交易费用视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160839

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农地整理建成设施及设备的管护是权利让渡和责任主体迁移的过程,对农地整理管护绩效开展研究是破解当前管护困境的有效途径。论文在构建农地整理管护绩效测度体系及其评估方法基础之上,运用威廉姆森交易费用“维度论”分析框架阐述农地整理管护绩效的影响因素。实证研究结果表明,实物资产专用性、人力资产专用性、交易不确定性、交易频率等维度要素对管护绩效的影响较为显著;论文运用工具变量方法解决计量模型中解释变量内生性问题,探讨了内生变量与工具变量以及其他解释变量的作用关系。研究结果验证了威廉姆森分析框架的有效性,并建议管理部门重视耕地生产水平的改善程度、村干部的表率示范作用以及管护人员的明确落实等关键影响要素。

关键词: 工具变量, 管护, 绩效, 交易费用, 农地整理

Abstract: Rural land consolidation is typically conducted as a consecutive sequence: decision-making, planning and budgeting, constructing, and then followed by supervision and maintenance. The behavior of Supervision and Maintenance of Rural Land Consolidation (SMRLC) implies the transfer of rights and duties between different subjects of responsibility, while the aim of SMRLC is to sustain regular operation of infrastructure and equipment provided by rural land consolidation and coordinate interrelationship between human being and land resources. The performance study of SMRLC is vitally important to solve the current predicament of lower efficiency or even deficiency of supervision and maintenance. First, index system and assessment method for SMRLC performance are proposed. Performance indices are set from the stakeholders’ viewpoint and weights are gained from AHP method after consulting 12 scholars throughout China. Second, the kernel concept of transaction is introduced to describe the behavior of SMRLC. Therefore, based on transaction cost theory, Williams’ analysis framework is employed to explain the impact mechanism of the performance of SMRLC. The empirical study is carried out in Dengzhou, Henan and Longzhou, Guangxi, and instrumental variable method is applied to solve the endogenous explanatory variable. Both Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and Instrumental Variable (IV) regression results show that the most significant factors are specificity of material asset, specificity of labor asset, transaction uncertainty and transaction frequency. The resutls validate Williams’ analysis framework for transaction cost and thereby it is highly suggested that management agency should pay close attention to the production level of cultivated land, the involvement of village leaders, and the staffs for supervision and maintenance.

Key words: instrumental variable, performance, rural land consolidation, supervision and maintenance, transaction cost

中图分类号:

F301.2

赵微, 杨钢桥, 李金玉. 交易费用视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1505-1516.

ZHAO Wei, YANG Gang-qiao, LI Jin-yu. Impact Factors of Supervision and Maintenance Performance of Rural Land Consolidation: A Theoretical and Empirical Study Based on Transaction Cost Theory[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(9): 1505-1516.

参考文献

[1] 罗文斌, 吴次芳, 杨剑. 基于“流程逻辑”框架的土地整理项目绩效物元评价 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(4): 55-61. [LUO W B, WU C F, YANG J. Performance evaluation of land consolidation projects based on the matter-element method under “Process Logic” framework. China Land Science, 2010, 24(4): 55-61. ]
[2] 曲延春. 农村公共产品供给中的政府责任担当: 基于扩大内需视角 [J]. 中国农村经济, 2012, 33(3): 63-69. [QU Y C. The government’s responsibility in rural public goods supply: Perspective based on domestic demand expansion. China Rural Economics, 2012, 33(3): 63-69. ]
[3] 刘敏. 农田水利工程管理体制改革的社区实践及其困境——基于产权社会学的视角 [J]. 中国农村经济, 2015, 36(4): 78-86. [LIU M. Community practice and the difficulties of the management system reform of rural small water infrastructures: Based on the perspective of social logic of the property. China Rural Economics, 2015, 36(4): 78-86. ]
[4] 胡珍, 杨钢桥, 汪文雄, 等. 基于农户视角的农地整理项目后期管护绩效评价 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2): 198-204. [HU Z, YANG G Q, WANG W X, et al. Evaluation on later period management and performance of rural land consolidation based on farmers’ perspective. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 198-204. ]
[5] 杨丽娜, 何多兴, 杨庆媛. 土地整治后期管护影响因素及保障体系分析——以三峡库区云阳县为例 [J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 38(5): 134-141. [YANG L N, HE D X, YANG Q Y. An analysis of impact factors and safeguarded system on final management and maintenance of land consolidation—A case study of Yunyang County in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 38(5): 134-141. ]
[6] 赵微, 周惠, 杨钢桥, 等. 农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究: 以河南邓州的调查为例 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(3): 55-62. [ZHAO W, ZHOU H, YANG G Q, et al. Farmers’ transformation between willingness and behavior of post land consolidation supervision and maintenance: A case study of Dengzhou, Henan Province. China Land Science, 2016, 30(3): 55-62. ]
[7] 罗必良. 制度经济学 [M]. 太原: 山西经济出版社, 2005. [LUO B L. New Institutional Economics. Taiyuan: Shanxi Economics Press, 2005. ]
[8] WILLIAMSON O E. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations [J]. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1979, 22: 233-261.
[9] 罗必良, 李尚蒲. 农地流转的交易费用: 威廉姆森分析范式及广东的证据 [J]. 农业经济问题, 2010(12): 30-40. [LUO B L, LI S P. Transaction cost of agricultural land circulation based on Williamson’s paradigm and evidence from Guangdong Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2010(12): 30-40. ]
[10] 上官彩霞, 冯淑怡, 吕沛璐, 等. 交易费用视角下宅基地置换模式的区域差异及其成因 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(4): 107-115. [SHANGGUAN C X, FENG S Y, LÜ P L, et al. Regional differences of rural residential land replacement modes and the reasons in the perspective of transaction cost economics. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(4): 107-115. ]
[11] 何一鸣, 罗必良. 产业特性、交易费用与经济绩效——来自中国农业的经验证据 (1958—2008年) [J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2011, 33(3): 57-62. [He Y M, LUO B L. Industrial characteristics, transactional costs and economic performance—Based on the positive analysis of China’s agricultural economic transition (1958-2008). Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 2011, 33(3): 57-62. ]
[12] 李学. 不完全契约、交易费用与治理绩效——兼论公共服务市场化供给模式 [J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(1): 114-118. [LI X. Incomplete contract, transaction cost and governance performance. China Public Administration, 2009(1): 114-118. ]
[13] 赵微, 吴诗嫚. “结构-行为-绩效”框架下农地整理的管护绩效研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(2): 249-256. [ZHAO W, WU S M. Performance analysis of supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidation: A theoretical framework of structure-conduct-performance. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(2): 249-256. ]
[14] 田甜, 杨钢桥, 赵微, 等. 农民参与农地整理项目行为决策研究——基于武汉城市圈农地整理项目的实证分析 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(8): 49-56. [TIAN T, YANG G Q, ZHAO W, et al. Farmers’ decision-making behaviors of participating in farmland consolidation project: An empirical analysis of land consolidation project in Wuhan fringe. China Land Science, 2014, 28(8): 49-56. ]
[15] 杨东升. 欠发达国家经济增长与金融发展——一个基于工具变量的分析 [J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(1): 85-95. [YANG D S. Economical growth and financial development of underdeveloped countries: An analysis framework based on instrumental variable. China Rural Economics, 2015(1): 85-95. ]
[16] 吴要武. 寻找阿基米德的“杠杆”——“出生季度”是个弱工具变量吗? [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9(2): 661-686. [WU Y W. Searching for the Archimedes’ lever: Is Quarter-of-Birth really a weak instrumental variable? China Economic Quarterly, 2010, 9(2): 661-686. ]
[17] 李龙, 宋月萍. 农地流转对家庭化流动的影响——来自流出地的证据 [J]. 公共管理学报, 2016, 13(2): 76-83. [LI L, SONG Y P. The influence of land renting on familization of migration: Evidence from the origin places. Journal of Public Management, 2016, 13(2): 76-83. ]
[18] 魏龙, 潘安. 出口贸易和FDI加剧了资源型城市的环境污染吗?——基于中国285个地级城市面板数据的经验研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(1): 17-27. [WEI L, PAN A. Do export and FDI aggravate environmental pollution in resources-based cities?—An empirical analysis based on panel data of 285 prefecture cities in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(1): 17-27. ]
[19] 陈强. 高级计量经济学及STATA应用 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014. [CHEN Q. Advanced Econometrics and Application of STATA. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014. ]
[20] 胡珍. 基于农户视角的农地整理项目后期管护绩效评价研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014. [HU Z. Study on the Evaluation of Final Management and Maintenance Performance of Rural Land Consolidation Based on Farmers’ Perspective. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014. ]