泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20150767

自然资源学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1149-1163.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150767

泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素

王坤^{1, 2}, 黄震方^{1*, *}, 曹芳东¹, 余凤龙³, 汤傅佳¹

1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023;
2. 江苏师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,江苏徐州 221116;
3. 南通大学地理科学学院,江苏南通 226007

收稿日期:2015-07-13 修回日期:2015-12-21 出版日期:2016-07-20 发布日期:2016-07-20
作者简介:王坤（1982- ）,男,湖北孝感人,讲师,博士,研究方向为旅游地理。E-mail:kunwang102@126.com *通信黄震方（1963- ）,男,江苏扬中人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游地理与旅游规划。E-mail:zhfh@263.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（41271149,41501148）; 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金资助项目（2014SJB396）; 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目（KYZZ15_0219）

Spatial Pattern Evolution of Urban Tourism Performance and Its Influence Factors in Pan-Yangtze River Delta

WANG Kun^{1, 2}, HUANG Zhen-fang¹, CAO Fang-dong¹, YU Feng-long³, TANG Fu-jia¹

1. School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. School of History Culture and Tourism, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China;
3. School of Geographical Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226007, China

Received:2015-07-13 Revised:2015-12-21 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271149 and 41501148 ;Jiangsu College Philosophy and Social Research Foundation of China, No.2014SJB396; Ordinary University Graduate Students’ Scientific Research Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province of China, No.KYZZ15_0219

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市旅游绩效是综合衡量城市旅游业生产活动过程和效果的重要手段。论文基于旅游发展规模和质量视角,利用旅游业绩指数和Bootstrap-DEA测算泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效,并采用空间变差函数和SDM探讨城市旅游绩效的格局演变及其影响因素。结果表明：1）区域城市旅游业绩和效率呈现相异的空间格局,城市旅游业绩高值区分布于上海、杭州和南京等中心城市及其邻近地区,低值区多位于皖北和苏北地区;城市旅游效率高值区逐渐呈现“皖北—苏南—上海—皖南—浙东”的“Z”字形分布,低值区不断向苏中、苏北和皖中地区集聚。2）区域城市旅游业绩和效率格局的演变过程存在明显差异,城市旅游业绩格局发生变异的随机成分不断降低,而旅游效率格局的结构化变异逐渐增大;城市旅游业绩的空间差异在不断缩小,各方向上的差异较为稳定,而旅游效率格局的空间差异先减小后增大,各方向上的差异切换频繁。3）区域城市旅游绩效的格局演变与城市经济发展、产业结构、交通条件、信息技术、市场化和城市化等多种因素有关,各影响因素及其空间效应强度的差异引致区域城市旅游业绩和效率格局呈现不同的演变轨迹。

关键词: 城市旅游绩效, 泛长江三角洲, 空间格局演变

Abstract: Urban tourism performance is an important guideline for comprehensive measurement of urban tourism production activities and benefits. Taking the prefecture-level cities as the study units, this paper measures the tourism performance of Pan-Yangtze River Delta. Adopting urban tourism achievement index and Bootstrap-DEA model, with the help of the spatial variogram function and the Spatial Durbin Model, this paper analyzes the spatial pattern evolution of tourism performance and its influence mechanism. The main conclusions are shown as follows. Firstly, the urban tourism achievement and the urban tourism efficiency exhibit distinct spatial patterns. The areas of high urban tourism achievement are mainly the regional centers, such as the cities of Shanghai, Hangzhou and Nanjing and their neighboring regions, while the areas of low urban tourism achievement locate in northern Anhui and northern Jiangsu. The areas of high urban tourism efficiency gradually form a “Z”-shaped spatial distribution, which is composed of the “northern Anhui-southern Jiangsu-Shanghai-southern Anhui-eastern Zhejiang”, and the areas of low urban tourism efficiency are gradually gathering at northern Jiangsu and northern Anhui. Secondly, according to the levels of urban tourism achievement and urban tourism efficiency, the cities in Pan-Yangtze River Delta can be divided into four types, namely highest-level tourism performance, higher-level tourism performance, lower-level tourism performance and lowest-level tourism performance. The numbers of cities at the highest level and higher level obviously increased, and these cities concentrate at Shanghai, Zhejiang, southern Jiangsu, and southern Anhui. The spatial distribution of the lowest-level of tourism performance gradually narrowed down, which mainly concentrated in the central and northern Jiangsu and northern Anhui. Thirdly, the evolutions of spatial patterns of urban tourism achievement and urban tourism efficiency are significantly different. The random components of the variation of urban tourism achievement pattern are constantly reducing, while the structured components of the variation of urban tourism efficiency pattern are constantly growing. The spatial difference of regional urban tourism achievement is shrinking and the variation is isotropic. The spatial difference of urban tourism efficiency increased first and then decreased, and the variation is anisotropic. Lastly, the spatial pattern evolution of urban tourism performance not only depends on the change of tourism production, but also relies on urban macro environment. Various factors of urban macro environment, such as urban economic development, industrial structure, traffic condition, information technology, market-oriented and urbanization, and their spatial interaction, constitute the power of spatial pattern evolution of urban tourism performance.

Key words: Pan-Yangtze River Delta, spatial pattern evolution, urban tourism performance

中图分类号:

F592.7

王坤, 黄震方, 曹芳东, 余凤龙, 汤傅佳. 泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(7): 1149-1163.

WANG Kun, HUANG Zhen-fang, CAO Fang-dong, YU Feng-long, TANG Fu-jia. Spatial Pattern Evolution of Urban Tourism Performance and Its Influence Factors in Pan-Yangtze River Delta[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(7): 1149-1163.

参考文献

[1] NOAH D C. Institution Change and Economic Performance [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990．
[2] 周峰, 濮励杰, 彭补拙. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.
[3] BRUMBRACH A. Performance Management [M]. London: The Cromwell Press, 1998.
[4] 林源源. 我国区域旅游产业经济绩效及其影响因素研究 [D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2010.
[5] 曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 等. 转型期城市旅游业绩效评价及空间格局演化机理: 以泛长江三角洲地区为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(1): 148-160.
[6] SZABO R. The economic performance of tourism in northern Hungarian region, with special regard to HEVES County [J]. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 2012, 6: 99-102.
[7] LEE C. The Comparison of Selected Aviation Factors and Level of Tourism for International Travelers in Selected States [D]. Missouri State: Central Missouri State University, 2001.
[8] 陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间格局演化 [J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1427-1437.
[9] 汪德根, 陈田. 中国旅游经济区域差异的空间分析 [J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(5): 528-536.
[10] AACHER B. Importance of tourism for the economy of Bermuda [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1995, 22(4): 918-930.
[11] LI C C, MAHMOOD R, ABDULLAH H, et al. Economic growth, tourism and selected macroeconomic variables: A triangular causal relationship in Malaysia [J]. The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2013, 7: 185-206.
[12] FAYISSA B, NSIAH C, TADESSE B. Research note: Tourism and economic growth in Latin American countries—Further empirical evidence [J]. Tourism Economics, 2011, 17(6): 1365-1373.
[13] 杨立勋, 陈晶, 程志富. 西北五省区旅游产业绩效影响因素分析: 基于面板数据分位数回归 [J]. 旅游学刊, 2013, 28(8): 94-101.
[14] QU H L, TSANG N. Service quality gap in China’s hotel industry: A study of tourist perceptions and expectations [J]. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 1998, 22(3): 252-267．
[15] BAKER D A, CROMPTON J L. Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2000, 27: 78-83.
[16] MOREY R C, DITTMAN D A. Evaluating a hotel GM’s performance: A case in benchmarking [J]. Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly, 1995, 36(5): 30-35.
[17] TSAUR S H. The operating efficiency of international tourist hotels in Taiwan [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2000, 6(1): 29-37.
[18] MA X L, RYAN C, BAO J G. Chinese national parks: Differences, resource use and tourism product portfolios [J]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(1): 21-30.
[19] 曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 等. 国家级风景名胜区旅游效率测度与区位可达性分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1686-1697.
[20] BARROS C P, MATIAS A. Assessing the efficiency of travel agencies with a stochastic cost frontier: A Portuguese case study [J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2006, 8(5): 367-379.
[21] SARKIS J, TALLURI S. Performance based clustering for benchmarking of US airports [J]. Transportation Research (Part A), 2004, 38(5): 329-346.
[22] CHARLES K N, PAUL S. Competition, privatization and productive efficiency: Evidence from the airline industry [J]. The Economic Journal, 2001, 111(3): 591-619.
[23] 秦伟山, 张义丰, 李世泰. 中国东部沿海城市旅游发展的时空演变 [J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(10): 1956-1965.
[24] 左冰, 保继刚. 1992—2005年中国旅游业全要素生产率及省际差异 [J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 417-427.
[25] 陶卓民, 薛献伟, 管晶晶. 基于数据包络分析的中国旅游业发展效率特征 [J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 1004-1012.
[26] 王坤, 黄震方, 陶玉国, 等. 区域城市旅游效率的空间特征及溢出效应分析 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(4): 161-167.
[27] LI R, GUO Q, WU D T, et al. Spatial characteristics of development efficiency for urban tourism in eastern China: A case study of six coastal urban agglomerations [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(6): 1175-1197.
[28] SIMAR L, WILSON P. A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier model [J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2000, 27(6): 779-802.
[29] 方创琳, 关兴良. 中国城市群投入产出效率的综合测度与空间分异 [J]. 地理学报, 2011, 26(8): 1011-1022.
[30] HALL P. On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval [J]. The Annals of Statistics, 1986, 14(4): 1453-1462.
[31] 靳诚, 陆玉麒. 基于县域单元的江苏省经济空间格局演化 [J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(6): 713-724.
[32] LESAGE J, PACE R K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics [M]. New York: CRC Press, 2009.

泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素

Spatial Pattern Evolution of Urban Tourism Performance and Its Influence Factors in Pan-Yangtze River Delta

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0