自然资源学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3282-3296.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221217
收稿日期:
2021-11-22
修回日期:
2022-04-23
出版日期:
2022-12-28
发布日期:
2022-12-13
作者简介:
秦腾(1989- ),男,江苏宿迁人,博士,讲师,研究方向为资源经济评估与资源政策分析。E-mail: qtblue@126.com
基金资助:
QIN Teng1(), TONG Jin-ping1, ZHI Yan-ling2
Received:
2021-11-22
Revised:
2022-04-23
Online:
2022-12-28
Published:
2022-12-13
摘要:
中国水权交易市场尚处于发展初期,其农业节水的实际效果有待检验。在测算2011—2020年中国30个省(市、自治区)农业用水效率的基础上,基于准自然实验的思路,运用空间双重差分法实证评估了水权交易机制对农业用水效率的定量影响,并进一步从理论和实证角度探究了水权交易机制对农业节水的影响机制与具体作用路径。研究发现:水权交易机制对农业用水效率具有显著的提升作用,这一结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后依然成立,且水权交易机制的政策效应具有明显的地区异质性,中部地区的政策效应最大,东部地区次之,西部地区最小;水权交易机制不仅有助于试点省份农业节水目标的实现,而且能够通过政策溢出效应同时提升周边地区的农业用水效率;技术创新和要素流动是水权交易机制发挥农业节水效应的主要路径,且一三产业之间的水要素流动对农业用水效率的促进作用更大。
秦腾, 佟金萍, 支彦玲. 水权交易机制对农业用水效率的影响及效应分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(12): 3282-3296.
QIN Teng, TONG Jin-ping, ZHI Yan-ling. Influence and effect of water rights trading mechanism on agricultural water use efficiency[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2022, 37(12): 3282-3296.
表1
普通面板双重差分回归结果
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
-0.089** (-2.33) | -0.032 (-0.9) | -0.045 (-1.26) | -0.029 (-0.78) | |
rfal | -0.003* (-1.72) | 0.005 (1.33) | ||
wabu | -0.009 (-1.57) | 0.027 (1.16) | ||
pstr | -0.025 (-1.05) | -0.06* (-1.77) | ||
pergdp | 0.008 (0.59) | 0.06 (1.09) | ||
fsup | -0.006 (-0.92) | -0.016 (-1.56) | ||
ircon | 0.002* (1.78) | -0.002 (-1.19) | ||
_cons | 0.41*** (29.4) | 0.396*** (40.04) | 0.63*** (4.86) | 0.622** (2.2) |
时间固定效应 | NO | YES | NO | YES |
省份固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N/个 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
表3
空间双重差分回归结果
变量 | SAR | SEM | SARAR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
0.084*** (4.15) | 0.077*** (3.85) | 0.068*** (3.39) | 0.062*** (3.07) | 0.054*** (2.79) | 0.036** (2.53) | |
rfal | 0.002* (1.91) | 0.003* (1.95) | 0.001* (1.92) | |||
wabu | -0.02** (-2.46) | -0.002** (-2.32) | -0.03** (-2.45) | |||
pstr | -0.097*** (-2.98) | -0.106*** (-3.08) | -0.008 (-1.32) | |||
pergdp | 0.147*** (9.38) | 0.158*** (9.26) | 0.122*** (5.28) | |||
fsup | 0.002** (2.02) | -0.011** (-2.13) | 0.008* (1.95) | |||
ircon | 0.007*** (3.69) | 003*** (3.13) | 0.01*** (4.05) | |||
0.508*** (9.47) | 0.422*** (6.61) | 0.791*** (9.87) | 0.788*** (11.21) | |||
0.516*** (9.45) | 0.537*** (7.26) | 0.488** (2.45) | 0.783*** (6.13) | |||
R2 | 0.493 | 0.612 | 0.488 | 0.58 | 0.214 | 0.349 |
LogL | 124.148 | 133.418 | 123.614 | 128.373 | 90.018 | 102.343 |
LR test | 39.82*** | 41.11*** | 42.29*** | 47.92*** | ||
N/个 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
表4
稳健性检验结果
变量 | 2012—2018年 (11) | 被解释变量取对数 (12) | 提前1年 (13) | 提前2年 (14) | PSM-DID (15) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.045** (2.57) | 0.172** (2.46) | 0.069 (1.42) | 0.04 (0.66) | 0.071*** (3.29) | |
控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
0.344*** (4.28) | 0.574*** (10.8) | 0.426*** (6.68) | 0.432*** (6.81) | 0.451*** (7.36) | |
R2 | 0.737 | 0.786 | 0.417 | 0.412 | 0.658 |
LogL | 180.253 | 194.52 | 118.145 | 117.354 | 142.738 |
N/个 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
表5
地区异质性下的回归结果
变量 | 东部 | 中部 | 西部 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(16) | (17) | (18) | (19) | (20) | (21) | |||
0.085** (2.29) | 0.068** (2.01) | 0.108*** (3.14) | 0.094*** (2.79) | 0.034** (2.24) | 0.022** (2.06) | |||
控制变量 | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | ||
0.487*** (6.33) | 0.272** (2.54) | 0.212** (2.52) | 0.153** (2.05) | 0.386*** (6.1) | 0.309*** (3.21) | |||
R2 | 0.408 | 0.598 | 0.389 | 0.436 | 0.459 | 0.612 | ||
LogL | 26.6159 | 40.0292 | 42.1683 | 47.2419 | 46.4284 | 51.3095 | ||
N/个 | 110 | 110 | 80 | 80 | 110 | 110 |
表6
水权交易机制影响农业用水效率的作用路径
变量 | agrieff (22) | tech (23) | fac1 (24) | fac2 (25) | fac3 (26) | agrieff (27) | agrieff (28) | agrieff (29) | agrieff (30) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.079*** (3.85) | 3.44** (3.73) | 0.064** (2.44) | 0.014** (2.52) | 0.016** (2.27) | 0.053** (2.29) | 0.068** (2.48) | 0.067** (2.43) | 0.064** (2.37) | |
tech | 0.016* (1.93) | ||||||||
fac1 | 0.016 (1.35) | ||||||||
fac2 | 0.124** (2.03) | ||||||||
fac3 | 0.298*** (3.66) | ||||||||
控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
0.422*** (6.61) | 0.476** (7.96) | 0.07* (0.82) | 0.095 (0.99) | 0.213*** (2.88) | 0.325*** (4.97) | 0.418*** (6.45) | 0.424*** (6.64) | 0.42*** (6.59) | |
R2 | 0.617 | 0.605 | 0.356 | 0.887 | 0.872 | 0.643 | 0.622 | 0.64 | 0.684 |
LogL | 137.418 | 132.439 | 103.382 | 265.634 | 258.742 | 141.568 | 138.794 | 141.012 | 146.437 |
N/个 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
[1] | 丁超, 胡永江, 王振华, 等. 虚拟水社会循环视域下的水资源承载力评价. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 356-371. |
[ DING C, HU Y J, WANG Z H, et al. Assessment of water resources carrying capacity from the perspective of virtual water social cycle. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(2): 356-371.]
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210207 |
|
[2] |
JIANG J J, XIE D J, YE B, et al. Research on China's cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook. Applied Energy, 2016, 178: 902-917.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.100 |
[3] | 徐豪, 刘钢. 考虑随机降雨预测的区域水期权交易动态定价机制: 以广东省为例. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 713-727. |
[ XU H, LIU G. Dynamic pricing mechanism of regional water option trading considering random rainfall forecast: A case study of Guangdong province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(3): 713-727.]
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200316 |
|
[4] | 李治国, 王杰. 中国碳排放权交易的空间减排效应:准自然实验与政策溢出. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(1): 26-36. |
[ LI Z G, WANG J. Spatial emission reduction effects of China's carbon emissions trading: Quasi-natural experiments and policy spillovers. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(1): 26-36.] | |
[5] | 杨骞, 武荣伟, 王弘儒. 中国农业用水效率的分布格局与空间交互影响: 1998—2013年. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(2): 72-88. |
[ YANG Q, WU R W, WANG H R. Regional disparities and spatial interaction of agricultural water use efficiency: 1998-2013. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2017, 34(2): 72-88.] | |
[6] | 陈洪斌. 我国省际农业用水效率测评与空间溢出效应研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2): 85-90. |
[ CHEN H B. Provincial agricultural water use efficiency evaluation and spatial spillover effect in China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(2): 85-90.] | |
[7] | 苏喜军, 纪德红, 何慧爽. 黄淮海平原农业水资源绿色效率时空差异与影响因素研究. 生态经济, 2021, 37(3): 106-111. |
[ SU X J, JI D H, HE H S. Study on spatial and temporal differences and affecting factors of agricultural water resources green efficiency in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(3): 106-111.] | |
[8] | 崔永正, 刘涛. 黄河流域农业水资源全要素生产率测度及其影响因素研究. 中国农村水利水电, 2021, (6): 126-129, 136. |
[ CUI Y Z, LIU T. Research on the measurement and influencing factors of agricultural water total factor productivity in the Yellow River Basin. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021, (6): 126-129, 136.] | |
[9] | 鲍超, 陈小杰, 梁广林. 基于空间计量模型的河南省用水效率影响因素分析. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(7): 1138-1148. |
[ BAO C, CHEN X J, LIANG G L. Analysis on the influencing factors of water use efficiency in Henan province based on spatial econometric models. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(7): 1138-1148.] | |
[10] | 杜书, 梁彦庆, 张梦, 等. 河北省农业水资源利用效率时空分异特征及影响因素研究. 节水灌溉, 2021, (6): 74-80. |
[ DU S, LIANG Y Q, ZHANG M, et al. A study on spatio-temporal differentiation characteristic and influencing factors of agricultural water resource utilization efficiency in Hebei province. Water Saving Irrigation, 2021, (6): 74-80.] | |
[11] | 佟金萍, 马剑锋, 王圣, 等. 长江流域农业用水效率研究: 基于超效率DEA和Tobit模型. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(4): 603-608. |
[ TONG J P, MA J F, WANG S, et al. Research on agricultural water use efficiency in Yangtze River Basin on super-efficiency DEA and Tobit model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(4): 603-608.] | |
[12] | 赵丽平, 李登娟, 侯德林, 等. 2003—2016年湖北省农业用水效率测算及时空差异. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(5): 240-247. |
[ ZHAO L P, LI D J, HOU D L, et al. Tempo-spatial variations of agricultural water use efficiency measurements in Hubei province from 2003 to 2016. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(5): 240-247.] | |
[13] | 李青松, 张凤太, 苏维词, 等. 长江经济带农业用水绿色效率测度及影响因素分析: 基于超效率EBM-Geodetector模型. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(8): 1-15. |
[ LI Q S, ZHANG F T, SU W C, et al. Measurement of green efficiency of agricultural water in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and analysis of influencing factors-based on the super-efficiency EBM-Geodetector model. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(8): 1-15.] | |
[14] | 李静, 徐德钰. 中国农业的用水效率及其影响因素: 基于MinDW模型的分析. 环境经济研究, 2018, 3(3): 56-74. |
[ LI J, XU D Y. Agricultural water utilization efficiency and its influencing factors in China: Based on MinDW model. Journal of Environment Economics, 2018, 3(3): 56-74.] | |
[15] | LIU P, FANG Z, LYU C, et al. China's agricultural water-use efficiency and its influencing factors under the constraint of pollution emission. International Journal of Design & Nature and Eco-dynamics, 2020, 15(4): 579-585. |
[16] | 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 等. 基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293-2304. |
[ FANG L, WU F P, WANG X H, et al. Analysis of agricultural water efficiency measurement and improvement potential based on meta frontier SBM model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(10): 2293-2304.] | |
[17] | 刘渝, 宋阳. 基于超效率SBM的中国农业水资源环境效率评价及影响因素分析. 中国农村水利水电, 2019, (1): 102-107. |
[ LIU Y, SONG Y. Evaluation and influencing factor analysis of agricultural water resource efficiency in China based on super-efficiency SBM model. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019, (1): 102-107.] | |
[18] | WANG G F, CHEN J, WU F, et al. An integrated analysis of agricultural water-use efficiency: A case study in the Heihe River Basin in Northwest China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2015, 89-90: 3-9. |
[19] |
LIU Y, HU X H, ZHANG Q, et al. Improving agricultural water use efficiency: A quantitative study of Zhangye city using the static CGE model with a CES water-land resources account. Sustainability, 2017, 9(308): 1-15.
doi: 10.3390/su9010001 |
[20] | 任志安, 刘柏阳. 淮河生态经济带农业水资源绿色效率的时空差异与影响因素. 资源开发与市场, 2019, 35(7): 929-934, 941. |
[ REN Z A, LIU B Y. Study on spatial and temporal differences and influencing factors of agricultural green water resources efficiency in Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt. Resource Development & Market, 2019, 35(7): 929-934, 941.] | |
[21] |
WEI J, LEI Y, YAO H, et al. Estimation and influencing factors of agricultural water efficiency in the Yellow River Basin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 308(10): 127249, Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127249 |
[22] | 刘涛, 崔永正, 李继霞. 基于水污染视角的中国农业生态用水效率及其影响因素. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5): 301-307. |
[ LIU T, CUI Y Z, LI J X. Ecological use efficiency of agricultural water and its influencing factors in China based on the perspective of water pollution. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(5): 301-307.] | |
[23] | 许朗, 黄莺. 农业灌溉用水效率及其影响因素分析: 基于安徽省蒙城县的实地调查. 资源科学, 2012, 34(1): 105-113. |
[ XU L, HUANG Y. Measurement of irrigation water efficiency and analysis of influential factors: An empirical study on Mengcheng county in Anhui province. Resources Science, 2012, 34(1): 105-113.] | |
[24] | 刘悦忆, 郑航, 赵建世, 等. 中国水权交易研究进展综述. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(8): 76-90. |
[ LIU Y Y, ZHENG H, ZHAO J S, et al. An overview of the study on water rights trading in China. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2021, 52(8): 76-90.] | |
[25] | 严予若, 万晓莉, 伍骏骞, 等. 美国的水权体系: 原则、调适及中国借鉴. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(6): 101-109. |
[ YAN Y R, WAN X L, WU J Q, et al. Water rights systems in the United States: Principles, evolution and their implications for China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(6): 101-109.] | |
[26] |
WANG Y B, LIU D, CAO X C, et al. Agricultural water rights trading and virtual water export compensation coupling model: A case study of an irrigation district in China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 180: 99-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.006 |
[27] | 刘敏. “准市场”与区域水资源问题治理: 内蒙古清水区水权转换的社会学分析. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(10): 41-50, 110-111. |
[ LIU M. "Quasi-market" and regional governance of water resources problem: A sociological analysis of transfer of water rights in Qingshui district, Inner Mongolia. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2016, 37(10): 41-50, 110-111.] | |
[28] | 田贵良, 盛雨, 卢曦. 水权交易市场运行对试点地区水资源利用效率影响研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(6): 146-155. |
[ TIAN G L, SHENG Y, LU X. On the influence of water rights trading market operation on water resource use efficiency in pilot areas. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(6): 146-155.] | |
[29] |
TONE K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(1): 32-41.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1 |
[30] |
YU S, KAREN X Y. Inference on difference-in-differences average treatment effects: A fixed-b approach. Journal of Econometrics, 2019, 211(2): 560-588.
doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.001 |
[31] | ANSELIN L. Spatial Econometrics:Methods and Models. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1988. |
[32] | 李江一, 仇童伟. 农地确权与农业生产结构调整: 来自中国家庭金融调查的证据. 财贸研究, 2021, 32(9): 57-69. |
[ LI J Y, QIU T W. Land entitlement and adjustment of agricultural production structure in China: Evidence from household finance survey. Finance and Trade Research, 2021, 32(9): 57-69.] | |
[33] | 屈小娥, 骆海燕. 中国对外直接投资对碳排放的影响及传导机制: 基于多重中介模型的实证. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(7): 1-14. |
[ QU X E, LUO H Y. Impact of China's OFDI on carbon emissions and its transmission mechanism: An empirical analysis based on multiple mediation effect model. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(7): 1-14.] | |
[34] | 董小菁, 纪月清, 钟甫宁. 农业水价政策对农户种植结构的影响: 以新疆地区为例. 中国农村观察, 2020, (3): 130-144. |
[ DONG X J, JI Y Q, ZHONG F N. The Impact of agricultural water pricing reform on farmers' planting structure: A case study from Xinjiang, China. China Rural Survey, 2020, (3): 130-144.] | |
[35] | 孙晓华, 郭旭, 王昀. 产业转移、要素集聚与地区经济发展. 管理世界, 2018, 34(5): 47-62. |
[ SUN X H, GUO X, WANG Y. Industrial relocation, elements agglomeration and regional economic development. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(5): 47-62.] | |
[36] | JACOBSON L S, LALONDE R J, SULLIVAN D G. Earnings losses of displaced workers. W. E. Upjohn Institute, 1992. |
[37] | 周茂, 陆毅, 杜艳, 等. 开发区设立与地区制造业升级. 中国工业经济, 2018, (3): 62-79. |
[ ZHOU M, LU Y, DU Y, et al. Special economic zones and region manufacturing upgrading. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (3): 62-79.] |
[1] | 李雨凌, 马雯秋, 姜广辉, 李广泳, 周丁扬. 中国粮食主产区耕地撂荒程度及其对粮食产量的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(6): 1439-1454. |
|