论文通过实地调查获得研究数据,分析了农区、 半农半牧区、 纯牧区农户替代生计选择的结果及特征,采用Logistic回归模型对影响农户替代生计选择意愿的因素进行分析。研究得出:①在替代生计的选择上,纯牧区农户主要选择特色产品加工、 做生意、 现代畜牧业,农区和半农半牧区农户主要选择做生意、 外出打工和旅游服务业;②农户对替代生计的选择表现出生计路径依赖性、 区域差异性和多样性特征;③农户对替代生计的选择偏好受生计资本的影响,自然资本、 社会资本、 家庭整体劳动能力、 家庭整体受教育水平、 家庭拥有的牲畜数量、 户主的学历和年龄分别对不同替代生计的选择影响显著。地方政府应深入了解农户选择替代生计的特点和影响因素,根据不同家庭的情况设计相应的转型政策促进农户尽快提高生计能力。
Abstract
The research on the choice to alternative livelihoods is of great significance to the implementation of the reasonable alternative livelihoods according to herdsmen circumstances. In this paper, basing on the survey in the study area, the results and characteristics of alternative livelihoods choice were analyzed. Then, the Logistic regressive model was set up to the analyze factors affecting the herdsmen's choice to the alternative livelihoods. Results are shown as follows: 1) Alternative livelihood choice and the diversity of choice differ obviously:As to the selection to alternative livelihoods, the herdsmen in pure pastoral areas mainly choose special products processing, business and modern livestock husbandry while the herdsmen in agricultural and agro-pastoral areas mainly choose business, go out to work and tourism services. In the diversity of alternative livelihood choice, the diversity index in pure pastoral areas is the lowest and the agro-pastoral areas is the highest. Farmers in pure pastoral areas mainly select two kinds of alternative livelihoods while farmers in agricultural and agro-pastora areas mainly select five kinds of alternative livelihoods. 2) The choice of alternative livelihoods has strong path dependence. Business has the strongest path dependence on the original livelihood, followed by animal husbandry, working outside and special products processing. 3) The livelihood capitals have influence on herdsmen's choice preferences of alternative livelihoods. Different capital types, such as natural capital, social capital, the overall labors in the family, the education level of family members, the amount of cattle and sheep, the education background and age of the householder, have different significant influences on the choice of different alternative livelihoods. In order to improve herdsmen livelihood level as soon as possible, the local government should further understand the choice characteristics of alternative livelihoods and the factors affecting the livelihoods choice, then make respective policy according to different circumstances.
关键词
替代生计 /
Logistic模型 /
农户意愿 /
甘南黄河水源补给区
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
alternative livelihoods /
the Logistic regressive model /
farmer’s willingness /
the Yellow River Water Supply Area of Gannan
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号:
X171.4
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 吴辉. 四川宝兴县综合生态管理示范区替代生计发展途径与对策研究. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009.
[2] Carney D. Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change [M]. London: Department for International Development, 2002.
[3] Chambers R, Conway G. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century . IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton, 1992: 7-8.
[4] 李斌, 李小云, 左停. 农村发展中的生计途径研究与实践[J]. 农业技术经济, 2004(4): 10-15.
[5] Claire Ireland. Alternative sustainable livelihoods for coastal communities—A review of experience and guide to best practice . The World Conservation Union, 2004: 3-49.
[6] Marion Howard. When fishing grounds are closed: Developing alternative livelihoods for fishing communities [J]. MPA News, 2003, 5(2): 1-3.
[7] Zafar Adeel, Uriel Safriel. Achieving sustainability by introducing alternative livelihoods [J]. Sustainability Science, 2008, 3: 125-133.
[8] 于秀波, 张琛, 潘明麒. 退田还湖后替代生计的经济评估研究——以洞庭湖西畔山洲垸为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 632-637.
[9] 杨明, 骆江玲, 明亮. 论替代生计项目在乡村的发展——以NGO在三江平原生态保护项目为例[J]. 农村经济, 2010(4): 101-104.
[10] 王富山. 晋西北地区农民生计方式对征地补偿安置的影响分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2008, 23(3): 57-59.
[11] 张春丽, 佟连军, 刘继斌. 湿地退耕还湿与替代生计选择的农民响应研究——以三江自然保护区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(4): 568-573.
[12] 庄孔韶. 可以找到第三种生活方式吗?——关于中国四种生计类型的自然保护与文化生存[J]. 社会科学, 2006(7): 35-40.
[13] 姚玉璧, 邓振镛, 尹东, 等. 黄河重要水源补给区甘南高原气候变化及其对生态环境的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 844-852.
[14] 王济川, 郭志刚. Logistic回归模型——方法与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 59-78.
[15] 苏芳. 生态补偿对农户可持续生计的影响——以黑河流域张掖市为例. 兰州: 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 2009.
[16] 赵雪雁. 生计资本对农牧民生活满意度的影响——以甘南高原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(4): 689-692.
[17] Frank E. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification [J]. Journal of Development Studies, 1998, 35(1): 1-38.
[18] Block S, Webb P. The dynamics of livelihood diversification in post-famine Ethiopia [J]. Food Policy, 2001, 26: 333-350.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(91125019,41061051);国家社科基金项目(10CYJ014);教育部科学技术重点项目(210230);教育部新世纪人才支持计划(NCET-11-0910)。
{{custom_fund}}