苏南地区农村宅基地转型研究：基于利用状态的视角

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20211112

自然资源学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2878-2891.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211112

苏南地区农村宅基地转型研究：基于利用状态的视角

高金龙¹^,²(), 刘彦随¹, 陈江龙²^,³()

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
2.中国科学院流域地理学重点实验室,中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,南京 210008
3.江苏省区域现代农业与环境保护协同创新中心,淮安 223300

收稿日期:2020-03-16 修回日期:2020-06-03 出版日期:2021-11-28 发布日期:2022-01-28
通讯作者: 陈江龙（1974- ）,男,福建厦门人,博士,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为国土空间规划与管理、城乡发展与区域规划。E-mail: jlchen@niglas.ac.cn
作者简介:高金龙（1988- ）,男,山东无棣人,博士,副研究员,研究方向为城乡发展与土地利用。E-mail: jlgao@niglas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971215);国家自然科学基金项目(41771193);国家自然科学基金项目(41571169);江苏省国土资源科技项目(KJXM2017017)

Transition of rural housing land in Southern Jiangsu, China: Evidences from the utilization status perspective

GAO Jin-long¹^,²(), LIU Yan-sui¹, CHEN Jiang-long²^,³()

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China
3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection in Jiangsu Province, Huai'an 223300, Jiangsu, China

Received:2020-03-16 Revised:2020-06-03 Online:2021-11-28 Published:2022-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农村宅基地转型是土地利用转型研究的重要内容。目前学界关于宅基地转型的研究主要集中在规模结构等显性形态方面,对隐性转型的研究仍较欠缺。以乡村经济发达的苏南地区为例,通过对正常使用、空置、废弃等不同利用状态宅基地空间分异规律的刻画,探索其功能转型的一般规律,并进一步分析宅基地空置与废弃的影响因素。结果表明：在乡村振兴战略实施背景下,“房子不用来住”的问题在农村地区同样存在,而且在不同代际和空间区位上农村宅基地的利用状态有所差异。具体地,1980年以前的老宅基地从距离城镇较远和较近的“两端”开始,其空废比率向中间地带递减;随着市场化和城镇化水平提升,1980—2000年的中龄宅基地空废比率呈现由近郊向外递减的趋势,城镇化影响下的距离衰减规律明显。近年来,伴随农村宅基地财产/资产属性的逐步显现,农村宅基地的利用状态与空间区位之间的关联关系弱化。2010年以后新宅基地的空置率出现反弹,尤其靠近城镇的农村地区“囤地”现象严重,发端于城镇地区的“地产霸权”正在向乡村地区蔓延。

关键词: 土地利用转型, 宅基地, 空置/废弃地, 乡村振兴, 苏南

Abstract:

Rural housing land transition is one of the most important aspects of land use transition, which has attracted interest among a wide variety of researchers as well as the government officials. To date, the majority of literatures in this field focuses mainly on the decline of rural housing land in respect of its share in the growth of total construction land with the development of local economy, while little attention has been paid to the change of its recessive morphology. Taking Southern Jiangsu, one of the most developed regions in China, as an example, this paper demystifies the general trajectory of the functional transformation of rural housing land through the lens of utilization status (i.e., normal, vacant, and abandoned). The results imply primarily that the issue of "housing is not for accommodation", which has been widely witnessed in urban China, has also been detected in rural areas of Southern Jiangsu. And a temporal and spatial heterogeneity of vacant and abandoned rural housing lands has been verified. Specifically, the transition of rural housing lands used before the 1980s tends to be more visible in the "both ends" near and far from the city with a relatively low share of vacant and abandoned lands to the total rural housing land in the central area. Within the double processes of urbanization and industrialization, the pattern of rural housing land transition during the last two decades of the 20th century shifts from the inverted-U trend to an inverted-S one, which is resulted from the distance attenuation of urban effects. With the functional transition of rural housing land from residence to property, the relationship between the utilization status of rural housing land and its location, particularly within the context of rural revitalization, has weakened in recent years. However, the share of vacant housing land has rebounded with a phenomenon of "housing land hoarding" being witnessed in rural areas since 2010, which predicts the sprawl of "real estate hegemony" originating in urban areas to rural areas.

Key words: land use transition, rural housing land, vacant/abandoned land, rural revitalization, Southern Jiangsu

高金龙, 刘彦随, 陈江龙. 苏南地区农村宅基地转型研究：基于利用状态的视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(11): 2878-2891.

GAO Jin-long, LIU Yan-sui, CHEN Jiang-long. Transition of rural housing land in Southern Jiangsu, China: Evidences from the utilization status perspective[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(11): 2878-2891.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 47

[1]	LIU Y S, FANG F, LI Y H. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.013
[2]	龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4):563-576.
	[ LONG H L, TU S S. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4):563-576.]
[3]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):637-650.
	[ LIU Y S. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):637-650.]
[4]	乔伟峰, 戈大专, 高金龙, 等. 江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3):522-534.
	[ QIAO W F, GE D Z, GAO J L, et al. Detecting the pathways towards rural vitalization from the perspective of territorial functions in Jiangsu province. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3):522-534.]
[5]	李裕瑞, 卜长利, 曹智, 等. 面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2):243-256.
	[ LI Y R, BU C L, CAO Z, et al. Village classification system for rural vitalization strategy: Method and empirical study. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2):243-256.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200201
[6]	LIU Y S, LI Y H. Revitalize the world's countryside. Nature, 2017, 548(7667):275-277. doi: 10.1038/548275a
[7]	胡智超, 彭建, 杜悦悦, 等. 基于供给侧结构性改革的空心村综合整治研究. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12):2119-2128.
	[ HU Z C, PENG J, DU Y Y, et al. Reconstructing hollow villages in the view of structural reform of the supply side. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(12):2119-2128.]
[8]	LI Y R, LIU Y S, LONG H L, et al. Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng county, Henan province. Land Use Policy, 2014, 39:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.016
[9]	ZHU F K, ZHANG F R, LI C, et al. Functional transition of the rural settlement: Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing, China. Habitat International, 2014, 41:262-271. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.011
[10]	JIANG G H, HE X, QU Y B, et al. Functional evolution of rural housing land: A comparative analysis across four typical areas representing different stages of industrialization in China. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57:645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.037
[11]	龙花楼. 中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10):1093-1100.
	[ LONG H L. Rural housing land transition in China: Theory and verification. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(10):1093-1100.]
[12]	LI T T, LONG H L, LIU Y Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis of rural housing land transition under China's rapid urbanization: The case of Bohai Rim. Habitat International, 2015, 48:227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.04.002
[13]	张佰林, 高江波, 高阳, 等. 中国山区农村土地利用转型解析. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3):503-517.
	[ ZHANG B L, GAO J B, GAO Y, et al. Land use transition of mountainous rural areas in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(3):503-517.]
[14]	LONG H L, HEILIG G K, LI X B, et al. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1):141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.003
[15]	龙花楼, 李婷婷. 中国耕地和农村宅基地利用转型耦合分析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(2):201-210.
	[ LONG H L, LI T T. Analysis of the coupling of farmland and rural housing land transition in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(2):201-210.]
[16]	曲衍波, 姜广辉, 张佰林, 等. 山东省农村居民点转型的空间特征及其经济梯度分异. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10):1845-1858.
	[ QU Y B, JIANG G H, ZHANG B L, et al. Spatial characteristics of rural residential land transition and its economic gradient differentiation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(10):1845-1858.]
[17]	SONG W, CHEN B M, ZHANG Y, et al. Establishment of rural housing land standard in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(4):483-495. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0532-2
[18]	RINDFUSS R R, WALSH S J, TURNER B L, et al. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. PNAS, 2004, 101(39):13976-13981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401545101
[19]	HOLMES J, ARGENT N. Rural transitions in the Nambucca valley: Socio-demographic change in a disadvantaged rural locale. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 48:129-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.009
[20]	MA W Q, JIANG G H, WANG D Q, et al. Rural settlements transition (RST) in a suburban area of metropolis: Internal structure perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615:672-680. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.152
[21]	WEGREN S K, O'BRIEN D J, PATSIORKOVSKY V V. The economics of rural households in Russia: Impact of village location. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2008, 49(2):200-214. doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.49.2.200
[22]	LONG H L, ZOU J, PYKETT J, et al. Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the New Millennium. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(3):1094-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.006
[23]	QU Y B, JIANG G G, ZHAO Q L, et al. Geographic identification, spatial differentiation, and formation mechanism of multifunction of rural settlements: A case study of 804 typical villages in Shandong province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166:1202-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.120
[24]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2):131-138.
	[ LONG H L. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2):131-138.]
[25]	刘彦随, 刘玉. 中国农村空心化问题研究的进展与展望. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1):35-42.
	[ LIU Y S, LIU Y. Progress and prospect on the study of rural hollowing in China. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(1):35-42.]
[26]	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):257-270.
	[ FANG Y G, LIU J S. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2):257-270.]
[27]	ZHU J M. Transition of villages during urbanization as collective communities: A case study of Kunshan, China. Cities, 2018, 72:320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.009
[28]	LIN G C S. State policy and spatial restructuring in post-reform China, 1978-1995. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(4):670-696. doi: 10.1111/ijur.1999.23.issue-4
[29]	刘彦随, 鲁奇. 苏南现代化进程中的土地问题及对策. 地理科学进展, 1998, 17(2):80-85.
	[ LIU Y S, LU Q. Problem and countmeasure of land in themodernization processof Southern Jiangsu province. Progress in Geography, 1998, 17(2):80-85.]
[30]	SARGESON S. Subduing "the rural house-building craze": Attitudes towards housing construction and land-use controls in four Zhejiang villages. The China Quarterly, 2002, 172:927-955. doi: 10.1017/S0009443902000566
[31]	刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新. 中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10):1193-1202.
	[ LIU Y S, LIU Y, ZHAI R X. Geographical research and optimizing practice of rural hollowing in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10):1193-1202.]
[32]	龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.
	[ LONG H L. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.]
[33]	王亚辉, 李秀彬, 辛良杰, 等. 中国土地流转的区域差异及其影响因素: 基于2003—2013年农村固定观察点数据. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3):487-502.
	[ WANG Y H, LI X B, XIN L J, et al. Regional differences of land circulation in China and its drivers: Based on 2003-2013 rural fixed observation points data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(3):487-502.]
[34]	龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随. 中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10):1203-1213.
	[ LONG H L, LI Y R, LIU Y S. Analysis of evolutive characteristics and their driving mechanism of hollowing villages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10):1203-1213.]
[35]	贺雪峰. 农村: 中国现代化的稳定器与蓄水池. 党政干部参考, 2011, (6):18-19.
	[ HE X F. Countryside: Stabilizer and reservoir for China's mordenization. Chinese Cadres Reference, 2011, (6):18-19.]
[36]	XU W. The changing dynamics of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang province. Environment and Planning A, 2004, 36(9):1595-1615. doi: 10.1068/a36185
[37]	ZHOU T, JIANG G H, ZHANG R J, et al. Addressing the rural in situ urbanization (RISU) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism. Cities, 2018, 75:59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.001
[38]	ZHANG M, WU W P, ZHONG W J, et al. The reshaping of social relations: Resettled rural residents in Zhenjiang, China. Cities, 2017, 60:495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.06.007
[39]	李红波, 张小林, 吴启焰, 等. 发达地区乡村聚落空间重构的特征与机理研究: 以苏南为例. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(4):591-603.
	[ LI H B, ZHANG X L, WU Q Y, et al. Characteristics and mechanism of rural settlements spatial reconstruction in developed areas: A case study of Southern Jiangsu. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(4):591-603.]
[40]	LIU Y S, WANG J Y, LONG H L. Analysis of arable land loss and its impact on rural sustainability in Southern Jiangsu province of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(3):646-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.028
[41]	LONG H L, LIU Y S, WU X Q, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su-Xi-Chang Region: Implications for building a new countryside in Coastal China. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(2):322-333. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.001
[42]	VEECK G, PANNELL C W. Rural economic restructuring and farm household income in Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1989, 79(2):275-292. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1989.tb00263.x
[43]	宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3):471-487.
	[ SONG X Q. Discussion on land use transition research framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3):471-487.]
[44]	翁一峰, 吕斌, 鲁晓军. “产权关系”视角下的乡村空间发展探究: 以无锡市阳山镇为例. 城市规划, 2014, 38(10):51-58.
	[ WENG Y F, LYU B, LU X J. Research on rural spatial development in the view of property right relationship: A case of Yangshan town, Wuxi city, Jiangsu province. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(10):51-58.]
[45]	LI P X, GAO J L, CHEN J L. Quantitative assessment of ecological stress of construction lands by quantity and location: Case study in Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22:1559-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0262-4
[46]	刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3):324-330.
	[ LIU Y S, CHEN B M. The study framework of land use/cover change based on sustainable development in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(3):324-330.]
[47]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2):179-188.
	[ LONG H L, LI X B. Rural housing land transition in transect of Yangtze River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2):179-188.]

利用状态		正常使用	空置	废弃
平均宗地面积/m²		208	160	405
平均建筑物面积/m²		228	175	366
平均户籍人口数/人		3.45	1.41	1.18
规划类型^*/%	撤并型	66.13	31.02	2.85
	保留型	89.26	9.96	0.78
	集聚型	86.63	12.63	0.74
农户类型^**/%	纯农户	93.11	6.24	0.65
	兼业农户	82.89	16.42	0.69
	非农户	77.15	21.77	1.08
建构时间/%	1980年前	76.63	22.15	1.22
	1980—1989年	91.96	7.66	0.38
	1990—1999年	90.18	8.73	1.08
	2000—2009年	93.27	6.43	0.31
	2010年后	87.40	12.33	0.26
建筑类型/%	砖混	90.73	8.37	0.90
	钢混	92.19	7.37	0.44
	砖木	84.47	15.14	0.39
	其他	81.20	18.40	0.40

苏南地区农村宅基地转型研究：基于利用状态的视角

Transition of rural housing land in Southern Jiangsu, China: Evidences from the utilization status perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	戈大专, 孙攀, 周贵鹏, 卢小雪. 传统农区粮食生产转型机制及其安全效应——基于乡村空间治理视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(6): 1588-1601.
[2]	李裕瑞, 卜长利, 王鹏艳. 中国农产品地理标志的地域分异特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(4): 827-840.
[3]	璩路路, 王永生, 刘彦随, 马晴. 乡村振兴导向的水土资源承载力评价及其优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 300-314.
[4]	韩文维, 陈佳, 袁倩文, 杨新军. 恢复力视角下秦岭贫困山区乡村振兴潜力研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2571-2584.
[5]	孙九霞, 徐新建, 王宁, 谢彦君, 马波, 章锦河, 杨勇, 李菲, 廖婧琳, 翁时秀. 旅游对全面脱贫与乡村振兴作用的途径与模式——“旅游扶贫与乡村振兴”专家笔谈[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2604-2614.
[6]	张海朋, 何仁伟, 李立娜, 李光勤. 环首都地区城乡融合水平时空分异及乡村振兴路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2652-2671.
[7]	李君轶, 傅伯杰, 孙九林, 洪增林, 张百平, 王晓峰, 白红英, 王飞, 赵振斌, 曹小曙. 新时期秦岭生态文明建设：存在问题与发展路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2449-2463.
[8]	黄震方, 张圆刚, 贾文通, 洪学婷, 余润哲. 中国乡村旅游研究历程与新时代发展趋向[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2615-2633.
[9]	徐维祥, 李露, 周建平, 刘程军. 乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2044-2062.
[10]	李婷婷, 龙花楼, 王艳飞, 屠爽爽. 黄淮海平原农区宅基地扩展时空特征及整治潜力分析——以禹城市5个村庄为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2241-2253.
[11]	李明珍, 李阳兵, 冉彩虹. 土地利用转型背景下的乡村景观格局演变响应——基于草堂溪流域的样带分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2283-2298.
[12]	牛善栋, 方斌, 崔翠, 黄仕辉. 乡村振兴视角下耕地利用转型的时空格局及路径分析——以淮海经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1908-1925.
[13]	蒋伟萱, 高金龙, 陈江龙, 张英浩. 基于土地利用视角的乡村居业协同多尺度分析——以徐州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 2002-2013.
[14]	陈晓艳, 黄睿, 洪学婷, 胡小海, 李东晔, 沈伟丽. 传统村落旅游地乡愁的测度及其资源价值——以苏南传统村落为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1602-1616.
[15]	张悦悦, 李翠珍, 周德, 夏浩. 乡村振兴视域下农村土地利用利益相关者分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1132-1146.