环境规制、经济高质量发展与生态资本利用的空间关系——以北部湾经济区为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20220201

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态资本利用的空间关系影响区域可持续发展。以北部湾经济区2006—2019年面板数据为例,构建空间杜宾模型研究环境规制、经济高质量发展与生态资本利用的空间关系,结论如下：（1）环境规制、经济高质量发展和生态资本构成三E系统。（2）生态资本利用存在显著空间正自相关关系。（3）生态资本供需、流量利用及存量占用与环境规制显著空间正相关,环境规制抑制了存量占用及资本供需和流量利用水平;与经济高质量发展显著空间正相关,经济高质量发展显著提高了资本供给需求与流量利用,也增大了存量占用。（4）交互效应显著抑制了两者对资本供需与流量利用的影响、抑制了环境规制对存量占用的影响,也促进了经济高质量发展对存量占用的影响。研究结论对区域生态资本管控有实际意义。

关键词: 生态资本, 环境规制, 经济高质量发展, 空间计量, 北部湾经济区

Abstract:

How to utilize ecological capital utilization can have influence on the sustainable development. Taking the panel data from the Beibu Gulf Economic Zone covering 2006-2019 as an example in this article, we build an SDM model to examine the spatial relationship between environmental regulation, high-quality economic development and ecological capital. Some conclusions can be drawn as follows. (1) Environmental regulation, high-quality economic development and ecological capital utilization constitutes a system, also known as a "3E" system. (2) There is a significant spatial positive autocorrelation of the utilization of ecological capital. (3) Environmental regulation has a significant positive correlation with the supply and demand of ecological capital, flow utilization and stock occupancy. Environmental regulation inhibits the stock occupancy as well as capital supply and demand and flow utilization levels. High-quality economic development significantly increases capital demand, supply and flow utilization, as well as stock occupancy. (4) The interaction between environmental regulation and high-quality economic development promotes the change of capital supply and demand and flow utilization, and restrains the change trend of stock occupation. The conclusion is of a practical significance for us to have a better understanding of rational utilization of ecological resources.

Key words: environmental regulation, high-quality economic development, ecological capital, spatial econometrics, Beibu Gulf Economic Zone

陈志刚, 姚娟. 环境规制、经济高质量发展与生态资本利用的空间关系——以北部湾经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(2): 277-290.

CHEN Zhi-gang, YAO Juan. On spatial relationship between environmental regulation, high-quality economic development and the utilization of ecological capital: Taking the Beibu Gulf Economic Zone as an example[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2022, 37(2): 277-290.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 26

[1]	何利, 沈镭, 陶建格 , 等. 基于复式记账的自然资源资产负债表平衡关系研究. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(10):1697-1705.
	[ HE L, SHEN L, TAO J G, et al. Research on equilibrium relation of natural resources balance sheet based on double-entry bookkeeping. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(10):1697-1705.]
[2]	袁丽静, 郑晓凡 . 环境规制、政府补贴对企业技术创新的耦合影响. 资源科学, 2017,39(5):911-923.
	[ YUAN L J, ZHENG X F. Coupling induction of environmental regulation and government subsidy on enterprise technological innovation. Resources Science, 2017,39(5):911-923.]
[3]	谢婷婷, 郭艳芳 . 环境规制、技术创新与产业结构升级. 工业技术经济, 2016, ( 9):135-145.
	[ XIE T T, GUO Y F. Environmental regulation, technical innovation and upgrading of industrial structure. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2016, ( 9):135-145.]
[4]	伍格致, 游达明 . 环境规制对技术创新与绿色全要素生产率的影响机制: 基于财政分权的调节作用. 管理工程学报, 2019, ( 1):37-50.
	[ WU G Z, YOU D M. The influence mechanism of environmental regulation on technology innovation and green total factor productivity: Based on the moderating effect of fiscal decentralization. Jonrnal of Industrial Engineering/ Engineering Management, 2019, ( 1):37-50.]
[5]	高志刚, 克甝 . 中国沿边省区经济高质量发展水平比较研究. 经济纵横, 2020, ( 2):23-35.
	[ GAO Z G, KE H. A comparative study on the high: Quality development of economy in the border areas of China. Economic Review, 2020, ( 2):23-35.]
[6]	任保平 . 经济增长质量的内涵、特征及其度量. 黑龙江社会科学, 2012, ( 3):50-53.
	[ REN B P. The connotation, characteristic and measure of economic growth quality. Heilongjiang Social Sciences, 2012, ( 3):50-53.]
[7]	赵昌文 . 推动我国经济实现高质量发展. 学习时报, 2017, (12): 1-3.
	[ ZHAO C W. promoting the development of high quality in our country's economy. Learning times, 2017, ( 12):1-3.]
[8]	师博, 任保平 . 中国省际经济高质量发展潜力测度及分析. 经济问题研究, 2018, ( 4):1-6.
	[ SHI B, REN B P. A measurement of China's provincial economic high quality development. Economic Research Journal, 2018, ( 4):1-6.]
[9]	张同斌 . 提高环境规制强度能否“利当前”并“惠长远”. 财贸经济, 2017,38(3):116-130.
	[ ZHANG T B. Can improving the environmental regulation strength "benefit the present" and "benefit the long term". Finance and Trade Economics, 2017,38(3):116-130.]
[10]	方恺, 吴次芳, 董亮 . 城市化进程中的土地生态资本利用动态分析. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(1):1-13.
	[ FANG K, WU C F, DONG L. The use of land natural capital in the context of urbanization. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(1):1-13.]
[11]	YY Y W. Sustainability assessment of natural capital based on the 3D ecological footprint model: A case study of the Shennongjia National Park Pilot. Sustainability, 2019,956(11):1-16.
[12]	COSTANZA R, ARGE R, GROOT R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capita. Nature, 1997,387(15):253-260.
[13]	PEARCE D, TURNER K R. Economics of Natural Resources and Environment. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.
[14]	方恺 . 自然资本核算的生态足迹三维模型研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(12):1700-1707.
	[ FANG K. A review on three-dimensional ecological footprint model for natural capital accounting. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(12):1700-1707.]
[15]	DALY H E. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996: 25-76.
[16]	NICCOLUCCI V, BASTIANONI S, TIEZZI E B P, et al. How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation. Ecological Modelling, 2009,220(20):2819-2823.
[17]	方恺, 李焕承 . 基于生态足迹深度和广度的中国自然资本利用省际格局. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(12):1995-2005.
	[ FANG K, LI H C. Provincial pattern of China's natural capital use: A modification and application of ecological footprint depth and size. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012,27(12):1995-2005.]
[18]	谢鸿宇 . 足迹评价模型的改进与应用. 北京: 化学工业出生版社, 2008.
	[ XIE H Y. Footprint Improvement and Application of Evaluation Model. Beijing: Chemical Industry was Born Publisher, 2008.]
[19]	师博, 何璐, 张文明 . 黄河流域城市经济高质量发展的动态演进及趋势预测. 经济问题, 2021, ( 1):1-8.
	[ SHI B, HE L, ZHANG W M. Can Enhancing the enviromental regulation intensiy address both currentand long-term needs?. Economic Issues, 2021, ( 1):1-8.]
[20]	叶阿忠, 吴继贵, 陈生明 , 等. 空间计量经济学. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2015: 1.
	[ YE A Z, WU J G, CHEN S M, et al. Space Econometrics. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press, 2015: 1.]
[21]	范冰雄, 税伟, 杨海峰 , 等. 闽三角城市群自然资本损失评估. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(1):153-167.
	[ FAN B X, SHUI W, YANG H F, et al. Evaluation on natural capital loss in Southern Fujian Urban Agglomeration. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(1):153-167.]
[22]	王雅竹, 段学军, 王磊 , 等. 长江经济带经济发展的时空分异及驱动机理研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020,29(1):1-12.
	[ WANG Y Z, DUAN X J, WANG L, et al. Spatial and temporal differentiation and driving mechanism of economic development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Resources and Environment in Yangtze River Basin, 2020,29(1):1-12.]
[23]	陈强 . 高级计量经济学及Stata应用(第二版). 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014: 579.
	[ CHEN Q. Advanced Econometric and Stata Applications (second edition). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014: 579.]
[24]	马维兢, 刘斌, 杨德伟 , 等. 基于三维生态足迹模型的流域自然资本动态评估: 以福建省九龙江流域为例. 资源科学, 2017,39(5):871-880.
	[ MA W J, LIU B, YANG D W, et al. Dynamic evaluation of natural capital using the Three-Dimension Ecological Footprint Model: The Jiulong River Basin in Southeast China. Resources Science, 2017,39(5):871-880.]
[25]	国家发展改革委, 住房城市建设部. 北部湾城市群发展规划.http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-02-16/content_5168454.htm.
	[ The National Development and Reform Commission of housing urban development. Beibu gulf urban agglomeration development plan.http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-02-16/content_5168454.htm. ]
[26]	李永盛, 张祥建, 赵晓雷 . 中国环境信息公开的时空演化特征及其影响因素. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020,30(3):106-114.
	[ LI Y S, ZHANG X J, ZHAO X L. Analysis on the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of environmental information disclosure in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(3):106-114.]

评价指标及权重				指标测算或来源	极小值	极大值	均值	标准差
环境规制指标Q		工业废水0.1958		数据来自历年《中国城市统计年鉴》《中国城乡统计年鉴》	476.00	15731.00	3859.28	3068.70
		工业废气0.4934			92.00	73567.00	20477.57	17618.80
		工业粉（烟）尘0.3108			71.00	49787.00	12875.57	10302.08
经济高质量发展	效益0.4933	全要素生产率0.4933		DEA—Malmquist	0.12	21.63	2.07	3.02
	创新0.1958	创新规模0.1958		R&D支出累计存量	15.00	808.87	149.13	134.93
	民生水平0.3108	城镇居民人均收入0.1554		数据来自相关地市统计年鉴	3290.00	18482.00	9191.90	3956.03
	民生水平0.3108	农村居民人均收入0.1554		数据来自相关地市统计年鉴	476.00	15731.00	3859.28	3068.70
被解释变量		人均生态足迹ef		由三维生态足迹模型核算	0.32	3.39	0.9810	0.62027
		人均生态承载力bc			0.09	3.09	0.7876	0.5655
		生态资本存量占用efd			1.00	2.41	1.11	0.31
		生态资本流量利用efs			0.08	2.97	0.62	0.50
解释变量		经济高质量发展水平HQED		自创指标体系	0.11	0.43	0.23	0.07
解释变量		环境规制强度Q		自创指标体系	554.93	131169.7	39396.95	28302.44
控制变量		人均GDP	数据来自相关地市历年统计年鉴		8062.31	27806.99	14889.62	4313.36
		物质资本pe			294.23	15586225	1001062.24	3149990.44
		人力资本he			112636	2341007	659892.9	504528.9

年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c
2006	0.335^*	2010	0.245^**	2014	0.197^**	2018	0.269^*
2007	0.190^**	2011	0.174^**	2015	0.451	2019	0.457
2008	0.316^*	2012	0.194^**	2016	0.269^*
2009	0.250^**	2013	0.186^**	2017	0.254^*

年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c
2006	0.530	2010	0.386^*	2014	0.345^*	2018	0.587
2007	0.588	2011	0.375^*	2015	0.287^*	2019	0.520
2008	0.630	2012	0.375^*	2016	0.246^*
2009	0.526	2013	0.371^*	2017	0.293^*

年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c	年份	Geary's c
2006	0.379^**	2010	0.571	2014	0.265^**	2018	0.272^*
2007	0.293^**	2011	1.188	2015	0.403^*	2019	0.239^*
2008	0.310^**	2012	0.336^**	2016	0.241^*
2009	0.351^**	2013	0.293^**	2017	0.298

年份	Moran's I	Geary's c	年份	Moran's I	Geary's c	年份	Moran's I	Geary's c
2006	0.11^*	0.07^*	2011	0.112^*	0.001^*	2016	0.112^*	0.001^*
2007	0.109^*	0.07^*	2012	0.112^*	0.001^*	2017	0.112^*	0.008^*
2008	0.106	0.013^*	2013	0.112^*	0.002^*	2018	0.111^*	0.000^*
2009	0.11^*	0.009^*	2014	0.112^*	0.001^*	2019	0.111^*	0.000^*
2010	0.111^*	0.007^*	2015	0.112^*	0.002^*