[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 1201-1210. [CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu. Measuring recreational value and existence value of agricultural land in Shiliuhong leisure farm in Wuhan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(3): 1201-1210.]
[19] 李广东, 邱道持, 王平. 三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 562-575. [LI Guang-dong, QIU Dao-chi, WANG Ping. Assessing non-market value of cultivated land in ecologically fragile areas of Three Gorges Reservoir. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 562-575.]
[20] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地非市场价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 763-773. [CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 763-773.]
[21] 景莉娜, 刘新平, 罗桥顺. 基于CVM法的乌鲁木齐市耕地非市场价值评价[J]. 现代农业科学, 2008, 15(2): 64-67. [JING Li-na, LIU Xin-ping, LUO Qiao-shun. Non-market value of cultivated land resource in Urumqi by the method of CVM. Modern Agricultural Science, 2008, 15(2): 64-67.]
[22] 诸培新, 任艳利. 基于城市居民支付意愿的耕地资源非市场价值研究——以江苏省南京市、盐城市为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 10(3): 57-62. [ZHU Pei-xin, REN Yan-li. Non-market value of cultivated land resource and its influencing factors based on urban residents’pay willingness: A case study of Nanjing and Yancheng. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 10(3): 57-62.]
[23] 李明利. 基于条件价值法的耕地资源非市场价值评估研究——以南京市为例[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009. [LI Ming-li. Evaluation of Non-Market Value of Cultivated Land Resource by the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study of Nanjing. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009.]
[24] 任朝霞, 陆玉麒. 条件价值法在西安市耕地资源非市场价值评估的应用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(3): 28-32. [REN Chao-xia, LU Yu-qi. The application of CVM for assessment of cultivated land of non-market value in Xi’an. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011, 25(3): 28-32.]
[25] 王瑞雪, 赵学涛, 张安录. 农地非市场价值条件评估法及其应用[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 105-110. [WANG Rui-xue, ZHAO Xue-tao, ZHANG An-lu. An application of CVM in the assessment of non-market value of agricultural land. Resources Science, 2005, 27(3): 105-110.]
[26] 姜昊. 基于CVM的耕地非市场价值评估研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009. [JIANG Hao. Study on Non-Market Value of Cultivated Land by the Method of CVM. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, 2009.]
[27] 王湃, 凌雪冰, 张安录. CVM评估休闲农地的存在价值——以武汉市和平农庄为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(6): 66-71. [WANG Pai, LING Xue-bing, ZHANG An-lu. Assessment on the existence value of recreational farmland by CVM: A case study of Heping Village in Wuhan City. China Land Science, 2009, 23(6): 66-71.]
[28] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国株. 生态经济学理论方法与应用[M]. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2003. [XU Zhong-min, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, CHENG Guo-zhu. Ecological Economics Theory and Application. Zhengzhou: The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2003.]
[29] Hausman J A. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment [M]. Amsterdam. New York: North-Holland, 1993.
[30] Diamond Peter A, Hausman Jerry A. Contingent valuation debate: is some number better than no number? [J] Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8(4): 45-64.
[31] Christie M. A comparison of alternative contingent valuation elicitation treatments for the evaluation of complex environmental policy [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 62(3): 255-269.
[32] Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1966, 74: 132-157.
[33] 徐中民, 张志强, 龙爱华, 等. 环境选择模型在生态系统管理中的应用——以黑河流域额济纳旗为例[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(3): 398-405. [XU Zhong-min, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, LONG Ai-hua, et al. Choice modeling and its potential application to ecosystem management and preservation: Taking Ejina Banner as an example. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(3): 398-405.]
[34] Scott M Swinton, Frank Lupi, Philip G Robertson, et al. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64: 245-252.
[35] John C Bergstrom, Richard C Ready. What have we learned from over 20 years of farmland amenity valuation research in North America? [J] Review of Agricultural Economics, 2008, 31(1): 21-49.
[36] Harpinder S Sandhu, Stephen D Wratten, Ross Cullen, et al. The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64: 835-848.
[37] Bowman T, Thompson J, Colletti J. Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 321-330.
[38] Ready R C, Abdalla C W. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 87: 314-326.
[39] Irwin E. The effects of open space on residential property values [J]. Land Economics, 2002, 78: 465-480.
[40] Roe B, Irwin E G, Morrow-Jones H A. The effects of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth [J]. Land Economics, 2004, 80: 55-75.
[41] Navrud S, Ready R. Environmental Values Transfer: Issues and Methods [M]. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2007.
[42] Kroeger T. The economic value of ecosystem services in four counties in northeastern Florida [R]. Companion report to the Kiker and Hodges 2002. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington D C, 2005.
[43] Kiker C F, Hodges A W. Economic benefits of natural land conservation: Case study of Northeast Florida [R]. Final Report for Defenders of Wildlife. Gainesville, F L: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 2002.
[44] Johnston R J, Duke J M. Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: Does the method matter? [J] American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 89: 1098-1115.
[45] Kevin J Boyle, Semra Özdemir. Convergent validity of attribute-based, choice questions in stated-preference studies [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 42: 247-264.
[46] Roy Brouwer, Julia Martin-Ortega, Julio Berbel. Spatial preference heterogeneity: A choice experiment [J]. Land Economics, 2010, 86 (3): 552-568.
[47] Danny Campbell, W George Hutchinson. Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements [J]. Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41: 97-111.
[48] Train Kenneth. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[49] Campbell D. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: Combining mixed logit and random effects models [J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 58: 467-483.
[50] Mette Termansen, Marianne Zandersen, Colin J McClean. Spatial substitution patterns in forest recreation [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2008, 38: 81-97.
[51] Ekin Birol, Katia Karousakis, Phoebe Koundouri. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60: 145-156.
[52] http: //www.limdep.com/features/whatsnew_nlogit.php [EB/OL].
[53] 张蕾, Jeff Bennett, 戴广翠, 等. 中国退耕还林政策成本效益分析[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2008. [ZHANG Lei, Jeff Bennett, DAI Guang-cui, et al. Cost-benefit Analysis on the Program for Conversion of Cropland to Forest Land in China. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2008.]
[54] Wang Xuehong, Jeff Bennett, Chen Xie, et al. Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: A choice modeling approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(1): 114-125.
[55] Ekin Birol, Katia Karousakis, Phoebe Koundouri. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60: 145-156.
[56] Robert J Johnston, Joshua M Duke. Willingness to pay for land preservation across states and jurisdictional scale: Implications for benefit transfer [J]. Land Economics, 2009, 85(2): 217-237.
[57] Zhang Y Q, Li Y Q. Valuing or Pricing natural and environmental resources [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2005, 8: 179-186.
[58] Veisten K. Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory [J]. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2007, 36(2): 204-232.
[59] Bateman I J, Cole M, Cooper P, et al. Visible choice sets and scope sensitivity: An experimental and field test of study design effects upon contingent values [R]. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 01-01, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, 2001.
[60] Veisten K, Hoen H F, Navrud S, et al. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 73(4): 317-331.
[61] Carson R T, Flores N E, Meade N F. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19: 173-210.
[62] Cameron T A, Poe G L, Ethier R G, et al. Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying Preferences the same? [J] Journal of Environmental Economies and Management, 2002, 44: 391-425.
[63] Bateman I J. Bringing the real world into economic analyses of land use value: Incorporating spatial complexity [J]. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(1): S30-S42.
[64] Bateman I J, Brett H Day, Stavros Georgiou, et al. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60: 450-460.
[65] Bateman I J, Brett H Day, Andrew P Jones, et al. Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009, 58: 106-118.
[66] 蔡运龙, 霍雅勤. 中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092. [CAI Yun-long, HUO Ya-qin. Reevaluating cultivated land in China: Method and case studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.]