山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160842

自然资源学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1554-1567.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160842

山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局

许凤娇¹, 吕晓^{1, 2, *}, 陈昌玲^{2, 3}

1. 曲阜师范大学地理与旅游学院,山东日照 276826;
2. 国土资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室,南京 210024;
3. 南京农业大学土地管理学院,南京 210095

收稿日期:2016-08-04 修回日期:2016-12-12 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-09-20
通讯作者: 吕晓（1984- ）,男,山东茌平人,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师,中国自然资源学会会员（S300001605M）,研究方向为土地经济与政策、土地利用与乡村发展。E-mail:xl1030@foxmail.com
作者简介:许凤娇（1993- ）,女,山东德州人,硕士研究生,中国自然资源学会会员（S300001815M）,研究方向为土地利用管理。E-mail:xufengjiao93@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41301185,41501171）

Spatial-temporal Pattern of Urban-rural Construction Land Transition in Shandong Province

XU Feng-jiao¹, LÜ Xiao^{1, 2}, CHEN Chang-ling^{2, 3}

1. School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China;
2. The Key Laboratory of the Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resource, Nanjing 210024, China;
3. College of Land Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received:2016-08-04 Revised:2016-12-12 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-09-20
Supported by:
National Nature Science Foundation of China, No.41301185 and 41501171

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在深化城乡建设用地转型内涵的基础上,论文构建指标体系并采用主成分分析法、德尔菲法及ArcGIS空间分析等方法对山东省17城市2005—2014年城乡建设用地转型的时空格局进行分析。结果显示：1）城乡建设用地转型是指某一区域一定时期内城乡建设用地利用形态在经济社会发展转型的驱动下所表现出的转变过程,包括结构转型、效率转型和功能转型等三方面。2）山东省城乡建设用地综合转型以及各分项转型平均水平在研究期间均有一定程度的提升,转型水平提升幅度最大的城市为菏泽;其中城乡建设用地功能转型这一维度对综合转型的影响较大。3）2005—2014年,城乡建设用地转型在区域之间的绝对差异和相对差异年际变化较为明显,全省城乡建设用地转型的全局空间自相关性并不显著,区域间转型发展并未出现明显的两极分化现象,但结构转型指数存在较明显的空间差异。4）在未来的城乡建设用地转型发展中,不仅要关注其经济功能,更应注重其对保护和治理环境、改善居民生活质量的推动作用,对区域转型差异进行适度调控和干预。

关键词: 城乡建设用地转型, 山东省, 土地利用转型

Abstract: Urban-rural construction land transition (URCLT) refers to the transformation process of urban-rural construction land use driven by the economic and social development in a region during a certain period of time, including urban-rural construction land structural transition, urban-rural construction land efficiency transition and urban-rural construction land function transition. This paper builds index system of URCLT and analyzes the spatio-temporal pattern of URCLT of 17 cities in Shandong Province during 2005-2014 using principal components analysis, Delphi method and spatial analysis method. Principal components analysis and Delphi method are used to obtain the weights of the indices and then the values of URCLT of 17 cities are calculated. Based on these values, spatial-temporal pattern of URCLT in Shandong Province is analyzed. Results show that: 1) The composite index of URCLT and each dimension of the transition have a certain degree of improvement in Shandong Province, in which the urban-rural construction land function transition has the great influence on URCLT. The city with the most URCLT is Heze, which has the change rate of 76.1%. However, the change rate of each dimension during 2005-2014 suggests that Binzhou has the biggest change in structural transition with the change rate of 79.5% and Zibo has the minimum change in structural transition with the change rate of -12.2%; Heze has the maximum change in efficiency transition with the change rate of 146.3%, and Binzhou has the minimum change in efficiency transition with the change rate of 36.3%. The city which has the biggest raise of function transition is Binzhou that the rate is 81.9%, and Dezhou has the minimum change of function transition with the rate of 39.0%. 2) Annual changes of the absolute difference and the relative difference of URCLT between 17cities are obvious; the spatial agglomeration of URCLT in Shandong Province is weak, and there is no obvious polarization of regional URCLT, except that the structural transition of urban-rural construction land has obvious spatial difference. The coefficient of structural transition, efficiency transition and function transition are 0.128, 0.081, and 0.044 in 2005, 0.134, 0.061 and 0.019 in 2009, 0.041, 0.053 and 0.044 in 2014, respectively. The spatial differences of structural transition, efficiency transition and function transition decrease in turn in 2005; the spatial difference of structural transition is the biggest and the spatial difference of function transition is the smallest in 2009; the degree of spatial difference of efficiency transition is the biggest and the spatial difference of structural transition is the smallest in 2014. 3) In the future, we should pay attention to URCLT’s role in protecting and treating environment and improving the life quality of residents as well as URCLT’s economic function. Also, regulation and intervention in the regional difference of URCLT are necessary.

Key words: land use transition, Shandong Province, urban-rural construction land transition

中图分类号:

F301

许凤娇, 吕晓, 陈昌玲. 山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1554-1567.

XU Feng-jiao, LÜ Xiao, CHEN Chang-ling. Spatial-temporal Pattern of Urban-rural Construction Land Transition in Shandong Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(9): 1554-1567.

参考文献

[1] 吕晓, 黄贤金, 赵雲泰. 不同视角下建设用地扩张效率的对比分析 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(7): 148-154, 168. [LÜ X, HUANG X J, ZHAO Y T. Comparative analysis on efficiency of construction land expansion based on the different perspective. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(7): 148-154, 168. ]
[2] 吕晓, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 等. 土地利用规划对建设用地扩张的管控效果分析——基于一致性与有效性的复合视角 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2): 177-187. [LÜ X, HUANG X J, ZHONG T Y, et al. The controlling effects of land-use planning on construction land expansion based on the perspective compositing consistency and effectiveness. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(2): 177-187. ]
[3] 刘纪远, 张增祥, 徐新良, 等. 21世纪初中国土地利用变化的空间格局与驱动力分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420. [LIU J Y, ZHANG Z X, XU X L, et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China in the early 21st century. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2009, 64(12): 1411-1420. ]
[4] 向敬伟, 李江风, 曾杰. 鄂西贫困县耕地利用转型空间分异及其影响因素 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(1): 272-279. [XIANG J W, LI J F, ZENG J. Spatial difference and its influence factors of cultivated land transition of poverty counties in west of Hubei. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(1): 272-279. ]
[5] 吕晓, 牛善栋, 张全景, 等. 基于内容分析法的集体建设用地流转政策演进分析 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(4): 25-33. [LÜ X, NIU S D, ZHANG Q J, et al. Evolution of policies on rural collective-owned construction land circulation in China based on content analysis method. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(4): 25-33. ]
[6] 龙花楼. 中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实 [J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1093-1100. [LONG H L. Rural housing land transition in China: Theory and verification. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2006, 61(10): 1093-1100. ]
[7] 龙花楼, 李婷婷. 中国耕地和农村宅基地利用转型耦合分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(2): 201-210. [LONG H L, LI T T. Analysis of the coupling of farmland and rural housing landtransition in China. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2012, 67(2): 201-210. ]
[8] 曲艺, 龙花楼. 城市土地利用隐性形态空间分异及其影响因素研究——以中国289个地级以上城市为例 [J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(10): 1-8. [QU Y, LONG H L. Spatial differentiation of the recessive morphology of urban land use and its influential factors: A case study of 289 prefecture-level cities in China. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(10): 1-8. ]
[9] 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. [LONG H L. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. ]
[10] 龙花楼. 土地利用转型——土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1): 87-90. [LONG H L. Land use transition: A new integrated approach of land use/cover change study. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2003, 19(1): 87-90. ]
[11] 张佰林, 张凤荣, 周建, 等. 农村居民点功能演变的微尺度分析——山东省沂水县核桃园村的实证 [J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(10): 1272-1279. [ZHANG B L, ZHANG F R, ZHOU J, et al. Functional evolution of rural settlement based on micro-perspective: A case study of Hetaoyuan village in Yishui County, Shandong Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(10): 1272-1279. ]
[12] 于伟, 刘本城, 宋金平. 城镇化进程中农户宅基地退出的决策行为及影响因素 [J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3): 551-560. [YU W, LIU B C, SONG J P. A study on farmers’ willingness to quit rural residential lands and its influencing factors. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(3): 551-560. ]
[13] 孙平军, 赵峰, 修春亮. 中国城镇建设用地投入效率的空间分异研究 [J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(6): 46-52. [SUN P J, ZHAO F, XIU C L. Study on the spatial differentiation of urban construction land input efficiency in China. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(6): 46-52. ]
[14] 吕晓, 黄贤金, 张全景. 城乡建设用地转型研究综述 [J]. 城市规划, 2015, 39(4): 105-112. [LÜ X, HUANG X J, ZHANG Q J. A literature review on urban-rural construction land transition. City Planning Review, 2015, 39(4): 105-112. ]
[15] GRAINGER A. National land use morphology: Patterns and possibilities [J]. Geography, 1995, 80(3): 235-245.
[16] 龙花楼. 国内土地利用转型研究的前沿探索 [C]// 刘彦随, 宋戈. 中国新时期土地资源科学创新与发展研究. 沈阳: 东北大学出版社, 2016: 18-29. [LONG H L. Frontiers of land use transition research in China// LIU Y S, SONG G. Research on Innovation and Development of Land Resource Science in the New Period of China. Shenyang: Northeastern University Press, 2016: 18-29.]
[17] 陆大道, 史培军, 董光器. 体现土地利用转型的重要理念 [N]. 中国国土资源报, 2006-07-17(5). [LU D D, SHI P J, DONG G Q. Important Ideas Embodying Land Use Transition. China Land and Resources News, 2006-07-17(5). ]
[18] 李秀彬. 农地利用变化假说与相关的环境效应命题 [J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(11): 1124-1129. [LI X B. Theoretical hypotheses about agricultural land use changes and the relevant propositions about environmental impacts. Advances in Earth Science, 2008, 23(11): 1124-1129. ]
[19] 龙花楼, 李秀彬. 区域土地利用转型分析——以长江沿线样带为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 144-149. [LONG H L, LI X B. Analysis on regional land use transition: A case study in Transect of the Yangtze River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(2): 144-149. ]
[20] 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理 [J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 1607-1618. [LONG H L. Land use transition and land management. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9): 1607-1618. ]
[21] LONG H L, HEILIG G K, LI X B, et al. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 141-153.
[22] 龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型 [J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2): 179-188. [LONG H L, LI X B. Rural housing land transition in transect of the Yangtse River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2): 179-188. ]
[23] 龙花楼, 李秀彬. 中国耕地转型与土地整理:研究进展与框架 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(5): 67-76. [LONG H L, LI X B. Cultivated-land transition and land consolidation and reclamation in China: Research progress and frame. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(5): 67-76. ]
[24] 傅超, 刘彦随. 我国城镇化和土地利用非农化关系分析及协调发展策略 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(3): 47-51. [FU C, LIU Y S. Coordinated development between land use change and population change in urbanizing China. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(3): 47-51. ]
[25] 肖正华. 新型城镇化亟待提高土地利用效率 [N]. 中国建设报, 2013-06-26(004). [XIAO Z H. New urbanization’s requirement for improving the efficiency of land use. China Construction News, 2013-06-26(004). ]
[26] 杜国明, 孙晓兵, 王介勇. 东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(2): 232-244. [DU G M, SUN X B, WANG J Y. Spatiotemporal patterns of multi-functionality of land use in Northeast China. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(2): 232-244. ]
[27] 王枫, 董玉祥. 基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断——以广州市为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(10): 1699-1713. [WANG F, DONG Y X. Dynamic evaluation of land use functions based on grey relation projection method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: A case study of Guangzhou City. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(10): 1699-1713. ]
[28] JIANG W G, WANG W J, CHEN Y H, et al. Quantifying driving forces of urban wetlands change in Beijing City [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(2): 301-314.
[29] 李胭胭, 鲁丰先. 河南省经济增长质量的时空格局 [J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(3): 41-47. [LI Y Y, LU F X. Spatial-temporal pattern of economic growth quality in Henan Province. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(3): 41-47. ]
[30] 王建康, 谷国锋, 姚丽, 等. 中国新型城镇化的空间格局演变及影响因素分析——基于285个地级市的面板数据 [J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(1): 63-71. [WANG J K, GU G F, YAO L, et al. Analysis of new urbanization’s spatial pattern evolution and influence factors in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(1): 63-71. ]
[31] 李艳萍, 乔琦, 柴发合, 等. 基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2014, 27(3): 334-340. [LI Y P, QIAO Q, CHAI F H, et al. Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(3): 334-340. ]
[32] LIU Y S, YANG R, LONG H L, et al. Implications of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yucheng, Shandong Province [J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40(1): 111-118.
[33] LI T T, LONG H L, LIU Y Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis of rural housing land transition under China’s rapid urbanization: The case of Bohai Rim [J]. Habitat International, 2015, 48: 227-238.
[34] LIU Y Q, LONG H L. Land use transitions and their dynamic mechanism: The case of the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(5): 515-530.
[35] 李婷婷, 龙花楼. 山东省乡村转型发展时空格局 [J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(3): 490-500. [LI T T, LONG H L. Study on the spatio-temporal pattern of rural transformation development in Shandong Province. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(3): 490-500. ]
[36] 赵明华, 郑元文. 近10年来山东省区域经济发展差异时空演变及驱动力分析 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(1): 79-85. [ZHAO M H, ZHENG Y W. Dynamics of temporal-spatial pattern of economic differences and driving forcesin Shandong Province in the past 10 years. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(1): 79-85. ]
[37] 刘雷, 张华. 山东省城市化效率与经济发展水平的时空耦合关系 [J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(8): 75-82. [LIU L, ZHANG H. Spatial-temporal coupling relationship between urbanization efficiency and economic development level in Shandong Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(8): 75-82. ]

山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局

Spatial-temporal Pattern of Urban-rural Construction Land Transition in Shandong Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李明珍, 李阳兵, 冉彩虹. 土地利用转型背景下的乡村景观格局演变响应——基于草堂溪流域的样带分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2283-2298.
[2]	刘建志, 房艳刚, 王如如. 山东省农业多功能的时空演化特征与驱动机制分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2901-2915.
[3]	张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 刘晶, 单薇, 周寅康. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 689-706.
[4]	余灏哲, 韩美. 基于水足迹的山东省水资源可持续利用时空分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 474-483.
[5]	杨皓然, 吴群. 碳排放视角下的江苏省土地利用转型生态效率研究——基于混合方向性距离函数[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(10): 1718-1730.
[6]	徐成龙, 程钰. 新常态下山东省环境规制对工业结构调整及其大气环境效应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(10): 1662-1674.
[7]	董旭光, 顾伟宗, 王静, 刘焕彬. 影响山东参考作物蒸散量变化的气象因素定量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(5): 810-823.
[8]	苏伟忠, 叶高斌, 杨桂山. 1985—2010年太湖流域粮食产能隐性增减评估研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8): 1366-1376.
[9]	王介勇, 刘彦随, 陈秧分. 农村空心化程度影响因素的实证研究——基于山东省村庄调查数据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(1): 10-18.
[10]	张衍广, 林振山, 陈玲玲. 山东省水资源承载力的动力学预测[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 596-605.
[11]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 区域土地利用转型分析——以长江沿线样带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 144-149.
[12]	卢兵友. 典型农村景观生态工程建设效益分析——以山东省西单村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 54-58.
[13]	代合治. 山东省矿产资源特点及其开发利用[J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(1): 94-96.