资源与环境双重约束下的工业用水效率&mdash;&mdash;基于SBM-Undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的实证研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.06.002

PDF(1360 KB)

自然资源学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6) : 920-933. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.06.002

资源利用与管理

资源与环境双重约束下的工业用水效率——基于SBM-Undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的实证研究

李静, 马潇璨

作者信息 +

The Utilization Efficiency of IndustrialWater under the Dual Constraints of Resource and Environment—An Empirical Study Based on SBM-Undesirable and Meta-frontier Model

LI Jing, MAXiao-can

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

我国工业用水效率低下已成为制约工业发展的资源瓶颈。论文基于中国30 个省区1999—2011 年的面板数据，利用SBM-Undesirable 和Meta-frontier 模型对共同前沿与群组前沿下各省区工业用水效率及其影响因素进行实证研究。研究结果表明，由于各省区工业用水技术水平的异质性，不同前沿下工业用水效率存在较大差异；考虑工业水污染的工业用水效率普遍较低，存在较大的效率改善空间。进一步研究发现，现行水价存在很大程度的扭曲，没有起到应有的提高水资源有效配置的作用。政策含义表明，工业用水效率不仅与地区工业发展的技术异质性有关，也和工业水污染及治理效果有关；应逐步提高现行工业水价，可仿照居民用水实行阶梯水价。

Abstract

The low utilization efficiency of industrial water in China has become a resource bottleneck restraining the development of industry. Based on the data of 30 provinces in China from 1999 to 2011, using SBM-Undesirable and the Meta-frontier model, this paper studies water use efficiency of industry under meta-frontier and group-frontier and estimates its influencing factors. The results show that the utilization efficiency of industrial water has a big difference between meta-frontier and group-frontier because of the utilization technological heterogeneity of industrial water in different regions. Efficiency values are generally lower when incorporated in industrial water pollutants. So there is still a larger room for improving the efficiency.Further study finds that the present price of industrial water is distorted to some extent, which can't reflect the efficient allocation of water resources. Policy implications indicate that water use efficiency of industry is concerned with technological heterogeneity, industrial water pollutants and its governance effect. The present price of industrial water should be gradually increased and the scalar water pricing system may be implemented followed the model of the residential water prices.

导出引用

李静, 马潇璨. 资源与环境双重约束下的工业用水效率——基于SBM-Undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的实证研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(6): 920-933 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.06.002

LI Jing, MAXiao-can. The Utilization Efficiency of IndustrialWater under the Dual Constraints of Resource and Environment—An Empirical Study Based on SBM-Undesirable and Meta-frontier Model[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2014, 29(6): 920-933 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.06.002

中图分类号： F424 TU991.31

参考文献

[1] 钱文婧, 贺灿飞.中国水资源利用效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(2): 54-60.
[2] Schneider M, Whitlatch E.User-specific water demand elasticities[J].Water Resources Planning and Management,1991, 117(1): 52-73.
[3] 贾绍凤, 康德勇.提高水价对水资源需求的影响分析——以华北地区为例[J].水科学进展, 2000, 11(3): 49-53.
[4] 雷小牛, 丘远尧, 王忠山, 等.水价提升的波及影响与分析研究[J].中国水利, 2005, 13: 107-112.
[5] 朱启荣.中国工业用水效率与节水潜力实证研究[J].工业技术经济, 2007, 26(9): 48-51.
[6] Romano G, Guerrini A.Measuring and comparing the efficiency of water utility companies: A data envelopment analysis approach[J].Utilities Policy, 2011, 19: 202-209.
[7] 潘登, 黄薇, 王树鹏, 等.基于DEA模型的用水效率研究——以云南省为例[J].长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(12): 15-18.
[8] 董毅明, 廖虎昌.基于DEA的西部省会城市水资源利用效率研究[J].水土保持通报, 2011, 31(4): 134-139.
[9] 杨丽英, 许新宜, 贾香香.水资源效率评价指标体系探讨[J].北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 45(5/6): 642-931
[10] Hu J L,Wang S C, Yeh F Y.Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China[J].Resources Policy, 2006, 31: 217-230.
[11] 李世祥, 成金华, 吴巧生.中国水资源利用效率区域差异分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(3): 215-220.
[12] 孙才志, 刘玉玉.基于DEA-ESDA的中国水资源利用相对效率的时空格局分析[J].资源科学, 2009, 31(10): 1696-1703.
[13] 王学渊, 赵连阁.中国农业用水效率及影响因素——基于1997—2006 年省区面板数据的SFA分析[J].农业经济问题, 2008, 6 (3): 10-18.
[14] 王鹏, 宋献方, 袁瑞强, 等.基于氢氧稳定同位素的华北农田夏玉米耗水规律研究[J].自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3):481-491.
[15] 孙爱军, 董增川, 王德智.基于时序的工业用水效率测算与耗水量预测[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2007, 36(4): 547-553.
[16] 陆蕾.浙江省工业水资源利用效率研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学经济学院, 2008.
[17] 岳立, 赵海涛.环境约束下的中国工业用水效率研究——基于中国13 个典型工业省区2003 年—2009 年数据[J].资源科学, 2011, 33(11): 2071-2079.
[18] 孙才志, 赵良仕, 邹玮.中国省际水资源全局环境技术效率测度及其空间效应研究[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(4):553-563.
[19] Dyson R G, Allen R, Camanho A S, et al.Pitfalls and protocols in DEA[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001, 132: 245-259.
[20] Battese G E, Rao D S P.Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic meta-frontier function[J].International Journal of Business and Economics, 2002, 1(2): 87-93.
[21] Rao D S P, O'Donnell C J, Battese G E.Meta-frontier functions for the study of inter-regional productivity differences[D].Queensland: School of Economics, Queensland University, 2003.
[22] Battese G E, O'Donnell C J, Rao D S P.A meta-frontier frameworks production function for estimation of technical efficiency and technology gap for firms operating under different technology[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 21(1): 91-103.
[23] 刘玉海, 武鹏.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与APEC地区经济增长——基于SBM-Undesirable 和Meta-frontier 模型的实证研究[J].经济评论, 2011, (6): 109-120.
[24] Tone K.Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach[J].GRIPS Research Series,2003.
[25] Anderson T W, Hsiao C.Formulation and estimation of dynamic model using panel data[J].Journal of Econometrics,1982, 18: 47-82.
[26] HonoréB E.Trimmed LAD and least squares estimation of truncated and censored regression models with fixed effects[J].Econometrica, 1992, 60(3): 533-565.
[27] Coggins J S, Swinton J R.The price of pollution: a dual approach to valuing SO₂ allowances[J].Journal of Environment Econometrics Manage, 1996, 30: 58-72.
[28] Lee M.The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach[J].Journal Environment Manage, 2005, 77: 104-110.