自然资源学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3282-3296.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221217

• 其他研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水权交易机制对农业用水效率的影响及效应分析

秦腾1(), 佟金萍1, 支彦玲2   

  1. 1.常州大学商学院,常州 213164
    2.河海大学商学院,南京 211100
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-22 修回日期:2022-04-23 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2022-12-13
  • 作者简介:秦腾(1989- ),男,江苏宿迁人,博士,讲师,研究方向为资源经济评估与资源政策分析。E-mail: qtblue@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(20BGL191);国家自然科学基金项目(41801194)

Influence and effect of water rights trading mechanism on agricultural water use efficiency

QIN Teng1(), TONG Jin-ping1, ZHI Yan-ling2   

  1. 1. School of Business, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China
    2. School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
  • Received:2021-11-22 Revised:2022-04-23 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2022-12-13

摘要:

中国水权交易市场尚处于发展初期,其农业节水的实际效果有待检验。在测算2011—2020年中国30个省(市、自治区)农业用水效率的基础上,基于准自然实验的思路,运用空间双重差分法实证评估了水权交易机制对农业用水效率的定量影响,并进一步从理论和实证角度探究了水权交易机制对农业节水的影响机制与具体作用路径。研究发现:水权交易机制对农业用水效率具有显著的提升作用,这一结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后依然成立,且水权交易机制的政策效应具有明显的地区异质性,中部地区的政策效应最大,东部地区次之,西部地区最小;水权交易机制不仅有助于试点省份农业节水目标的实现,而且能够通过政策溢出效应同时提升周边地区的农业用水效率;技术创新和要素流动是水权交易机制发挥农业节水效应的主要路径,且一三产业之间的水要素流动对农业用水效率的促进作用更大。

关键词: 水权交易机制, 农业用水效率, 空间双重差分法, 中介效应模型

Abstract:

As China's water rights trading market is still in the early stages of development, the actual effect needs to be tested. Based on the data of agricultural water use efficiency from 2011 to 2020 in China and the method of quasi-natural experiments the spatial difference-in-difference method was adopted to evaluate the quantitative impact of water rights trading mechanism on agricultural water use efficiency. Moreover, the theoretic mechanism and specific action path of agricultural water saving effect of water rights trading mechanism can be clarified. The results show that the water rights trading mechanism has a significant effect on improvement of the agricultural water use efficiency of the pilot provinces, and this conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. The water rights trading mechanism shows obvious regional heterogeneity, with the largest effect in the central region, followed by the eastern and the western region. The water rights trading mechanism not only contributes to agricultural water saving goals in the pilot provinces, but also improves agricultural water use efficiency in surrounding areas through policy spillover effects. Technological innovation and factor flow are the main paths in which the water rights trading mechanism exerts the agricultural water saving effect, and the flow of water elements between the primary and tertiary industries has a greater role in promoting agricultural water use efficiency.

Key words: water rights trading mechanism, agricultural water use efficiency, spatial difference-in-difference method, mediating effect model