青海省东部农业区参考作物蒸散量的变化及对气象因子的敏感性分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.05.006

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 765-775.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.05.006

青海省东部农业区参考作物蒸散量的变化及对气象因子的敏感性分析

周瑶, 张鑫, 徐静

西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2012-06-19 修回日期:2012-11-04 出版日期:2013-05-20 发布日期:2013-05-20
作者简介:周瑶(1986- ),女,汉,陕西宝鸡人,硕士研究生,主要从事水文水资源方向的研究。E-mail:zhouyiyun-1010@163.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划("863"计划)项目(14110209);国家重大科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD11B05)。

Changes of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Sensitivity Analysis of Meteorological Factors in Eastern Plateau Agricultural Region of Qinghai Province

ZHOU Yao, ZHANG Xin, XU Jing

College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China

Received:2012-06-19 Revised:2012-11-04 Online:2013-05-20 Published:2013-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

使用FAO推荐的Penman-Monteith公式计算了青海省东部农业区7个气象代表站的逐日参考作物蒸散量(ET₀),运用多窗谱方法(MTM)对青海省东部代表站的ET₀的变化周期进行了分析,同时,分析了影响ET₀的主要气象要素的变化趋势,运用基于偏导数的敏感系数法分析了生长季ET₀对气温、日照时数、相对湿度、风速的敏感性,结果表明,青海省东部农业区的7个站点有比较一致的19.23~22.22 a的周期;整个东部农业区的气温(最高温度、最低温度、平均温度)呈明显的上升趋势,日照时数、风速、相对湿度则随纬度的变化而趋势不同,北纬36°以南的两个站日照时数、风速均有增加的趋势,相对湿度则减小,以北的5个站则呈相反的变化;ET₀对日照时数最为敏感,其次是气温、相对湿度和风速;敏感系数在整个生长季随气象因子的变化而变化,日照时数敏感系数呈波动状,最大值出现在4月,最小值出现在9月,气温敏感系数呈现单峰型变化,最大值出现在7月,风速敏感系数则呈单谷型变化,最小值出现在7月。

关键词: 参考作物蒸散量, Penman-Monteith公式, 多窗谱(MTM), 敏感系数

Abstract:

The reference crop evapotranspiration (ET₀) in the eastern plateau agricultural region of Qinghai Province was calculated by Penman-Monteith formula based on meteorological data of seven meteorological observation stations. The main change circle as well as the main trend of main meteorological elements were analyzed with Multi-Taper Method (MTM). Sensitivity coefficient of temperature, sunshine duration, relative humidity, wind speed sensitivity in growing season of eastern Qinghai were studied based on partial derivatives. The results showed that the seven stations we used have a constant 19.23－22.22-year changing cycle, temperature (including maximum temperature, minimum temperature and average temperature) showed a significant upward trend in the whole region. Sunshine duration, wind speed and relative humidity differed with the variation of latitude. In south of latitude 36°, sunshine duration and wind speed showed a significant upward trend while relative humidity decreased, the other five stations in north of latitude 36° had an opposite trend; that sunshine duration was the most sensitive variable to ET₀ in general for the region, followed by air temperature and relative humidity, wind speed had the least impact.Sensitivity coefficient in the whole growth season changed with meteorological factors. The sensitivity coefficient of sunshine duration in the whole growth season fluctuate insignificantly, the maximum value appeared in April, and the minimum value appeared in September. The sensitivity coefficient of temperature varies in a single curve and the maximum value appeared in July. The sensitivity coefficient of wind speed varies in a single valley and the minimum value appeared in July.

Key words: reference crop evapotranspiration, Penman-Monteith formula, Multi-Taper Method (MTM), sensitivity coefficient

中图分类号:

S161.4

周瑶, 张鑫, 徐静. 青海省东部农业区参考作物蒸散量的变化及对气象因子的敏感性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(5): 765-775.

ZHOU Yao, ZHANG Xin, XU Jing. Changes of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Sensitivity Analysis of Meteorological Factors in Eastern Plateau Agricultural Region of Qinghai Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(5): 765-775.

参考文献

[1] Allen R G, Perreira L S, Raes D. Crop evapotranspiration [R]. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, 1998.

[2] Hashmi M A, Carcia L A. Spatial and temporal errors inestimating regional evapotranspiration [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainages Engineering, 1998, 124(2): 108-114.

[3] 曾丽红, 宋开山, 张柏, 等. 东北地区参考作物蒸散量对主要气象要素的敏感性分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2010, 31(1): 11-18. [ZENG Li-hong, SONG Kai-shan, ZHANG Bai, et al. Sensitive analysis on reference evapotranspiration to key meteorological factors in Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2010, 31(1): 11-18.]

[4] 佟玲, 康绍忠, 粟晓玲. 石羊河流域气候变化对参考作物蒸发蒸腾量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(2): 15-18. [TONG Ling, KANG Shao-zhong, SU Xiao-ling. Impacts of climate change on reference crop evapotranspiration in Shiyang River Basin. Transactions of the CSAE, 2004, 20(2): 15-18]

[5] Jensen M E, Burman R D, Allen R G. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements [R]. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, 1990, 70: 332.

[6] Thomson D J. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis[J]. Proc. IEEE, 1982, 70: 1055-1096.

[7] Park J. Envelope estimation for quasi-periodic geophysical signals in noise[C]//A Multitaper Approach in Statistics in the Environmental and Earth Sciences. London: Edward Arnold Press, 1992: 189-219.

[8] 廖良清. 华东地区降水周期特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(4): 514-520. [LIAO Liang-qing. Analysis of precipitation cycle characteristics and its influencing factors in East China. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2011, 32(4): 514-520.]

[9] 江志红, 屠其璞, 施能. 多窗谱分析方法及其在全球变暖研究中的应用[J]. 气象学报, 2001, 59(4): 480-490. [JIANG Zhi-hong, TU Qi-pu, SHI Neng. Multi-taper method of spectral analysis and applications in global warming study. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2001, 59(4): 480-490.]

[10] McCuen R H. A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evaporation [J]. Water Resource Bulletin, 1974, 10(3): 486-498.

[11] 唐国利, 丁一汇. 由最高气温最低气温求算的平均气温对我国多年平均气温序列的影响[J]. 应用气象学报, 2007, 18(4): 187-192. [TANG Guo-li, DING Yi-hui. Impacts of the average air temperature derived from maximum and minimum temperatures on annual mean air temperatures series of China. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2007, 18(4): 187-192.]

[12] 曹雯, 申双和, 段春锋. 西北地区近 49 年生长季参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(3): 375-381. [CAO Wen, SHEN Shuang-he, DUAN Chun-feng. Sensitivity analysis of the reference crop evapotranspiration during growing season in the Northwest China in recent 49 years. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2011, 32(3): 375-381.]

[13] IPCC. ClimateChange 2007: Synthesis Report [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[14] 气候变化国家评估报告编写委员会. 气候变化国家评估报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. [Compilation Commission of China’s National Assessment for Climate Change. China’s National Assessment for Climate Change. Beijing: Science Press, 2007.]

[15] 丛振涛, 倪广恒, 杨大文, 等. "蒸发悖论"在中国的规律分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(2): 144-152. [CONG Zhen-tao, NI Guang-heng, YANG Da-wen, et al. Evaporation paradox in China. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(2): 144-152.]

[16] 韩松俊, 王少丽, 杨大文. 农业活动对中国区域"蒸发悖论"的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(10): 1-8. [HAN Song-jun, WANG Shao-li, YANG Da-wen. Agricultural influences on evaporation paradox in China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(10): 1-8.]

青海省东部农业区参考作物蒸散量的变化及对气象因子的敏感性分析

Changes of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Sensitivity Analysis of Meteorological Factors in Eastern Plateau Agricultural Region of Qinghai Province

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李可利, 张鑫. 基于ANFIS的陕西省参考作物蒸散量计算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1472-1483.
[2]	徐羽, 吴艳飞, 徐刚, 刘敏. 长三角地区地表干湿状况及极端干湿事件特征研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1579-1590.
[3]	董旭光, 顾伟宗, 王静, 刘焕彬. 影响山东参考作物蒸散量变化的气象因素定量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(5): 810-823.
[4]	黄会平, 曹明明, 宋进喜, 韩宇平, 陈姗姗. 1957—2012 年中国参考作物蒸散量时空变化及其影响因子分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2): 315-326.
[5]	粟晓玲, 宋悦, 牛纪苹, 钟锋. 泾惠渠灌区潜在蒸散发量的敏感性及变化成因[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1): 115-123.
[6]	赵玲玲, 夏军, 王中根, 李宗礼. 北京潜在蒸散发量年内-年际的气候变化特征及成因辨识[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11): 1911-1921.
[7]	马宁, 王乃昂, 王鹏龙, 孙彦猛, 董春雨. 黑河流域参考蒸散量的时空变化特征及影响因素的定量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(6): 975-989.
[8]	曾丽红, 宋开山, 张柏. 1951—2008年东北地区水分盈亏量时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(5): 858-870.